Biomedical subjects

Graeme Milligan

Publications and source records attributed to Graeme Milligan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Functional interactions between the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are compromised by de-palmitoylation of the G protein but not of the receptor.

Both the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are targets for post-translational thio-acylation that is regulated by agonist occupancy of the receptor [P.A. Stevens, J. Pediani, J.J. Carrillo, G. Milligan, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 35883]. In co-expression studies mutation of the sites of thio-acylation in the G protein or treatment of cell membranes with hydroxylamine greatly reduced agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. In alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins mutation of thio-acylation sites in receptor or G protein did not alter the binding affinity of the antagonist [3H]prazosin or the agonist phenylephrine. Although the potency of phenylephrine to stimulate binding of [35S]GTPgammaS to alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins was unaffected by the thio-acylation potential of either element, the maximal effect was reduced by some 50% when the G protein but not the receptor was mutated to prevent thio-acylation. This reflected lack of thio-acylation of the G protein rather than mutation of Cys9 and Cys10 to Ser because treatment with hydroxylamine mimicked this in fusions containing the wild type G protein but was without effect in those mutated to prevent thio-acylation. Mutation to reduce binding of beta/gamma to Galpha11 markedly reduced phenylephrine stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Combination of mutations to prevent thio-acylation and beta/gamma binding did not, however, have an additive effect on [35S]GTPgammaS binding. These results indicate that the thio-acylation status of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor does not regulate G protein activation whereas thio-acylation of Galpha11 plays a key role in activation by the receptor beyond providing membrane association and proximity.

Acylation↗

PubMed2005

Interactions between the Mas-related receptors MrgD and MrgE alter signalling and trafficking of MrgD.

When expressed via an inducible promoter in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, the rat Mas-related gene D (rMrgD) receptor responded to beta-alanine but not L-alanine by elevating intracellular [Ca(2+)], stimulating phosphorylation of the mitogenactivated protein kinases known as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1 and ERK2 and translocating from the plasma membrane to punctate intracellular vesicles. By contrast, the related rat Mas-related gene E (rMrgE) receptor did not respond to beta-alanine. Coexpression of rMrgD with rMrgE, which occurs in peripheral nociceptive neurons, allowed coimmunoprecipitation of the two receptors and resulted in the detection of cell surface rMrgD-rMrgE heterodimers via timeresolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer. These interactions increased the potency of beta-alanine to phosphorylate ERK1 and ERK2 as well as maintaining the capacity of beta-alanine to elevate intracellular [Ca(2+)], which was reduced in magnitude and slowed in response with increasing times of expression of rMrgD in isolation. Associated with these effects, the presence of rMrgE restricted beta-alanine-induced internalization of rMrgD. This is the first report of heterodimeric interactions between members of the Mas-related gene (Mrg) receptor family and indicates that interactions between rMrgD and rMrgE modulate the function of rMrgD. Because the Mrg receptors are potential therapeutic targets in pain, these results suggest that efforts to understand the function and regulation of individual Mrg family receptors may require coexpression of relevant pairs.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Techniques: promiscuous Galpha proteins in basic research and drug discovery.

Assay technologies that measure the activation of heterotrimeric (alphabetagamma) G proteins by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are well established within the pharmaceutical industry, either for pharmacological characterization or for the identification of natural or surrogate receptor ligands. Despite recent evidence indicating that GPCR-linked signalling events might not be mediated exclusively by G proteins, G-protein activation remains a common benchmark for assessing GPCR family members. Thus, assay systems that translate ligand-mediated modulation of GPCRs into G-protein-dependent intracellular responses still represent key components of both basic research and the drug discovery process. In this article, the current knowledge and recent progress of integrating Galpha subunits into assay systems for GPCR drug discovery will be reviewed. Emphasis is given to novel promiscuous and chimeric Galpha proteins. Because of their ability to interact with a wide range of GPCRs, such novel G proteins are likely to be incorporated rapidly into drug discovery programmes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

A key serine for the GTPase-activating protein function of regulator of G protein signaling proteins is not a general target for 14-3-3 interactions.

Mammalian regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are highly conserved within the RGS domain. Of amino acids that are universal, a serine residue at the C terminus of this domain has been described as the binding site in RGS7 for 14-3-3 proteins. However, studies with the related RGS3 indicate that the site of interaction is not within the RGS domain. We confirm that the interaction of RGS3 with 14-3-3tau and 14-3-3zeta requires Ser264 and not the RGS domain and show both that mutation of the conserved RGS domain serine, Ser496 in RGS3, to either alanine or aspartate does not prevent binding of 14-3-3 proteins and that 14-3-3 proteins do not inhibit GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). However, mutation of Ser496 does directly impair the action of RGS3 as a GAP against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). We mutated the equivalent serine residue in the family B/R4 RGS proteins RGS1 and RGS16. Using two distinct assay formats, conversion to aspartate virtually abolished GAP activity, whereas conversion to alanine decreased potency 20-fold. Neither alteration modulated interactions with 14-3-3tau or 14-3-3zeta, but the 14-3-3 proteins did not modulate the GAP activity of the wild-type or mutant RGS proteins. Although interactions between 14-3-3 proteins and many RGS proteins can be observed, this does not involve this conserved serine and does not inherently modify GAP function.

14-3-3 Proteins↗

PubMed2005

Functional complementation and the analysis of opioid receptor homodimerization.

Complementation of function after coexpression of pairs of nonfunctional G protein-coupled receptors that contain distinct inactivating mutations supports the hypothesis that such receptors exist as dimers. Chimeras between members of the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family have been particularly useful because the N-terminal ligand binding and heptahelical transmembrane elements can be considered distinct domains. To examine the utility of a related approach for opioid receptors, fusion proteins were generated in which a pertussis toxin-resistant (Cys351Ile) variant of the G protein Gi1alpha was linked to the C-terminal tails of the delta opioid peptide (DOP), kappa opioid peptide, and mu opioid peptide receptors. Each was functional as measured by agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-([gamma-35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in Gialpha immunoprecipitates from membranes of pertussis toxin-treated HEK293 cells. Agonist function was eliminated either by fusion of the receptors to Gi1alphaGly202Ala,Cys351Ile or mutation of a pair of conserved Val residues in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor. Coexpression, but not simple mixing, of the two inactive fusion proteins reconstituted agonist-loading of [35S]GTPgammaS for each receptor. At equimolar amounts, reconstitution of DOP receptor function was more extensive than kappa or mu opioid receptor. Reconstitution of DOP function required two intact receptors and was not achieved by provision of extra Gi1alphaCys351Ile membrane anchored by linkage to DOP transmembrane domain 1. Inactive forms of all G protein alpha subunits can be produced by mutations equivalent to Gi1alphaGly202Ala. Because the amino acids modified in the opioid receptors are highly conserved in most rhodopsin-like receptors, this approach should be widely applicable to study the existence and molecular basis of receptor dimerization.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2005

The CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors form constitutive homo- and heterodimers selectively and with equal apparent affinities.

Both homo- and heterodimeric interactions between the CXCR1 and CXCR2 chemokine receptors were observed following co-expression of forms of these receptors in HEK293 cells using assays, including co-immunoprecipitation, single cell imaging of fluorescence resonance energy transfer, cell surface time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. These interactions were constitutive and unaffected by the presence of the agonist interleukin 8 and selective as no significant interactions were noted between either the CXCR1 or CXCR2 receptor and the alpha(1A)-adrenoreceptor. Saturation bioluminescence resonance energy transfer indicated that heteromeric interactions between CXCR1 and CXCR2 were of similar affinity as the corresponding homomeric interactions. A novel endoplasmic reticulum trapping strategy demonstrated that these interactions were initiated during protein synthesis and maturation and prior to cell surface delivery. These studies indicated that CXCR1-CXCR2 heterodimers are as likely to form in cells co-expressing these two chemokine receptors as the corresponding homodimers and stand in contrast to previous studies indicating an inability of the CXCR1 receptor to homodimerize or to interact with the CXCR2 receptor (Trettel, F., Di Bartolomeo, S., Lauro, C., Catalano, M., Ciotti, M. T., and Limatola, C. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 40980-40988).

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2005

The sustainability of interactions between the orexin-1 receptor and beta-arrestin-2 is defined by a single C-terminal cluster of hydroxy amino acids and modulates the kinetics of ERK MAPK regulation.

The orexin-1 receptor interacts with beta-arrestin-2 in an agonist-dependent manner. In HEK-293T cells, these two proteins became co-internalized into acidic endosomes. Truncations from the C-terminal tail did not prevent agonist-induced internalization of the orexin-1 receptor or alter the pathway of internalization, although such mutants failed to interact with beta-arrestin-2 in a sustained manner or produce its co-internalization. Mutation of a cluster of three threonine and one serine residue at the extreme C-terminus of the receptor greatly reduced interaction and abolished co-internalization of beta-arrestin-2-GFP (green fluorescent protein). Despite the weak interactions of this C-terminally mutated form of the receptor with beta-arrestin-2, studies in wild-type and beta-arrestin-deficient mouse embryo fibroblasts confirmed that agonist-induced internalization of this mutant required expression of a beta-arrestin. Although without effect on agonist-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca2+ levels, the C-terminally mutated form of the orexin-1 receptor was unable to sustain phosphorylation of the MAPKs (mitogen-activated protein kinases) ERK1 and ERK2 (extracellular-signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2) to the same extent as the wild-type receptor. These studies indicate that a single cluster of hydroxy amino acids within the C-terminal seven amino acids of the orexin-1 receptor determine the sustainability of interaction with beta-arrestin-2, and indicate an important role of beta-arrestin scaffolding in defining the kinetics of orexin-1 receptor-mediated ERK MAPK activation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Analysis of endogenous S1P and LPA receptor expression in CHO-K1 cells.

The CHO-K1 cell line is commonly used for studies of recombinantly expressed proteins, including proteins of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. This laboratory has used CHO-K1 cells for the functional characterization of Edg family GPCRs. However, parental CHO-K1 cells respond to lysophospholipids in in-vitro functional assays, which suggests expression of endogenous Edg family GPCRs. To determine the repertoire of Edg family receptor expression in this cell line, alignments of human and rodent sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor sequences were used to design semi-redundant oligonucleotide pairs. A portion of each receptor gene coding sequence was amplified from Chinese hamster genomic DNA and the resultant gene fragments sequenced. Species-specific oligonucleotide pairs were designed using this novel sequence information and used to detect expression of S1P(1,2,4) and LPA(1) transcripts in CHO-K1 cells by RT-PCR.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

G-protein-coupled receptor Mas is a physiological antagonist of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

BACKGROUND: We previously identified the G-protein-coupled receptor Mas, encoded by the Mas proto-oncogene, as an endogenous receptor for the heptapeptide angiotensin-(1-7); however, the receptor is also suggested to be involved in actions of angiotensin II. We therefore tested whether this could be mediated indirectly through an interaction with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, AT1. METHODS AND RESULTS: In transfected mammalian cells, Mas was not activated by angiotensin II; however, AT1 receptor-mediated, angiotensin II-induced production of inositol phosphates and mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ was diminished by 50% after coexpression of Mas, despite a concomitant increase in angiotensin II binding capacity. Mas and the AT1 receptor formed a constitutive hetero-oligomeric complex that was unaffected by the presence of agonists or antagonists of the 2 receptors. In vivo, Mas acts as an antagonist of the AT1 receptor; mice lacking the Mas gene show enhanced angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction in mesenteric microvessels. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that Mas can hetero-oligomerize with the AT1 receptor and by so doing inhibit the actions of angiotensin II. This is a novel demonstration that a G-protein-coupled receptor acts as a physiological antagonist of a previously characterized receptor. Consequently, the AT1-Mas complex could be of great importance as a target for pharmacological intervention in cardiovascular diseases.

Angiotensin II↗

PubMed2005

Beta-arrestin 2-dependent angiotensin II type 1A receptor-mediated pathway of chemotaxis.

Chemotaxis is a cellular response that directs cell migration toward a chemical gradient and is fundamental to a variety of cellular processes. The receptors for most known chemokines belong to the seven transmembrane-spanning superfamily and signal through members of the G(alphai) family. Beta-arrestins, in addition to regulating desensitization, have emerged as potential mediators of G-protein-independent signaling pathways and have been implicated in several chemotactic pathways. Here, we report a system wherein chemotaxis is stimulated in a beta-arrestin 2-dependent and apparently G-protein-independent manner. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells with stable expression of the angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor type 1A (AT(1A)R) undergo chemotaxis in response to Ang II. An Ang II peptide analog S(1)I(4)I(8) Ang II that is unable to activate G-protein-mediated responses induces chemotaxis in these cells that is unaffected by pertussis toxin-mediated suppression of G(alphai). Suppression of beta-arrestin 2 expression using small interfering RNA (siRNA) essentially eliminated AT(1A)R-mediated chemotaxis induced by either Ang II or the S(1)I(4)I(8) Ang II peptide but had no effect on epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced chemotaxis. It also abolished chemotaxis induced by lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which was completely sensitive to pertussis toxin. In contrast, reduction of G(alphaq/11) through siRNA and inhibition of protein kinase C, extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2, or phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase did not diminish AT(1A)R-mediated chemotaxis. Inhibiting p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase decreased AT(1A)R-mediated chemotaxis and eliminated EGF-mediated chemotaxis, suggesting that p38 plays a role in chemotaxis that is not specific to the AT(1A)R in this system. These data suggest that beta-arrestin 2 can mediate chemotaxis through mechanisms which may be G-protein-independent (Ang II receptors) or -dependent (LPA receptors).

Arrestins↗

PubMed2005

Activation of an alpha2A-adrenoceptor-Galphao1 fusion protein dynamically regulates the palmitoylation status of the G protein but not of the receptor.

Post-translational thio-acylation of a fusion protein between the alpha2A-adrenoceptor and the alpha subunit of the G protein G(o1) is both dynamic and regulated by agonist binding. Incorporation of [3H]palmitate into the fusion protein was reduced substantially in the presence of the agonist adrenaline. This was dependent on the concentration of adrenaline and correlated with occupancy of the ligand binding site. Both the receptor and G-protein elements of the fusion construct incorporated [3H]palmitate but this occurred more rapidly for the G-protein element and regulation of acylation by the agonist occurred only for the G protein. The kinetics of de-palmitoylation of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor-Galpha(o1) fusion were accelerated markedly by agonist. Again, this reflected modulation of the G protein but not of the receptor. Agonist-induced regulation of the kinetics of thio-acylation of the G protein was abolished, however, in a mutant unable to bind guanosine 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTP[S]) in response to adrenaline. Despite the dynamic nature of the post-translational acylation and its regulation by agonist, the ability of adrenaline to activate the G protein, monitored by stimulation of the binding of [35S]GTP[S] to such fusion constructs, was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either the receptor or G-protein element.

Acylation↗

PubMed2005

Dominant portion of thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor is excluded from lipid domains. Detergent-resistant and detergent-sensitive pools of TRH receptor and Gqalpha/G11alpha protein.

Some G protein-coupled receptors might be spacially targetted to discrete domains within the plasma membrane. Here we assessed the localization in membrane domains of the epitope-tagged, fluorescent version of thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor (VSV-TRH-R-GFP) expressed in HEK293 cells. Our comparison of three different methods of cell fractionation (detergent extraction, alkaline treatment/sonication and mechanical homogenization) indicated that the dominant portion of plasma membrane pool of the receptor was totally solubilized by Triton X-100 and its distribution was similar to that of transmembrane plasma membrane proteins (glycosylated and non-glycosylated forms of CD147, MHCI, CD29, CD44, transmembrane form of CD58, Tapa1 and Na,K-ATPase). As expected, caveolin and GPI-bound proteins CD55, CD59 and GPI-bound form of CD58 were preferentially localized in detergent-resistant membrane domains (DRMs). Trimeric G proteins G(q)alpha/G(11)alpha, G(i)alpha1/G(i)alpha2, G(s)alphaL/G(s)alphaS and Gbeta were distributed almost equally between detergent-resistant and detergent-solubilized pools. In contrast, VSV-TRH-R-GFP, Galpha, Gbeta and caveolin were localized massively only in low-density membrane fragments of plasma membranes, which were generated by alkaline treatment/sonication or by mechanical homogenization of cells. These data indicate that VSV-TRH-R-GFP as well as other transmembrane markers of plasma membranes are excluded from TX-100-resistant, caveolin-enriched membrane domains. Trimeric G protein G(q)alpha/G(11)alpha occurs in both DRMs and in the bulk of plasma membranes, which is totally solubilized by TX-100.

Caveolin 1↗

PubMed2005

Methods to monitor the quaternary structure of G protein-coupled receptors.

A wide range of approaches has been applied to examine the quaternary structure of G protein-coupled receptors, the basis of such protein-protein interactions and how such interactions might modulate the pharmacology and function of these receptors. These include co-immunoprecipitation, various adaptations of resonance energy transfer techniques, functional complementation studies and the analysis of ligand-binding data. Each of the available techniques has limitations that restrict interpretation of the data. However, taken together, they provide a coherent body of evidence indicating that many, if not all, G protein-coupled receptors exist and function as dimer/oligomers. Herein we assess the widely applied techniques and discuss the relative benefits and limitations of these approaches.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

The specificity and molecular basis of alpha1-adrenoceptor and CXCR chemokine receptor dimerization.

It is now well established that rhodopsin-like, family-A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist within homo- and heterodimeric/oligomeric complexes. However, limited information is currently available on the molecular basis of these interactions or their selectivity. Using the alpha1-adrenoceptor family as a model, this has been examined using assays including coimmunoprecipitation, saturation bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and bimolecular fluorescence complementation. We demonstrate key roles for transmembrane helices I and IV in homodimeric/oligomeric interactions of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and suggest that other interactions indicate that this GPCR can exist as a higher-order oligomeric complex. Literature reports on heterodimerization between chemokine receptor family members and the effects or otherwise of agonist ligands are complex. It was recently indicated that although the CXCR2 receptor is able to homodimerize, this is not the case for the closely related CXCR1 receptor and that these two GPCRs do not heterodimerize. We have reinvestigated these issues using combinations of coimmunoprecipitation, saturation BRET, and a novel endoplasmic reticulum-trapping strategy. Unlike the previous report, we demonstrate that CXCR1 is able to both homodimerize and heterodimerize with the CXCR2 receptor and that the relative affinity of these interactions suggests that with coexpression of these two GPCRs a random mixture of homo- and heterodimers will be present.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Opioid receptors and their interacting proteins.

The opioid receptors are among the most highly studied members of the family of G protein-coupled receptors. As for many other members of this family, recent studies have indicated that they do not exist in isolation but are able to interact with a substantial range of other polypeptides. Such interactions can alter the effectiveness of agonist-mediated cell signalling, determine the signals generated, alter the intracellular trafficking routes of the receptors and potentially determine cellular localization by providing a scaffold to link the receptors to the cytoskeletal network. Although virtually all studies on these interactions to date have employed expression into simple heterologous cell lines, the availability of knock-out mouse lines and the capacity to knock-down levels of opioid receptor-interacting proteins using techniques such as siRNA suggest that information on the functional consequences of such protein-protein interactions in a physiological setting will soon be forthcoming.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Beta-arrestin-dependent spontaneous alpha1a-adrenoceptor endocytosis causes intracellular transportation of alpha-blockers via recycling compartments.

The antagonist ligand BODIPY-FL-prazosin (QAPB) fluoresces when bound to bovine alpha(1a)-adrenoceptors (ARs). Data indicate that the receptor-ligand complex is spontaneously internalized by beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis. Internalization of the ligand did not occur in beta-arrestin-deficient cells; was blocked or reversed by another alpha(1) ligand, phentolamine, indicating it to reflect binding to the orthosteric recognition site; and was prevented by blocking clathrin-mediated endocytosis. The ligand showed rapid, diffuse, low-intensity, surface binding, superseded by punctate intracellular binding that developed to equilibrium in 50 to 60 min and was reversible on ligand removal, indicating a dynamic equilibrium. In cells expressing a human alpha(1a)-AR-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) 2 fusion protein, BODIPY-R-558/568-prazosin (RQAPB) colocalized with the fusion, indicating that the ligand gained access to all compartments containing the receptor, and, conversely, that the receptor has affinity for the ligand at all of these sites. The distribution of QAPB binding sites was similar for receptors with or without EGFP2, validating the fusion protein as an indicator of receptor location. The ligand partially colocalized with beta-arrestin in recycling and late endosomes, indicating receptor transit without destruction. Organelles containing receptors showed considerable movement consistent with a transportation function. This was absent in beta-arrestin-deficient cells, indicating that both constitutive receptor internalization and subsequent intracellular transportation are beta-arrestin-dependent. Calculations of relative receptor number indicate that at steady state, less than 30% of receptors reside on the cell surface and that recycling is rapid. We conclude that alpha(1a)-ARs recycle rapidly by an agonist-independent, constitutive, beta-arrestin-dependent process and that this can transport "alpha-blockers" into cells carrying these receptors.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

A highly conserved glycine within linker I and the extreme C terminus of G protein alpha subunits interact cooperatively in switching G protein-coupled receptor-to-effector specificity.

Numerous studies have attested to the importance of the extreme C terminus of G protein alpha subunits in determining their selectivity of receptor recognition. We have previously reported that a highly conserved glycine residue within linker I is important for constraining the fidelity of receptor recognition by Galpha(q) proteins. Herein, we explored whether both modules (linker I and extreme C terminus) interact cooperatively in switching G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-to-effector specificity and created as models mutant Galpha(q) proteins in which glycine was replaced with various amino acids and the C-terminal five Galpha(q) residues with the corresponding Galpha(i) or Galpha(s) sequence. Coupling properties of the mutated Galpha(q) proteins were determined after coexpression with a panel of 13 G(i)-and G(s) -selective receptors and compared with those of Galpha proteins modified in only one module. Galpha proteins modified in both modules are significantly more efficacious in channeling non-G(q) -selective receptors to G(q)-mediated signaling events compare with those containing each module alone. Additive effects of both modules were observed even if individual modules lacked an effect on GPCR-to-effector specificity. Dually modified Galpha proteins were also superior in conferring high-affinity agonist sites onto a coexpressed GPCR in the absence, but not in the presence, of guanine nucleotides. Together, our data suggest that receptor-G protein coupling selectivity involves cooperative interactions between the extreme C terminus and linker I of Galpha proteins and that distinct determinants of selectivity exist for individual receptors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

beta-Arrestin 1 and Galphaq/11 coordinately activate RhoA and stress fiber formation following receptor stimulation.

beta-Arrestins were initially shown, in conjunction with G protein-coupled receptor kinases, to be involved in the desensitization and internalization of activated seven-transmembrane receptors. Recently, beta-arrestin 2 has been shown to act as a signal mediator in mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades and to play a positive regulatory role in chemotaxis. We now show that beta-arrestin 1 is required to activate the small GTPase RhoA leading to the re-organization of stress fibers following the activation of the angiotensin II type 1A receptor. This angiotensin II type 1A receptor-directed RhoA activation and stress fiber formation also require the activation of the heterotrimeric G protein G(alphaq/11). Whereas neither beta-arrestin 1 nor G(alphaq/11) activation alone is sufficient to robustly activate RhoA, the concurrent recruitment of beta-arrestin 1 and activation of G(alphaq/11) leads to full activation of RhoA and to the subsequent formation of stress fibers.

Actins↗