PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Giovanni Passalacqua

Publications and source records attributed to Giovanni Passalacqua.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

New insights in allergen avoidance measures for mite and pet sensitized patients. A critical appraisal.

It is widely acknowledged that avoidance of allergens such as those derived from foods, drugs, latex and stinging insects results in a complete disappearance of symptoms. By contrast, although it has been clearly shown that allergens are an important risk factor for the development of respiratory symptoms and that several avoidance measures reduce allergen levels, whether this gives clinical improvement in symptoms is debatable. Many reasons could be invoked to justify this evident discrepancy. Apart from the intrinsic methodological aspects (e.g. single or combined interventions measure, population studied, severity of respiratory symptoms, outcomes, evaluated parameters, etc.), it is important to outline that a successful approach requires that the avoided allergen is the only and real factor responsible for symptoms, the patient's education and the use of a comprehensive protocol to reduce allergen exposure. Other important factors include the involvement of the patient, the relevance of other allergens/non-specific agents, and exposure to sensitizing agents also outside patient's home. It is likely that the clinical phase of allergic airway disease and the degree of bronchial (and also nasal) remodelling, in each individual, represent relevant factors for the clinical outcome of allergen avoidance procedures. Since the management of respiratory allergy is a complex strategy (including drugs, allergen avoidance, immunological and educational interventions), it is difficult in real life to distinguish the efficacy of a single intervention in comparison to the others. A combined strategy is likely to produce better clinical results.

Adult↗

Sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric patients: beyond clinical efficacy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is widely used in several European countries. Many clinical trials and a meta-analysis presently support its efficacy, but limits and indications in pediatric age still need to be clarified. We review here the most recent literature on SLIT, with particular attention paid to the safety of children and to the additional clinical effects. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance studies have confirmed the optimal safety profile of SLIT in adults and children, including those below the age of 5 years. The most recent studies have shown that SLIT, identically to the subcutaneous route, has the potential to affect the immunological response to allergens. This is testified to by the facts that SLIT can prevent the onset of new sensitizations and maintain its beneficial effect for years after discontinuation. Moreover, it has been shown that SLIT can prevent the onset of asthma in children with rhinitis. SUMMARY: Due to its excellent safety, SLIT would be an optimal candidate for use in pediatric age groups, where the natural history of allergy can be to some extent modified. Nonetheless, formal and rigorous studies are needed to define its exact indication and dosage.

Administration, Sublingual↗

Are physicians aware of the side effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors?: a questionnaire survey in different medical categories.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are considered safe, but they are associated with characteristic side effects, namely cough and angioedema, usually requiring discontinuation. We perceived that referrals for these side effects have become more and more frequent; therefore, we evaluated the degree of knowledge on the safety of ACE-I in different medical categories. DESIGN: A questionnaire (13 questions) on side effects of ACE-I was posted to physicians. SETTING: Everyday clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiologists, allergists, and general practitioners (GPs) from the National Healthcare System. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Three hundred twelve physicians were contacted, and 154 returned questionnaires that could be analyzed. Of the 154 physicians (mean age, 45 years) 48 were cardiologists, 52 were GPs, and 54 were allergists. The percentage of correct answers was low: 31.9% for cardiologists, 40% for GPs, and 33% for allergists. Thus, GPs provided a significantly higher percentage of correct answers with respect to the remaining categories (p = 0.05). The lower rate of correct answers (0 to 15.9%) concerned the time of onset of cough and the action to take. Cardiologists seemed to be less aware of the fact that angiotensin receptor blockers (sartans) can cross-react with ACE-I. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was a poor knowledge of the side effects of ACE-I. This may account for the increased referrals for chronic cough and angioedema.

Adult↗

Emerging anti-inflammatory agents for allergic rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a high-prevalence disease, affecting 10-15% of the general population. AR is sustained by an IgE-mediated reaction, and by a complex inflammatory network of cells, mediators and cytokines that becomes chronic when exposure to allergen persists. A T helper 2 (TH2)-biased immune response is the basis for the allergic inflammation. The current therapeutic strategy is mainly based on drugs (antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, cromones, decongestants) and allergen immunotherapy. Drugs are overall effective in controlling symptoms, but do not modify the immune background that leads to allergic inflammation, and safety concerns may be present especially for prolonged treatments. Immunotherapy can modify the allergic response, but there is still space for improvement. Nowadays, several approaches are under investigation to optimise the management of AR. On one hand, new drugs and antimediators are being developed; on the other hand, attempts are made to selectively block relevant signal pathways of allergic reaction. Finally, one of the major goals is to modify the TH2-biased immune response by improving the characteristics and modes of action of allergen immunotherapy.

Animals↗

TIPS with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent: results of an Italian multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to describe the results of a multicenter prospective trial on the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) using the Viatorr stent-graft. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2003, 114 patients (75 men and 39 women; mean age, 59.3 years) with portal hypertension underwent TIPS with the Viatorr stent-graft. Indications for treatment were variceal bleeding (n = 49, 43.0%), refractory ascites (n = 52, 45.6%), hypertensive gastropathy (n = 10, 8.8%), Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 1, 0.9%), and hepatorenal syndrome (n = 2, 1.7%). Eight patients (7.0%) had Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis; 60 (52.6%), Child-Pugh class B; and 46 (40.4%), Child-Pugh class C. Patients were monitored by color Doppler sonography and phlebography. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 113 (99.1%) of 114 patients; in one patient, creation of the track was not feasible. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient decreased from 21.8 to 8.7 mm Hg. Three minor immediate complications (2.6%) occurred (two cases of self-limiting hemoperitoneum and one extrahepatic portal puncture requiring covered stenting). At a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, the overall mortality rate was 31.0% (35/113), with a 30-day mortality rate of 8.8% (10/113). Mortality was significantly higher in patients in Child-Pugh class C with refractory ascites and with post-procedural encephalopathy. Cumulative primary patency rates were 91.9%, 79.9%, and 75.9% at 6, 12, and 24 months' follow-up, respectively. Restenosis occurred in 15 patients (13.3%) within the stent (n = 8, 53.3%) or at the ends of the portal (n = 1, 6.7%) or hepatic (n = 6, 40%) veins and was solved by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 11), stenting (n = 3), or parallel TIPS (n = 1). The secondary patency rate was 98.2%. Post-procedural encephalopathy occurred in 27 patients (23.9%). CONCLUSION: The Viatorr stent-graft is safe and effective in TIPS creation, with high primary patency rates. Covering the entire track up to the inferior vena cava can increase patency.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of the effects in the nose and skin of a single dose of desloratadine and levocetirizine over 24 hours.

BACKGROUND: Desloratadine (DL) and levocetirizine (LCZ) are the newest commercialized antihistamines. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical data are available for both drugs, but there is to date no direct comparison involving the nose and skin at the same time. We compared the effects of a single dose of the two drugs in the nose and skin over 24 h. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic allergic rhinitis were enrolled in a randomized double-blind crossover administration of DL and LCZ. The histamine-induced wheal and flare was measured at baseline and 2 and 24 h after dosing. A reflective total symptom score (rTSS) for the previous 24 h was assessed before and after each dose. An instant symptom score was also measured at various time points after each drug. RESULTS: LCZ provided greater inhibition of the flare at 2 h (p = 0.05) and at 24 h (p = 0.007) and greater inhibition of the wheal only at 2 h (p = 0.02). The decrease in wheal and flare was significant versus baseline (p = 0.007) with both drugs. The rTSS of the previous 24 h decreased significantly with both LCZ (11.53 vs. 8.0; p < 0.05) and DL (11.3 vs. 7.9; p < 0.05). The instant TSS progressively decreased in parallel with both drugs, but a difference in favor of LCZ was seen 2 h after dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of DL and LCZ had a comparable effect on nasal symptoms, but LCZ was faster and displayed a greater effect on histamine wheal.

Adolescent↗

Sublingual and oral immunotherapy.

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a viable alternative to the subcutaneous route for the treatment of respiratory allergy, whereas the pure oral route has been abandoned because of its lack of efficacy. The main distinctive feature of SLIT is its optimal safety profile, which has been demonstrated in adults and children. The indications for SLIT are similar to those for the subcutaneous route. A long-lasting effect has been demonstrated for the sublingual route, but data are needed to determine the optimal dose and the preventive effect in asthma.

Administration, Oral↗

Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the available published data concerning the use of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in respiratory allergy to primarily evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the treatment and to secondarily consider the mechanisms of action and any unresolved questions. DATA SOURCES: Articles in the medical literature (starting from 1986 up to November 2003) derived from searching the MEDLINE database with the keywords sublingual immunotherapy, respiratory allergy, asthma, and rhinitis. Sources included review articles, randomized controlled clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance studies, and relevant reports from meeting proceedings. STUDY SELECTION: Articles concerning safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of SLIT published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: SLIT proved effective and safe in adults and children. As with traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy, SLIT has long-lasting efficacy and a preventive effect on new sensitizations. CONCLUSION: SLIT is a viable alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy. Its use in pediatric patients seems to be particularly promising.

Administration, Sublingual↗

Sublingual immunotherapy: an update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sublingual immunotherapy is now officially accepted as a viable alternative to the traditional subcutaneous route, and it is widely used especially in European countries. Despite the large amount of experimental evidence on the safety and efficacy of the method, some concerns still exist, and several aspects need to be clarified: magnitude of the efficacy, adherence, long-lasting effect and others. Recently published studies have provided answers to some of these points. RECENT FINDINGS: The most recent studies have shown that sublingual immunotherapy exerts a long-lasting effect up to 5 years after discontinuation and that it is able to prevent the onset of new sensitizations. Moreover, when systematically assessed, the adherence to treatment is quite satisfactory, despite the treatment being self-administered. In addition, evidence has been provided that sublingual immunotherapy is effective in treating allergic conjunctivitis, and a metaanalysis has confirmed its efficacy in rhinitis. Moreover, some studies have addressed the possibility of simplifying the schedule of administration by shortening the build-up phase. SUMMARY: More and more new data on sublingual immunotherapy are rapidly appearing in the international literature. These data confirm the clinical value of this treatment and show that it is comparable to subcutaneous immunotherapy from several points of view.

Administration, Sublingual↗

An update on the asthma-rhinitis link.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For the present article we collected and reviewed the more relevant experimental results concerning the asthma-rhinitis link in allergic diseases, published since January 2002. RECENT FINDINGS: During the last 2 years, particular attention has been devoted to the behaviour of the immune response in the two compartments of the airways. The recent experimental data, mainly obtained with specific nasal or bronchial allergen challenges, have confirmed that the link between the nose and the bronchi is bidirectional, and that a systemic cross-talk occurs. Furthermore, the pathogenic role of paranasal sinus infections in respiratory allergy has been better elucidated. It was shown that, in sinusitis, a T helper type 2 polarization exists, which can be reverted by proper therapy. On the other hand, despite the abundant experimental evidence, our view of the united airways is still not complete, and several points need to be developed. SUMMARY: The new findings on the asthma-rhinitis link have confirmed the current pathogenic view of respiratory allergy. These findings have important implications from a therapeutic point of view, and therefore encourage and promote the search for novel integrated treatment strategies.

Asthma↗

Effects of fexofenadine and other antihistamines on components of the allergic response: adhesion molecules.

Intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs), in particular ICAM-1, appear to play a crucial role in the recruitment and migration of inflammatory cells to the site of an allergic reaction. Glucocorticoids and allergen-specific immunotherapy have been shown to exert effects on selected components of this system, both in vitro and in vivo, but further research is required to better understand the effects of these therapies. Nasal and conjunctival challenge models (including natural and experimental allergen exposure) represent useful and safe tools for studying the activity of antiallergy drugs in vivo. These tests allow the investigation of a wide variety of parameters including inflammatory infiltrate, ICAM-1 expression, and changes in the concentration of soluble inflammatory mediators. With these tools, anti-inflammatory activity related to the modulation of epithelial cell adhesion molecules has been demonstrated in vivo for several H(1)-receptor antagonists (azelastine, cetirizine, loratadine, levocabastine, oxatomide, and terfenadine). Fexofenadine is a nonsedating, long-acting antihistamine with highly selective H(1)-receptor antagonist activity and a particularly favorable safety profile. In addition, fexofenadine has proven anti-inflammatory activity and has been shown to inhibit a number of mediators at clinically relevant concentrations, including in vitro inhibition of ICAM-1 expression on conjunctival and nasal epithelial cells.

Anti-Allergic Agents↗

Non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness in children with allergic rhinitis: relationship with the atopic status.

An increased prevalence of bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) has been demonstrated in children from a general population, and in non-asthmatic adults with allergic rhinitis. Thus, also children with allergic rhinitis are expected to be at higher risk of BHR. We evaluated the prevalence of BHR in a sample of non-asthmatic children with allergic rhinitis by means of the methacholine (Mch) bronchial challenge, and by monitorizing the airway patency using the daily peak expiratory flow variability (PEFv). Fifty-one children (ranged 6-15 years of age) with allergic rhinitis, ascertained by skin prick test to inhalant allergens, underwent a 14-day peak expiratory flow monitoring, and a Mch bronchial provocation challenge. Thirty healthy children matched for age, and sex served as control group. Thirty-one children in the rhinitis group (61%), and six (20%) in the control group were Mch+ (Mch provocative dose causing a 20% fall of forced expiratory volume in 1 s respect to baseline <2250 microg, equivalent to 11.50 micromol). In rhinitic children the PEFv did not significantly differ between Mch+ and Mch- subjects, but the total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) were higher among Mch+. The persistent form of rhinitis was significantly associated to Mch positivity. Non-asthmatic children with allergic rhinitis displayed a high prevalence of BHR. The BHR was significantly associated with persistent rhinitis and with higher total IgE levels. Nevertheless, the spontaneous changes in airway patency, as expressed by PEFv, were within normal limits both in Mch+ and Mch- children.

Adolescent↗

Clinical and therapeutic aspects of allergic asthma in adolescents.

Little is known about the management of asthma in adolescents. We aimed at evaluating these aspects, through a specific questionnaire, in the real life of adolescents with allergic asthma. The questionnaire was administered to a group of adolescents after a diagnosis of allergic asthma. The diagnosis was based on history, clinical examination, pulmonary function tests and allergy tests. One hundred and fifteen adolescents (65 males, mean age 16.5 years) fulfilled the criteria for allergic asthma. The questionnaire explored demography, family history, clinical history, previous diagnosis, therapy, attitude towards therapy and social aspects. The mean actual FEV1 was 87 +/- 10%. Methacholine challenge was carried out in 79 patients and was always positive (PD20 < 1,200 microg), whereas 36 patients underwent reversibility test. According to GINA guidelines, severity of asthma resulted intermittent in 62, mild persistent in 31, moderate in 19 and severe in three patients. In 61% of cases teachers were not aware of the disease. Asthma was managed by general practitioners, allergists and pulmonologists, but PFT/allergy tests had never been performed in 14% of patients. Forty-two per cent of the adolescents received no therapy at all, and only 15% of those with persistent asthma were receiving a stable treatment. Seventy-four per cent of adolescents preferred the inhaled, as against the oral, route. From a clinical and functional point of view, asthma in adolescents did not differ from other age ranges. Nevertheless, the management (diagnosis and therapy) emerged to be unsatisfactory from many points of view.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Noninjection routes for immunotherapy.

Allergen specific immunotherapy, together with drugs and allergen avoidance, is a cornerstone in the management of respiratory allergy. The traditional subcutaneous route is burdened with the risk of severe adverse events; therefore, safer routes of administration (noninjection or local routes) have been investigated and developed. Controlled trials failed to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and the safety of oral and bronchial administration, and these routes have been abandoned. Local nasal immunotherapy proved effective and safe in 17 of 18 controlled trials; thus it is considered a viable route of immunotherapy. Nevertheless, nasal immunotherapy is effective in rhinitis only and requires a particular administration technique; therefore its use is slowly declining. The sublingual route is supported by numerous controlled trials showing its efficacy in asthma and rhinitis in adults and children. The safety profile, assessed in clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance studies, is satisfactory; the most frequent side effects are gastrointestinal complaints, which can be easily managed by proper dose adjusting. Sublingual immunotherapy is now accepted by the World Health Organization as a valid alternative to the subcutaneous route also in children. Although the long-lasting efficacy has been recently documented for the sublingual route, several points still need to be elucidated, including mechanisms of action, optimal dosage, cost-effectiveness, and adherence.

Administration, Intranasal↗