PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Grant J Anhalt

Publications and source records attributed to Grant J Anhalt.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Adalimumab therapy for recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a patient with treatment-refractory pyoderma gangrenosum and the outcome of a novel therapeutic approach. METHODS: Case report and review of the literature. RESULTS: A patient with inflammatory bowel disease developed severe pyoderma gangrenosum while receiving treatment with the chimeric anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab. Despite subsequent trials of numerous immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory medications, the dermatologic disease progressed. The patient's ulcers finally resolved when treatment with adalimumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody specific for TNF-alpha, was initiated. CONCLUSIONS: We report a novel application of the TNF-alpha inhibitor, adalimumab, in the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum.

Journal Article↗

Lichenoid paraneoplastic pemphigus in the absence of detectable antibodies.

Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) has been described as an antibody-mediated mucocutaneous disease occurring almost exclusively in patients with lymphocytic neoplasms. We describe 4 patients with the clinical features of the lichenoid variant of PNP in the absence of detectable autoantibodies. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that the spectrum of PNP likely includes patients with disease predominantly or exclusively mediated by cytotoxic T cells rather than autoantibodies. The pathophysiology and range of PNP disease are likely more complex than was initially believed.

Aged↗

Role of electron microscopy in the diagnosis of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of electron microscopy (EM) for the diagnosis of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) among patients with cicatrizing conjunctivitis. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients with cicatrizing conjunctivitis referred for the evaluation of possible ocular MMP between January 1985 and February 2002 who underwent conjunctival biopsy and evaluation with EM and direct immunofluorescent (DIF) techniques. METHODS: The diagnosis of each patient was based on DIF techniques. The reproducibility of EM readings was measured by assessing intraobserver and interobserver variability. The diagnosis from EM was compared to the DIF diagnosis from the same patient to evaluate the validity of the EM diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EM for diagnosing ocular MMP. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six of 128 conjunctival biopsies were available for evaluation of EM findings. The percent agreement between 2 readings from the same observer was 92%, and the percent agreement between 2 independent observers was 78%. The sensitivity and specificity of EM for the diagnosis of ocular MMP were 51% and 72%, respectively. The positive predictive value of EM for the diagnosis of ocular MMP was 49%. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of EM findings was good as indicated by high percent agreement for both intraobserver and interobserver measurements. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of EM for the diagnosis of ocular MMP was low. It seems that EM has limited usefulness in the diagnosis of ocular MMP.

Adolescent↗

Mucous membrane pemphigoid of the vulva.

BACKGROUND: Mucous membrane pemphigoid is a rare autoimmune blistering disease primarily affecting mucosal surfaces. Blistering and scarring may occur in the eyes, mouth, esophagus, larynx, and on the vulva. Scarring can result in severe structural changes to the vulva that may mimic the findings of other inflammatory dermatologic disorders of the vulva, including lichen sclerosus and lichen planus. CASE: A 58-year-old woman presented with vulvar erosions, esophagitis, and laryngeal blisters. The clinical picture and the histopathology of a vulvar biopsy were suggestive of erosive lichen planus. Direct immunofluorescence, however, revealed findings diagnostic of mucous membrane pemphigoid. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the importance of examining extragenital mucosal surfaces of any woman presenting with vulvar lesions. In addition, it demonstrates the importance of vulvar biopsy and the usefulness of direct immunofluorescence to differentiate between conditions with similar clinical and histopathologic changes.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Mucosal dominant pemphigus vulgaris with anti-desmoplakin autoantibodies.

BACKGROUND: Anti-desmoplakin (DP) antibodies are present in paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) as a component of a complex humoral autoimmune reaction characterized by antibodies against proteins of the plakin family, desmogleins, and an unidentified 170 kd protein. Anti-DP antibodies have also been rarely identified in other blistering diseases. The significance of anti-DP antibodies in the pathogenesis of bullous diseases is unclear. OBSERVATION: We studied 3 patients with severe and chronic mucosal dominant pemphigus vulgaris (PV). In addition to anti-desmoglein 3 antibodies, these patients had anti-DP autoantibodies, demonstrable by immunofluorescence (IF), immunoprecipitation (IP), and indirect immunoelectromicroscopy (IIEM). This finding suggested these patients may have had PNP and not PV. However, antibodies against periplakin, envoplakin, bullous pemphigoid antigen 1 (BPAG 1), plectin, and 170 kd PNP antigen could not be detected using IP and immunoblotting. Extensive and repeated investigations for an underlying neoplasm throughout the follow-up period were consistently negative for all patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that anti-DP antibodies without the presence of any other anti-plakin antibodies are not specific for PNP, and are present in some cases of PV. Cellular disadhesion induced by anti-desmoglein antibodies can trigger an epitope-spreading phenomenon with a secondary formation of autoantibodies against desmoplakins, intracellular desmosomal antigens. The role of anti-DP antibodies in the pathogenesis of these PV patients is still unclear. The presence of anti-DP antibodies will produce a false positive serologic interpretation for the diagnosis of PNP especially if one uses only indirect IF on murine bladder, the most commonly employed screening test to identify PNP. More specific immunologic tests are required in this subset of patients with PV.

Autoantibodies↗

Mucous membrane pemphigoid and pseudopemphigoid.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and pseudopemphigoid. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty consecutive patients referred for the evaluation of possible ocular MMP from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 2001. METHODS: Information on patients presenting for evaluation of possible MMP was entered prospectively into a database, which was supplemented by a retrospective chart review. Mucous membrane pemphigoid was diagnosed in patients with a compatible clinical picture by the linear deposition of antibodies to the basement membrane zone (BMZ) on direct immunofluorescent analysis of a mucous membrane biopsy specimen or by the presence of circulating autoantibodies to epithelial BMZ. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and clinical characteristics of MMP and pseudopemphigoid; risk of ocular MMP among patients presenting with extraocular MMP without ocular disease. RESULTS: Among patients with ocular MMP, extraocular disease was common (82.4% of patients). The risk of ocular involvement among patients with MMP seen without ocular disease was approximately 5% per year over the first 5 years of follow-up (cumulative risk at 5 years, 22%). Although immunohistologic confirmation of the diagnosis was obtained in all patients, the initial conjunctival biopsy was positive for MMP in 80% of the patients diagnosed with ocular MMP. The most frequent presumed causes of pseudopemphigoid were topical glaucoma medications (28.3%), rosacea blepharoconjunctivitis (20.0%), atopic keratoconjunctivitis (8.3%), and conjunctival lichen planus (8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ocular MMP typically have other systemic manifestations of MMP. Patients who are initially seen with extraocular MMP without ocular involvement are at risk for ocular disease developing. The clinical characteristics of ocular MMP and pseudopemphigoid are similar; therefore, immunohistologic evaluation of biopsied tissue is needed to confirm the diagnosis of MMP.

Adolescent↗

Neoplasms associated with paraneoplastic pemphigus: a review with emphasis on non-hematologic malignancy and oral mucosal manifestations.

The review included 163 cases of paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) reported between 1990 and 2003, including a new unique case of PNP associated with occult breast cancer and an ovarian cyst of borderline malignancy. Hematologic-related neoplasms or disorders were associated with 84% of the cases, with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (38.6%) as the most frequent, followed by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (18.4%) and Castleman's disease (18.4%). The non-hematologic neoplasms comprised 16% of all cases: epithelial origin-carcinoma (8.6%), mesenchymal origin-sarcoma (6.2%), and malignant melanoma (0.6%). Carcinoma cases comprised 58% of the non-hematologic neoplasms. Carcinoma cases (n = 14) consisted of adenocarcinoma (n = 7), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 2), multiple skin tumors probably basal cell carcinoma (n = 1), and bronchogenic carcinoma (n = 1). Of the 10 (6.2%) sarcoma cases, there was one case each of leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, malignant nerve sheath tumor, poorly differentiated sarcoma, reticulum cell sarcoma, dendritic cell sarcoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. The oral mucosa was involved in all of cases. Isolated oral ulcerations were the first sign in 45% of the cases. Diffuse and persistent oral ulcerations with a progressive course could be a sign of malignancy, either recognized or occult. In the absence of a clear diagnosis, malignancy should be suspected and extensive work-up performed. The full spectrum of signs of PNP may not be present initially. Repeated biopsies, direct and indirect immunofluorescence as well as screening indirect immunofluorescence on murine bladder are required for diagnosis. Clinicians should be highly suspicious when signs and symptoms suggestive of PNP are present in cancer patients, of hematologic and non-hematologic origin.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Drug-induced, Ro/SSA-positive cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical and immunopathologic findings of drug-induced, Ro/SSA-positive cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). DESIGN: Retrospective medical and laboratory record review. SETTING: Immunodermatology Division of Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Md). PATIENTS: Of 120 patients found to have anti-Ro/SSA antibodies by hemagglutination and/or double immunodiffusion, 70 had clinical and immunopathologic confirmation of CLE. Fifteen of these 70 patients had a history of new drug exposure, defined as less than 6 months, associated with disease development. RESULTS: The disease-associated drugs included hydrochlorothiazide (5 patients), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (3 patients), calcium channel blockers (3 patients), interferons (2 patients), and statins (2 patients). The most common presentations were photodistributed diffuse erythema and subacute CLE-type lesions without evidence of significant systemic disease. All specimens revealed interface dermatitis and fine granular IgG deposition along the basement membrane zone and throughout the epidermis. Most patients experienced improvement or resolution of clinical lesions within 8 weeks and decrease of Ro/SSA titers within 8 months after discontinuation of drug treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive drugs are the most commonly associated with Ro-positive CLE. Clinical and immunopathologic features of this drug-induced variant do not seem to differ from the idiopathic disease. In most cases, the disease improves or resolves on discontinuation of the offending drug treatment. It is not known if these drugs precipitate disease in patients who have subclinical disease. Drug-induced Ro/SSA-positive CLE should be included on the differential diagnosis in patients presenting with photosensitive or subacute CLE-type eruptions.

Adult↗

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus with mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil is increasingly being used as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in immunosuppressive regimens. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effectiveness of mycophenolate as adjuvant therapy in the treatment of both pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. DESIGN: Historical prospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: The study included 42 consecutive patients with pemphigus (31 with pemphigus vulgaris and 11 with pemphigus foliaceus) who had relapses during prednisone taper or had clinically significant adverse effects from previous drug therapy. RESULTS: Remission was achieved in 22 (71%) and 5 (45%) of patients with pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus, respectively. Partial remission was achieved in 1 (3%) and 4 (36%), respectively. The median time to achieve complete remission was 9 months (range, 1-13 months). The treatment was administered for a median of 22 months, and the median follow-up period was 22 months. Seventy-seven percent of patients had no adverse effect. Two patients had side effects severe enough to necessitate discontinuation of treatment, one because of symptomatic but reversible neutropenia and the other because of nausea. CONCLUSION: Mycophenolate is an effective and safe adjuvant in the treatment of both pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

Adolescent↗

Lichen planus and cicatrizing conjunctivitis: characterization of five cases.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical and immunopathologic features and the response to therapy in a series of six patients with cicatrizing conjunctivitis due to lichen planus. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: All six patients were seen in an ocular pemphigoid clinic. Clinical, immunopathologic, and serologic features were evaluated and therapeutic response in each patient was monitored. RESULTS: All six patients had evidence of conjunctival scarring. Five patients had lichen planus of the oral mucosa and gingiva; one patient had involvement of the skin. Histologic findings consisted of thickened epithelium and an interface lymphocytic infiltrate along the lamina propria. In three patients, electron microscopy of the conjunctiva revealed thickening, fragmentation, and duplication of the basement membrane zone. Direct immunofluorescence examination of the conjunctiva and oral mucosa demonstrated linear and shaggy fibrinogen deposition along the basement membrane zone, confirming the diagnosis of lichen planus. All six patients were placed on immunosuppressive therapy with control of the disease. However, only one patient was able to discontinue the anti-inflammatory medication and have the lichen planus remain in remission. CONCLUSIONS: Lichen planus should be included in the differential diagnosis of cicatrizing conjunctivitis. Performing appropriate investigations to distinguish conjunctival lichen planus from other autoimmune diseases such as mucous membrane pemphigoid is critical to managing the patient with cicatrizing conjunctivitis appropriately. Oral cyclosporine effectively controlled the conjunctival lichen planus in four of the six cases.

Administration, Oral↗

Differences and similarities among expert opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: As a result of a lack of large-scale controlled studies, the diagnosis and management of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) has been solely on the basis of expert opinion, rather than on empirical evidence. We have completed a survey of worldwide experts on the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to PV. METHODS: We conducted a telephone-based survey of 24 physicians from academic, tertiary care centers worldwide with an average of 20 years experience treating pemphigus. Survey questions included referral patterns, diagnostic techniques, and therapeutic regimens. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 50% receive referrals within 6 months after onset of symptoms, 17% within 1 year, and 8% within 3 years. Diagnosis is secured by 96% using skin biopsy specimen with direct immunofluorescence, and by indirect immunofluorescence alone for 4%. None of the participating physicians make the diagnosis of PV solely on clinical and histologic evidence. Of the physicians, 75% initially treat with prednisone and 25% use other agents or attempt to eliminate potential triggers. The physicians who initially used noncorticosteroid drugs did so with no relation to the nature or extent of the disease. Of those surveyed, 50% use prednisone doses of 1 mg/kg/d, 31% use 1 to 1.5 mg/kg/d, and 19% use 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/d. Azathioprine is used as an adjuvant by 44%, mycophenolate mofetil by 20%, cyclophosphamide by 16%, and methotrexate by 8%. Complete discontinuation of prednisone was the goal for 37% whereas others were satisfied with doses from 2.5 to 10 mg/d. CONCLUSION: Wide variation exists in diagnostic techniques and treatment of PV, even among the world's experts. The lag time from symptom onset to referral emphasizes the need for heightened awareness. There is clearly a need for consensus standards with regard to patient stratification and randomized controlled trials.

Azathioprine↗

Vesicular pemphigoid in a 16-year-old boy.

We describe a case of a 16-year-old African-American boy with bullous pemphigoid (BP), an acquired autoimmune blistering disease that is rarely seen in children. The patient's lesions, however, were distinctly herpetiform, complicating initial diagnosis and therapy. A diagnosis of BP was made by direct and indirect immunofluorescence. Immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis confirmed the presence of autoantibodies directed against the BP180 antigen. The autoantibodies reacted with the same epitopes within the immunodominant BP180 NC16A domain that have previously been shown to be the target of autoantibodies in BP. This case describes an uncommon disease in the pediatric population and should be included in the differential diagnosis in young patients with an unusual generalized vesicular eruption.

Adolescent↗