PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Giacomo Cavalli

Publications and source records attributed to Giacomo Cavalli.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Loss of SUMOylation drives aberrant PRC1 clustering and 3D genome rewiring independent of H3K27me3.

Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) forms nuclear condensates that organize target chromatin domains. SUMOylation modulates PRC1 clustering, but its impact on condensate properties and 3D genome architecture remains unclear. Here, we show that depletion of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) in Drosophila wing imaginal discs transforms PRC1 condensates into large structures with reduced molecular dynamics. Biophysical modeling suggests that the changes in PRC1 self-interactions are responsible for the formation of large PRC1 condensates when SUMO is depleted. Interestingly, this biophysical reorganization occurs without global loss of the H3K27me3 mark. Instead, Hi-C reveals widespread rewiring of topologically associating domain (TAD) interactions. PRC1-bound TADs lose specific long-range contacts with each other while gaining ectopic interactions with active chromatin. These topological shifts correlate with gene misregulation independently of changes in Polycomb histone modifications. Our results establish SUMOylation as a critical regulator of PRC1 condensates, demonstrating that post-translational control of biomolecular condensation modulates 3D genome architecture and transcriptional output through mechanisms separable from histone mark deposition.

Animals↗
PubMed2007

Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions.

The regulation of gene expression is mediated by interactions between chromatin and protein complexes. The importance of where and when these interactions take place in the nucleus is currently a subject of intense investigation. Increasing evidence indicates that gene activation or silencing is often associated with repositioning of the locus relative to nuclear compartments and other genomic loci. At the same time, however, structural constraints impose limits on chromatin mobility. Understanding how the dynamic nature of the positioning of genetic material in the nuclear space and the higher-order architecture of the nucleus are integrated is therefore essential to our overall understanding of gene regulation.

Biological Transport↗
PubMed2006

Combinatorial epigenetics, "junk DNA", and the evolution of complex organisms.

At certain evolutionary junctures, two or more mutations participating in the build-up of a new complex function may be required to become available simultaneously in the same individuals. How could this happen in higher organisms whose populations are small compared to those of microbes, and in which chances of combined nearly simultaneous highly specific favorable mutations are correspondingly low? The question can in principle be answered for regulatory evolution, one of the basic processes of evolutionary change. A combined resetting of transcription rates in several genes could occur in the same individual. It is proposed that, in eukaryotes, changes in epigenetic trends and epigenetically transforming encounters between alternative chromatin structures could arise frequently enough so as to render probable particular conjunctions of changed transcription rates. Such conjunctions could involve mutational changes with low specificity requirements in gene-associated regions of non-protein-coding sequences. The effects of such mutations, notably when they determine the use of histone variants and covalent modifications of histones, can be among those that migrate along chromatin. Changes in chromatin structure are often cellularly inheritable over at least a limited number of generations of cells, and of individuals when the germ line is involved. SINEs and LINEs, which have been considered "junk DNA", are among the repeat sequences that would appear liable to have teleregulatory effects on the function of a nearby promoter, through changes in their numbers and distribution. There may also be present preexisting unstably inheritable epigenetic trends leading to cellular variegation, trends endemic in a cell population based on DNA sequences previously established in the neighborhood. Either way, epigenetically conditioned teleregulatory trends may display only limited penetrance. The imposition at a distance of new chromatin structures with regulatory impact can occur in cis as well as in trans, and is examined as intrachromosomally spreading teleregulation and interchromosomal "gene kissing". The chances for two or more particular epigenetically determined regulatory trends to occur together in a cell are increased thanks to the proposed low specificity requirements for most of the pertinent sequence changes in intergenic and intronic DNA or in the distribution of middle repetitive sequences that have teleregulatory impact. Inheritable epigenetic changes ("epimutations") with effects at a distance would then perdure over the number of generations required for "assimilation" of the several regulatory novelties through the occurrence and selection, gene by gene, of specific classical mutations. These mutations would have effects similar to the epigenetic effects, yet would provide stability and penetrance. The described epigenetic/genetic partnership may well at times have opened the way toward certain complex new functions. Thus, the presence of "junk DNA", through co-determining the (higher or lower) order and the variants of chromatin structure with regulatory effects at a distance, might make an important contribution to the evolution of complex organisms.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The role of polycomb group proteins in cell cycle regulation during development.

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins are evolutionarily conserved chromatin modifiers that have well known roles in the maintenance of silent and active expression states of homeotic genes. PcG proteins may also be involved in the control of cellular proliferation, as several PcG complexes have been shown to act either as proto-oncogenes or as tumor suppressors in vertebrates. In Drosophila, PcG factors associate with specific DNA regions termed PcG response elements (PREs), and a PRE was recently identified in the gene encoding Cyclin A. Still, it is not yet clear how PcG complexes could control cell cycle progression. Beyond acting as stable silencers of cell cycle genes during the differentiation process, PcG complexes might also be integrators and/or modulators of cell cycle checkpoints in dividing cells. Here, we discuss this dual aspect of PcG involvement in epigenetic cell cycle control.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Chromatin and epigenetics in development: blending cellular memory with cell fate plasticity.

The epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure and composition has often been studied molecularly in the context of specific DNA-dependent processes. However, epigenetics also play important global roles in shaping and maintaining cell identity, and in patterning the body plan during normal development. Moreover, alterations in epigenetic regulation are involved in many diseases, including cancer. The advances in our understanding of the impact of epigenetics in development and disease were discussed at a recent Keystone symposium.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Cellular memory and dynamic regulation of polycomb group proteins.

Epigenetic components drive the inheritance of transcriptional programs. This cellular memory is crucial for the stable maintenance of cell fates throughout development. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are central players in various epigenetic phenomena, such as the maintenance of Hox expression patterns from fruit flies to humans, X chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals. This cellular memory system involves changes at the chromatin level, through histone modifications and DNA methylation, as well as at the level of the nuclear architecture. Surprisingly, in addition to their role in the stable maintenance of repressive states, PcG factors are involved in more dynamic processes such as cellular proliferation and plasticity.

Adaptation, Biological↗
PubMed2006

Chromosomal distribution of PcG proteins during Drosophila development.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are able to maintain the memory of silent transcriptional states of homeotic genes throughout development. In Drosophila, they form multimeric complexes that bind to specific DNA regulatory elements named PcG response elements (PREs). To date, few PREs have been identified and the chromosomal distribution of PcG proteins during development is unknown. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with genomic tiling path microarrays to analyze the binding profile of the PcG proteins Polycomb (PC) and Polyhomeotic (PH) across 10 Mb of euchromatin. We also analyzed the distribution of GAGA factor (GAF), a sequence-specific DNA binding protein that is found at most previously identified PREs. Our data show that PC and PH often bind to clustered regions within large loci that encode transcription factors which play multiple roles in developmental patterning and in the regulation of cell proliferation. GAF co-localizes with PC and PH to a limited extent, suggesting that GAF is not a necessary component of chromatin at PREs. Finally, the chromosome-association profile of PC and PH changes during development, suggesting that the function of these proteins in the regulation of some of their target genes might be more dynamic than previously anticipated.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

RNAi components are required for nuclear clustering of Polycomb group response elements.

Drosophila Polycomb group (PcG) proteins silence homeotic genes through binding to Polycomb group response elements (PREs). Fab-7 is a PRE-containing regulatory element from the homeotic gene Abdominal-B. When present in multiple copies in the genome, Fab-7 can induce long-distance gene contacts that enhance PcG-dependent silencing. We show here that components of the RNA interference (RNAi) machinery are involved in PcG-mediated silencing at Fab-7 and in the production of small RNAs at transgenic Fab-7 copies. In general, these mutations do not affect the recruitment of PcG components, but they are specifically required for the maintenance of long-range contacts between Fab-7 copies. Dicer-2, PIWI, and Argonaute1, three RNAi components, frequently colocalize with PcG bodies, and their mutation significantly reduces the frequency of PcG-dependent chromosomal associations of endogenous homeotic genes. This suggests a novel role for the RNAi machinery in regulating the nuclear organization of PcG chromatin targets.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Polycomb group-dependent Cyclin A repression in Drosophila.

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins are well known for their role in the maintenance of silent and active expression states of homeotic genes. However, PcG proteins may also be required for the control of cellular proliferation in vertebrates. In Drosophila, PcG factors act by associating with specific DNA regions termed PcG response elements (PREs). Here, we have investigated whether Drosophila cell cycle genes are directly regulated by PcG proteins through PREs. We have isolated a PRE that regulates Cyclin A (CycA) expression. This sequence is bound by the Polycomb (PC) and Polyhomeotic (PH) proteins of the PcG, and also by GAGA factor (GAF), a trxG protein that is usually found associated with PREs. This sequence causes PcG- and trxG-dependent variegation of the mini-white reporter gene in transgenic flies. The combination of FISH with PC immunostaining in embryonic cells shows that the endogenous CycA gene colocalizes with PC at foci of high PC concentration named PcG bodies. Finally, loss of function of the Pc gene and overexpression of Pc and ph trigger up-regulation and down-regulation, respectively, of CycA expression in embryos. These results demonstrate that CycA is directly regulated by PcG proteins, linking them to cell cycle control in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

From genetics to epigenetics: the tale of Polycomb group and trithorax group genes.

The Polycomb gene was discovered 60 years ago as a mutation inducing a particular homeotic phenotype. Subsequent work showed that Polycomb is a general repressor of homeotic genes. Other genes with similar function were identified and named Polycomb group (PcG) genes, while trithorax group (trxG) genes were shown to counteract PcG-mediated repression of homeotic genes. We now know that PcG and trxG proteins are conserved factors that regulate hundreds of different genomic loci. A sophisticated pathway is responsible for recruitment of these proteins at regulatory regions that were named PcG and trxG response elements (PRE and TRE). Once recruited to their targets, multimeric PcG and trxG protein complexes regulate transcription by modulating chromatin structure, in particular via deposition of specific post-translational histone modification marks and control of chromatin accessibility, as well as regulation of the three-dimensional nuclear organization of PRE and TRE. Here, we recapitulate the history of PcG and trxG gene discovery, we review the current evidence on their molecular function and, based on this evidence, we propose a revised classification of genes involved in PcG and trxG regulatory pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

PRE-mediated bypass of two Su(Hw) insulators targets PcG proteins to a downstream promoter.

Drosophila Polycomb group response elements (PRE) silence neighboring genes, but silencing can be blocked by one copy of the Su(Hw) insulator element. We show here that Polycomb group (PcG) proteins can spread from a PRE in the flanking chromatin region and that PRE blocking depends on a physical barrier established by the insulator to PcG protein spreading. On the other hand, PRE-mediated silencing can bypass two Su(Hw) insulators to repress a downstream reporter gene. Strikingly, insulator bypass involves targeting of PcG proteins to the downstream promoter, while they are completely excluded from the intervening insulated domain. This shows that PRE-dependent silencing is compatible with looping of the PRE in order to bring PcG proteins in contact with the promoter and does not require the coating of the whole chromatin domain between PRE and promoter.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Mapping the distribution of chromatin proteins by ChIP on chip.

The ChIP on chip method combines chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with hybridization on DNA microarrays (chip). The ChIP technique allows one to obtain a DNA sample enriched in sequences bound by transcription factors or chromatin-associated proteins. Usually, ChIP is used to test whether specific candidate sequences are bound by a transcription factor, but microarrays are a powerful tool that allows testing large pools of sequences at once. This chapter presents the pipeline of a ChIP on chip method that can be applied to map the binding sites of chromatin-associated proteins along Drosophila chromosomes at different developmental stages. This chapter provides protocols for ChIP, for quality control tests of ChIP samples, for microarray design, for hybridization of the ChIP samples onto microarrays, and for initial analysis of the data. In addition, this chapter discusses the most important steps in each of the protocols as well as the importance of bioinformatic analysis in order to extract valuable biological information from the data sets.

Chromatin↗
PubMed2005

The epigenome network of excellence.

An initiative funded by the European Union is building a collaborative network of established and younger research groups to tackle key questions in epigenetics.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed2005

Recruitment of Drosophila Polycomb group proteins to chromatin by DSP1.

Polycomb and trithorax group (PcG and trxG) proteins maintain silent and active transcriptional states, respectively, throughout development. In Drosophila, PcG and trxG proteins associate with DNA regions named Polycomb and trithorax response elements (PRE and TRE), but the mechanisms of recruitment are unknown. We previously characterized a minimal element from the regulatory region of the Abdominal-B gene, termed Ab-Fab. Ab-Fab contains a PRE and a TRE and is able to maintain repressed or active chromatin states during development. Here we show that the Dorsal switch protein 1 (DSP1), a Drosophila HMGB2 homologue, binds to a sequence present within Ab-Fab and in other characterized PREs. Addition of this motif to an artificial sequence containing Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor consensus sites is sufficient for PcG protein recruitment in vivo. Mutations that abolish DSP1 binding to Ab-Fab and to a PRE from the engrailed locus lead to loss of PcG protein binding, loss of silencing, and switching of these PREs into constitutive TREs. The binding of DSP1 to PREs is therefore important for the recruitment of PcG proteins.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Epigenetic inheritance of chromatin states mediated by Polycomb and trithorax group proteins in Drosophila.

Proteins of the Polycomb group (PcG) and of the trithorax group (trxG) are involved in the regulation of key developmental genes, such as homeotic genes. PcG proteins maintain silent states of gene expression, while the trxG of genes counteracts silencing with a chromatin opening function. These factors form multimeric complexes that act on their target chromatin by regulating post-translational modifications of histones as well as ATP-dependent remodelling of nucleosome positions. In Drosophila, PcG and trxG complexes are recruited to specific DNA elements named as PcG and trxG response elements (PREs and TREs, respectively). Once recruited, these complexes seem to be able to establish silent or open chromatin states that can be inherited through multiple cell divisions even after decay of the primary silencing or activating signal. In recent years, many components of both groups of factors have been characterized, and the molecular mechanisms underlying their recruitment as well as their mechanism of action on their target genes have been partly elucidated. This chapter summarizes our current knowledge on these aspects and outlines crucial open questions in the field.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Interaction between the GAGA factor and Mod(mdg4) proteins promotes insulator bypass in Drosophila.

Chromatin insulators or boundaries are proposed to structure the chromatin fiber into functionally independent domains by promoting the formation of chromatin loops. These elements can block the communication between an enhancer and a gene when placed between them. Interestingly, it has been previously observed that two tandem copies of the Drosophila Su(Hw) insulator abolish this enhancer-blocking activity, presumably through pairing. This bypass effect has not been described with other insulators, however. In this report, we show that the insertion of binding sites for the GAGA factor (GAF) between an enhancer and the Su(Hw) insulator allows bypassing of the insulator. This bypass relies on the activity of both the GAF protein and the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 protein, a factor required for Su(Hw) insulator activity. We show that these two proteins interact in vitro and in vivo, providing molecular evidence of pairing between the GAF sites and the Su(Hw) insulator. Finally, we show that placing the Mcp boundary together with the Su(Hw) insulator between an enhancer and a promoter leads to bypass, again in a GAF- and Mod(mdg4)-dependent manner. Our data provide direct evidence that heterologous insulators can be bypassed by distal enhancers and identify the interaction between GAF and Mod(mdg4) as a possible means to regulate insulator activity.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Engrailed and polyhomeotic maintain posterior cell identity through cubitus-interruptus regulation.

In Drosophila, the subdivision into compartments requires the expression of engrailed (en) and hedgehog (hh) in the posterior cells and of cubitus-interruptus (ci) in the anterior cells. Whereas posterior cells express hh, only anterior cells are competent to respond to the hh signal, because of the presence of ci expression in these cells. We show here that engrailed and polyhomeotic (ph), a member of the Polycomb Group (PcG) genes, act concomitantly to maintain the repression of ci in posterior compartments during development. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), we identified a 1 kb genomic fragment located 4 kb upstream of the ci coding region that is responsible for the regulation of ci. This genomic fragment is bound in vivo by both Polyhomeotic and Engrailed. In particular, we show that Engrailed is responsible for the establishment of ci repression early during embryonic development and is also required, along with Polyhomeotic, to maintain the repression of ci throughout development.

Animals↗