Biomedical subjects

Giambattista Isabella

Publications and source records attributed to Giambattista Isabella.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation and multivessel coronary artery disease: Impact of different treatment on survival and rehospitalization.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation with multivessel coronary artery disease is still debated. We analysed the effect of different treatments, i.e. medical therapy (MT), coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) alone and CABG with mitral valve surgery (MVS), on the survival and rehospitalization of these patients. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2002, we identified 111 consecutive patients, aged 73+/-8 years, with chronic moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation and multivessel coronary artery disease at cardiac catheterization, in absence of primary valve disease. Twenty-two patients were treated by MT, 50 by CABG and 39 by CABG+MVS. Overall, the median clinical and echocardiographic follow-ups were 34.9 and 14.6 months, respectively. RESULTS: Groups differed significantly (p < 0.03) for left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (MT 153+/-54, CABG 125+/-35, CABG + MVS 129+/-38, ml/m2), ejection fraction (MT 35+/-14, CABG 38+/-13, CABG + MVS 50+/-14, %) and mammary artery graft use (CABG 60, CABG + MVS 74, %). While in-hospital mortality was higher in surgical patients (MT 13.6, CABG 18, CABG + MVS 17.9, %, p=0.09), 7-years mortality showed a trend in favour of CABG + MVS compared to other groups (MT 100, CABG 57, CABG + MVS 29, %, p = 0.1). After adjusting for baseline differences, CABG alone or with MVS had a 57% (HR 0.43, p = 0.005) and 53% (HR 0.47, p = 0.02) risk reduction of combined cardiac death and rehospitalization rate compared to MT. However, only CABG + MVS independently predicted mortality (risk reduction 65%, HR 0.35, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation and multivessel coronary artery disease, surgery reduced total cardiac events but only a concomitant MVS significantly improved survival.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: determinants of cardiac mortality and ventricular function recovery.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on survival of patients with severe aortic stenosis is poorly characterized. Few data are available about preoperative predictors of cardiac mortality and LV function recovery after aortic valve replacement of such patients. The aim of our study was to examine the outcome and the preoperative predictors of postoperative cardiac death and of LV function recovery in these patients. METHODS: We evaluated 85 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm(2)) and severe depression of LV ejection fraction (EF) <35% at cardiac catheterization. Among them, 52 underwent aortic valve replacement and they were compared to patients who were not operated on. All patients had a mean clinical follow-up of 53 months and 94% of them had a mean echocardiographic follow-up of 14 months after aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: The mean baseline characteristics included: LVEF 28+/-6%, peak-to-peak transvalvular gradient 51+/-29 mmHg, aortic valve area 0.63+/-0.25 cm(2). Thirty-three patients did not undergo aortic valve replacement: 32 of them died within 3 years. Fifty-two patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 16 had a concomitant coronary bypass surgery. In-hospital mortality was 8%. Postoperative NYHA functional class changed from 2.84+/-0.67 to 1.43+/-0.44 (P<0.001) and LVEF from 29+/-6% to 43+/-10% (P<0.001). At follow-up 10 patients died of heart disease. By multivariate analysis, preoperative LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) was the only covariate of cardiac death (LVESVI/10 ml/m(2), OR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.8, P<0.028). By using a receiver operating characteristic curve, LVESVI< or =90 ml/m(2) was the best cut-off value (sensitivity and specificity 78%) to fit with a better survival (93% vs. 63%, P<0.01) and with LVEF recovery after aortic valve replacement (EF improved by 15+/-10% vs. 8+/-5%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite LV dysfunction, aortic valve replacement appears to change drastically the natural history of severe aortic stenosis. Preoperative LV levels predict different postoperative survival rate and LVEF recovery.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Gender differences in left ventricular function in patients with isolated aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Hypertrophic response of the left ventricle to systolic overload in aortic stenosis appears to be gender-dependent. METHODS: To examine gender-related differences in left ventricular (LV) function in patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis, 145 patients (65 women, 80 men; mean age 66 +/- 8 years; range: 50 to 89 years) with aortic valve area <0.8 cm2 who underwent cardiac catheterization were studied. No patient had associated myocardial, coronary or other valve disease; patients with diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension were excluded. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in aortic valve area between men and women. Neither were there any significant gender-related differences in LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV mass indexed by body surface area, LV mass:volume ratio, LV mass:height ratio, elastic stiffness constant, ejection fraction, pulmonary wedge pressure, pulmonary arteriolar resistance and preload. Women showed significantly higher mean transaortic gradient, LV peak systolic pressure and peak systolic stress, end-systolic stress:end-systolic volume ratio, heart rate and cardiac index. In the subgroup of patients with LV pressure >199 mmHg, the mass:volume ratio was increased in men compared with women; of note, the mass:volume ratio in women was not increased in this subgroup compared with the general population. LV pump function in this subgroup was normal and did not differ between men and women. CONCLUSION: Although no clear-cut difference in hemodynamic parameters was seen, there was a trend towards a less compensatory increase in LV mass in females.

Adaptation, Physiological↗