PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gerhard van Kaick

Publications and source records attributed to Gerhard van Kaick.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Computed tomography in various fields outside medicine.

CT has been widely used for non-medical purposes, for which, as in medicine, it has the advantage of being non-destructive and having a high spatial and density resolution. CT may help to generate 3-D views which could otherwise be obtained only by dissecting the object. There is almost no limitation with regard to X-ray exposure and scanning time. Dedicated techniques, e.g., rotating the specimen between stationary tube and detector, have been developed. Micro-CT may provide a spatial resolution up to 1 microm. Fields where CT has been successfully applied are archaeology, soil science, the timber industry, biology, industrial X-ray inspection and aviation security.

Archaeology↗
PubMed2005

Hepatic phospholipids in alcoholic liver disease assessed by proton-decoupled 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Alteration of the phospholipid composition of hepatic biomembranes may be one mechanism of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We applied proton-decoupled (31)P magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ({(1)H}-(31)P MRSI) to 40 patients with ALD and to 13 healthy controls to confirm that metabolic alterations in hepatic phospholipid intermediates could be detected non-invasively. METHODS: All patients underwent liver biopsy. Specimens were scored in non-cirrhosis [fatty liver (n=3), alcoholic hepatitis (n=2), fibrosis (n=4), alcoholic hepatitis plus fibrosis (n=16)], and cirrhosis (n=15). {(1)H}-(31)P spectra were collected on a clinical 1.5-Tesla MR system and were evaluated by calculating signal intensity ratios of hepatic phosphomonoester (PME), phosphodiester (PDE), phosphoethanolamine (PE), phosphocholine (PC), glycerophosphorylethanolamine (GPE), and glycerophosphorylcholine (GPC) resonances. RESULTS: The signal intensity ratio GPE/GPC was significantly elevated in cirrhotic (1.19+/-0.22; P=0.002) and non-cirrhotic ALD patients (1.01+/-0.13; P=0.006) compared to healthy controls (0.68+/-0.04), while PE/PC and PME/PDE were significantly elevated in cirrhotic ALD patients compared to controls (1.68+/-0.60 vs. 0.97+/-0.31; P=0.02, and 0.38+/-0.02 vs. 0.25+/-0.01; P=0.002, respectively) and non-cirrhotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The data support that {(1)H}-(31)P MRSI appears to distinguish cirrhotic from non-cirrhotic ALD patients and confirms changes in hepatic phospholipid metabolism observed in an animal model.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Can pre-operative contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for prostate cancer predict microvessel density in prostatectomy specimens?

The aim of this study was to correlate quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI) parameters with microvessel density (MVD) in prostate carcinoma. Twenty-eight patients with biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma were examined by endorectal MRI including multiplanar T2- and T1-weighted spin-echo and dynamic T1-weighted turbo-FLASH MRI during and after intravenous Gd-DTPA administration. Microvessels were stained on surgical specimens using a CD31 monoclonal antibody. The MVD was quantified in hot spots by counting (MVC) and determining the area fraction by morphometry (MVAF). The DCE MRI data were analyzed using an open pharmacokinetic two-compartment model. In corresponding anatomic locations the time shift (Deltat) between the beginning of signal enhancement of cancer and adjacent normal prostatic tissue, the degree of contrast enhancement and the contrast exchange rate constant (k21) were calculated. The MVC and MVAF were elevated in carcinoma (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively) and correlated to k21 (r=0.62, p<0.001 and r=0.80, p<0.001, respectively). k21-values of carcinoma were significantly higher compared with normal peripheral but not central zone tissue. Deltat was longer in high compared with low-grade tumors (p=0.025). The DCE MRI can provide important information about individual MVD in prostate cancer, which may be helpful for guiding biopsy and assessing individual prognosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of focal liver reaction by multiphasic CT after stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy of liver tumors.

PURPOSE: To characterize and quantitatively assess focal radiation reactions in the liver after stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy for liver malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 131 multiphasic CT scans were performed in 36 patients before and after stereotactic radiotherapy for liver tumors. The examination protocol included a nonenhanced scan and contrast-enhanced scans at different times after contrast injection. The volume of the reaction was determined in each scan and the threshold dose calculated using the dose-volume histogram of the treatment plan. RESULTS: Every patient showed a focal radiation reaction on at least one follow-up examination. In 74% of the posttherapeutic scans, a sharply demarcated hypodense area surrounded the treated tumor in the nonenhanced scans. The reaction occurred at a median of 1.8 months (range 1.2-4.6) after radiotherapy. The median threshold dose was 13.7 Gy (range 8.9-19.2). The threshold dose strongly correlated with the time of detection after therapy (r = 0.7). Radiologically, three reaction types were found on the enhanced scans: type 1, portal-venous phase: hypodense and late phase: isodense; type 2, portal-venous phase: hypodense and late phase: hyperdense; and type 3, portal-venous phase: isodense/hyperdense and late phase: hyperdense. Type 1 or 2 reactions were observed significantly earlier than type 3 (p <0.05). The median threshold dose for type 1 or 2 reactions was significantly lower than for type 3 (p <0.05). The reaction volume decreased with longer follow-up (2-4 months: median 40% of initial volume). The reaction types shifted with follow-up: 58% were of type 1 at the initial manifestation and 58% were of type 3 at the next examination thereafter. CONCLUSION: A focal radiation reaction occurs after stereotactic single-dose therapy in the liver. The volume of the reaction decreases and changes its radiologic appearance during follow-up. This reaction has to be differentiated from recurrent tumor.

Adult↗