PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Giuseppe Garigali

Publications and source records attributed to Giuseppe Garigali.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

The clinical art and science of urine microscopy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The examination of urine sediment is a diagnostic test which is frequently neglected by nephrologists. With this review the authors wanted to demonstrate that it can provide useful and relevant information in a wide spectrum of clinical situations. RECENT FINDINGS: The authors reviewed the main contributions dealing with urine sediment examination, published in international journals in the period from January 2002 to April 2003. After a section on methodological aspects, they described the importance of urine sediment examination in various diseases of the urinary tract. These included bladder B-lymphoma, systemic histoplasmosis, urate nephropathy, Fabry disease, myeloma cast nephropathy, giant cell arteritis, and lupus nephritis. The significance of 'decoy cells' in the urine as a marker of polyomavirus BK reactivation was also discussed, both in renal transplantation and other conditions such as solitary pancreas transplantation, chronic lymphatic leukaemia, and HIV infection. In the section devoted to urine sediment changes caused by drugs the authors dealt with leukocyturia induced by indinavir, and crystalluria, which can follow amoxycillin and acyclovir administration. Finally, they reported on the utility and limits of flow cytometry for the automated analysis of urine sediments. SUMMARY: The review of the recent literature on urine sediment examination shows that this test has important clinical implications in a large spectrum of diseases. Therefore, it should be more widely used by nephrologists.

BK Virus↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Urinary sediment features in proliferative and non-proliferative glomerular diseases.

BACKGROUND: The studies on urine sediment particles in patients with glomerular diseases (GD) are few and have focused only on single urine particles. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and number of 12 urine sediment particles in two groups of patients, one with proliferative GD, and the other with non-proliferative GD. METHODS: The urine sediment of 100 consecutive patients, with a renal biopsy-proven proliferative or non-proliferative GD and marked cylindruria, were examined a few hours before renal biopsy according to a standardized method. The urine particles investigated were erythrocytes, leukocytes, renal tubular cells, lipids and hyaline, hyaline-granular, granular, waxy, erythrocytic, leukocytic, epithelial and fatty casts. RESULTS: Patients with proliferative GD (n=52) had both a significantly higher prevalence of microscopic hematuria, leukocyturia, tubular epithelial cells, erythrocytic casts, epithelial casts, and significantly higher amounts of erythrocytes,leukocytes, tubular epithelial cells/20 high power field (HPF), erythrocytic and epithelial casts. On the other hand, patients with non-proliferative GD (n=48) had significantly higher numbers of fatty casts. In proliferative GD, leukocyturia was associated with intracapillary and extracapillary proliferation, crescents and fibrinoid necrosis at renal biopsy. At discriminant analysis, the two types of GD could be identified with 80.8% sensitivity and 79.2% specificity. By multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with erythrocytes, leukocytes and erythrocytic casts in the urine had an odds ratio (OR) of 9.91 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.01-97.51), 7.85 (95% CI: 2.77-22.20), and 4.33 (95% CI: 1.41-13.31), respectively, of having proliferative GD. CONCLUSIONS: Our examination of the urine sediment shows that proliferative GD and non-proliferative GD differ in many respects.

Biopsy↗