Biomedical subjects

Gerry Richardson

Publications and source records attributed to Gerry Richardson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Cost-effectiveness of a supplementary class-based exercise program in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a class-based exercise program supplementing a home-based program when compared with a home-based program alone. In addition, we estimated the probability that the supplementary class program is cost-effective over a range of values of a decision maker's willingness to pay for an additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). METHODS: The resource use and effectiveness data were collected as part of the clinical trial detailed elsewhere. Unit costs were estimated from published sources. The net benefit approach to cost-effectiveness analysis is used to estimate the probability of the intervention being cost-effective. RESULTS: The addition of a supplementary class-based group results in an increase in QALYs and lower costs. For all plausible values of a decision maker's willingness to pay for a QALY, the supplementary class group is likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a class-based exercise program is likely to be cost-effective and, on current evidence, should be implemented.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2005

Nurse led care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Coronary Disease↗

PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to support self-care: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Interventions to support patient self-care of their condition aim to improve patient health and reduce health service costs. Consequently, they have attracted considerable policy interest. There is some evidence of clinical effectiveness but less attention has been paid to whether these interventions are cost-effective. This study examines the quality and quantity of existing evidence of the cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out to assess the extent and quality of economic evaluations of self-care support interventions. Thirty-nine economic evaluations were assessed against a quality checklist developed to reflect the special features of these interventions. RESULTS: The majority of the studies claimed that self-care support interventions were cost-effective or cost saving. The overall quality of economic evaluations was poor because of flaws in study designs, especially a narrow definition of relevant costs and short follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence base does not support any general conclusion that self-care support interventions are cost-effective, but ongoing trials may provide clearer evidence.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2005

Economic evaluation of a nursing-led inpatient unit: the impact of findings on management decisions of service utility and sustainability.

AIMS: The nursing-led inpatient unit is designed to substitute for a period of care in acute hospital wards and to improve patient outcome prior to discharge to the community. This paper aims to evaluate the cost, from the UK National Health Service perspective, of transfer to a nursing-led inpatient unit for intermediate care and to discuss the impact of these findings to the future development and sustainability of the nursing-led inpatient unit. BACKGROUND: Recent economic analyses have showed that nursing-led inpatient units are associated with increased costs of care with length of stay as the main driver of inpatient costs. METHOD: The cost-effectiveness analysis was part of a randomized-controlled trial with a sample size of 175, of which 89 were in the nursing-led inpatient unit arm and 86 in the control arm. Resource use data included length of stay, investigations performed, multiprofessional input and nursing input. Clinical outcome was measured using Barthel Index, a functional status measure. RESULTS: Cost per day was lower on the nursing-led inpatient unit although cost per hospital stay was higher due to significantly increased length of stay. Postdischarge community care costs were lower. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the treatment was 1044 pounds sterling per point improvement of the Barthel Index. CONCLUSIONS: The nursing-led inpatient unit was associated with higher costs however, the question of whether the nursing-led inpatient unit is cost-effective has not been clearly answered because of the limited follow-up period of the study. The increased cost of care on the nursing-led inpatient unit was not a major factor in local management decisions about the future of the unit. The changes in the context of service provision within which the nursing-led inpatient unit operated as a result of substantial investment in intermediate care did have a major impact.

Activities of Daily Living↗