PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gillian Moore

Publications and source records attributed to Gillian Moore.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

To examine the effectiveness of a hospital-based nurse-led secondary prevention clinic.

Modification of cardiovascular risk factors can reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), effectively extend survival, decrease the need for interventional procedures, and improve quality of life in persons with known cardiovascular disease. Pharmacological treatments and important lifestyle changes reduce people's risks substantially (by 1/3 to 2/3) and can slow and perhaps reverse progression of established coronary disease. When used appropriately, these interventions are more cost-effective than many other treatments, currently provided by the National Health Service [Department of Health National Service Frameworks: coronary heart disease. Preventing coronary heart disease in high risk patients. 2000. HMSO.] Secondary prevention clinics are effective means by which to ensure targets are achieved and assist primary care in long-term maintenance of lifestyle change and drug optimisation. A 2-year hospital-based pilot project was established at the Royal Hospitals, April 2001-April 2003. The aim of the project was to target patients with coronary heart disease, post-MI and/or coronary artery bypass grafting and/or percutaneous coronary intervention, 6 months following their cardiac event. The plan was to assess patient risk factors and medication a minimum of 6 months following their cardiac event to ascertain if government targets were being achieved; secondly, to examine the effectiveness of a hospital-based nurse-led secondary prevention clinic on modifying risk factors and optimising drug therapies.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Bacterial detection of platelets: current problems and possible resolutions.

The greatest transfusion-transmitted disease risk facing a transfusion recipient is that of bacterial sepsis. The prevalence of bacterial contamination in platelets and red blood cells is approximately 1 in 3,000 units transfused. The available data indicate that transfusion-associated sepsis develops after 1 in 25,000 platelet transfusions and 1 in 250,000 red blood cell transfusions. One of the most widely used strategies for decreasing bacterial sepsis risk is bacterial detection. A roundtable meeting of experts was convened during the XXVIII Annual Congress of the International Society of Blood Transfusion (Edinburgh, UK, July 2004) to provide a forum for experts to share their experiences in the routine bacterial detection of platelet products. This article summarizes the presentations, discussions, and recommendations of the panel. The data presented indicate that some of the current bacterial screening technology is useful for blocking the issuance of platelet units that contain relatively high levels of contaminating bacteria. Platelet units are usually released based on a test-negative status, which often become test-positive only upon longer storage. These data thus suggest that bacterial screening may not prevent all transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections. Two transfusion-transmitted case reports further highlighted the limitation of the routine bacterial screening of platelet products. It was felt that newer technologies, such as pathogen inactivation, may represent a more reliable process, with a higher level of safety. The panel thus recommended that the Transfusion Medicine community may need to change its thinking (paradigm) about bacterial detection, toward the possibility of the pathogen inactivation of blood products, to deal with the bacterial contamination issue. It was suggested, where permitted by regulatory agencies, that blood centers should consider adopting first-generation pathogen inactivation systems as a more effective approach to reducing the risk of transfusion-associated sepsis than some of the approaches currently available.

Bacteria↗