PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gordon C Baylis

Publications and source records attributed to Gordon C Baylis.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The effect of ipsilesional cues on line-bisection errors: the importance of predictive value.

Patients with unilateral neglect were tested on a line-bisection task in which vertical lines were added to the ipsilesional or contralesional end. During some blocks, these vertical lines accurately predicted the horizontal length of the line, while on other blocks the vertical lines had little predictive value. We found that much of the improvement for ipsilesional vertical bars can be explained by their ability to predict the extent of the horizontal line. These results suggest that the predictive value of a ipsilesional cue is responsible for the reduction in line-bisection errors noted by Halligan and Marshall [Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 13]. This effect of the predictive ipsilesional cue may work in combination with the expanded attentional effects posited by the ipsilesional contraction model that they proposed.

Aged↗

Visual extinction with double simultaneous stimulation: what is simultaneous?

Patients with unilateral lesions to the parietal lobe leading to extinction were tested with stimuli presented in both hemifields. In addition to simultaneous presentation of two stimuli, trials were given with the contralesional or ipsilesional side having an onset slightly before the other. In the first experiment, subjects were asked to identify the stimuli. In agreement with di Pellegrino et al. [Neuropsychologia 35(1997)1215], all patients showed maximal extinction when the stimuli were physically simultaneous. In the second experiment, the same patients were requested to report whether the left or right item had been presented first. In accordance with Rorden et al. [Neuropsychologia 35(1997)421], all three patients required the contralesional item to have a significant lead in order to in order to be judged as occurring first. Taken together, these findings appear to present a paradoxical picture of extinction: the first task implies that items compete maximally when they are physically simultaneous, while the second study suggests that the physical simultaneity is not phenomenally special to the patients. Attempts to reconcile these findings with popular models of extinction are discussed.

Aged↗