Biomedical subjects

Gina Pohani

Publications and source records attributed to Gina Pohani.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

A comparison of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure as outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: patterns of disability scale usage in clinical trials.

In order to compare the frequency and patterns of use of the Barthel Index (BI) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in stroke rehabilitation trials, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of stroke rehabilitation published between 1968 and 2002 were identified and reviewed to determine the frequency with which the BI and FIM measures were used relative to other measures of disability. The date and location of each study citing either the FIM or the BI were also recorded. Studies were assigned ratings of methodological quality based on the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scoring system. Comparisons of the age, frequency and continents of origin and methodological quality of the studies were explored. Results indicate that the BI and FIM were the most common measures of disability used in RCTs examining stroke rehabilitation. However, the BI was used more often than the FIM (n=86, P<0.001) and was cited in trials of superior quality (P=0.005). Studies from North America were more likely to use the FIM compared with European studies (n=24, P<0.001). Publications citing the BI were significantly more recent when originating in Europe as opposed to North America (P=0.023). These results provide insight into current patterns of scale use in stroke rehabilitation research.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2005

Recovery from stroke: differences between subtypes.

The objective of this study was to compare the differences in patterns of recovery and incidence of medical complications in hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke patients admitted for rehabilitation, using a retrospective case series design. It was set in three tertiary care facilities in London, Ontario, Canada. Eight-hundred-and-nineteen consecutive patients, admitted from 1997 to 2001 for rehabilitation following cerebrovascular event, were reviewed. The main outcome measures were: age, length of hospital stay, time to admission, medical complications, ambulation status and functional independence measure scores on both admission and discharge. The results showed that 110 patients had strokes that were hemorrhagic, while 709 were ischemic. The hemorrhagic stroke patients were younger (66 vs. 70 years, P=0.001) and were admitted later post stroke onset (30 vs. 18 days, P<0.0001). They had a higher incidence of pneumonia (6.4 vs. 2.7%, P=0.04), pulmonary emboli (3.6 vs. 0.07%, P=0.006) and wheelchair ambulation on admission (53 vs. 41%, P=0.026). There was no significant difference in incidence of seizures or wheelchair ambulation on discharge, length of rehabilitation stay or Functional Independence Measure scores on both admission and discharge. In conclusion, hemorrhagic stroke patients took longer than ischemic stroke patients to enter into rehabilitation, and were more inclined to experience ambulatory impairments and develop medical complications.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Ineffectiveness of the current strategy to prevent hepatitis A in travelers.

BACKGROUND: Each year, a large number of Canadians travel to regions of the world where hepatitis A remains endemic. Many of these travelers are not immune and the current preventive strategy relies wholly on self-referral to a travel clinic. All of the costs associated with such a visit are assumed by the traveler. We estimated the effectiveness of this strategy. METHODS: This case-control study included 108 travel-related hepatitis A cases with onset of disease between 1997 and 1999 and 620 controls who traveled during the same period. RESULTS: Hepatitis A was strongly associated with high-risk travel (Odds Ratio = 7.2, 95% Confidence Interval 1.76-29.4), but only 7% of cases were found in this category. The risk of hepatitis A was 5 times lower in travelers who visited a travel clinic than in those who did not (80% efficacy). However, only 14% of the controls visited a travel clinic. As a result, the effectiveness of the current strategy is estimated to be 11% (80% of 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis A in travelers can be prevented effectively by attendance at a travel clinic. Unfortunately, most travelers do not visit such clinics prior to departure. Even if all high-risk travelers were to visit a travel clinic and receive vaccination, this would have negligible impact on the number of travel-related hepatitis A cases (approximately 7% reduction). The current strategy for the prevention of hepatitis A in travelers is ineffective and should be reexamined.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A population-based comparison between travelers who consulted travel clinics and those who did not.

BACKGROUND: Travel to hepatitis A-endemic countries is frequent among North Americans. Such travel carries significant risks for the individuals themselves and for the general population. We documented the patterns of use of travel clinics in a large Canadian adult population. METHODS: Travelers who had visited a hepatitis A-endemic country between 1990 and the time of the survey in 1999 were eligible. Subjects were identified from a representative sample of 4,002 adults from the two largest Canadian provinces. They were contacted by random digit dialing and interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Only 15% of trips had been preceded by a visit to a travel clinic. The probability of visiting a travel clinic was approximately 10 times greater for travelers considered to be in the high-risk category than for those in the low-risk category, but the former represented only 2% of the total. The probability of visiting a travel clinic was approximately 23 times greater for travelers who were aware of the health risks in their country of destination. Income level was not associated with attendance at a travel clinic, and cost was rarely mentioned as a reason for not attending such a travel clinic before departure. CONCLUSIONS: Each year, millions of Canadian travelers go to hepatitis A-endemic countries without consulting a travel clinic. Active steps must be taken by public health authorities to improve their utilization of health services and prevent the accrued health risk for these travelers.

Adult↗