Biomedical subjects

Giorgio Capogna

Publications and source records attributed to Giorgio Capogna.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Minimum local analgesic doses of ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for intrathecal labor analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Doses for intrathecal opioid-local anesthetic mixtures have been arbitrarily chosen. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacies of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for labor analgesia and to determine the analgesic potency ratios for these three drugs. For this purpose, the authors used the up-down sequential allocation model, which estimates the minimum local analgesic dose for intrathecal local anesthetic. METHODS: Ninety-seven nulliparous term parturients in spontaneous labor, requesting combined spinal-epidural analgesia, were randomly allocated to one of three groups to receive 0.25% spinal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, or bupivacaine. The initial dose of the local anesthetic drug was chosen to be 2.5 mg, and the testing interval was set at 0.25 mg. The subsequent doses were determined by the response of the previous parturient. Efficacy was accepted if the visual analog pain score decreased to 10 mm or less on a 100-mm scale within 30 min. The minimum local analgesic dose was calculated using the method of Dixon and Massey. RESULTS: The intrathecal minimum local analgesic dose was 3.64 mg (95% confidence interval, 3.33-3.96 mg) for ropivacaine, 2.94 (2.73-3.16) mg for levobupivacaine, and 2.37 (2.17-2.58) mg for bupivacaine. The relative analgesic potency ratios were 0.65 (0.56-0.76) for ropivacaine:bupivacaine, 0.80 (0.70-0.92) for ropivacaine:levobupivacaine, and 0.81 (0.69-0.94) for levobupivacaine:bupivacaine. There were significant trends (P </= 0.021) for greater motor block with bupivacaine and levobupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a potency hierarchy of spinal bupivacaine > levobupivacaine > ropivacaine.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The relative motor blocking potencies of intrathecal ropivacaine: effects of concentration.

UNLABELLED: This study established the median effective dose (ED(50)) for motor block of intrathecal 1% and 0.1% ropivacaine and determined the effects of the concentration of the solution injected on the motor block obtained. We enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double-blind, sequential allocation study 54 parturients undergoing elective Cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural technique. Parturients were randomized to receive intrathecal ropivacaine either 1% or 0.1%. The initial dose was chosen to be 4 mg, with subsequent doses being determined by the response of the previous patient (testing interval, 1 mg). The occurrence of any motor block in either lower limb within 5 min from the intrathecal injection of the study solution was considered effective. The motor block at 5 min was 6.1 mg for 1% ropivacaine (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-7.1) and was 9.1 mg (95% CI, 7.8-10.3) for 0.1% ropivacaine (P = 0.0013; 95% CI difference, 1.3-4.7). The relative efficacy ratio of the 2 concentrations was 1.5 (95% CI difference, 1.2-1.9) in favor of the larger concentration. The ED(50) of spinal ropivacaine to produce motor block in pregnant patients was significantly influenced by the concentration of the local anesthetic, with dose requirements being increased by 50% for the smaller concentration. IMPLICATIONS: The minimum local anesthetic dose for motor block with 0.1% ropivacaine is 50% larger than the 1% concentration with a relative efficacy ratio of 1.5. Our findings suggest that more diluted local anesthetic solutions determine less motor block, and this may be considered in ambulant laboring parturients.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Epidural analgesia for childbirth: effects of newer techniques on neonatal outcome.

New low-dose, local anesthetic-opioid combinations, combined spinal epidural analgesia, and new anesthetic drugs, such as ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, have modified the anesthetic practice in obstetric labor analgesia. These new analgesic techniques have less or no neonatal effects when compared with traditional epidural labor analgesia. They also have less effect on mode of delivery, which may in turn affect neonatal outcome. The use of very diluted or low concentrations of local anesthetic solutions may reduce their placental passage and thus the possible subtle neonatal effects. Small doses of epidural or spinal opioids alone or combined with low doses of local anesthetics does not affect the well-being of the neonate at birth. When considering the neonatal outcome, combined spinal epidural analgesia is as well tolerated as low-dose epidural analgesia. Transient fetal heart rate changes have been described immediately after the administration of intrathecal or epidural opioids. Maternal hypotension may also occur at the onset of epidural analgesia. Whether the occurrence of transient fetal heart rate changes or maternal hypotension immediately after the epidural block may influence the neonatal outcome at birth needs verification.

Analgesia, Epidural↗

PubMed2003

Minimum analgesic doses of fentanyl and sufentanil for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor.

UNLABELLED: In this study, we sought to determine the minimum analgesic doses and relative potencies of fentanyl and sufentanil when they are used as the sole epidural analgesic during the first stage of labor. Nulliparous parturients (n = 66) in spontaneous labor at term gestation and requesting epidural analgesia were enrolled into this prospective, double-blinded, randomized, sequential-allocation study. Each woman received fentanyl or sufentanil diluted with 0.9% wt/vol saline to a volume of 10 mL. The initial dose was arbitrarily chosen to be 125 microg for fentanyl and 25 microg for sufentanil, with subsequent doses being determined by the response of the previous patient (testing interval, 5 microg for fentanyl and 1 microg for sufentanil). Efficacy was accepted if the visual analog score decreased to < or =10 mm on a 100-mm scale within 30 min. The minimum analgesic dose or median effective dose was 21.1 microg (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.2-21.9 microg) for sufentanil and 124.2 microg (95% CI, 118.1-130.6 microg) for fentanyl (P < 0.0001). The sufentanil/fentanyl potency ratio was 5.9 (95% CI, 5.6-6.3). In conclusion, we have established the equivalent doses and relative potencies of fentanyl and sufentanil for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor. IMPLICATIONS: This study determined the minimum analgesic doses of fentanyl and sufentanil for epidural anesthesia in the first stage of labor. The sufentanil/fentanyl potency ratio was 5.9. This ratio may be used to establish the equivalent doses for fentanyl and sufentanil for epidural analgesia in labor.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Mobile epidurals.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Analgesia, Epidural↗