PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Goran Stankovic

Publications and source records attributed to Goran Stankovic.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Intraprocedural stent thrombosis during implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST) is a rare event (<0.01% in our experience with bare metal stents), with the exception of specific settings such as acute myocardial infarction, thrombus-containing lesions, and dissections. We report the occurrence of this event during elective implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2002 and August 2003, 670 patients with 1362 lesions were treated with Cypher (Cordis, Johnson and Johnson Co) sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in San Raffaele Hospital and EMO Centro Cuore Columbus. Diabetes mellitus was present in 142 patients (21%), and 164 (24.5%) had unstable angina. Pretreatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) inhibitors was carried out in 235 patients (35%). Total stent length per vessel was 42.9+/-28.3 mm. IPST occurred in 5 patients (0.7%). None of the patients with IPST were pretreated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Using univariate exact logistic regression, only total stent length per vessel, in millimeters (exact OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.011 to 1.046; P=0.0028), was associated with the occurrence of IPST. CONCLUSIONS: Stent length was associated with the occurrence of IPST. Particular attention will need to be directed to this potential complication when long sirolimus-eluting stents are being used.

Adult↗

Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing.

Late lumen loss after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) is mainly determined by arterial remodeling. We hypothesized that stent implantation after optimal lesion debulking could be an effective approach to reduce restenosis. A total of 753 patients with de novo or restenotic coronary lesions were prospectively randomized to DCA plus stenting (n = 381) or stenting alone (n = 372). The patients were followed for 12 months. Procedural success was achieved in 91.5% versus 97.3% (p = 0.0007) of patients treated with DCA plus stent versus stent alone. Optimal atherectomy (<20% residual stenosis) was achieved in 26.5% of patients. The final minimal luminal diameter and the acute gain were similar in the 2 groups. There was no increase in 30-day major adverse cardiac events in the DCA plus stent group (3.9% vs 2.4%, p = 0.30). The primary end point, angiographic restenosis at 8 months, occurred in 26.7% of patients treated with DCA plus stents and in 22.1% of patients treated with stents alone (p = 0.237). Clinical follow-up to 1 year showed no difference in mortality (1.3% vs 0.8%, p = 0.725), acute myocardial infarction (4.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.706), and target vessel failure (composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) (23.9% vs 21.5%, p = 0.487) between patients with DCA plus stents and those with stents alone. This study failed to support the hypothesis that DCA before stenting lowers the angiographic restenosis rate compared with stents alone. At 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in rates of death, reinfarction, or target vessel failure.

Adult↗

Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: immediate and mid-term results.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated clinical outcome after multivessel stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in unselected lesions. BACKGROUND: Safety and effectiveness of multivessel SES implantation is currently unknown. METHODS: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction [MI], and repeat revascularization) were analyzed at 30 days and at 6 months after multivessel SES implantation. RESULTS: In 155 consecutive patients, 573 SES were implanted in 3.3 +/- 1.3 lesions per patient. At 30 days, the cumulative MACE rate was 10.3%: 7.1% patients developed a non-Q-wave MI, 1.9% developed a Q-wave MI, 0.6% died for non-cardiac reasons, and 0.6% had a repeat revascularization. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all 112 eligible patients treated for 359 lesions at a mean time of 6.5 +/- 2.2 months. The cumulative MACE rate was 22.3%: 3 (2.7%) deaths (1 for cardiac reasons), 4 (3.6%) MIs, target lesion revascularization (TLR) in 16 (14.3%) patients with 24 (6.7%) lesions. Target vessel revascularization was required in 18 (16.1%) patients due to TLR of lesions treated with SES or to disease progression (1.8% of patients). Cox regression analysis revealed total stent length per patient as the most powerful independent predictor of MACE. Overall stent thrombosis occurred in three (1.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel SES implantation can be safely performed on patients with complex coronary artery disease. The need for revascularization increases because of the cumulative effect of TLR on patients with multiple lesions.

Aged↗

Comparison of diamond-like carbon-coated stents versus uncoated stainless steel stents in coronary artery disease.

Stainless steel (SS) and carbon-coated (CC) stents were randomly compared in 347 patients (520 lesions). No differences were observed in in-hospital major adverse cardiac events: 2.8% in the CC group and 4.5% in the SS group (p = 0.286). The 6-month follow-up showed similar rates of binary restenosis (31.8% in the CC group vs 35.9% in the SS group; p = 0.448) and of cumulative major adverse cardiac events (30.5% in the CC group vs 32.7% in the SS group; p = 0.675). In unselected patients and lesions, carbon coating does not provide significant improvements over SS stents with the same design.

Carbon↗

Incidence, predictors, in-hospital, and late outcomes of coronary artery perforations.

We sought to determine the incidence of coronary perforations, predisposing factors, and in-hospital and late outcome of patients with coronary perforations. Perforations occurred in 0.84% of treated lesions and more frequently in patients with complex lesions after atheroablative procedures and who underwent intravascular ultrasound guided lumen optimization. The incidence of adverse events, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting and death significantly decreased over time.

Causality↗

Effectiveness of treatment of in-stent restenosis with an 8-French compatible atherectomy catheter.

The study reports the results of directional atherectomy with an 8Fr guiding catheter-compatible atherectomy catheter in a series of 31 in-stent restenotic lesions. This preliminary experience indicates a favorable safety profile, with events limited to non-Q-wave myocardial infarction occurring in 3.6% of patients. The secondary end point regarding the incidence of angiographic restenosis at 6 months showed a high restenosis rate (65%).

Aged↗

Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: the Randomized Evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in Saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of lesions located in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is associated with increased procedural risk and a high rate of restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, multicenter trial to evaluate the usefulness of a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent compared with a bare stainless steel (SS) stent for prevention of restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing SVG treatment. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months. Secondary end points were 30-day and 6-month MACE rates, defined as the cumulative of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization. Between September 1999 and January 2002, 301 patients with SVG lesions were randomized to either the PTFE-covered JoStent coronary stent graft (PTFE group, n=156) or the SS JoFlex stent (control group, n=145). Angiographic and procedural success rates were similar between the 2 groups (97.4% versus 97.9% and 87.3% versus 93.8%, respectively). The incidence of 30-day MACE was higher in the PTFE group (10.9% versus 4.1%, P=0.047) and was mainly attributed to MI (10.3% versus 3.4%, P=0.037). The primary end point, the restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up, was similar between the 2 groups (24.2% versus 24.8%, P=0.237). Although the 6-month non-Q-wave MI rate was higher in the PTFE group (12.8% versus 4.1%, P=0.013), the cumulative MACE rate was not different (23.1% versus 15.9%, P=0.153). CONCLUSIONS: The study did not demonstrate a difference in restenosis rate and 6-month clinical outcome between the PTFE-covered stent and the SS stent for treatment of SVG lesions. However, a higher incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarctions was found in patients treated with the PTFE-covered stent.

Adult↗

Preliminary observations regarding angiographic pattern of restenosis after rapamycin-eluting stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Restenosis after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) is a rare phenomenon, occurring more frequently peri-stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the pattern of restenosis occurring after implantation of DES in unselected lesions. From April 15 to December 6, 2002, we treated 368 patients with 735 lesions by using 841 rapamycin-eluting stents (Cypher, Cordis, a Johnson & Johnson Company). Mean baseline lesion length was 17.48+/-12.19 mm, and mean stent length was 27.59+/-14.02 mm. Follow-up ischemia-driven angiography was performed in 24 patients. Eleven patients had angiographic restenosis (> or =50% diameter stenosis) in 14 stented segments (stent and 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent). The pattern of restenosis in all 14 stented segments was focal, and in 6 of them it was multifocal, occurring inside the stents. Mean length of restenotic lesions was 5.62+/-1.90 mm, with a range from 2.54 to 8.44 mm. One multifocal restenosis involved also the distal stent margin. Intravascular ultrasound evaluation at follow-up, performed in 2 patients, showed significant lumen obstruction attributable to in-stent hyperplasia in both cases. Individual cases can be viewed in the Data Supplement. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of restenotic lesions after rapamycin-eluting stent implantation was focal and mostly inside the stent.

Aged↗

A new dedicated stent and delivery system for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: preliminary experience.

We report the first clinical experience in eight patients with a new stent and delivery system specifically designed for the treatment of bifurcational lesions. The device (AST SLK-View system) consists of a premounted stent and a delivery system. The stent has a side aperture, which orients toward the ostium of the side branch. The system allows deployment of the stent while the access to both main and side branches is maintained by two wires. We evaluated this system in nine bifurcations. The location of bifurcations was left descending artery/diagonal branch in four lesions, left circumflex/obtuse marginal branch in three lesions, and postero-lateral branch/posterior descending artery in two lesions. Predilation was performed in six lesions of the main branches and in five lesions of the side branches. The stent was effectively delivered to all bifurcations except for one, in which the target lesion was located at a distal segment and the device could not be delivered. Following stent implantation in the main branch, two lesions at the side branches were treated by stent, while the other lesions were treated by balloon angioplasty without difficulty. Final kissing balloon was performed in four bifurcation lesions. No adverse event was observed during 1 month of clinical follow-up. Treatment of bifurcation lesions with this new dedicated device appears to be feasible. This new device may introduce a new approach for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.

Aged↗

Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions: immediate results and 30-day outcome.

We report a new stenting technique employed in 20 consecutive patients to treat true bifurcation lesions using the Cypher stent (Cordis, Warren, NJ). Both stents are advanced at the site of the bifurcation. The proximal marker of the side-branch stent must be situated in the main branch at a distance of 4-5 mm proximal to the carina of the bifurcation and the main branch stent must cover the bifurcation as well as the protruding segment of the side-branch stent. The side-branch stent is deployed first and balloon and wire are removed. The stent deployed in the main branch completely covers and crushes the protruding segment of the side branch stent against the vessel wall of the main branch. Following main- and side-branch predilatation, stents were successfully deployed in all lesions. Final kissing balloon inflation was performed in seven patients. Two patients had in-hospital myocardial infarction and one patient underwent in-hospital re-PTCA due to a dissection distal to a stent. No other major adverse cardiac events were observed in-hospital and during 1-month clinical follow-up. Treatment of bifurcation lesions using crushing stent technique is feasible with acceptable rate of procedural complications. Angiographic follow-up is necessary to prove the advantage of this specific technique to give complete coverage of the ostium of the side branch with a drug-eluting stent.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Initial experience with a new 8 French-compatible directional atherectomy catheter: immediate and mid-term results.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new Fox Hollow atherectomy device (FHT) designed for more efficient and easier plaque removal. The FHT has short rigid section and low-profile cutter mounted on a monorail catheter. The FHT catheter was utilized in 77 patients with 98 lesions. Mean reference vessel diameter was 2.75 +/- 0.51 mm. Successful atherectomy with tissue retrieval was performed in 94 lesions (96%). Following atherectomy, mean diameter stenosis was reduced from 71.1% to 31.9% and further to 10.4% following adjunctive treatment. Angiographic complications were one coronary perforation and one adventitial staining, both successfully treated with prolong balloon inflation and stent implantation. Nine patients (11.7%) had in-hospital non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). One patient died (1.3%) for noncardiac reasons and one had MI (1.3%) at 6-month follow-up. Target lesion revascularization was required in 13 (13.8%) lesions and target vessel revascularization in 15 (20.3%) patients. There was target vessel failure in 17 (23.0%) patients. Plaque debulking with the FHT catheter can be performed safely and effectively in relatively small vessels and complex lesions located in mid-distal artery segments with 6-month clinical outcome similar to prior atherectomy devices.

Aged↗

Aortic root and extensive coronary dissections complicating recanalization of chronic right coronary artery occlusion: refraining from stenting may have a favorable outcome!

Aortic root dissection is a rare, potentially life-threatening complication of revascularization procedures. We report a case of recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery. A huge coronary dissection with a false lumen was created using commercially available guidewires during attempts to establish a connection with the distal true vessel lumen. In addition, an aortic root dissection from the right coronary cusp occurred. The patient was asymptomatic and a decision was made to refrain from stent deployment in order not to close communications between the false, true lumen and branches. The hospital stay was uneventful and the patient was discharged on conservative management. Control angiography at 3 months revealed patency of the right coronary artery with complete healing of the aortic wall dissection and improved clinical status of the patient.

Aortic Dissection↗

Insulin-treated diabetes mellitus and predictors of mid-term clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions with stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type II, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus have a high risk of death and repeat revascularization following successful percutaneous coronary interventions. The predictors of outcome in such patients after coronary stenting have not been clarified. METHODS: We studied 133 consecutive patients with type II, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who underwent coronary stenting from November 1992 to May 2001. The clinical outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; that is death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) at follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: Out of 133 patients, 102 (76%) had multivessel (> or = 2 vessels) disease. Eight patients (6.0%) had in-hospital MACE. Clinical follow-up data at 19.5 months (range 6.1-100 months) were available for 121 (91%) patients. The MACE rate was 40.5%; 22 patients (18%) died, 17 (14%) of a cardiac death; 7 (5.8%) patients had a myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization was performed in 35 (28.9%) patients. At univariate analysis, hypertension (odds ratio-OR 5.5; confidence interval-CI 2.5-12.3; p < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (OR 3.7; CI 1.7-8.2; p = 0.001), a prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 6.6; CI 2.9-15.4; p < 0.001), a prior myocardial infarction (OR 3.1; CI 1.5-6.7; p = 0.003) and the stent length (> or = 15 mm) (OR 2.7; CI 1.5-4.3; p = 0.008) were related to MACE. At multivariate analysis, hypertension (OR 4.1; CI 1.7-9.9; p = 0.002), a prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 4.8; CI 1.9-12; p = 0.001) and the stent length (OR 3.0; CI 1.3-7.4; p = 0.01) remained as independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus continue to face a high mortality and incidence of adverse events after stenting. The occurrence of events was related to a history including hypertension, percutaneous coronary interventions and to the stent length.

Aged↗

Mechanism of late in-stent restenosis after implantation of a paclitaxel derivate-eluting polymer stent system in humans.

BACKGROUND: We recently reported delayed angiographic restenosis in 15 patients who received 7-hexanoyltaxol (QP2)-eluting polymer stents (QuaDS) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. This study presents the histological findings of atherectomy specimens from a subset of these patients receiving implants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October and December 2001, 5 patients treated with QuaDS-QP2 stents underwent directional coronary atherectomy at 11.2+/-1.0 months for recurrent in-stent restenosis. Restenotic lesion composition was assessed with special stains, immunohistochemistry with quantitative image analysis, and, in one specimen, transmission electron microscopy. Atherectomy specimens contained fibrin interspersed in a smooth muscle cell-rich neointima with proteoglycan matrix. In 2 of 5 specimens, large aggregates of macrophages and T-lymphocytes were noted. These areas of active inflammation demonstrated a relatively high proliferation index by Ki-67 antibody staining, whereas the proliferation index in smooth muscle cell-rich restenotic areas was low. CONCLUSION: Restenotic lesions from QuaDS-QP2-eluting stents at 12 months show persistent fibrin deposition with varying degrees of inflammation. These pathological changes, representing delayed healing, are usually observed up to only 3 months in human coronary arteries with stainless steel balloon-expandable stents. The nonreabsorbable polymer alone may have induced chronic inflammation.

Aged↗

Selection of coronary stents.

In clinical practice, the operator must decide which stent is most appropriate for the patient. This article focuses on the features of stent design that make a specific stent more or less suitable for a particular type of lesion or anatomy: the "average" coronary lesion, the lesion situated on a curve, the ostial lesion, the bifurcational lesion, the lesion located at the left main stem, the calcified lesion, the chronic total occlusion, the small vessel, the saphenous vein graft, acute or threatened vessel closure, and special situations such as coronary aneurysms and perforations.

Coronary Disease↗

In-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries: impact of strut thickness.

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES; We sought to evaluate whether strut thickness may impact the restenosis rate after stent implantation in small coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: Small vessel size (<3.0 mm) is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. It has been reported that vessel damage induced during stent deployment is an important factor in restenosis. METHODS: From our database, we selected all patients who had successful stenting in small native vessels, with angiographic follow-up available, between March 1996 and April 2001. The strut was defined as thin when <0.10 mm and thick when > or = 0.10 mm. According to these criteria, we identified two subgroups: a thin group and a thick group. RESULTS: A total of 821 (57%) of the 1,447 patients had angiographic follow-up available and were included in the analysis. The thin group included 400 patients with 505 lesions. The thick group included 421 patients with 436 lesions. The restenosis rate was 28.5% in the thin group and 36.6% in the thick group (p = 0.009; odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.90). The study group was classified into three subgroups according to the reference vessel diameter: < or = 2.50 mm, 2.51 to 2.75 mm and 2.76 to 2.99 mm. Strut thickness influenced the restenosis rate only in the subgroup with a reference vessel diameter between 2.76 and 2.99 mm, with rates of 23.5% in the thin group and 37% in the thick group (p = 0.006). By logistic regression analysis, predictors of restenosis were stent length (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04; p = 0.001), strut thickness (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.29; p = 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.68; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that strut thickness is an independent predictor of restenosis in coronary arteries with a reference diameter of 2.75 to 2.99 mm.

Aged↗