PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Grant M Russell

Publications and source records attributed to Grant M Russell.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

General practitioners' experiences of managing patients with chronic leg ulceration.

OBJECTIVE: To understand general practitioners' experiences of managing patients with chronic leg ulceration, thus informing future strategies to improve leg ulcer care in general practice, Australia. DESIGN: Qualitative study using phenomenology and in-depth interviewing. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Maximum variation sample of 12 GPs working in the Perth and Hills Division of General Practice between September and December 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Themes in participants' experiences of leg ulcer care. FINDINGS: Participants regarded leg ulcer management as an integral part of general practice. They expressed a desire to maintain their involvement, yet relied on nursing assistance. They perceived that ulcer care was usually straightforward and successful. Approaches to management appeared to differ significantly from that outlined in current guidelines. Instead, participants valued accessibility of care for the patient, awareness of patient context and regular review. Occasional problems with non-healing ulcers were experienced, and, in these situations, specialist opinion was appreciated. CONCLUSION: This study highlights fundamental differences between GP and specialist conceptualisation of leg ulcer care. For GPs, it identifies key areas of ulcer management that could be improved. For specialists, it suggests that widespread implementation of traditional guidelines may not be appropriate or acceptable. New approaches to leg ulcer management in general practice are likely to need a combination of education, human resources and practical support.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Is prevention unbalancing general practice?

Australia has begun to encourage and financially reward general practitioners for implementing preventive activities. While an expanding preventive agenda for general practice remains attractive, there is a real potential for opportunity costs, especially in the absence of realistic practice-based support for preventive care. These costs may include a shift from the needs of individual patients to those of the community. It is crucial not to neglect the concept of relationship-centred primary care (which may actually enhance preventive activities), as well as enhancing the preventive environment of the practice, when considering strategies to improve preventive uptake.

Australia↗

Occupational stress: a survey of management in general practice.

OBJECTIVES: To identify approaches to and barriers associated with the management of patients with work-related stress by general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional postal survey using a self-administered questionnaire which included a case vignette of a patient with work-related stress and questions ascertaining perceived barriers to the effective general practice management of work-related stress. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 450 Western Australian GPs on the mailing list of a GP journal. The survey was conducted between 22 March and 28 April 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood that GPs would (i) choose to open a workers compensation claim and (ii) provide time off work for the patient described in the vignette. RESULTS: Response rate was 50.1%. Eighty-five percent (95% CI, 79.6%-19.7%) of respondents advised the hypothetical patient to take time away from work; however, only 44.0% (95% CI, 37.2%-50.7%) chose to initiate a workers compensation claim. GPs with training or experience in occupational health were less likely to advise the patient to stay away from work (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12-0.73), but were just as likely to initiate a claim. GPs were reluctant to involve the employer in management decisions, because of concern about patient confidentiality and the potential to make matters worse for the patient. These, and the adversarial nature of the workers compensation system, were the strongest perceived barriers to effective management of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that general practitioners take a pragmatic and varied approach to the management of work-related stress. The perceived difficulties with contacting employers challenges the principles of injury management within a workers compensation system which is dependent on liaison between system stakeholders.

Adult↗