PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gerrie J J W Bours

Publications and source records attributed to Gerrie J J W Bours.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

A pressure ulcer audit and feedback project across multi-hospital settings in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether participating in a pressure ulcer prevalence survey and receiving feedback results in an improvement in quality of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional studies from 1998 to 2002 were compared over time. SETTING: Sixty-two acute care hospitals in the Netherlands. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Patients hospitalized at the moment of the surveys. INTERVENTIONS: Each hospital was given hospital-specific performance data and national aggregate data, and peer comparisons to improve the quality of care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The case-mix-adjusted prevalence of pressure ulcers of grade >or=2, the percentage of high-risk patients receiving adequate prevention, and the total number of enabling conditions present were compared between successive surveys using multi-level analysis, in order to estimate a linear trend model and trend differences for each hospital. RESULTS: The case-mix-adjusted prevalence of pressure ulcers decreased over the 5-year period, while the percentage of patients receiving adequate prevention and the total number of enabling conditions present increased. The total number of enabling conditions had a significant effect on the decrease in case-mix-adjusted prevalence: more enabling conditions led to a lower case-mix-adjusted prevalence (chi(2) = 125; degrees of freedom = 1; P < 0.00). The percentage of patients receiving adequate prevention also had an effect on the change in case-mix-adjusted prevalence, with a higher percentage leading to a lower case-mix-adjusted prevalence. This effect, however, was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring prevalence and giving feedback results in an improvement in quality of care in terms of pressure ulcer prevention. It is very important to continue conducting surveys to avoid attention moving away from this topic, which may in turn lead to a deterioration in the quality of pressure ulcer care. Further research to find the most effective feedback approach is needed.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Development of a model for case-mix adjustment of pressure ulcer prevalence rates.

BACKGROUND: Acute care hospitals participating in the Dutch national pressure ulcer prevalence survey use the results of this survey to compare their outcomes and assess their quality of care regarding pressure ulcer prevention. The development of a model for case-mix adjustment is essential for the use of these prevalence rates as an outcome measure. OBJECTIVE: The development of a valid model for case-mix adjustment to compare the prevalence rates in the acute care hospitals that participated in the 1998 Dutch pressure ulcer prevalence survey, for the purpose of performance comparisons among the hospitals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SUBJECTS: Subjects were patients residing in the 43 acute care hospitals that participated in the national pressure ulcer prevalence survey on May 26, 1998. MEASURES: The study examined the validity of a model for case-mix adjustment of pressure ulcer prevalence rates and compared hospitals to evaluate the impact of adjusted prevalence rates on their performance. RESULTS: A logistic model was developed for case-mix adjustment, using age, malnutrition, incontinence, activity, mobility, sensory perception, friction and shear, and ward specialty. This model was found to have content, construct, and internal validity. Case-mix adjustment influenced the hospitals' performance. CONCLUSION: The data of the national pressure ulcer prevalence survey can be used to develop a valid model for case-mix adjustment. Conclusions about the quality of care were influenced by the use of case-mix adjusted outcomes as a measure of this quality.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Prevalence, prevention, and treatment of pressure ulcers: descriptive study in 89 institutions in the Netherlands.

The purpose of the present study was to assess the prevalence of pressure ulcers and the use of Dutch guidelines for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. A survey of 16,344 patients in 89 health care institutions on 1 day showed a mean prevalence of pressure ulcers of 23.1%. It was found that Dutch guidelines on some aspects of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers were not being followed. Only 53% of the patients who should have been positioned on a support surface were positioned on such a device. Fewer than one-third of the patients who should have been repositioned, should have received nutritional support, or should have been educated received these interventions, and only 33.6% of all pressure ulcers were dressed as recommended. More attention to the dissemination and implementation of the guidelines is needed to reduce this high prevalence of pressure ulcers.

Aged↗