PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gregg W Stone

Publications and source records attributed to Gregg W Stone.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Impact of Diabetes on Outcomes of Contemporary PCI Guided by OCT vs Angiography: The ILUMIEN IV Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes are at higher risk for adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with patients without diabetes. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the influence of diabetes and complex lesions on the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with and without optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance during a follow-up period of 2 years. METHODS: Patients in ILUMIEN IV randomized to OCT-guided vs angiography-guided PCI were grouped into those with (n = 1,044) and without diabetes (n = 1,443). Study endpoints were target vessel failure (TVF) and serious major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics, the 2-year rates of both TVF (9.9% vs 6.3%; adjusted HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.09-2.02; P = 0.01) and serious MACE (5.3% vs 2.7%; adjusted HR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.14-2.76; P = 0.01) were increased in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients, consistently in patients with and without complex lesions (Pinteraction = 0.22 and 0.14, respectively), although the highest 2-year rates were in patients with diabetes and complex lesions. In all randomized patients, OCT guidance compared with angiography guidance did not reduce TVF or serious MACE. These effects were consistent in patients with and without diabetes (Pinteraction = 0.41 and 0.20, respectively), and were not modified by treatment of complex lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In the large-scale ILUMIEN IV trial, patients with diabetes remained at increased risk for adverse events after PCI compared with nondiabetic patients despite the use of OCT procedural guidance. Patients with diabetes and complex lesions were at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes after PCI.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Low and Non-Low Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Primary PCI for STEMI: The BRIGHT-4 Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the BRIGHT-4 trial, among 6,016 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a radial artery approach, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2 to 4 hours reduced the 30-day primary composite outcome of all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5 bleeding, as well as death and bleeding individually, compared with heparin monotherapy. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the benefits of bivalirudin apply principally to patients who are at low bleeding risk (LBR) as well as non-LBR. METHODS: In a prespecified analysis from BRIGHT-4, outcomes were examined by baseline bleeding risk, with LBR defined as a CRUSADE score <30. RESULTS: At baseline, 4,581 patients (76.1%) were categorized as LBR. Non-LBR patients had higher rates of the 30-day primary endpoint (8.6% vs 2.2%; HR: 4.08 [95% CI: 3.14-5.31]; P < 0.0001), driven by both greater mortality and BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding. In non-LBR patients, the primary outcome occurred in 8.1% of patients randomized to bivalirudin vs 9.2% of those randomized to heparin (difference: -1.1% [95% CI: -4.0% to 1.8%]; HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.62-1.26]). In LBR patients, the primary outcome occurred in 1.4% of patients randomized to bivalirudin vs 2.9% of those randomized to heparin (difference: -1.5% [95% CI: -2.3% to -0.6%]; HR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.32-0.75]) (Pabsolute interaction = 0.81; Prelative interaction = 0.04). The effects of bivalirudin compared with heparin in reducing all-cause death were as robust in LBR patients compared with non-LBR patients (Pabsolute interaction = 0.67; Prelative interaction = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with radial artery access, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a high-dose post-PCI infusion for 2 to 4 hours reduced the 30-day risk of all-cause death and major bleeding in patients at low bleeding risk as well as in patients at higher-risk of bleeding. (Bivalirudin With Prolonged Full Dose Infusion Versus Heparin Alone During Emergency PCI [BRIGHT-4; NCT03822975]).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clopidogrel Versus Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy for Long-Term Maintenance After Coronary Stenting in Ischemic and Bleeding Birisk Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the OPT-BIRISK Trial.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with acute coronary syndromes at both high bleeding and ischemic risk (birisk), extended clopidogrel monotherapy after 9 to 12&#x2009;months of dual-antiplatelet therapy reduces bleeding without increasing ischemia. Whether this benefit extends to birisk patients with diabetes is unknown. METHODS: This prespecified subgroup analysis of the OPT-BIRISK (Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for High Bleeding and Ischemic Risk Patients) trial included birisk patients with acute coronary syndrome who had completed 9 to 12&#x2009;months of dual-antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were then randomized 1:1 to 9&#x2009;months of clopidogrel&#x2009;plus&#x2009;placebo versus clopidogrel&#x2009;plus&#x2009;aspirin. Outcomes were compared by diabetes status. The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 9 months after randomization. The key secondary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, defined as a composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or clinically driven revascularization. RESULTS: Of 7758 patients, 4072 (52.5%) had diabetes. Clopidogrel monotherapy decreased Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (2.1% versus 3.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45-0.97]) with no increase in major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (2.9% versus 3.6%; HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.56-1.12]) compared with clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with diabetes. Outcomes were consistent in patients without diabetes, with no significant interactions by diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: In birisk patients with acute coronary syndrome who were stable on dual-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin for 9 to 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention, clopidogrel monotherapy for an additional 9 months reduced clinically relevant bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared with continued dual-antiplatelet therapy, irrespective of diabetes status. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03431142.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes recommend an early invasive approach with concomitant antithrombotic therapy, including aspirin, clopidogrel, unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We evaluated the role of thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin in such patients. METHODS: We assigned 13,819 patients with acute coronary syndromes to one of three antithrombotic regimens: unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. The primary end points were a composite ischemia end point (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization for ischemia), major bleeding, and the net clinical outcome, defined as the combination of composite ischemia or major bleeding. RESULTS: Bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with noninferior 30-day rates of the composite ischemia end point (7.7% and 7.3%, respectively), major bleeding (5.3% and 5.7%), and the net clinical outcome end point (11.8% and 11.7%). Bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with a noninferior rate of the composite ischemia end point (7.8% and 7.3%, respectively; P=0.32; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.24) and significantly reduced rates of major bleeding (3.0% vs. 5.7%; P<0.001; relative risk, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65) and the net clinical outcome end point (10.1% vs. 11.7%; P=0.02; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes who were undergoing invasive treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin was associated with rates of ischemia and bleeding that were similar to those with heparin. Bivalirudin alone was associated with similar rates of ischemia and significantly lower rates of bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00093158 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Usefulness of routine unfractionated heparin infusion following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in patients not receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

We evaluated the utility of a routine postprocedure course of unfractionated heparin after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients not receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In the CADILLAC study, 2,082 patients with AMI who underwent primary PCI were randomized to receive stents versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), each with or without abciximab. In a subset of 976 patients who did not receive abciximab, we compared outcomes of patients who received postprocedural heparin (n = 758; 78%; median duration 2 days) with those who did not. In 421 patients treated with PTCA, postprocedural heparin use was associated with lower in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; 5.3% vs 11.4%, p = 0.069), 1-year MACEs (22% vs 31%, p = 0.08), and decreased in-hospital moderate/severe bleeding (2.3% vs 8.9%, p = 0.01). By multivariate analyses, heparin use correlated with freedom from in-hospital and 1-year MACEs in patients after PTCA. In contrast, in 555 patients who underwent stenting, postprocedural heparin use was associated with increased bleeding and hospitalization costs without a decrease in early or late MACEs. In conclusion, in patients with AMI treated with coronary stenting without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, routine postprocedural heparin was not associated with any significant benefits and may be safely omitted. However, in a subset of patients treated with PTCA, postprocedural heparin use was independently associated with fewer in-hospital and 1-year MACEs.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2006

Volumetric intravascular ultrasound assessment of neointimal hyperplasia and nonuniform stent strut distribution in sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis.

The neointimal hyperplasia (IH) distribution pattern of in-stent restenotic lesions after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation has not been well described. We identified 48 in-stent restenotic lesions (41 patients) after SES implantation and performed volumetric intravascular ultrasound analyses. Lumen area, stent area, and IH area at the minimal lumen area site were 2.7 +/- 1.0, 5.4 +/- 1.9, and 2.7 +/- 1.4 mm(2), respectively. IH area at the minimal lumen site was larger in the group with a stent area > or =5.0 mm(2) than the group with a stent area <5.0 mm(2) (3.7 +/- 1.3 vs 1.9 +/- 0.8 mm(2), p <0.001). There were fewer visualized stent struts in lesions with a minimum stent area > or =5.0 mm(2) at the minimum lumen site compared with those with a stent area <5.0 mm(2) (0.69 +/- 0.25 vs 0.83 +/- 0.16, p = 0.04). When we compared lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus with patients without diabetes, minimum lumen areas, percent IH at minimal lumen area, percent IH, and neointima-free stent length were identical. In conclusion, (1) lesions without SES underexpansion at the minimum lumen site had more IH and greater nonuniform stent strut distribution compared with restenotic SESs that were underexpanded, and (2) the IH response did not appear to be more aggressive in patients with diabetes mellitus than in those without diabetes mellitus.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study.

BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality of surgical aortic valve replacement are increased in elderly patients with multiple high-risk comorbid conditions. Therefore, a prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study was performed in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease to evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous implantation of a novel self-expanding aortic valve bioprosthesis (CoreValve). METHODS AND RESULTS: Symptomatic high-risk patients with an aortic valve area <1 cm2 were considered for enrollment. CoreValve implantation was performed under general anesthesia with extracorporeal support using the retrograde approach. Clinical follow-up and transthoracic echocardiography were performed after the procedure and at days 15 and 30 after device implantation to evaluate short-term patient and device outcomes. A total of 25 patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient before implantation, 44.2+/-10.8 mm Hg) and multiple comorbidities (median logistic EuroScore, 11.0%) were enrolled. Device success and procedural success were achieved in 22 (88%) and 21 (84%) patients, respectively. Successful device implantation resulted in a marked reduction in the aortic valve gradients (mean gradient after implantation, 12.4+/-3.0 mm Hg; P<0.0001). The mean aortic regurgitation grade was unchanged. Major in-hospital cardiovascular and cerebral events occurred in 8 patients (32%), including mortality in 5 patients (20%). Among 18 patients with device success surviving to discharge, no adverse events occurred within 30 days after leaving the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous implantation of the self-expanding CoreValve aortic valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis with or without aortic regurgitation is feasible and, when successful, results in marked hemodynamic and clinical improvement.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Cost effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization: results from the TAXUS-IV Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare aggregate medical care costs for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) and to formally evaluate the incremental cost effectiveness of PES for patients undergoing single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Although the cost effectiveness of SES has been studied in both clinical trials and decision-analytic models, few data exist on the cost effectiveness of alternative drug-eluting stent (DES) designs. In addition, no clinical trials have specifically examined the cost effectiveness of DES among patients managed without mandatory angiographic follow-up. METHODS: We performed a prospective economic evaluation among 1,314 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization randomized to either PES (N = 662) or BMS (N = 652) in the TAXUS-IV trial. Clinical outcomes, resource use, and costs (from a societal perspective) were assessed prospectively for all patients over a 1-year follow-up period. Cost effectiveness was defined as the incremental cost per target vessel revascularization (TVR) event avoided and was analyzed separately among cohorts assigned to mandatory angiographic follow-up (n = 732) or clinical follow-up alone (n = 582). RESULTS: The PES reduced TVR by 12.2 events per 100 patients treated, resulting in a 1-year cost difference of 572 dollars per patient with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 4,678 dollars per TVR avoided and 47,798 dollars/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Among patients assigned to clinical follow-up alone, the net 1-year cost difference was 97 dollars per patient with cost-effectiveness ratios of 760 dollars per TVR event avoided and $5,105/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, treatment with PES led to substantial reductions in the need for repeat revascularization while increasing 1-year costs only modestly. The cost-effectiveness ratio for PES in the study population compares reasonably with that for other treatments that reduce coronary restenosis, including alternative drug-eluting stent platforms.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Outcome after acute incomplete sirolimus-eluting stent apposition as assessed by serial intravascular ultrasound.

We investigated the fate of postprocedural incomplete stent apposition (ISA) after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation by evaluating long-term intravascular ultrasound findings in 168 consecutive patients (182 de novo lesions). Postprocedural ISA was defined as > or = 1 stent strut that was clearly separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckle behind the strut without overlapping a side branch. After SES implantation, there were 61 ISA sites in 46 stents in 31 patients (23 at the proximal edge, 7 at the distal edge, and 31 within the stent body). There were no clinical, procedural, or intravascular ultrasound measurement differences between patients and lesions with versus without ISA. At follow-up, 15 acute ISA sites (25%) in 11 patients completely resolved and 40 sites (75%) in 20 patients persisted, although 32 of 46 persisting ISA sites (70%) decreased. There was a greater decrease in effective lumen area and a greater increase in peristent plaque area in the complete-resolution group than in the persistent-ISA group. No lesion developed stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis (angiographic diameter stenosis > 50%). Six acute ISA sites were also associated with new, late acquired ISA, only 1 of which resulted in aneurysm formation. Although most ISAs after SES implantation do not resolve completely, the incidence of restenosis or thrombosis is not affected.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Intravascular ultrasound profile analysis of ruptured coronary plaques.

Angiographic studies have shown that lesions preceding nonfatal acute events are usually not hemodynamically significant. This has led to the concept that plaque ruptures occur at minimal disease sites. We used intravascular ultrasound to create a prerupture "profile" of unstable (vulnerable) plaques. We analyzed 112 ruptured plaques detected by intravascular ultrasound. Reference and lesion external elastic membrane (EEM) and lumen areas were measured to calculate prerupture estimates of plaque area, plaque burden (plaque/EEM area), eccentricity, area stenosis, and remodeling. The narrowest coefficients of variance were for lesion EEM area, maximum plaque thickness, and plaque burden, reference lumen area, and remodeling index (coefficients of variance 0.29, 0.25, 0.12, 0.29, and 0.18, respectively); conversely, there was great variability in measurements of calcification and lumen compromise (minimum lumen area and area stenosis). When using the 5 variables with the narrowest coefficient of variance, we found that 67% of ruptured plaques fit all of following 10th or 90th percentile parameters (> 14.3 mm2 lesion EEM area, > 8.1 mm2 reference lumen area, > 1.6 mm maximum lesion plaque thickness, > 0.63 lesion plaque burden, and > 0.87 remodeling index). Further, 89% of ruptured plaques fit 4 of 5 parameters and 96% fit 3 of 5 parameters. In conclusion, plaque ruptures do not occur at minimal disease sites. Rather, vulnerable (rupture-prone) plaques predictably have significant plaque accumulation and remodeling and occur in larger arteries. It is only the degree of lumen compromise that is variable and often insignificant.

Coronary Artery Disease↗
PubMed2006

Impact of time to therapy and reperfusion modality on the efficacy of adenosine in acute myocardial infarction: the AMISTAD-2 trial.

AIMS: The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether the efficacy of adenosine vs. placebo was dependent on the timing of reperfusion therapy in the second Acute Myocardial Infarction Study of Adenosine (AMISTAD-II). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting with ST-segment elevation anterior AMI were randomized to receive placebo vs. adenosine (50 or 70 microg/kg/min) for 3 h starting within 15 min of reperfusion therapy. In the present post hoc hypothesis generating study, the results were stratified according to the timing of reperfusion, i.e. > or = or < the median 3.17 h, and by reperfusion modality. In patients receiving reperfusion < 3.17 h, adenosine compared with placebo significantly reduced 1-month mortality (5.2 vs. 9.2%, respectively, P = 0.014), 6-month mortality (7.3 vs. 11.2%, P = 0.033), and the occurrence of the primary 6-month composite clinical endpoint of death, in-hospital CHF, or rehospitalization for CHF at 6 months (12.0 vs. 17.2%, P = 0.022). Patients reperfused beyond 3 h did not benefit from adenosine. CONCLUSION: In this post hoc analysis, 3 h adenosine infusion administered as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy within the first 3.17 h onset of evolving anterior ST-segment elevation AMI enhanced early and late survival, and reduced the composite clinical endpoint of death or CHF at 6 months.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2006

Treatment of coronary artery perforations complicating percutaneous coronary intervention with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent graft.

Coronary artery perforation is a rare, but dreaded, complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Conventional treatment, including reversal of anticoagulation and prolonged balloon inflation, is associated with a high incidence of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and emergency coronary bypass surgery. Although a number of case reports have demonstrated the feasibility of sealing coronary perforations with synthetic material-covered stent grafts, the efficacy of this treatment has not been reported in a large, multicenter series. We used a retrospective international registry to examine the outcomes of the polytetrafluoroethylene-coated JOSTENT coronary stent graft (CSG) in 41 cases of coronary perforations. Perforations were relatively severe: 16.7% Ellis grade 1, 54.2% grade 2, and 29.1% grade 3. Of the 41 patients, > 1/3 (n = 14) experienced life-threatening complications before stent graft implantation, including pericardial tamponade (12.2%), cardiogenic shock (9.8%), and cardiac arrest (2.4%). A total of 52 CSGs were used to treat the 41 perforations (mean 1.3 per lesion). All CSGs were placed successfully, with 92.9% of the perforations sealed completely and 7.1% partially. One patient developed abrupt vessel closure after CSG deployment, resulting in an overall procedure success rate of 96.4%. No in-hospital Q-wave myocardial infarctions, emergency coronary bypass surgeries, or deaths resulted. The CSG may be a reliable and highly effective treatment option for sealing coronary perforations complicating percutaneous coronary interventions.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Comparative early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC trial).

We determined the outcomes of patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The prognosis after primary PCI in STEMI has been extensively studied and defined. Outcomes of patients who undergo primary PCI for NSTEMI are less well established. In total, 2,082 patients with ongoing chest pain for > 30 minutes consistent with acute MI were randomized to balloon angioplasty versus stenting, each with/without abciximab. Of 1,964 patients, STEMI was present in 1,725 (87.8%) and NSTEMI in 239 (12.2%). Compared with STEMI, those with NSTEMI were more likely to have delayed time-to-hospital arrival (2.4 vs 1.8 hours, p = 0.0002) and increased door-to-balloon time (3.2 vs 1.9 hours, p < 0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to have Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow at baseline (37.3% vs 19.4%, p < 0.0001) and higher ejection fraction (58.7% vs 55.8%, p = 0.001), but similar rates of postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow. At 1 year, patients with NTEMI had similar mortality (3.4% vs 4.4%, p = 0.40) but higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (24.0% vs 16.6%, p = 0.007) that was driven by more frequent ischemic target vessel revascularization (21.8% vs 11.9%, p <0.0001). In conclusion, patients with acute MI without STE who are treated with primary PCI have marked delays to treatment, similar late mortality, and increased rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization compared with patients with STEMI, despite more favorable angiographic features at presentation and similar reperfusion success. The adverse prognosis of patients with NSTEMI should be recognized and efforts made to decrease reperfusion times.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2006

Impact of routine angiographic follow-up on the clinical benefits of paclitaxel-eluting stents: results from the TAXUS-IV trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effect of angiographic follow-up on revascularization rates in the TAXUS-IV trial and to determine whether the relative benefit of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare metal stent implantation was modified by angiographic follow-up. BACKGROUND: Although several clinical trials have demonstrated that drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), virtually all of these studies have incorporated angiographic follow-up. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 percutaneous coronary intervention patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) (n = 662) or identical-appearing BMS (n = 652). Clinical outcomes were compared, stratified by assignment to angiographic follow-up or clinical follow-up alone. RESULTS: Compared with clinical follow-up alone, angiographic follow-up patients had a significantly higher rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.46; p = 0.04), with similar relative increases in PES and BMS patients. Because PES reduced TVR by approximately 60% regardless of type of follow-up, assignment to angiographic follow-up tended to overestimate the absolute benefit of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. In contrast, assessment of end points immediately before the time of follow-up angiography led to substantial underestimation of the absolute benefit of PES implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of mandatory angiographic follow-up increases rates of TVR among patients receiving both BMS and PES and overestimates the absolute clinical benefits of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. Nonetheless, PES substantially reduces TVR regardless of assignment to mandatory angiographic follow-up or not. Future studies designed to determine the true clinical benefits of DES should either forgo routine angiographic follow-up or separate the time of repeat angiography from the primary clinical end point by as long as possible.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Drug-eluting stents in the treatment of intermediate lesions: pooled analysis from four randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: To address the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of intermediate lesions, we performed a pooled analysis of four randomized DES versus bare-metal stent (BMS) trials and assessed outcomes among patients with intermediate lesions. BACKGROUND: Before the introduction of DES, intermediate coronary lesions were commonly managed based on physiologic or anatomic assessment of lesion severity. The DES may challenge this paradigm. METHODS: The study population involved 167 of 2,478 randomized patients (6.7%) with intermediate lesions (diameter stenosis <50% [mean 44%] by quantitative coronary angiography) from the Sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity Balloon Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions (SIRIUS), TAXUS-IV, and the First and Second First Use to Underscore Restenosis Reduction with Everolimus (FUTURE-I and -II) trials. End points examined included early (in-hospital and 30-day) and late (1-year) major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, and follow-up angiographic restenosis. RESULTS: Patients with intermediate lesions randomized to DES versus BMS had low rates of 30-day MACE (1.1% vs. 4.0% respectively; p = 0.22). At one-year follow-up, patients treated with DES versus BMS had similar rates of cardiac death (0% vs. 2.7%, respectively; p = 0.11) and MI (3.4% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.49) but markedly lower rates of TVR (3.4% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.0004), MACE (5.6% vs. 25.4%; p = 0.0003), and binary angiographic restenosis (1.8% vs. 34.0%; p < 0.0001). No patient in either group developed stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with BMS, treatment of intermediate lesions with DES appears safe and results in a marked reduction in clinical and angiographic restenosis. The efficacy of DES may require a reevaluation of current treatment paradigms for intermediate lesions.

Coronary Restenosis↗
PubMed2006

Outcome of multivessel coronary intervention in the contemporary percutaneous revascularization era.

Clinical outcomes after multivessel versus single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the era of stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel pretreatment have not been well studied. Thus, we compared outcomes from the Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET) for patients who underwent multivessel versus single-vessel PCI and separately considered the effect of acute coronary syndromes on the results. Composite clinical outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) were evaluated at 30 days and 6 months and mortality at 1 year. Safety analysis included in-patient major and minor bleeding. Despite similar baseline characteristics, patients who underwent multivessel PCI (n = 775) had significantly higher 30-day and 6-month composite event rates than did those who were treated in a single coronary artery territory (n = 3,969). This association remained significant at 30 days (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.33, p = 0.025) after using propensity matching to minimize confounding factors. The higher event rate was primarily due to an increase in periprocedural myocardial infarction. However, there were no significant differences in propensity-matched ischemic outcomes at 6 months and 1 year or in bleeding. In addition, in a propensity-matched analysis that included 810 patients with acute coronary syndrome, multivessel stenting resulted in numerically more ischemic events than did single-vessel stenting, although this did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 2.05, p = 0.221). In conclusion, multivessel PCI was more often associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction than single-vessel intervention, although this did not translate into higher 1-year mortality. A randomized trial comparing multivessel PCI with staged or surgical revascularization is warranted.

Abciximab↗