PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ghyslain Leclerc

Publications and source records attributed to Ghyslain Leclerc.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Prostatic edema in 125I permanent prostate implants: dynamical dosimetry taking volume changes into account.

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of edema on the dose delivered to the target volume. An evaluation of the edema characteristics was first made, and then a dynamical dosimetry algorithm was developed and used to compare its results to a standard clinical (static) dosimetry. Source positions and prostate contours extracted from 66 clinical cases on images taken at different points in time (planning, implant day, post-implant evaluation) were used, via the mean interseed distance, to characterize edema [initial increase (deltar0), half-life (tau)]. An algorithm was developed to take into account the edema by summing a time series of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) with a weight based on the fraction of the dose delivered during the time interval considered. The algorithm was then used to evaluate the impact of edema on the dosimetry of permanent implants by comparing its results to those of a standard clinical dosimetry. The volumetric study yielded results as follows: the initial prostate volume increase was found to be 1.58 (ranging from 1.15 to 2.48) and the edema half-life, approximately 30 days (range: 3 to 170 days). The dosimetric differences in D90 observed between the dynamic dosimetry and the clinical one for a single case were up to 15 Gy and depended on the edema half-life and the initial volume increase. The average edema half-life, 30 days, is about 3 times longer than the previously reported 9 days. Dosimetric differences up to 10% of the prescription dose are observed, which can lead to differences in the quality assertion of an implant. The study of individual patient edema resorption with time might be necessary to extract meaningful clinical correlation or biological parameters in permanent implants.

Algorithms↗

Idealized line source configuration for permanent 125I prostate implants.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To validate the use of idealized seed orientations in conjunction with the line source formalism for post-implant dosimetry of permanent 125I prostate implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post-implant, a CT scan and three fluoroscopic images were obtained for 32 patients having undergone permanent implants. From these images, the seed positions and orientations (phi,theta) were determined (1625 individual seeds). Two different dosimetric calculations were done: one using real orientations and one using idealized orientations (seeds along the axis of implantation). Dose volume histograms (DVHs) and key dosimetric parameters were compiled for the prostate, urethra, rectum, bladder and penile bulb, to evaluate the difference between the two approximations. RESULTS: The phi angle distribution (phi = 1.1 degrees; sigma phi = 22.9 degrees) and the theta angle distribution (theta= -4.29 degrees; sigma theta = 27.1 degrees) were found to be similar to the first order except for the pronounced peak of the phi angle distribution. The DVHs comparison and dosimetric parameters study reveal no significant difference between the two approximations. The difference in D90 for the prostate was only 0.02% (sigma = 0.91%) The differences were slightly higher in the case of the organs at risk, as expected from the dosimetric characteristics of the seed model used. CONCLUSIONS: The angular distributions (phi,theta) of individual seeds were determined. The dosimetric evaluation shows that line source formalism can be used in conjunction with an idealized seed configuration presented here to report prostate and organs at risk dose coverage.

Brachytherapy↗