PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Grace Lu-Yao

Publications and source records attributed to Grace Lu-Yao.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

A Prospective Validation of the Decipher Genomic Classifier in Men With Early Localized Prostate Cancer: The VANDAAM Study.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of genomic precision oncology has advanced personalized care for some patients with prostate cancer (PCa), while threatening to widen existing disparities due to the historically low recruitment of African American men (AAM), who have the highest disease burden. Here, we report the first prospective validation of a genomic classifier (GC) to predict rapid-onset biochemical recurrence (BCR) in AAM. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2021, this multicenter prospective validation study recruited 243 patients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa who received treatment for their disease. Patients were recruited on a 1:1 basis (AAM:White) and matched by CAPRA score. Patients who elected active surveillance were ineligible for participation. Decipher GC testing was ordered for all patients using their biopsy and/or radical prostatectomy (RP) tumor tissue. The primary outcome was to determine whether the GC could predict 2-year BCR rates-used as a surrogate for disease aggressiveness-following standard treatment. The secondary outcome evaluated the concordance between biopsy- and RP-derived GC risk scores for treatment recommendations. RESULTS: The final analytical cohort included 226 matched patients with genomic information, and 207 evaluable cases (104 AAM, 103 White) with both genomic and complete clinical outcome data. Overall, a high genomic-risk GC score was associated with a 5.25-fold increase in the odds of rapid-onset 2-year BCR compared with the low-risk group (odds ratio, 5.25 [95% CI, 1.27-21.66]; P=.021). In a subset of the surgical cohort (n=74), biopsy- and RP-derived GC scores exhibited a 77% concordance rate, defined as no reclassification in GC risk-based categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first prospective validation of GC performance in predicting early 2-year BCR in both AAM and White men. The findings provide strong evidence supporting the integration of the GC into clinical practice guidelines to improve risk stratification and management of AAM with early-stage PCa. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT02723734.

Aged↗
PubMed2007

Population based study of hormonal therapy and survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Although the palliative benefits of hormonal therapy for metastatic prostate cancer are widely recognized, little information is available regarding the effect of hormonal therapy on cancer specific and overall survival, and the types of patients who might benefit the most or least from hormonal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate cancer specific and overall survival according to hormonal therapy use was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method in 6,098 men 65 years or older diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer in 1991 to 1999 who were identified through the population based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, and Medicare linked database. Cox proportional hazards and propensity score methods were used to adjust for potential confounders, such as disease status and patient comorbidity. RESULTS: Propensity score adjusted median overall survival was 26 months in men who received hormonal therapy compared with 13 months in those who did not (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.17-0.70, p <0.0001). The benefit of hormonal therapy was observed across all comorbidity strata and races. Effects were most evident in patients with poorly differentiated cancer (cancer specific mortality in favor of treatment HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.69, p <0.001). Benefit was not found in patients with well differentiated cancer (cancer specific mortality in favor of no treatment HR 1.92, 95% CI 0.90-4.10, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal therapy is associated with improved prostate cancer specific and overall survival in men with poorly differentiated cancer. Improved survival does not appear evident in men with well differentiated disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Use of hormonal therapy in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Bilateral orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists represent the standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer. In this population based study we assessed the use rates of these therapies in men who died of prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 9,110 men 65 years or older who died of prostate cancer in 1991 to 2000 were identified through the population based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, and Medicare linked database to determine hormonal therapy use rates. A modified Poisson regression model was used to estimate the adjusted effects of various factors associated with hormone use. RESULTS: Approximately 38% of black and 25% of white men did not receive hormonal therapy before dying of prostate cancer. After adjusting for cancer status at diagnosis and other potential confounding factors black race and residence in low income areas were associated with lower hormonal therapy use (relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.80 and 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98, respectively). Hormonal therapy use was most comprehensive in the Northeast. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of men who die as a consequence of prostate cancer never receive hormonal therapy. The use of hormonal therapy varies significantly. Further studies are warranted to determine factors that may be associated with the incomplete use of hormonal therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Changing patterns in competing causes of death in men with prostate cancer: a population based study.

PURPOSE: We examined trends in hospitalization and death in men with prostate cancer to determine whether outcomes have changed with time in men diagnosed and treated for this disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population based cohort study of 180973 patients with prostate cancer in the 1979 to 1996 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry and 450448 admissions in the 1987 to 1996 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database were analyzed. ORs derived from logistic regression were used to assess time trends in mortality and hospitalization. Multinominal logistic regression was used to obtain the adjusted proportions of deaths due to various causes in different years. RESULTS: In men with prostate cancer the risk of death from cancer was 39.7% (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.66), which was lower in 1995 to 1996 than in 1979 to 1980. Decreases in prostate cancer death were greater than those in cardiovascular disorders (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.92) and evident even in men with nonlocalized disease. Overall nonprostate cancer causes of mortality increased (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.52 to 1.79) and ultimately exceeded that due to prostate cancer. By 1995 to 1996 the proportion of prostate cancer deaths was similar to that of cardiovascular disorders (27.7% and 26.6%, respectively) and substantially less than that of all other sources combined (45.7%). Similar effects were observed for prostate cancer (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.42) and nonprostate cancer (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 2.36 to 2.68) hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: In men with prostate cancer decreases in prostate cancer hospitalization and mortality have been greater than those in competing diseases with time. Most deaths in patients with prostate cancer, including those with nonlocalized disease, are now due to nonprostate cancer causes.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Prostate-specific antigen screening in elderly men.

Although the efficacy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer has not been established, it is widely used. However, despite the overall controversy regarding PSA screening, there has been general agreement that elderly men (i.e., those aged 75 years or older) should not be screened. By using a nationally representative sample of 7889 men who participated in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey, we found that the rate of PSA screening among men aged 75 or older was 32.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 28.8% to 36.1%), which was greater than that of fecal occult blood screening among men of the same age (22.8%, 95% CI = 19.2% to 26.4%) and was comparable with that of annual Pap smear screening among women aged 75 years or older (29.0%, 95% CI = 26.6% to 31.3%). Among screened elderly men, 88.4% (95% CI = 82.3% to 92.6%) reported that their doctor first suggested screening and 66.5% (95% CI = 59.7% to 73.3%) reported that the risks and benefits of screening were discussed before screening. We conclude that strategies are needed to increase understanding of the risks and benefits of PSA screening among elderly men.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the more intensive screening and treatment for prostate cancer in the Seattle-Puget Sound area in 1987-90 led to lower mortality from prostate cancer than in Connecticut. DESIGN: Natural experiment comparing two fixed cohorts from 1987 to 1997. SETTING: Seattle-Puget Sound and Connecticut surveillance, epidemiology, and end results areas. PARTICIPANTS: Population based cohorts of male Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-79 drawn from the Seattle (n=94 900) and Connecticut (n=120 621) areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of screening for prostate cancer, treatment with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy, and prostate cancer specific mortality. RESULTS: The prostate specific antigen testing rate in Seattle was 5.39 (95% confidence interval 4.76 to 6.11) times that of Connecticut, and the prostate biopsy rate was 2.20 (1.81 to 2.68) times that of Connecticut during 1987-90. The 10 year cumulative incidences of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy up to 1996 were 2.7% and 3.9% for Seattle cohort members compared with 0.5% and 3.1% for Connecticut cohort members. The adjusted rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality up to 1997 was 1.03 (0.95 to 1.11) in Seattle compared with Connecticut. CONCLUSION: More intensive screening for prostate cancer and treatment with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy among Medicare beneficiaries in the Seattle area than in the Connecticut area was not associated with lower prostate cancer specific mortality over 11 years of follow up.

Aged↗