PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gerold Ebenbichler

Publications and source records attributed to Gerold Ebenbichler.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

ICF Core Sets for osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the results of the consensus process integrating evidence from preliminary studies to develop the first version of a Comprehensive ICF Core Set and a Brief ICF Core Set for osteoarthritis. METHODS: A formal decision-making and consensus process integrating evidence gathered from preliminary studies was followed. Preliminary studies included a Delphi exercise, a systematic review, and an empirical data collection. After training in the ICF and based on these preliminary studies relevant ICF categories were identified in a formal consensus process by international experts from different backgrounds. RESULTS: The preliminary studies identified a set of 388 ICF categories at the second, third, and fourth ICF levels with 144 categories on body functions, 49 on body structures; 165 on activities and participation, and 43 on environmental factors. Seventeen experts from 7 different countries attended the consensus conference on osteoarthritis. Altogether 55 second-level categories were included in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set with 13 categories from the component body functions, 6 from body structures, 19 from activities and participation, and 17 from environmental factors. The Brief ICF Core Set included a total of 13 second-level categories (3 on body functions, 3 on body structures, 3 on activities and participation, and 4 on environmental factors). CONCLUSION: A formal consensus process integrating evidence and expert opinion based on the ICF framework and classification led to the definition of ICF Core Sets for osteoarthritis. Both the Comprehensive ICF Core Set and the Brief ICF Core Set were defined.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Cross-cultural adaption of the Manniche questionnaire for German-speaking low back pain patients.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a cross-cultural version of the Manniche Low Back Pain Rating Scale (MRS) for use in German-speaking low back pain patients. BACKGROUND: Clinical intervention research in back pain would be enormously facilitated if a small number of relevant, patient-centred questionnaires became internationally used. MRS seems to be particularly suitable for cross-cultural adaptation due to its coverage of multidimensional back pain-specific health domains. METHODS: MRS was translated and back-translated, pretested and reviewed by a committee. The German version was tested in 126 patients with low back pain from all countries of German-speaking Europe. Reliability (subsample n = 20), dimensionality and construct validity was assessed. Single-dimensionality, higher correlations of MRS with the physical scales compared with the mental scales of the MOS SF-36, a moderate to good correlation with the Roland Morris Questionnaire and a low correlation with the Finger Floor Distance were hypothesized. RESULTS: Spearman's Rho for test-retest reliability was 0.98 (p < 0.001); Cronbach's alpha 0.95. Factor analysis revealed only 1 factor with an Eigenvalue >1 [3.25]. MRS was strongly correlated with the Roland Morris Questionnaire (r = 0.91), and slightly correlated with the Finger Floor Distance (r = 0.23). Correlations of MRS with domains of the SF-36 "Physical Functioning", "Role Physical" and "Bodily Pain" were higher (r -0.66 to -0.72) than with "Role Emotional", "Mental Health" and "Social Functioning" (r -0.34 to -0.61). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MRS seems to be reliable, uni-dimensional and construct valid for the assessment of functional status in German-speaking low back pain patients.

Adult↗