PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Graeme J Sills

Publications and source records attributed to Graeme J Sills.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a search for risk factors.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the commonest cause of seizure-related mortality in people with refractory epilepsy. Of the 6140 patients registered with the Epilepsy Unit at the Western Infirmary in Glasgow between 1982 and 2005, 529 had died, 62 (11.7%) of whom succumbed to SUDEP. All but 2 deaths occurred at home; 3 were witnessed. Two living controls were matched with each SUDEP case for year of birth, gender, and syndromic classification. Mean duration of epilepsy was significantly longer in cases compared with controls (P=0.001). More people succumbing to SUDEP had had a seizure within the previous year (P=0.007). There were no significant associations between SUDEP and a history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, drug polytherapy, and current use of carbamazepine. There is an urgent need for a large-scale, prospective, international, community-based study of SUDEP to explore more closely the risk factors to plan preventive strategies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The mechanisms of action of gabapentin and pregabalin.

Gabapentin and pregabalin are structurally related compounds with recognized efficacy in the treatment of both epilepsy and neuropathic pain. The pharmacological mechanisms by which these agents exert their clinical effects have, until recently, remained unclear. The interaction of gabapentin and pregabalin with conventional antiepileptic and analgesic drug targets is likely to be modest, at best, and has been largely dismissed in favour of a selective inhibitory effect on voltage-gated calcium channels containing the alpha2delta-1 subunit. This mechanism is consistently observed in both rodent- and human-based experimental paradigms and may be sufficiently robust to account for much of the clinical activity of these compounds.

Amines↗
PubMed2005

Lack of association between the C3435T polymorphism in the human multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene and response to antiepileptic drug treatment.

PURPOSE: P-glycoprotein (P-gp) has been implicated in the causation of refractory epilepsy. The expression and efflux efficiency of P-gp is influenced by a polymorphism (C3435T) in the encoding gene (MDR1). Recent evidence suggests that the homozygous C-variant, which is associated with higher expression and increased activity of P-gp, is more common in patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. We have investigated the prevalence of this polymorphism in a series of patients attending a specialist epilepsy clinic. METHODS: DNA samples were obtained from 400 patients, irrespective of seizure type or drug treatment. Genotype of the C3435T polymorphism was determined by traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by restriction digest. Classification of response to treatment was determined in a blinded fashion by an independent physician. Results were expressed as genotype and allele frequencies per response group and compared by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 170 patients were classified as responders, with > or =12 months seizure freedom on current treatment. The remaining 230 patients were classified as nonresponders. Comparison of responders and nonresponders revealed no significant difference in allele frequency (C vs. T; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.37; p = 0.83) or genotype frequency (CC vs TT; odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.60-1.91; p = 0.81). Subanalyses of individual seizure types were similarly unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to corroborate a previously reported association between the C3435T polymorphism in the human MDR1 gene and pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Whether the C3435T polymorphism can act as a marker for the natural history of treated epilepsy remains to be determined.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacodynamic interaction studies with topiramate in the pentylenetetrazol and maximal electroshock seizure models.

There is emerging evidence to support the efficacy of some antiepileptic drug (AED) combinations in refractory epilepsy. Definitive clinical studies are, however, difficult to perform. Experimental seizure models can be employed to identify potentially useful combinations for subsequent clinical evaluation. We have investigated the anticonvulsant effects of topiramate (TPM) in combination with 13 other AEDs in the pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) and maximal electroshock (MES) seizure models. Single drugs and combinations were administered by intraperitoneal injection and anticonvulsant effects determined at 1-hour post-dosing. TPM was without significant effect in the PTZ test. In contrast, phenobarbital, primidone, ethosuximide, sodium valproate, felbamate and tiagabine all increased the latency to the first generalised seizure. Combinations of TPM and active adjunctive drug were universally effective. Combinations of TPM with clobazam, lamotrigine and levetiracetam were also anticonvulsant, despite the inactivity of the constituent compounds when administered alone. TPM reduced the incidence of MES-induced seizures in a dose-dependent manner, as did phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, carbamazepine, sodium valproate, clobazam, lamotrigine, felbamate and tiagabine. All combination treatments were similarly effective. These findings suggest that combinations of TPM with lamotrigine and levetiracetam may demonstrate anticonvulsant synergism and merit further investigation in additional model systems and with recourse to more quantitative mathematical analysis.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2003

Differential expression of multidrug resistance genes in naïve rat brain.

The multidrug resistance (mdr1) gene family encodes the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) which contributes to the functionality of the blood-brain barrier. We have characterised the regional expression of mdr1 genes in nai;ve rat brain. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6) were sacrificed and their brains rapidly removed. Seven distinct anatomical regions were isolated by microdissection and the expression of mdr1a and mdr1b determined by quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. The mdr1a isoform was expressed in all brain regions investigated, while mdr1b was expressed to a quantifiable degree in hippocampus alone. These findings reveal a differential expression of mdr1 genes in normal rodent brain tissue and suggest that P-gp may afford a broader protection of the hippocampus than other brain structures.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2003

Vigabatrin, but not gabapentin or topiramate, produces concentration-related effects on enzymes and intermediates of the GABA shunt in rat brain and retina.

PURPOSE: The antiepileptic drug (AED) vigabatrin (VGB), which exerts its pharmacologic effects on the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system, causes concentric visual field constriction in >40% of exposed adults. This may be a class effect of all agents with GABA-related mechanisms of action. We compared the concentration-related effects of VGB in rat brain and eye with those of gabapentin (GBP) and topiramate (TPM), both of which have been reported to elevate brain GABA concentrations in humans. METHODS: Adult male rats (n = 10) were administered 0.9% saline (control), VGB (250, 500, 1,000 mg/kg), GBP (50, 100, 200 mg/kg), or TPM (12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg/kg). At 2 h after dosing, animals were killed, a blood sample obtained, the brain dissected into eight distinct regions, and the retina and vitreous humor isolated from each eye. Samples were analyzed for several GABA-related neurochemical parameters, and serum and tissue drug concentrations determined. RESULTS: VGB treatment produced a significant (p < 0.05) dose-related increase in GABA concentrations and decrease in GABA-transaminase activity in all tissues investigated. This effect was most pronounced in the retina, where VGB concentrations were 18.5-fold higher than those in brain. In contrast, GBP and TPM were without effect on any of the neurochemical parameters investigated and did not accumulate appreciably in the retina. CONCLUSIONS: These findings corroborate a previously reported accumulation of VGB in the retina, which may be responsible for the visual field constriction observed clinically. This phenomenon does not appear to extend to other GABAergic drugs, suggesting that these agents might not cause visual field defects.

4-Aminobutyrate Transaminase↗
PubMed2003

Pre-clinical studies with the GABAergic compounds vigabatrin and tiagabine.

In the last decade, nine new antiepileptic drugs have reached the global marketplace. These new agents can be categorised according to their principal mechanisms of action. Vigabatrin and tiagabine are the only new compounds with selective effects on inhibitory neurotransmission. The principal inhibitory neurotransmitter in mammalian brain is gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Both vigabatrin and tiagabine exert their pharmacological effects by reducing the inactivation of GABA. Vigabatrin attenuates the metabolism of GABA by inhibiting the enzyme GABA-transaminase, whereas tiagabine blocks the uptake of GABA from the synaptic cleft by an action on the GAT-1 transporter. These mechanistic differences are borne out in a range of experimental seizure models in which vigabatrin and tiagabine have very different anticonvulsant profiles. Pre-clinical neurotoxicity and pharmacokinetic profiles also differ. Long-term vigabatrin treatment is associated with intramyelinic oedema in white matter tracts of several brain regions and further studies have revealed an accumulation of vigabatrin in the retina. In contrast, it seems that tiagabine does not precipitate any significant neurotoxicity and does not appear to accumulate in the retina. The results of these pre-clinical investigations suggest that vigabatrin and tiagabine are pharmacologically distinct compounds with different anticonvulsant, neurotoxicity and pharmacokinetic profiles. It is possible that they will ultimately prove to have different clinical efficacies and spectra of activity.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Differential effects of remacemide and desglycinyl-remacemide on epileptiform burst firing in the rat hippocampal slice.

Remacemide is a potential anticonvulsant drug with an active metabolite, desglycinyl-remacemide (DGR). Both moieties have been reported to block neuronal Na(+) channels and the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptor. The effects of remacemide and DGR on zero Mg(2+)/4-aminopyridine-induced epileptiform discharges were investigated in the rat hippocampal slice preparation and compared with carbamazepine (CBZ), a prototypic Na(+) channel blocker, and AR-R15896AR, a putative NMDA channel blocker. Remacemide (0-100 microM) was without significant effect, while DGR, CBZ and AR-R15896AR all decreased burst frequency in a concentration (0-100 microM) dependent manner. These findings suggest that remacemide is not sufficiently potent at the Na(+) channel or NMDA receptor to attenuate epileptiform activity in this model and that the anticonvulsant effects of the drug may be mediated by DGR.

4-Aminopyridine↗
PubMed2002

Na(+) channel effects of remacemide and desglycinyl-remacemide in rat cortical synaptosomes.

The effects of the novel anticonvulsant, remacemide hydrochloride and its active metabolite, desglycinyl-remacemide, on veratridine-induced Na(+) influx in rat cortical synaptosomes were investigated and compared to established Na(+) channel blocking antiepileptic drugs. Remacemide and desglycinyl-remacemide reduced veratridine-stimulated Na(+) influx to 30.7% (IC(50)=160.6 microM) and 13.2% (IC(50)=85.1 microM) of control, respectively. Carbamazepine, phenytoin and lamotrigine similarly reduced Na(+) influx to 20.1% (IC(50)=325.9 microM), 79.8% and 27.9% (IC(50)=23.0 microM) of control, respectively. Resting internal Na(+) concentrations were significantly increased by desglycinyl-remacemide (1 and 10 microM) and, conversely, decreased by desglycinyl-remacemide and carbamazepine (both 1000 microM). These studies support previous electrophysiological investigations, which suggest that remacemide and desglycinyl-remacemide exert their antiepileptic effects, at least in part, by an inhibitory action on voltage-gated Na(+) channels. Desglycinyl-remacemide may have an additional action on Na(+) homeostasis that merits further exploration.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

Influence of cytochrome P450 induction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remacemide hydrochloride.

Remacemide hydrochloride (RMD) is a putative anticonvulsant agent with an active metabolite, desglycinyl-remacemide (DGR) and a broad spectrum of activity in experimental seizure models. In clinical trials, however, the efficacy of RMD is questionable. In the case of add-on studies, the inconclusive findings may be related to pharmacokinetic interactions between RMD and established antiepileptic drugs. We have investigated the influence of cytochrome P450 (CYP(450)) induction following repeated treatment with phenobarbital (PB) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RMD in mice. Pre-treatment with PB (80 mg/kg; once daily for 4 days) significantly increased CYP(450) content and activity in mouse liver. This was associated with a consistent reduction in the brain concentrations of both RMD and DGR and attenuation of the anticonvulsant effects of RMD in the maximal electroshock model. Pharmacokinetic analysis suggested that DGR was proportionately more susceptible to CYP(450) induction than the parent compound. As the principal active moiety, the selectively enhanced metabolism of DGR under induced conditions may underlie the debatable findings of add-on trials with RMD in refractory epilepsy. However, this hypothesis does not explain the similarly questionable efficacy of RMD monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy, an observation that may have wider pharmacological implications.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

Regional expression of multidrug resistance genes in genetically epilepsy-prone rat brain after a single audiogenic seizure.

PURPOSE: The multidrug resistance (mdr) gene family encodes the drug transport macromolecule P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which contributes to the functionality of the blood-brain barrier. Recent evidence suggests that P-gp-mediated drug extrusion may play a facilitatory role in refractory epilepsy. We investigated the regional expression of mdr genes in genetically epilepsy-prone rat (GEPR) brain after a single audiogenic seizure. METHODS: Three groups of adult male GEPRs (n = 5/group) were exposed to a seizure-inducing audiogenic stimulus and killed at 4 h, 24 h, and 7 days thereafter. A further group (n = 5) served as a stimulus-naïve control. Expression of mdr1a and mdr1b in distinct anatomic brain regions (cortex, midbrain, pons/medulla, hippocampus) was determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the presence of competitive internal standards. RESULTS: When compared with control, mdr1a expression in cortex and midbrain was significantly (p < 0.05) increased at 24 h after a single audiogenic seizure. Cortical mdr1a expression remained elevated at 7 days after stimulus. In contrast, mdr1a expression in pons/medulla and hippocampus was unchanged. The mdr1b isoform was quantifiable in hippocampus alone and not influenced by seizure activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that acute seizures in the GEPR can induce the expression of mdr genes. The pattern of increased expression appears to follow the anatomic pathway of audiogenic seizures in these animals, with initiation in the midbrain and propagation to the cortex. Further studies are required to investigate the effects of recurrent seizure activity and to characterise mdr expression in other experimental seizure models.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B↗
PubMed2002

Topiramate in patients with learning disability and refractory epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Management of seizures in learning disabled people is challenging. This prospective study explored the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive topiramate (TPM) in patients with learning disability and refractory epilepsy attending a single centre. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (36 men, 28 women, aged 16-65 years) were begun on adjunctive TPM after a 3-month prospective baseline on unchanged medication. Efficacy end points were reached when a consistent response was achieved over a 6-month period at optimal TPM dosing. These were seizure freedom or > or =50% seizure reduction (responder). Appetite, behaviour, alertness, and sleep were assessed by caregivers throughout the study. RESULTS: Sixteen (25%) patients became seizure free with adjunctive TPM. There were 29 (45%) responders. A further 10 (16%) patients experiencing a more modest improvement in seizure control continued on treatment at the behest of their family and/or caregivers. TPM was discontinued in the remaining nine (14%) patients, mainly because of side effects. Final TPM doses and plasma concentrations varied widely among the efficacy outcome groups. Many patients responding well to adjunctive TPM did so on < or =200 mg daily. Mean carer scores did not worsen with TPM therapy. CONCLUSIONS: TPM was effective as add-on therapy in learning-disabled people with difficult-to-control epilepsy. Seizure freedom is a realistic goal in this population.

Adolescent↗