PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gregg W Stone

Publications and source records attributed to Gregg W Stone.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Does proximal location of culprit lesion confer worse prognosis in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction?

ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from proximally located culprit lesion is associated with greater myocardium at jeopardy. In STEMI patients treated with thrombolytics, proximal culprit lesions are known to have worse prognosis. This relation has not been studied in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In 3,535 STEMI patients with native coronary artery occlusion pooled from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction database, we compared in-hospital and 1-year outcomes between those with proximal (n = 1,606) versus non-proximal (n = 1,929) culprit lesions. Patients with proximal culprits were more likely to die and suffer major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during the index hospital stay (3.8% vs 2.2%, P = 0.006; 8.2% vs 5.8%, P = 0.0066, respectively) as well as during 1-year follow-up (6.9% vs 4.5%, P = 0.0013; 22% vs 17%, P = 0.003, respectively) compared to those with non-proximal culprits. After adjustment for baseline differences, proximal culprit was independently predictive of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio% 1.58, 95% confidence intervals, CI 1.05-2.40) and MACE (OR 1.41, CI 1.06-1.86), but not 1-year death or MACE. In addition, proximal culprit was independently associated with higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and sustained hypotension during the index hospitalization. The univariate impact of proximal culprit lesion on in-hospital death and MACE was comparable to other adverse angiographic characteristics, such as multivessel disease and poor initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow, and greater than that of anterior wall STEMI. In conclusion, proximal location of the culprit lesion is a strong independent predictor of worse in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

An overview of the TAXUS Express, paclitaxel-eluting stent clinical trial program.

Restenosis remains a problem following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents (DES), which combine mechanical and pharmacologic properties, have been shown to prevent or reduce neointimal growth after deployment. This review describes the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent clinical trial expansion program (TAXUS Express, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). This program comprises the largest data set of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DES to date, with over 6,200 patients enrolled since 2000. The program includes treatment of de novo lesions, as well as higher-risk lesion and patient populations. In this review, we discuss the results from the TAXUS family of randomized clinical trials, and compare the findings with data from TAXUS registries. The data from the randomized clinical trials suggest that the paclitaxel-eluting stent provides consistent and durable benefits across multiple lesion and patient types. Evidence from peri-and post-approval registries, where patient populations are more heterogeneous than those eligible and included in the RCTs, corroborate these findings, with overall low rates of cardiac events, including reinterventions.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Long-term care after percutaneous coronary intervention: focus on the role of antiplatelet therapy.

Arterial wall injury caused by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) triggers transient platelet activation and mural thrombosis; these effects are superimposed on the preexisting platelet hyperreactivity associated with underlying atherothrombosis. Platelet activation has been implicated in the major complications of PCI: acute and subacute thrombosis and restenosis. Antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapy minimizes thrombotic complications after PCI. Aspirin plus a thienopyridine (ticlopidine or clopidogrel) is more effective than aspirin plus heparin and extended warfarin therapy in preventing periprocedural ischemic events and subsequent stent thrombosis and results in less major and minor bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (the preferred thienopyridine because of its superior hematologic safety) is recommended for at least 4 weeks to prevent subacute stent thrombosis with bare-metal stents and 3 to 6 months to prevent late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents. Coronary atherothrombosis is a diffuse vascular disease, and reduction of the risk of future ischemic events requires strategies that extend beyond the focal treatment of stenotic lesions. Optimal long-term care after PCI requires aggressive systemic pharmacotherapy (antiplatelet agents, statins, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme Inhibitors) in conjunction with therapeutic lifestyle changes (smoking cessation, weight reduction, dietary measures, and exercise). In this context, dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) is recommended for at least 12 months after PCI for prophylaxis of future atherothrombotic events.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

Outcomes of patients consented but not randomized in a trial of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (the CADILLAC registry).

Baseline features, management, and outcomes of patients who had acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and were excluded from randomized trials of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been well described. We examined the baseline features and outcomes of patients who had AMI and were excluded due to angiographic ineligibility from a randomized trial of primary PCI. The CADILLAC trial evaluated 4 primary PCI strategies in patients who had AMI without cardiogenic shock. Of 2,681 patients who consented, 599 (22.3%) were subsequently excluded from randomization due to protocol-specified angiographic findings. These patients were enrolled in a formal in-hospital registry and were treated at the discretion of attending physicians. Registry versus randomized patients were older (median age 61.9 vs 59.0 years, p = 0.002), more frequently had 3-vessel disease (52.4% vs 15.6%, p = 0.0001), and more frequently had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45% vs 50%, p = 0.002). Registry patients were treated with PCI (n = 234), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 136), or medically only (n = 226). In-hospital mortality rate among all patients who consented was 2.2% and was higher among registry than among randomized patients (4.0% vs 1.6%, relative risk 2.45, p = 0.001). Within the registry, covariate-adjusted risk of mortality was lower among patients who were treated by PCI compared with those who were treated medically (odds ratio 0.21, p=0.03). In conclusion, angiographic ineligibility for randomization in a large, prospective, primary PCI trial was associated with numerous high-risk demographic characteristics and higher short-term mortality. Nonetheless, the overall survival of patients who were referred for primary PCI was excellent, and performance of primary PCI versus medical therapy was associated with increased survival among excluded patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Association of plaque characterization by intravascular ultrasound virtual histology and arterial remodeling.

Positive remodeling is more often observed in lesions of patients who have acute coronary syndromes or vulnerable (rupture-prone) plaques. However, there are few data that correlate plaque morphology, composition, and arterial remodeling in vivo. We evaluated coronary plaque characterization of lesions with positive remodeling using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) radiofrequency data analysis. Seventy-seven nonbifurcation native coronary lesions (in 50 patients) were imaged in vivo using 30-MHz IVUS transducers. Lesions were classified into 4 plaque types, fibrous, fibrofatty, dense calcium, and necrotic core, by using processing of the radiofrequency signal validated in vitro. The remodeling index was calculated as the lesion external elastic membrane area divided by the proximal reference external elastic membrane area. Lesions were divided into 2 groups: positive remodeling (remodeling index>1.0, 26 lesions) and intermediate/negative remodeling (remodeling index<or=1.0, 51 lesions). Total plaque volume and the volume of each plaque type were averaged over the length of the lesion. Reference segment plaque compositions were similar. Mean lesion fibrofatty plaque area was significantly larger in lesions with positive remodeling than in lesions with intermediate/negative remodeling (1.2+/-0.7 vs 0.8+/-0.4 mm2, p=0.001; 26.3+/-6.6% vs 19.8+/-5.7%, p<0.001, of total plaque volume). The same results were obtained at the minimum lumen site and in the subgroup of patients who had acute coronary syndromes. Further, there was a linear relation between remodeling index and fibrofatty plaque area (r=0.26, p=0.02). In conclusion, in vivo IVUS radiofrequency data analysis demonstrates that positive remodeling occurs in lesions with more fibrofatty plaque.

Coronary Artery Disease↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of coronary stenting versus conventional balloon angioplasty on five-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Little is known about the influence of stenting versus balloon angioplasty on long-term outcomes (particularly mortality) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated 2,087 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in various Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trials in the United States, who underwent primary PCI. The main outcome was all-cause mortality at 5 years, obtained through the National Death Index. Of the 2,087 patients, stenting was performed in 692 (33%). The absolute difference in the hospital (2.2% vs 3.3%), 1-year (3.3% vs 5.2%), and 5-year (10% vs 13%) mortality rates favored patients receiving a stent versus conventional balloon therapy, with the difference increasing with time. A multivariate Cox model identified stent use (vs balloon alone) as an independent correlate of lower 5-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.85). The absolute reduction in mortality was greatest in the highest risk group. In conclusion, compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting during primary PCI not only resulted in better angiographic and short-term outcomes, but also in a sustained beneficial effect on mortality at 5 years. These data support the routine use of coronary stenting in most patients undergoing primary PCI, when feasible.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗
PubMed2005

Impact of coronary culprit lesion calcium in patients undergoing paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (a TAXUS-IV sub study).

Randomized clinical trials have shown that paclitaxel-eluting stents significantly reduce restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. The impact of lesion calcification on the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents is unknown. In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to a bare-metal or paclitaxel-eluting stent. By core laboratory analysis, 247 lesions (19%) were moderately or severely calcified. At the 9-month angiographic follow-up examination, the paclitaxel-eluting stent had significantly reduced the amount of late loss compared with the control stent (0.26 +/- 0.56 vs 0.51 +/- 0.48 mm, p = 0.015) within the analysis segment in the calcific lesions. The analysis segment restenosis rate was similar in patients with calcified and noncalcified lesions after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (7.5% vs 8.0%, respectively; p = 1.0). The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year was reduced by 56% in patients with calcified lesions (11.9% vs 5.1%, p = 0.09) and by 75% in noncalcified lesions (15.7% vs 4.3%, p <0.0001). By interaction testing, the efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting stent in reducing TLR at 1 year was similar in the calcified and noncalcified lesions (p = 0.30). Moreover, by multivariate analysis, implantation of the paclitaxel-eluting stent was a powerful independent predictor of freedom from TLR, with similar hazard ratios for efficacy in calcified and noncalcified lesions (0.30 and 0.26, respectively). In conclusion, implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions significantly reduced restenosis in patients with and without calcified lesions.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Compared with bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis in noncomplex lesions. The utility of drug-eluting stents has not been evaluated in more difficult stenoses. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the polymer-based, slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent in a patient population with more complex lesions than previously studied. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 2003 to March 2004 at 66 academic and community-based institutions with 1156 patients who underwent stent implantation in a single coronary artery stenosis (vessel diameter, 2.25-4.0 mm; lesion length, 10-46 mm), including 664 patients (57.4%) with complex or previously unstudied lesions (requiring 2.25-mm, 4.0-mm, and/or multiple stents) and 9-month clinical and angiographic follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 or more bare metal stents (n = 579) or identical-appearing paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 577). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well matched. Diabetes was present in 31% of patients. The mean (SD) reference vessel diameter was 2.69 (0.57) mm, the reference lesion length was 17.2 (9.2) mm, and 78% of lesions were type B2/C. A mean (SD) of 1.38 (0.58) stents (total mean [SD] length, 28.4 [13.1] mm) were implanted per lesion; 33% of lesions required multiple stents. Stents that were 2.25 mm and 4.0 mm in diameter were used in 18% and 17% of lesions, respectively. Compared with bare metal stents, paclitaxel-eluting stents reduced the 9-month rate of target lesion revascularization from 15.7% to 8.6% (P<.001) and target vessel revascularization from 17.3% to 12.1% (P = .02). Similar rates were observed for cardiac death or myocardial infarction (5.5% for bare metal stent group vs 5.7% for paclitaxel-eluting stent group) and stent thrombosis (0.7% in both groups). Angiographic restenosis was reduced from 33.9% to 18.9% in the entire study cohort (P<.001), including among patients receiving 2.25-mm stents (49.4% vs 31.2%; P = .01), 4.0-mm stents (14.4% vs 3.5%; P = .02), and multiple stents (57.8% vs 27.2%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with a bare metal stent, implantation of the paclitaxel-eluting stent in a patient population with complex lesions effectively reduces clinical and angiographic restenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Usefulness of the presence of peripheral vascular disease in predicting mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty (from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Database).

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often have multiple co-morbidities that influence outcome. We sought to evaluate the impact of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on the outcome of patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty. We evaluated 3,716 patients with AMI who underwent emergency catheterization with planned primary angioplasty in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trials. Patients with a history of PVD (claudication, stroke, or transient ischemic attack) were compared with patients without PVD. Of the 3,716 patients, 394 (10.6%) had PVD and were older, more often women, and more frequently had a history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, congestive heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization. They presented more often with a heart rate >100 beats/min, Killip class >1, lower ejection fraction, and multivessel disease. No difference was found in stent use, final percentage of stenosis, or Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow. Patients with PVD had a twofold increased in-hospital mortality (5.3% vs 2.6%, p = 0.0021). The difference remained significant at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year (12.6% vs 6%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a history of PVD was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and death at 1 year (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 2.57, p = 0.032). In conclusion, patients with AMI with PVD have increased co-morbidities and higher mortality despite treatment with primary angioplasty. The presence of PVD is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and death at 1 year.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Effectiveness of the concomitant use of bivalirudin and drug-eluting stents (from the prospective, multicenter BivAlirudin and Drug-Eluting STents [ADEST] study).

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) reduce restenosis compared with bare metal stents. Safety issues with drug-eluting stents are particularly important given concerns of possible increased thrombogenicity. Compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has been shown to reduce the risk of hemorrhagic complications in patients receiving bare metal stents, with similar efficacy in preventing ischemic complications. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with SESs and bivalirudin anticoagulation have not been prospectively studied. This prospective study performed at 9 United States hospitals evaluated 1,182 patients referred for PCI with SESs in whom the procedural anticoagulant was bivalirudin. Clopidogrel was administered before PCI in 79% of patients, and only 5.3% received procedural glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. At 30 days, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 7.1% of patients, including 0.3% mortality, 4.4% myocardial infarction (defined as creatine kinase-MB >3x normal), 1.7% target vessel revascularization, and 0.6% stent thrombosis. Major bleeding occurred in only 0.8% of patients. Thus, use of bivalirudin as the procedural anticoagulant to support SES implantation in a "real world" population of patients undergoing PCI results in low rates of major adverse cardiac events, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

Mortality at 1 year for the direct comparison of tirofiban and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization: do tirofiban and ReoPro give similar efficacy outcomes at trial 1-year follow-up.

AIMS: Compared with placebo, abciximab has been associated with mortality reduction at late follow-up. The TARGET trial was performed to test whether tirofiban and abciximab provide similar efficacy outcomes among patients undergoing non-emergent, stent-based percutaneous coronary intervention. We report here the 1-year mortality of the study population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 countries at 149 hospitals, 4,809 patients undergoing elective or urgent stent implantation were randomly assigned a bolus and infusion of tirofiban or abciximab. Ischaemic events were assessed at 30 days and 6 months and mortality was assessed at 1 year. We previously reported that abciximab was superior to tirofiban considering the composite rate of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days among all patients and at 6 months among those with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). At 1-year follow-up death occurred in 46 (1.9%) patients who received tirofiban and 42 (1.7%) patients who received abciximab (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.72-1.67; P=0.660). Mortality rates for patients with ACS were 2.3% with tirofiban vs. 2.2% with abciximab (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.67; P=0.897) and those without ACS were 1.4 vs. 1.0% (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 0.56-3.13; P=0.530). CONCLUSION: At 1 year, tirofiban provided a similar level of survival benefit compared with abciximab.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2005

Bifurcation coronary lesions treated with the "crush" technique: an intravascular ultrasound analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We report intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings after crush-stenting of bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Preliminary results with the crush-stent technique are encouraging; however, isolated reports suggest that restenosis at the side branch (SB) ostium continues to be a problem. METHODS: Forty patients with bifurcation lesions underwent crush-stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent. Postintervention IVUS was performed in both branches in 25 lesions and only the main vessel (MV) in 15 lesions; IVUS analysis included five distinct locations: MV proximal stent, crush area, distal stent, SB ostium, and SB distal stent. RESULTS: Overall, the MV minimum stent area was larger than the SB (6.7 +/- 1.7 mm2 vs. 4.4 +/- 1.4 mm2, p < 0.0001, respectively). When only the MV was considered, the minimum stent area was found in the crush area (rather than the proximal or MV distal stent) in 56%. When both the MV and the SB were considered, the minimum stent area was found at the SB ostium in 68%. The MV minimum stent area measured <4 mm2 in 8% of lesions and <5 mm2 in 20%. For the SB, a minimum stent area <4 mm2 was found in 44%, and a minimum stent area <5 mm2 in 76%, typically at the ostium. "Incomplete crushing"--incomplete apposition of SB or MV stent struts against the MV wall proximal to the carina--was seen in >60% of non-left main lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of bifurcation lesions treated with the crush technique, the smallest minimum stent area appeared at the SB ostium. This may contribute to a higher restenosis rate at this location.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

Impact of in-hospital acquired thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Thrombocytopenia that develops after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may result in hemorrhagic complications, requirement for blood product transfusions, and potentially thrombotic or ischemic complications. The incidence and prognostic significance of thrombocytopenia, in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who undergo primary PCI have not been evaluated. In the CADILLAC trial 2,082 patients who had AMI within 12 hours of onset without shock were prospectively randomized to receive balloon angioplasty with or without abciximab versus stenting with or without abciximab. Acquired thrombocytopenia, defined as a nadir platelet count <100 x 10(9)/L in patients who did not have baseline thrombocytopenia, developed in 50 of 1,975 qualifying patients (2.5%) after primary PCI. By multivariate analysis, acquired thrombocytopenia developed more frequently in patients who had non-insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 3.88 [OR], p = 0.0002), previous statin administration (OR 3.28, p = 0.002), and use of abciximab (OR 2.06, p = 0.02) and less frequently in patients who had previous aspirin use (OR 0.26, p = 0.002), a higher baseline platelet count (OR 1.20, p < 0.0001), and greater body mass index (OR 0.90, p = 0.006). Patients who developed thrombocytopenia versus those who did not had higher in-hospital rates of major hemorrhagic complications (10.0% vs 2.7%, p = 0.01), greater requirement for blood transfusions (10.0% vs 3.9%, p = 0.05), longer hospital stay (median 4.8 vs 3.6 days, p = 0.008), and increased costs (median dollar 14,466 vs dollar 11,629, p = 0.001). All-cause mortality was markedly increased at 30 days (8.0% vs 1.6%, p = 0.0008) and at 1 year (10.0% vs 3.9%, p = 0.03) in patients who developed thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, thrombocytopenia that develops after primary PCI for AMI, although uncommon, is associated with increased hemorrhagic complications and decreased survival.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of the prognostic effect of left versus right versus no bundle branch block on presenting electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty in the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials.

The presence of bundle branch block (BBB) has been associated with poor outcomes in patients who have acute myocardial infarction. Whether this is true in the angioplasty era is not known. We sought to evaluate the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction and BBB who were treated with primary angioplasty. We evaluated 3,053 patients who underwent emergency catheterization in the PAMI trials. Patients who had left BBB (n = 48, 1.6%) on presenting electrocardiogram were compared with patients who had right BBB (n = 95, 3.1%) or no BBB (n = 2,910, 95.3%). Patients who had BBB were older and more frequently had diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and previous coronary artery bypass grafting. They had lower ejection fraction and more multivessel disease. There were no significant differences in door-to-balloon time, final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade or stent use. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (death, ischemic target vessel revascularization, and reinfarction) were higher in patients who had BBB due primarily to increased in-hospital death (left BBB 14.6%, right BBB 7.4%, no BBB 2.8%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, left BBB was an independent predictor of in-hospital death (odds ratio 5.53, 95% confidence interval 1.89 to 16.1, p = 0.002). In conclusion, patients who have acute myocardial infarction and BBB have increased co-morbidities and higher mortality rates despite treatment with primary angioplasty. Despite early identification of multivessel disease with triage to angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting, if necessary, similar treatment times, and final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow, the presence of left BBB on admission electrocardiogram in patients who have acute myocardial infarction is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Because 85% of deaths in patients who have left BBB occur within the first week, these patients should be recognized early and receive prompt and aggressive treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Impact of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition on the paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris or provocable myocardial ischemia (a TAXUS IV substudy).

Whether the benefits that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors confer in patients who undergo bare metal stent implantation extend to drug-eluting stents is unknown. We performed a prespecified subgroup analysis of the TAXUS IV study population to examine the effect of procedural glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition during paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation on periprocedural creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) levels. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered to 57.7% of patients who had been randomized to receive the TAXUS stent and to 56.7% of those who had been randomized to receive the control stent. Among patients who received the TAXUS stent, the rate of CK-MB increases of >3 times the normal level was 2.6-fold higher in those who received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor than in those who did not (11.4% vs 4.4%, p = 0.0015). Composite rates of major adverse cardiac events and target vessel failure were also higher at 1 month in the GP IIb/IIIa group. By multivariate analysis, use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors during stenting with the TAXUS stent was an independent predictor of CK-MB increases >3 times the normal level. Further studies are warranted.

Abciximab↗