Biomedical subjects

Giovanni Gordini

Publications and source records attributed to Giovanni Gordini.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The first Italian trauma registry of national relevance: methodology and initial results.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and discuss the ongoing endeavor to establish a multiregional trauma registry in Italy. METHODS DESIGN: Prospective observational analysis by description and cohort comparison. SETTING: Three Italian hospitals, referral centers for severely traumatized patients. PATIENTS: trauma victims admitted between 1 July 2004 and 28 February 2005 with an Injury Severity Score >15 or requiring early admission to intensive care. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASURES: Compilation rates for some 'sentry' variables. Total number of patients and Injury Severity Score. Ten widely used descriptive variables (type of trauma, mechanism of injury, age, gender, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, Prognostic Severity Index, 'call-to-hospital' and 'admission-to-ward' intervals, and outcome at 30 days) measured in the subgroup with Injury Severity Score>15, in general and by hospital. RESULTS: A trauma registry has been established that fit the present organization of trauma care in Italy. It seems to compare well with the references available in the literature. Five hundred and forty-nine patients have been enrolled so far. The compilation rate has been well above 70% for all variables in all hospitals, except pre-hospital times in two hospitals. A substantial homogeneity exists among the hospitals in the general characteristics of the patients with Injury Severity Score>15. CONCLUSIONS: The project has achieved its goals so far. The previous estimates on the number of cases (about 300/year/hospital) are confirmed and major shortcomings in methodology seem unlikely. Therefore, positive future developments are possible: usage for quality improvement and research, linkage to other European registries and participation of other hospitals.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Key issues in advanced bleeding care in trauma.

The incidence of hemostatic abnormalities in the early hours after traumatic incident is high and represents an independent predictor of mortality. Key factors in the development of traumatic coagulopathy include the severity of injury, hypothermia, acidosis, hemorrhagic shock, hemodilution, clotting factor consumption, and fibrinolysis. Assessment of bleeding includes evaluation of the mechanism of injury, vital signs, biochemistry, detection of external and internal bleeding sources, injuries found upon secondary investigation, and response to treatment. Priority in treating the bleeding trauma patient should be given to prevention of further bleeding, hypothermia, acidosis, coagulopathy, and maintenance of tissue oxygenation, achieved by careful physical handling, damage control surgery, analgesia, maintenance of normothermia, correction of coagulopathy, control of blood pH, and serum calcium. Priority during initial treatment is to restore tissue perfusion and achieve hemostasis in vital functions; other nonvital procedures may generally be delayed. This state-of-the-art review aims to address key issues in acute control of bleeding in the trauma patient.

Hemorrhage↗

PubMed2002

[Relation between cardiology and cardiosurgery in a center without cardiosurgery: an organizational proposal in the coronary syndromes].

A modern cardiology department has very frequent relations with a heart surgery center for the management of stable and unstable patients with coronary artery disease. Therefore, these relations need to be formally defined. This impelling necessity stems from the clinical evidence that a high number of unstable patients need a timely revascularization as well as from the economical pressure to correctly allocate the limited surgical resources available. Thus three main contexts should be clearly defined: 1) surgical support during coronary angioplasty (PTCA), when this activity is performed on-site; 2) timely revascularization of unstable patients admitted to the coronary care unit or the ward; 3) surgical prioritization of stable subjects undergoing diagnostic catheterization. The increased experience in PTCA as well as several technical improvements, namely stents, has dramatically reduced the need for emergency surgical revascularization and has induced an evolution in the stand-by strategy with new concepts such as "surgical back-up" or "next available operating room". Therefore, the role of heart surgery has switched from the emergency treatment of the frequent complications of PTCA to the timely revascularization of subjects not suitable for percutaneous interventions. Thus, PTCA "without on-site" surgical facilities is gaining widespread acceptance. With the aim of defining the requirements to perform PTCA at hospitals without coronary surgery facilities, several aspects are reviewed. Furthermore, the concepts of timely surgical revascularization in unstable patients as well as the management of surgical prioritization for stable subjects submitted to diagnostic catheterization are discussed in detail. Therefore, there is still a tight relation between cardiology and heart surgery in several clinical contexts. However, the main issues of these relations as well as outcomes do not differ significantly whether heart surgery is on-site or off-site.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗