PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gini F Fleming

Publications and source records attributed to Gini F Fleming.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Impact of body mass index on treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cisplatin: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with doxorubicin/cisplatin. METHODS: Data from patients treated on five Gynecologic Oncology Group trials were retrospectively reviewed. BMI was categorized as normal (< 25), overweight (> or = 25 to < 30), obese (> or = 30 to < 40), and morbidly obese (> or = 40). BMI was analyzed for associations with demographics, clinical characteristics, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 949 patients, 533 (56%) had recurrent disease, 227 (23.9%) had Stage IV disease, and 189 (19.9%) had Stage III disease. Mean BMI was 29.8; 29.6%, 27.0%, 33.2% and 10.2% of patients, respectively, were categorized as normal, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese. The mean BMI was significantly different when compared by age group (p<0.001), stage (p=0.047), histologic type (p=0.024), and tumor grade (p=0.014). Older patients and those with clear cell, poorly differentiated tumors, or stage IV disease had a lower BMI. No significant associations between PFS and BMI were detected. Increasing BMI was significantly associated with an increased risk of death in Stage III/IV (HR=1.86, 95% CI 1.16-2.99 for BMI > or = 40 vs. BMI < 25) but not recurrent patients. Higher BMI patients had less Grade 3/4 toxicities than normal patients (p<0.001) but this difference disappeared for obese patients receiving > or = 95% of the calculated dose. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was not predictive of PFS in this endometrial cancer population although morbidly obese patients had decreased OS in primary Stage III/IV patients. Toxicities decreased with increasing BMI, perhaps secondary to capped dosing.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Racial disparity in survival among patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported shorter survival of black women compared with white women who had advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. It has been suggested that this may reflect racially based differences in treatment. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed data from 169 black women and 982 white women with International Federation of Gynecologic Oncology (FIGO) Stage III, Stage IV, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma who were participants in 1 of 4 Gynecologic Oncology Group randomized treatment trials of doxorubicin alone or combined with paclitaxel and/or cisplatin. Demographic, histologic, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed to estimate survival, and between-group comparisons were performed. RESULTS: The pooled data revealed that black women were more likely to have papillary serous histology (P < .001), Stage IV disease (P < .001), and higher tumor grade (P < .001) compared with white women, and survival was worse among black women than among white women (median survival, 10.6 months vs. 12.2 months, respectively; P < .001). A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis that was adjusted for performance status, disease stage, tumor histology, tumor grade, and treatment demonstrated worse survival for black women (hazards ratio, 1.26, 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.51; P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: The data from a large group of women with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer suggested that a racial disparity in survival persists, despite the finding that black women and white women received similar treatment. Although the causes of racial disparity in endometrial cancer remain to be elucidated, socioeconomic, biologic, and cultural factors should be investigated to identify the etiologic origins of this multifactorial healthcare problem.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Clinical activity of pertuzumab (rhuMAb 2C4), a HER dimerization inhibitor, in advanced ovarian cancer: potential predictive relationship with tumor HER2 activation status.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancers (OCs) frequently have HER2 activation in the absence of HER2 overexpression. Pertuzumab, a humanized antibody that prevents HER2 dimerization and inhibits multiple HER-mediated pathways, was studied in a phase II, multicenter trial in advanced, refractory OC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients (cohort 1) with relapsed OC received a loading dose of 840 mg pertuzumab intravenously followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks; 62 patients (cohort 2) received 1,050 mg every 3 weeks. Response rate was the primary end point. Fresh tumor biopsies were obtained in cohort 1 to assay for phosphorylated HER2 (pHER2). RESULTS: Median age was 57 years and median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was five. Fifty-five patients in cohort 1 and 62 patients in cohort 2 were assessable for efficacy. There were five partial responses (response rate [RR] = 4.3%; 95% CI, 1.7% to 9.4%), eight patients (6.8%) with stable disease (SD) lasting at least 6 months, and 10 patients with CA-125 reduction of at least 50% (includes two partial responses and four patients with SD > or = 6 months; total clinical activity, 14.5%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.6 weeks. Eight of 28 tumor biopsies (28.6%) were pHER2+ by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; without gene amplification). Median PFS for pHER2+ patients was 20.9 weeks (n = 8) versus 5.8 weeks for pHER2- (n = 20; P = .14) and 9.1 weeks for unknown pHER2 status (n = 27). Pertuzumab was well tolerated with diarrhea in 69.1% (11.4% grade 3, no grade 4). Five patients had asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decreases to less than 50% (one confirmed by central facility). CONCLUSION: Pertuzumab is well tolerated with a RR of 4.3% in heavily-pretreated OC patients. Further studies on pHER2 as a diagnostic are warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A phase I trial of intraperitoneal sustained-release paclitaxel microspheres (Paclimer) in recurrent ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: Paclimer is a biodegradable polymer microsphere formulation containing 10% (w/w) paclitaxel that is designed to provide a sustained-release form of paclitaxel after intraperitoneal (IP) administration. The goals of this phase I study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IP paclitaxel microspheres and the pharmacology of paclitaxel after IP paclitaxel microsphere administration. METHODS: Twelve patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma were treated. After placement of an IP catheter, patients were treated with escalating doses of IP paclitaxel microspheres administered with 2 l of normal saline following premedication. Treatment could be repeated once, 8 weeks after initial treatment. The starting dose was 60 mg/m2 and no intrapatient dose escalation was used. RESULTS: One dose-limiting toxicity consisting of abdominal pain, ileus and bowel obstruction was seen with the second cycle of therapy in one patient who received 900 mg/m2. Patients received up to 1200 mg/m2 without further evidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). The study was discontinued before MTD was defined due to the manufacturer's decision to suspend further clinical development of paclitaxel microspheres. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a trend toward a dose-dependent effect of IP paclitaxel microspheres on measured plasma paclitaxel levels. Sustained paclitaxel levels were maintained throughout all 8 weeks of therapy; however, paclitaxel concentrations were well below the plasma concentrations associated with toxicity. In one patient, laparoscopy revealed extensive adhesions, fat necrosis, foreign body giant cell reaction and detectable residual polymer filaments 7 months after completion of treatment with paclitaxel microspheres. CONCLUSIONS: IP administration of paclitaxel microspheres is well tolerated up to 1200 mg/m2 without defining MTD. The low but persistent detection of plasma paclitaxel indicates that paclitaxel continues to be released for at least 8 weeks after IP paclitaxel microsphere treatment. The finding of significant peritoneal abnormalities, including the presence of residual polymer filaments, months after IP Paclimer treatment suggests that the polymer preparation used in Paclimer degrades slowly.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Population analysis of a 24-h paclitaxel infusion in advanced endometrial cancer: a gynaecological oncology group study.

AIMS: To examine determinants of paclitaxel disposition and the association between paclitaxel exposure and toxicity or survival in patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel. METHODS: A limited sampling scheme was used to examine the population pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in 160 patients from one arm of a randomized Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin. Four plasma samples per patient were collected at approximately 0, 3, 22 and 27 h after the first 24-h infusion of paclitaxel and submitted to the Gynecological Oncology Group (GOG) Pharmacology Core Laboratory. Total paclitaxel concentrations were quantified by LC/MS and paclitaxel disposition was examined using NONMEM. Paclitaxel exposure was evaluated for associations with toxicity or survival. RESULTS: Patient weight, age and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase level were determinants of paclitaxel clearance (clearance increased 0.437 l h-1 kg-1; decreased 0.223 l h-1 year-1 and 0.105 l h-1 IU-1). Bayesian shrinkage was minimal for this parameter. In different measures of paclitaxel exposure, AUC was most predictive of toxicity, with higher AUC associated with granulocytopenia [probability of 1% at AUC=1 to 22% at AUC=4 microg l-1 h-1 for performance status (PS)=0]. PS was more strongly associated with survival than disease stage and higher paclitaxel AUC was associated with worse survival irrespective of PS and stage. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel AUC is an independent predictor of granulocytopenia and survival in patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer. Future studies are needed to validate the latter finding. This study confirms the appropriateness of evaluating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in multicentre oncology trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Chemotherapy in endometrial cancer.

Endometrial cancer is a highly curable malignancy when it presents as uterine-confined disease, but the prognosis for metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer is poor. The median survival of women enrolled in trials for recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer is only approximately 12 months. Hormonal therapy, most commonly with progestins, benefits a small group of patients. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is indicated as frontline treatment for the majority of women with metastatic or recurrent disease. Anthracyclines, platinum compounds, and taxanes consistently achieve response rates greater than 20% in single-agent trials of chemotherapy-naive patients. Combination chemotherapy typically produces higher response rates, although combination regimens have not always improved survival historically. Doxorubicin plus cisplatin has been accepted as the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) standard regimen based on phase III data. Recently, a COG randomized trial compared doxorubicin plus cisplatin to the triplet of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel, and it was found that the addition of paclitaxel significantly improved response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Moreover, chemotherapy has been reported to improve survival when

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Concomitant radiation therapy and paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer: results from two consecutive phase I/II trials.

PURPOSE: The management of unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (ULABC) remains a major challenge because of the necessity both to treat local disease and to prevent distant disease. Two consecutive Phase I/II trials of concomitant chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) were performed to attempt to address both local and distant disease control in ULABC. This analysis focuses on rates of locoregional control and radiation-associated acute and late complications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-three patients with unresectable locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancers (T4N0-3M0-1) or locally recurrent disease were treated with CRT on two consecutive Phase I/II trials. Radiotherapy consisted of 60-70 Gy to the breast or chest wall and 60 Gy to draining lymphatics in a week-on/week-off (WO/WO) schedule. Chemotherapy consisted of either continuous infusion or bolus paclitaxel +/- vinorelbine. A subset analysis of 16 patients with nonmetastatic ULABC Stage IIIB-C (T4N0-3M0) was performed. Among this cohort, 13 patients (81%) underwent planned mastectomy after CRT. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients with Stage IIIB-C disease, acute toxicity included moist desquamation (n = 8) and Grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 3). Late toxicity included breast reconstruction loss, decreased range of arm motion, lymphedema, and skin toxicity, although none was life-threatening. Of 15 assessable patients, 14 had a clinical response, 7 had a pathologic complete response (pCR) including 6 of 13 patients undergoing mastectomy. With a median follow-up for living patients of 43.8 months, the 4-year actuarial locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 83%, 33%, and 56% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent WO/WO radiation therapy and paclitaxel +/- vinorelbine is effective locoregional therapy for ULABC with an acceptable toxicity profile. Further investigation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in ULABC is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Rare uterine cancers.

The most common malignant tumour of the uterus is endometrioid endometrial cancer. However, many less common malignant diseases also develop in the uterus, including both carcinomas and sarcomas. Most notable of these tumours are papillary serous carcinomas, clear-cell carcinomas, carcinosarcomas, stromal sarcomas, and leiomyosarcomas. These less common cancers can be aggressive, and account for a greatly disproportionate amount of deaths from uterine cancers. Because they are uncommon, physicians will usually have seen only a few cases, and randomised data to guide treatment often do not exist. This review summarises the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and prognoses of the less common malignant diseases of the uterus, and presents the information available to guide the clinician about treatment options.

Carcinoma↗
PubMed2005

A phase II trial of UFT and leucovorin in women 65 years and older with advanced breast cancer.

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral UFT (ftorafur plus uracil) plus leucovorin in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included age > or =65 years, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, < or =1 prior chemotherapy regimens in the setting of metastatic disease, performance status 0-2, and adequate end-organ function. UFT at 300 mg/m2 per day as 2 divided doses and 30 mg leucovorin with each dose were administered orally daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. Ten patients were accrued. Six patients received treatment in their first relapse and 3 in their second. One patient was chemotherapy-naive. The dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea with grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurring more often in the oldest patients (1 of 6 patients between 65 and 69 vs. 3 of 4 patients > or =70 years old). Protocol treatment was discontinued in 2 patients (ages 78 and 83) secondary to severe gastrointestinal toxicity. One patient achieved a partial response. Although UFT/leucovorin had efficacy in 1 patient, toxicity in the patients over 70 years of age was increased. Careful evaluation of anticancer drug toxicity in very elderly patients is important as our population ages.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A phase I trial of pharmacokinetic modulation of carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) with ketoconazole in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: Carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) is a novel antineoplastic agent in clinical development with limited oral bioavailability. In vitro, ketoconazole has been demonstrated to inhibit CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of CAI. We performed this phase I trial to determine if ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition would lead to favorable alteration of CAI pharmacokinetics, and to evaluate the safety, toxicity and tolerability of the proposed combination. DESIGN: Forty-seven patients were treated using a standard three patients per cohort CAI dose-escalation scheme. In cycle 1, CAI was administered alone on day-6 followed by a single dose of ketoconazole (200 mg) on day 0. CAI and ketoconazole (200 mg/day) were subsequently coadministered on days 1 and 3-28. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained following the doses on days-6 and 1. All subsequent cycles were of 28-day duration, and consisted of daily CAI and ketoconazole coadministration. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on samples from 44 patients. In most patients administration of ketoconazole produced an increase in CAI AUC and Cmax with a decrease in CAI clearance. Seven patients experienced stable disease for up to 12 months. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities were the most common toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of CAI with ketoconazole increased CAI exposure in most of the patients without altering the toxicity profile of CAI. The highest CAI dose administered on the trial was 300 mg/day. The clinical utility of such a modulation strategy might be explored in future clinical trials of CAI.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin plus cisplatin improves overall survival (OS) in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Secondary comparisons included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (AP), or doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (day 1), followed by paclitaxel 160 mg/m(2) (day 2) with filgrastim support (TAP). The initial doxorubicin dose in the AP arm was reduced to 45 mg/m(2) in patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy and those older than 65 years. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks to a maximum of seven cycles. Patients completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire before each cycle. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three women (10 ineligible) were registered. Objective response (57% v 34%; P <.01), PFS (median, 8.3 v 5.3 months; P <.01), and OS (median, 15.3 v 12.3 months; P =.037) were improved with TAP. Treatment was hematologically well tolerated, with only 2% of patients receiving AP, and 3% of patients receiving TAP experiencing neutropenic fever. Neurologic toxicity was worse for those receiving TAP, with 12% grade 3, and 27% grade 2 peripheral neuropathy, compared with 1% and 4%, respectively, in those receiving AP. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the TAP arm following two cycles of therapy. CONCLUSION: TAP significantly improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with AP. Evaluation of this regimen in the high-risk adjuvant setting is warranted, but close attention should be paid to the increased risk of peripheral neuropathy.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342.

PURPOSE: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens-175 mg/m(2), 210 mg/m(2), or 250 mg/m(2)-each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment. RESULTS: No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P =.04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m(2) should be considered the optimal dose.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, cisplatin, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine in combination with weekly cisplatin and pelvic radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Eligible patients included those with bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer. Women with other advanced gynecologic malignancies were also eligible. All patients received cisplatin 40 mg/m(-2)/week (maximum dose, 70 mg) during pelvic RT. Vinorelbine was administered on the same day as cisplatin at a starting dose of 10 mg/m(-2)/week and escalated in 5 mg/m(-2)/week increments. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, or any toxicity which required > or =1 week delay in RT or an omission of >1 dose of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between April 2001 and September 2002, 12 women with pelvic malignancies (11 cervical, 1 recurrent ovarian) were enrolled. Cohorts of 3, 6, and 3 patients were treated at 10, 15, and 20 mg/m(-2)/week dose levels of vinorelbine. At the 20 mg/m2 level, DLT was observed. Two of three patients missed >1 cycle of chemotherapy secondary to predominantly hematologic toxicity. One patient at the 20 mg level developed a creatinine clearance <50 ml/min and missed 1 dose of cisplatin. Another developed transient grade 3 diarrhea. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and pelvic RT in patients with cervical cancer is 15 mg/m(-2)/week.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase I study of an oral formulation of ZD9331 administered daily for 28 days.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of an oral formulation of ZD9331, a novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor that is not a substrate for folylpolyglutamate synthase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status < or = 2 and refractory solid tumors. Initially, patients received ZD9331 daily for 2 weeks, with the duration of treatment escalated to a maximum of 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Once the maximum-tolerated duration of treatment was determined, the dose of ZD9331 was increased until DLT occurred. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled at eight dose levels. The DLTs were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. At 3 mg/d, two of 19 patients developed DLT; one patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia, and the other patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia only. Anemia was common, with a median hemoglobin nadir of 75% of baseline, before recovery or transfusion. The apparent oral clearance of ZD9931 was 11.6 +/- 6.3 mL/min. Dose-limiting myelosuppression was associated with both an increased 24-hour ZD9931 concentration and blood urea nitrogen. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is 3 mg/d for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. ZD9331 seems to have a manageable toxicity profile, although it should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Pentostatin pharmacokinetics and dosing recommendations in patients with mild renal impairment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of pentostatin in renally impaired patients in order to establish dosing guidelines for this population. METHODS: Pentostatin doses were administered as 15-min intravenous infusions to patients based on their measured creatinine clearance (CLcr) as follows. Patients with normal renal function (NRF), defined as CLcr >60 ml/min, received 4 mg/m(2) repeated every14 days. Patients with impaired renal function (IRF) included those with CLcr 41-60 ml/min who received 3 mg/m(2) and those with CLcr 21-40 ml/min who received 2 mg/m(2), also repeated every 14 days. Heparinized plasma samples were collected during drug infusion and out through 96 h after dosing, except in two patients in whom sampling was extended to 144 h after dosing. Urine sampling extended to 96 h after dosing, and all samples were analyzed by a validated enzyme immunoassay for pentostatin concentrations. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 13 patients (7 IRF and 6 NRF), of whom 12 contributed samples for pharmacokinetic analysis. Median baseline CLcr values were 71.5 ml/min for NRF patients and 44 ml/min for IRF patients. Following the end of intravenous infusion, pentostatin plasma concentrations declined biexponentially with time. In some patients there was a transient increase in pentostatin equivalents 2 to 4 h after dosing. There was a good correlation between measured CLcr and pentostatin total plasma clearance. The AUC(0- infinity ) values seen in IRF patients, at lower doses, were within the range of the AUC(0- infinity ) values seen in patients with normal CLcr. Toxicities observed in the two groups of patients were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The pentostatin doses used in the study appear to be appropriate for administration to cancer patients with varying degrees of renal impairment.

Aged↗