Biomedical subjects

Gina Green

Publications and source records attributed to Gina Green.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Stereotypy in young children with autism and typically developing children.

Although stereotypy is one of the key diagnostic features of autism, few studies have compared stereotypic behavior in children with autism and typically developing children. The present study employed direct observational measurement methods to assess levels of stereotypic behavior in 2-, 3- and 4-year-old children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder - not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) and age-matched typically developing peers. Thirty children with autism or PDD-NOS and 30 typically developing children participated. Each child's performance of several early learning and play skills was assessed using a direct observational assessment protocol developed for children with autism who were entering early intensive behavioral treatment. Duration of episodes of vocal and motor stereotypy was recorded from a videotaped 10 min portion of that assessment session. Results indicated that the 2-year-old children with autism or PDD-NOS had somewhat higher levels of stereotypic behavior than the typically developing 2-year-olds, while the 3- and 4-year-old children with autism or PDD-NOS displayed substantially higher levels stereotypic behavior than their same-age peers.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2005

Behavioral assessment of joint attention: a methodological report.

This paper describes a highly structured assessment protocol with objective behavioral measures for joint attention responding and initiation. The assessment was given to 26 children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and 21 typically developing children, aged two to four years. Interobserver agreement was high for all behavioral measures. Children with autism had relatively minor deficits in joint attention responding and more severe deficits in joint attention initiation, relative to typically developing children. These results replicate those reported in previous research. The protocol can be used reliably to assess behavior indicative of joint attention responding and initiation in typically developing children and children with autism.

Attention↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of two procedures for teaching dictated-word/symbol relations to learners with autism.

The efficacy of exclusion and delayed-cue procedures for establishing novel dictated-word/symbol relations with 2 boys with autism was compared using computerized match-to-sample procedures. Acquisition of the relations under the two training conditions was compared via an alternating treatments design. The delayed-cue procedure was more efficacious than the exclusion procedure in four of five comparisons across participants.

Autistic Disorder↗

PubMed2002

Intensive behavioral treatment for a toddler at high risk for autism.

Intensive, comprehensive treatment using a variety of applied behavior analysis methods was provided to a toddler who was determined to be at high risk for autism at the age of about 1 year. Initially, treatment was delivered in a one-to-one adult-child format in the child's home and other settings, with gradual transitions to group instruction in early intervention and preschool classrooms. Intensive treatment continued for 3 years; by the 4th year, the child was spending most of her time in a regular preschool classroom, with minimal ongoing one-to-one instruction. Direct observational data and results of norm-referenced tests documented large increases in language, social, cognitive, and daily living skills over the course of treatment. After 4 years, the child demonstrated no behavioral or developmental abnormalities, performed above her chronological age level on norm-referenced tests of cognitive and language skills, and was functioning as a typical child in a regular public school kindergarten classroom.

Autistic Disorder↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of direct observational methods for measuring stereotypic behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders.

We compared partial-interval recording (PIR) and momentary time sampling (MTS) estimates against continuous measures of the actual durations of stereotypic behavior in young children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. Twenty-two videotaped samples of stereotypy were scored using a low-tech duration recording method, and relative durations (i.e., proportions of observation periods consumed by stereotypy) were calculated. Then 10, 20, and 30s MTS and 10s PIR estimates of relative durations were derived from the raw duration data. Across all samples, PIR was found to grossly overestimate the relative duration of stereotypy. Momentary time sampling both over- and under-estimated the relative duration of stereotypy, but with much smaller errors than PIR (Experiment 1). These results were replicated across 27 samples of low, moderate and high levels of stereotypy (Experiment 2).

Autistic Disorder↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Two methods for teaching simple visual discriminations to learners with severe disabilities.

Simple discriminations are involved in many functional skills; additionally, they are components of conditional discriminations (identity and arbitrary matching-to-sample), which are involved in a wide array of other important performances. Many individuals with severe disabilities have difficulty acquiring simple discriminations with standard training procedures, such as differential reinforcement. Errorless training methods may be more effective with this population. We used multiple-probe designs to compare two potentially errorless procedures for teaching simple discriminations among three pairs of photos of preferred items (S+) and colored rectangles (S-) to three youths with severe disabilities. In Experiment 1, baseline trials conducted with differential reinforcement yielded near-chance performances on all stimulus sets. A progressive delayed prompt training procedure was then implemented, with stimuli presented flat on the tabletop for one participant and at a 45 degrees angle to the tabletop for the other participants. After 120 teaching trials, accuracy remained near chance. Next, a stimulus control shaping procedure was implemented using an adapted Wisconsin General Test Apparatus (WGTA), with stimuli at a 45 degrees angle to the tabletop. Accuracy increased when this procedure was implemented with each stimulus pair in succession. In Experiment 2, for the participant whose stimuli were presented flat on the tabletop during the progressive delayed prompt training procedure, baseline trials were presented on the WGTA as at the end of Experiment 1, with differential reinforcement; accuracy remained high. On probe trials with stimuli placed flat on the tabletop, accuracy decreased to near-chance levels, indicating that the orientation of the stimulus array was a controlling variable.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism.

We compared the effects of three treatment approaches on preschool-age children with autism spectrum disorders. Twenty-nine children received intensive behavior analytic intervention (IBT; 1:1 adult:child ratio, 25-40 h per week). A comparison group (n=16) received intensive "eclectic" intervention (a combination of methods, 1:1 or 1:2 ratio, 30 h per week) in public special education classrooms (designated the AP group). A second comparison group (GP) comprised 16 children in non-intensive public early intervention programs (a combination of methods, small groups, 15 h per week). Independent examiners administered standardized tests of cognitive, language, and adaptive skills to children in all three groups at intake and about 14 months after treatment began. The groups were similar on key variables at intake. At follow-up, the IBT group had higher mean standard scores in all skill domains than the AP and GP groups. The differences were statistically significant for all domains except motor skills. There were no statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the AP and GP groups. Learning rates at follow-up were also substantially higher for children in the IBT group than for either of the other two groups. These findings are consistent with other research showing that IBT is considerably more efficacious than "eclectic" intervention.

Adaptation, Psychological↗