Biomedical subjects
Greg Ogrinc
Publications and source records attributed to Greg Ogrinc.
Preclinical preceptorships in medical school: can curricular objectives be met in diverse teaching settings?
BACKGROUND: Although preclinical preceptorships for medical students during the first 2 years are now common, little is known about how well the curricular objectives can be met in clinical training sites. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a clinical encounter system can help align preclinical preceptorship experiences with the core curriculum. METHODS: Using a PDA documentation system, 27 students collected student-preceptor-patient encounter information on all patients (N = 2,953) during a 2-year clinical training course. We compared Years 1 and 2 teaching and learning processes, common symptoms seen, and counseling skills performed and examined how well these clinical experiences aligned with the curricular goals. RESULTS: The majority of encounters in Year 1 involved the student observing the preceptor perform a history (47%) or physical exam (40%). In Year 2, there was a shift to student and preceptor both participating in the history (Year 1, 12%; Year 2, 24%; p = .004) and physical exam (Year 1, 34%; Year 2, 47%; p = .002). Cardiovascular; pulmonary; and head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat examinations were most common in Year 1 and increased in Year 2. Genitourinary, gynecologic, and neurological examinations occurred least often, and only the neurological examinations increased significantly in Year 2. Overall, at least 75% of students could find opportunities in Years 1 and 2 to achieve the majority of curricular goals. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing what students experience at their preceptor sites is vital for clinical skills course evaluation. Student-preceptor-patient encounter data should be used to complement other course evaluations to aid curriculum planning and decrease variability in student experiences.
The influence of teaching setting on medical students' clinical skills development: is the academic medical center the "gold standard"?
PURPOSE: Many medical schools have revised their curricula to include longitudinal clinical training in the first and second years, placing an extra burden on academic teaching faculty and expanding the use of community-based preceptors for clinical teaching. Little is known about the impact of different learning settings on clinical skills development. METHOD: In 2002-03 and 2003-04, the authors evaluated the clinical skills of two sequential cohorts of second-year medical students at Dartmouth Medical School (n = 155) at the end of a two-year longitudinal clinical course designed to prepare them for their clerkship year. Students' objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores were compared on a cardiopulmonary and an endocrine case according to precepting sites (academic medical center [AMC] clinics, AMC-affiliated office-based clinics, or community-based primary care offices) and core communication, history taking, physical examination, and patient education skills were assessed. Study groups were compared using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (mixed model). RESULTS: Ninety-five students (61%) had community-based preceptors, 31 (20%) AMC clinic-based preceptors, and 29 (19%) AMC-affiliated office-based preceptors. Students' performances did not differ among clinical learning sites with overall scores in the cardiopulmonary case of 61.2% in AMC clinics, 63.3% in office-based AMC-affiliated clinics, and 64.9% in community-based offices (p = .20). Scores in the endocrine case similarly did not differ with overall scores of 65.5% in AMC clinics, 68.5% in office-based AMC-affiliated clinics, and 66.4% in community-based offices (p = .59). CONCLUSIONS: Students' early clinical skill development is not influenced by educational setting. Thus, using clinicians for early clinical training in any of these settings is appropriate.
Teaching and assessing resident competence in practice-based learning and improvement.
We designed, implemented, and evaluated a 4-week practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) elective. Eleven internal medicine residents from 2 separate residency programs participated in the PBLI elective and 22 other residents comprised a comparison group. Residents in each group had similar pretest Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool scores; but after the PBLI elective, participant scores were significantly higher. Also, participants' self-assessed ratings of PBLI skills increased after the rotation and remained elevated 6 months afterward. In this curriculum, residents completed a project to improve patient care and demonstrated their knowledge on an evaluation tool in a way that was superior to nonparticipants.
Reducing medication confusion in homebound patients: when the data do not conform to the initial hypothesis.
Visiting nurses often find it difficult to reconcile multiple and conflicting medication orders, particularly when more than one physician orders medications. As the authors report, resolving medication order confusion was thought to be very time-consuming--until a team started to collect data.
Using aggregate root cause analysis to improve patient safety.
The authors describe use of aggregate root cause analysis, which provides a systematic process for analyzing high-priority, frequent events.
Exploring and embracing complexity in a distance-learning curriculum for physicians.
The recent pressures on clinical medicine such as the attention to medical error and the challenges of interdisciplinary care have also exerted pressure on health professions education. Educators must now gauge how to redesign education systems to adapt quickly to these disruptions. Sometimes disruptions can be self-inflicted, such as the VA National Quality Scholars Fellowship's decision to use interactive video (IV) as its primary medium for delivering the curriculum to its six sites around the nation. The authors describe how this disruption to their education system helped to fashion a learning environment that is adaptable. Along the journey from a classroom-based curriculum to an IV-based curriculum, the authors and others involved in the program learned the basic tenets of IV sessions, redefined the roles of the teachers and learners, and discovered an IV environment that functions as a complex adaptive learning system. This distance-learning curriculum can be a model for other health professions education, since it starts with simple rules, changes from within, has a tolerance for unpredictability, and continually moves forward and transforms itself despite tension.
A framework for teaching medical students and residents about practice-based learning and improvement, synthesized from a literature review.
PURPOSE: To create a framework for teaching the knowledge and skills of practice-based learning and improvement to medical students and residents based on proven, effective strategies. METHOD: The authors conducted a Medline search of English-language articles published between 1996 and May 2001, using the term "quality improvement" (QI), and cross-matched it with "medical education" and "health professions education." A thematic-synthesis method of review was used to compile the information from the articles. Based on the literature review, an expert panel recommended educational objectives for practice-based learning and improvement. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were conducted in academic medical centers and medical schools and 40% addressed experiential learning of QI. More than 75% were qualitative case reports capturing educational outcomes, and 7% included an experimental study design. The expert panel integrated data from the literature review with the Dreyfus model of professional skill acquisition, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) knowledge domains for improving health care, and the ACGME competencies and generated a framework of core educational objectives about teaching practice-based learning and improvement to medical students and residents. CONCLUSION: Teaching the knowledge and skills of practice-based learning and improvement to medical students and residents is a necessary and important foundation for improving patient care. The authors present a framework of learning objectives-informed by the literature and synthesized by the expert panel-to assist educational leaders when integrating these objectives into a curriculum. This framework serves as a blueprint to bridge the gap between current knowledge and future practice needs.
Improving the effectiveness of physician participation in local quality improvement efforts.
The authors present five success factors for medical students, residents, and fellows to consider when engaged in quality improvement projects: (1) add value, not work; (2) start small and build; (3) move quickly; (4) adapt, innovate, and collaborate; (5) produce understandable results. Using examples from the Veterans Affairs National Quality Scholars Fellowship Program, they describe how these factors were used successfully. While not the only steps to take, these critical success factors proved helpful in defining the problem to be addressed, engaging leadership, and anticipating the resolution of conflict.