PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Giuseppe Mancia

Publications and source records attributed to Giuseppe Mancia.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Effects of heart rate changes on arterial distensibility in humans.

In rats, an increase in heart rate by pacing is accompanied by progressive large-artery stiffening. Whether this is also the case in humans is unknown. We enrolled 20 patients who were chronically implanted with a pacemaker because of atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome. Arterial distensibility was measured by an echo-tracking device. In 10 patients, the evaluation was performed on the radial artery by using continuous finger blood pressure measurements, whereas in the remaining 10 patients, the common carotid artery was studied with a semiautomatic measure of brachial artery blood pressure. Diastolic diameter, systodiastolic diameter change, and distensibility were obtained at baseline (heart rate 63+/-2 beats/min) and after atrial and ventricular sequential pacing at a heart rate of 90 and 110 beats/min. At baseline, the diameter was 7.8+/-0.3 mm in the carotid artery and 2.4+/-0.1 mm in the radial artery; the respective systodiastolic diameter change values were 375.4+/-31.0 and 55.9+/-9.0 (microm) and the distensibility values were 1.4+/-0.1 and 0.7+/-0.1 (1/mm Hg 10-3). Blood pressure and diameter were not significantly modified by increasing heart rate, which markedly modified systodiastolic diameter change and distensibility. In the radial artery, distensibility was reduced by 47% (P<0.05) at a heart rate of 90 beats/min with no further reduction at 110 beats/min. In the carotid artery, distensibility was reduced by 20% at a heart rate of 90 beats/min (P<0.05) with a further reduction at 110 beats/min (45%, P<0.05). These data provide the first evidence in humans that acute increases in heart rate markedly affect arterial distensibility and that this occurs in both large- and middle-size muscle arteries within the range of "normal" heart rate values.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2003

Impairment of thermoregulatory control of skin sympathetic nerve traffic in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Human aging is characterized by a marked increase in muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA). No information exists, however, on the effects of aging on skin sympathetic nerve traffic (SSNA) and on its reflex modulation by thermoregulatory mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 13 young, 11 middle-aged, and 12 elderly healthy subjects, we measured arterial blood pressure (Finapres), skin temperature (thermocouples), and resting MSNA and SSNA (microneurography). Measurements also included the SSNA responses to (1) an acute increase and reduction (+/-8 degrees C) in room temperature, each lasting 45 minutes and (2) an acoustic stimulus capable to trigger an emotional arousal. Although resting MSNA was progressively and significantly (P<0.05) increased from young to middle-aged and elderly groups, SSNA was significantly (P<0.05) reduced in the latter compared with the former 2 groups. Cold exposure induced a SSNA increase that was significantly (P<0.01) smaller in the elderly than in young and middle-aged subjects. Conversely, heat exposure induced a SSNA reduction that was significantly (P<0.05) smaller in elderly than in young and middle-aged subjects. Compared with SSNA in young individuals, the SSNA change from cold to warm temperature was reduced by 61% in the elderly group. This was not the case, however, for the SSNA responses to the arousal stimulus, which were superimposable in the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the first demonstration of a dichotomy in the MSNA and SSNA responses to aging. They also show that aging markedly impairs thermoregulatory control of SSNA and that this impairment might participate at the age-related SSNA decrease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Daily life blood pressure changes are steeper in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects.

Target organ damage in hypertensive patients is related to their increased average blood pressure and greater 24-hour blood pressure variability. Whether the rate of blood pressure changes is also greater in hypertension, producing a greater stress on arterial walls, is not known, however. Our study aimed at addressing this issue by computer analysis of 24-hour ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure recordings in 34 subjects (29 males), 13 normotensive subjects and 21 uncomplicated hypertensive subjects (mean age+/-SD, 40.4+/-11.8 years). The number, slope (mm Hg/s), and length (beats) of systolic blood pressure ramps of 3 or more consecutive beats characterized by a progressive increase (+) or reduction (-) in systolic blood pressure of at least 1 mm Hg per beat were computed for each hour and for the whole 24-hour period. Twenty-four-hour average systolic blood pressure was 112.9+/-2.1 and 159.4+/-5.7 mm Hg in normotensive and hypertensive subjects, respectively. Over the 24 hours, the number and length of systolic blood pressure ramps were similar in both groups, whereas the slope was markedly different (24-hour mean+/-SE slope, 4.80+/-0.30 in normotensives and 6.50+/-0.40 mm Hg/s in hypertensives, P<0.05). Ramp slope was not influenced by age or reflex pulse interval changes, but it was greater for higher ramp initial systolic blood pressure values. Thus, in daily life, hypertensive subjects are characterized by steeper blood pressure changes than normotensives, and this, regardless of the mechanisms, may have clinical implications, because it may be associated with greater traumatic effect on the vessel walls of hypertensive patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Outcomes with nifedipine GITS or Co-amilozide in hypertensive diabetics and nondiabetics in Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension (INSIGHT).

To investigate the impact of treatment on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, we assessed outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who received co-amilozide or nifedipine in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension. Participants had to be 55 to 80 years of age, with hypertension (> or =150/95 or > or =160 mm Hg) and at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. Patients received 30 mg nifedipine once daily or co-amilozide (25 mg hydrochlorothiazide and 2.5 mg amiloride) daily. Doses were doubled if target blood pressures (<140/90 mm Hg) were not achieved. Primary (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke) and secondary outcomes (composite of primary outcomes, including all-cause mortality and death from vascular and nonvascular causes) were assessed by means of intent-to-treat analyses. There was no significant difference in the incidence of primary outcomes between nifedipine-treated and co-amilozide-treated patients with diabetes at baseline (n=1302) (8.3% versus 8.4%; relative risk, 0.99, 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.42; P=1.00). A significant benefit for nifedipine-treated patients was seen for the composite secondary outcome (14.2% versus 18.7%; relative risk, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.97; P=0.03). Among patients without diabetes at baseline (n=5019), there was a significant difference in the incidence of new diabetes (nifedipine 4.3% versus co-amilozide 5.6%, P=0.023). Nifedipine GITS once daily is as effective as diuretic therapy in reducing cardiovascular complications in hypertensive diabetics. Nifedipine-treated patients were also less likely to have diabetes or have secondary events (a composite of all-cause mortality, death from a vascular cause, and death from a nonvascular cause) than co-amilozide recipients. Our results suggest that nifedipine could be considered as first-line therapy for hypertensive diabetics.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Short-versus long-term effects of different dihydropyridines on sympathetic and baroreflex function in hypertension.

Antihypertensive treatment with dihydropyridines may be accompanied by sympathetic activation. Data on whether this is common to all compounds and similar in the various phases of treatment are not univocal, however. In 28 untreated essential hypertensives (age, 56.4+/-1.8 years; mean+/-SEM) finger blood pressure (BP, Finapres), heart rate (HR, ECG), plasma norepinephrine (NE, high-performance liquid chromatography), and muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA, microneurography) were measured at rest and during baroreceptor manipulation (vasoactive drugs) in the placebo run-in period and after randomization to double-blind acute and chronic (8 weeks) felodipine (10 mg/d, n=14) or lercanidipine (10 mg/d, n=14). Acute administration of both drugs induced pronounced BP reductions and marked increases in HR, NE, and MSNA. After 8 weeks of treatment, BP reductions were similar to those observed after acute administration, whereas HR, NE, and MSNA responses were markedly attenuated (-7%, -32%, and -14%, respectively; P<0.05). There was a small residual increase in sympathetic activity in the felodipine group, whereas in the lercanidipine group, all adrenergic markers returned to baseline values. Baroreflex control of HR and MSNA was markedly impaired (-42% and -48%, respectively) after acute drug administration, with a recovery and complete resetting during chronic treatment. Thus, the sympathoexcitation induced by 2 different dihydropyridines is largely limited to the acute administration. The 2 drugs have, nevertheless, a different chronic sympathetic effect, indicating that dihydropyridines do not homogeneously affect this function. The acute sympathoexcitation, but not the small between-drugs differential chronic adrenergic effect, is accounted for by baroreflex impairment.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2003

Behaviour of the adrenergic cardiovascular drive in atrial fibrillation and cardiac arrhythmias.

AIM: Animal studies have conclusively shown that the sympathetic nervous system plays a major role not only in regulating sinus node activity but also in promoting cardiac rhythm alterations. Less univocal and often circumstantial have been the evidences collected on this issue in humans. However, the introduction of the microneurographic technique in clinical research has allowed to gain new important insights on the role of neuroadrenergic factors in the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias. METHODS: The present paper will review the results of microneurographic studies performed by our group and others in the field of cardiac rhythm disturbances by addressing three specific issues. First it will examine the relationships between heart rate and muscle sympathetic neural outflow in a variety of cardiovascular diseases characterized by sympathetic activation. This will be followed by an analysis of the behaviour of the sympathetic nerve traffic responses to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Finally, the sympathetic adjustments to spontaneously occurring or artificially induced pre-mature ventricular contractions will be highlighted.

Atrial Fibrillation↗
PubMed2003

Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension: the SHELL study results.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the effect of lacidipine and chlorthalidone on cardiovascular outcome as a primary parameter and blood pressure as a secondary in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension in a prospective study with an open design. METHODS: 1882 males and females outpatients > or = 60 years were randomly assigned to the administration of chlorthalidone 12.5 mg o.d. or lacidipine 4 mg o.d. Patients were recruited if sitting systolic blood pressure was > or = 160 mmHg with a diastolic blood pressure equal or lower than 95 mmHg. Primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. RESULTS: At randomization mean systolic blood pressure was 178.1 mmHg in the lacidipine and 178.2 mmHg in the chlorthalidone group, the corresponding mean diastolic values being 86.9 and 86.8 mmHg. In both lacidipine and chlorthalidone groups treatment caused a significant (p < 0.001) and marked systolic blood pressure reduction which was maintained throughout the treatment period with a significant (p < 0.001) and steady although less marked reduction in diastolic blood pressure as well. At the end of treatment period (median 32 months), the reduction was 36.8/8.1 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) in the chlorthalidone and 38.4/7.9 mmHg in the lacidipine group, the final on treatment blood pressures being 142.0/79.2 and 143.2/79.5 mmHg, respectively. Treatments were similarly effective in males and females and in age groups between 60 and 69 years (n = 763), 70 and 79 years (n = 744) and > or = 80 years (n = 375). Similar reductions were obtained in a subgroup of patients (n = 209) followed in double-blind fashion for 1 year. The overall incidence of the primary endpoints was 9.3% with no significant between-group difference. Total mortality was also similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, administration of lacidipine or chlorthalidone markedly reduced systolic blood pressure with no difference in the incidence of cardiovascular events and total mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Comparative effects of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and sympathetic drive in obese hypertensive individuals: results of the CROSS study.

OBJECTIVE: The increase in blood pressure that accompanies the obese state is almost invariably associated with alterations in metabolism (insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia) and the neurohumoral profile (activation of the renin-angiotensin system, sympathetic overactivity), which potentiate the cardiovascular risk associated with hypertension. However, debate remains as to the antihypertensive drug on which treatment of obesity-related hypertension should be based. The CROSS (Candesartan Role on Obesity and on Sympathetic System) study was undertaken to examine the antihypertensive, neuroadrenergic, and metabolic effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker in comparison with a diuretic in obese hypertensive individuals. METHODS: In 127 obese hypertensive individuals aged 50.7 +/- 5.1 years (mean +/- SD), we measured clinic blood pressure, heart rate, plasma glucose, and insulin at rest and during an oral glucose load before and 12 weeks after treatment with either candesartan cilexetil (8-16 mg once daily) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ, 25-50 mg once daily), administered orally in accordance with a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-parallel-groups study design. Insulin sensitivity was expressed as insulin resistance index (IRI), calculated as the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose to that for insulin. In a subgroup of patients, measurements also included direct microneurographic recording of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in the peroneal nerve. RESULTS: Candesartan cilexetil caused a significant (P < 0.01) reduction in both mean blood pressure (from 114.2 +/- 5.1 to 99.6 +/- 6.0 mmHg) and MSNA (from 51.0 +/- 12.3 to 40.4 +/- 12.5 bursts per 100 heart beats), and a significant (P < 0.02) increase in insulin sensitivity (AUC IRI: from -23.2 +/- 22.1 to -17.6 +/- 12.2). In contrast, HCTZ did not significantly affect MSNA and worsened insulin sensitivity, while achieving blood pressure reductions similar to those produced by candesartan cilexetil. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that, in obese hypertensive individuals, treatment with candesartan cilexetil has an antihypertensive effect similar to that of HCTZ. Unlike diuretic treatment, however, treatment with candesartan cilexetil improves insulin sensitivity and exerts sympathoinhibitory effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Combination of lisinopril and nifedipine GITS increases blood pressure control compared with single drugs in essential hypertensive patients.

The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of combination therapy using the angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor lisinopril and the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine GITS on the degree and homogeneity of 24-hour blood pressure reduction in essential hypertensive patients. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 51 patients (mean age, 54.4 +/- 9.4 years) with essential hypertension and clinic diastolic blood pressure between 105 and 115 mm Hg were randomized to 4-week treatment with lisinopril (20 mg), nifedipine GITS (30 mg), or their combination according to a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Trough clinic blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were measured at the end of the run-in period and after 4 weeks of treatment. In addition to clinic and 24-hour average blood pressure reduction, the trough-to-peak ratio and the smoothness index, a new measure for the homogeneity of blood pressure reduction, were also calculated. Although both lisinopril and nifedipine GITS produced a significant reduction in clinic and 24-hour average blood pressure values, the reduction obtained with the combination was significantly (P < 0.001) greater. Moreover, the combination therapy increased (P < 0.01) the smoothness index as compared with each single drug for both systolic (lisinopril, 1.02; nifedipine GITS, 1.1; combination, 1.76) and diastolic (lisinopril, 0.98; nifedipine GITS, 0.87; combination, 1.54) blood pressure values, whereas trough-to-peak ratio values (expressed as median) for systolic (lisinopril, 0.41; nifedipine GITS, 0.52; combination, 0.55) and diastolic (lisinopril, 0.35; nifedipine GITS, 0.40; combination, 0.49) blood pressure values were not significantly increased by the combination therapy. Thus, antihypertensive treatment with the combination of lisinopril and nifedipine GITS is more effective and balanced over the 24 hours than the combination components administered alone, confirming that the smoothness index is superior to the trough-to-peak ratio in assessing homogeneity of pharmacologic blood pressure reduction.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring: new developments.

Continuous blood pressure monitoring is an essential prerequisite for any study on blood pressure variability. Invasive procedures are no longer acceptable for research projects in a clinical setting, and recently developed devices able to record blood pressure on a beat-by-beat basis in a non-invasive fashion may represent valuable alternative tools. This article will briefly review the available information on the most recent advances in this field. It will focus on further developments of the original technology for finger blood pressure monitoring introduced by Penáz, as well as on newer devices that have been proposed over the last few years for non-invasive cardiovascular monitoring both in research and in clinical studies.

Blood Pressure Determination↗
PubMed2003

International Society of Hypertension (ISH): statement on the management of blood pressure in acute stroke.

The ISH statement on the management of blood pressure in acute stroke was finalized after presentation and discussion at the World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) Meeting on Stroke and Blood Pressure, held in Melbourne, Australia, 5-7 December 2002. The meeting was conducted under the auspices of the Austin Hospital Medical Research Foundation, Melbourne.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

International Society of Hypertension (ISH): statement on blood pressure lowering and stroke prevention.

The ISH Statement on blood pressure lowering and stroke prevention was finalized after presentation and discussion at the World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) Meeting on Stroke and Blood Pressure, held in Melbourne Australia, 5-7 December 2002. The meeting was conducted under the auspice of the Austin Hospital Medical Research Foundation, Melbourne.

Anticoagulants↗