Tracheal intubation with the LMA CTrach or direct laryngoscopy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Gilles Dhonneur.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: The rate of difficult intubation in prehospital emergency medicine varies greatly among studies already published and depends on several factors. The authors' objective was to determine the rate of difficult intubations and to determine factors associated with prehospital difficult airways when a standard protocol for sedation and intubation was applied. METHODS: This 30-month clinical, observational, prospective study was performed in a suburb of Paris, France (Val de Marne, population 1,300,000) by a prehospital emergency medical unit. Airway management for patients who needed tracheal intubation was standardized. The pharmacological procedure recommended rapid sequence intubation for patients with spontaneous cardiac activity. In cases of difficult, laryngoscopy-assisted intubation, a predefined algorithm was proposed. The Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) was calculated for all patients requiring tracheal intubation, and factors associated with difficult intubation, defined by IDS of >5, were identified by using multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,442 patients were included; 640 (44%) were in cardiorespiratory arrest, and 802 had a spontaneous cardiac activity. Deviation from the pharmacological and airway management procedures occurred in 1% of cases. When the predefined difficult airway management algorithm was followed, failure to intubate was encountered twice (0.1%). One hundred six (7.4%) patients had an IDS of >5, and 60 (4.1%) required first (n = 56) then second (n = 4) alternative techniques for tracheal intubation. Semirigid leaders allowed tracheal access in 93% of difficult-intubation patients. One patient required a prehospital cricothyroidotomy. Factors associated with difficult intubation were the following: a history of ear, nose, or throat neoplasia or surgery; obesity; facial trauma; the operator's status; and the operator's position. CONCLUSIONS: If prehospital medical airway management is standardized and performed by trained operators, failure to intubate is rare (0.1%), and the incidence of difficult tracheal intubation is 7.4%, independent of cardiorespiratory status.
The objective of this study was to assess effectiveness of gum elastic bougie (GEB) in case of difficult intubation occurring in the prehospital settings. After manikin training to GEB handling, physicians were recommended to use GEB as first alternative technique in case of difficult intubation. Intubating conditions and details of patients requiring GEB-assisted laryngoscopy were recorded over 30 months. Among the 1442 extrahospital intubations performed, 41 patients (3%) required GEB. Gum elastic bougie allowed successful intubation in 33 cases (78%) and 8 patients sustained a second alternative technique. One patient was never intubated, another 1 required rescue cricothyroidotomy. Twenty-four (60%) GEB patients had associated factors for difficult intubation such as reduced or limited cervical spine mobility, morbid obesity, cervicofacial trauma, and ears, nose, and throat neoplasia. The success rate of GEB was 75% and 94%, respectively, depending on whether associated factors for difficult intubation are present or not. No adverse events associated to GEB use were noted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The gum elastic bougie (GEB) has been in use for a long time and allows tracheal intubation in most cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy. Use of the GEB when anatomical landmarks of the upper airway are not recognizable has not been reported. We describe our experience of airway management with the GEB in cases of severe upper airway distortion. CLINICAL FEATURES: Four patients with severe respiratory distress caused by upper airway distortion secondary to various non-malignant causes were managed with the GEB. For these four patients, a rapid sequence induction of anesthesia was performed with a surgeon present during the procedure. The GEB was used as the initial intubating technique in all cases and allowed a rapid and successful tracheal intubation in spite of non-recognizable anatomical structures. The distal hold-up feeling after GEB insertion confirmed, in all cases, the correct intratracheal position of the GEB. CONCLUSION: The GEB can be a valuable tool in cases of difficult airway management caused by upper airway distortion. The lack of visualization of normal pharyngeal structures did not prevent the successful insertion of the GEB in the trachea in the four patients reported.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Management strategies conceived to improve patient safety in anesthesia have rarely been assessed prospectively. The authors undertook a prospective evaluation of a predefined algorithm for unanticipated difficult airway management. METHODS: After a 2-month period of training in airway management, 41 anesthesiologists were asked to follow a predefined algorithm for management in the case of an unanticipated difficult airway. Two different scenarios were distinguished: "cannot intubate" and "cannot ventilate." The gum elastic bougie and the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) were proposed as the first and second steps in the case of impossible laryngoscope-assisted tracheal intubation, respectively. In the case of impossible ventilation or difficult ventilation, the IMLA was recommended, followed by percutaneous transtracheal jet ventilation. The patient's details, adherence rate to the algorithm, efficacy, and complications of airway management processes were recorded. RESULTS: Impossible ventilation never occurred during the 18-month study. One hundred cases of unexpected difficult airway were recorded (0.9%) among 11,257 intubations. Deviation from the algorithm was recorded in three cases, and two patients were wakened before any alternative intubation technique attempt. All remaining patients were successfully ventilated with either the facemask (89 of 95) or the ILMA (6 of 95). Six difficult-ventilation patients required the ILMA before completion of the first intubation step. Eighty patients were intubated with the gum elastic bougie, and 13 required a blind intubation through the ILMA. Two patients ventilated with the ILMA were never intubated. CONCLUSION: When applied in accordance with a predefined algorithm, the gum elastic bougie and the ILMA are effective to solve most problems occurring during unexpected difficult airway management.
UNLABELLED: Because of difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation, a 59-yr-old man admitted for emergency cardiac surgery underwent a bedside PercuTwist tracheostomy on day 14 of his intensive care unit stay. We observed a double fracture of the second tracheal ring during the initial dilation process with the PercuTwist dilator, associated with distal migration of a cartilage fragment, which was avulsed from the anterior portion of the second cartilaginous ring. IMPLICATIONS: Like other antegrade single-step techniques, the PercuTwist tracheostomy presents the risk of anterior tracheal wall damage during the initial stage of the dilation process. Antegrade forces applied to the trachea should be minimized by sufficiently deep skin incision and both slow and smooth initial rotation of the dilator.
UNLABELLED: Prick tests are frequently used for the authentication of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) as causative drugs for anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia. Unfortunately, the actual threshold concentration for skin testing remains debatable for most NMBDs. We studied the flare and wheal responses to prick tests with rocuronium and vecuronium. Thirty healthy, nonatopic, anesthesia-naive male and female volunteers (14 men and 16 women) from 18 to 40 yr of age were assigned randomly to receive a total of 10 prick tests-4 ascending dilutions (1:1000, 1:100, 1:10, and 1) of rocuronium and vecuronium and 2 controls-on both forearms. An assessor blinded to the assignment monitored systemic and skin responses to NMBDs and measured wheal and flare surfaces immediately after and 15 min after prick tests. None of the volunteers experienced any immediate systemic or cutaneous responses to rocuronium or vecuronium. Although a dilution of 1:1000 of both NMBDs failed to promote any skin response at 15 min, 50% and 40% of the subjects had a positive skin reaction to undiluted rocuronium and vecuronium, respectively. We demonstrated a sex effect related to smaller threshold concentration-induced cutaneous reactions in female volunteers to both muscle relaxants. Our observation questions the reliability of prick testing with undiluted solutions of rocuronium and vecuronium for the diagnosis of allergy. IMPLICATIONS: Building concentration-skin response curves to prick tests with rocuronium and vecuronium in healthy, nonatopic, anesthesia-naive male and female volunteers demonstrated that the nonreactive concentration for both muscle relaxants is the 1:1000 dilution of the stock solutions. Our observation calls into question the past practice of prick-testing skin for sensitivity to neuromuscular blocking drugs by using undiluted solutions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: A postinjury immunodepression involving neutrophil functions has been described in critically ill patients. The aim of this prospective study was to search for a relationship between an impairment of neutrophil functions and the subsequent development of nosocomial infection. DESIGN: Twenty-one severely ill (simplified acute physiology score II >20 on admission), nonimmunosuppressed patients who were receiving no antibiotics active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and highly resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa were included. Twelve healthy subjects constituted a control group. MEASUREMENTS: Neutrophil functions (phagocytosis and bactericidal activity toward S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in homologous plasma, reactive oxygen species secretion) were studied at day 4 +/- 1 after admission, and occurrence of nosocomial infection was prospectively recorded over the following 5 days. Interleukin-10 concentration was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results are expressed as median (25th-75th percentiles). MAIN RESULTS: Six out of the 21 patients acquired a nosocomial infection during the 5 days after blood sampling (infected group). Compared with the patients who did not acquire nosocomial infection (noninfected group, n = 15), the neutrophils of the infected group demonstrated a higher percentage of intracellular bacterial survival (17% [2% to 67%] vs. infected: 62% [22% to 100%], p <.05), leading to an impairment of S. aureus killing in homologous plasma (killed bacteria: 4.93 log(10) colony forming units/mL [4.24-5.29] vs. infected: 3.62 log(10) colony forming units/mL [0.00-4.58], p <.05). Interleukin-10 plasma concentration was higher in infected patients (78 pg/mL [60-83]) compared with noninfected patients (22 pg/mL [14-58], p <.05). By contrast, P. aeruginosa killing was similar in patients whether or not they acquired a nosocomial infection. CONCLUSION: A decrease in S. aureus killing capabilities of neutrophils can be evidenced within the days before occurrence of a nosocomial infection.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the success rate of single-injection infraclavicular plexus block by using electrically evoked radial, ulnar, or median nerve-type distal motor response to guide the injection of local anesthetic. METHODS: Consecutive patients requiring surgery distal to the upper arm were prospectively included in this study over a 6-month period. No search for predetermined distal motor responses was performed. The first qualifying distal motor response evoked for a stimulating current intensity of <0.5 mA distributed patients into 3 groups of patients. The study was continued until 3 groups of 60 patients were fulfilled. Twenty to 25 minutes after the injection of 30 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine, blinded evaluation of block quality was performed. A successful block was defined by the presence of a complete sensory block of the 5 major nerve distal distributions of the arm. RESULTS: Five hundred patients were included. The first evoked distal motor response was of radial, median, and ulnar nerve type in 46% (n = 230), 42% (n = 210), and 12% (n = 60) cases, respectively. The success rate of the infraclavicular plexus block was significantly higher when the injection was performed on a radial nerve-type response (90%) as compared with the median (74%) or ulnar (68%) nerve distal motor response. Intraoperative sedation and general anesthesia were not needed. None of the patients experienced specific complications. CONCLUSION: We showed that evoked distal motor response influenced the success rate of single-injection infraclavicular plexus block. The highest success rate was obtained when injection was performed after radial nerve-type motor response.