PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gregg W Stone

Publications and source records attributed to Gregg W Stone.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Intravascular ultrasound assessment of ulcerated ruptured plaques: a comparison of culprit and nonculprit lesions of patients with acute coronary syndromes and lesions in patients without acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear why some plaque ruptures lead to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) but others do not. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 80 plaque ruptures in 74 patients and compared culprit lesions of ACS patients with nonculprit lesions of ACS patients and lesions of non-ACS patients; both culprit and nonculprit plaque ruptures were studied in 6 of 54 ACS patients. Intravascular ultrasound findings suggesting thrombus were observed more frequently in culprit lesions of ACS patients (n=35) compared with nonculprit lesions of ACS patients (n=19) and lesions of non-ACS patients (n=26): 60% versus 32% versus 8% (P<0.001). At the minimal lumen site, smaller lumen areas (3.3+/-1.5 versus 5.4+/-2.6 versus 6.1+/-2.0 mm2, P<0.001) and greater area stenosis (61+/-15% versus 50+/-14% versus 46+/-18%, P=0.002) and plaque burden (80+/-8% versus 71+/-8% versus 69+/-10%, P<0.001) were observed in culprit lesions of ACS patients compared with nonculprit lesions of ACS patients and lesions of non-ACS patients. Lesions were longer (18.7+/-6.4 versus 154.9+/-6.1 versus 12.0+/-4.9 mm, P<0.001) and rupture site remodeling indices were greater (1.26+/-0.21 versus 1.24+/-0.21 versus 1.09+/-0.05, P=0.002). Independent predictors of culprit plaque ruptures in ACS patients were smaller minimum lumen areas (P=0.02) and presence of thrombus (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured plaques in culprit lesions of ACS patients have smaller lumens; greater plaque burdens, area stenosis, and remodeling indices; and more thrombus. Plaque rupture itself does not lead to symptoms. The association of plaque rupture with a smaller lumen area and/or thrombus formation causes lumen compromise and leads to symptoms.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting and abciximab for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) trial.

BACKGROUND: Both stenting and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab improve outcomes for patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the cost-effectiveness of these strategies is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective cost-utility analysis among US participants in the CADILLAC trial. Patients with AMI (n=1703) were randomized to stenting versus balloon angioplasty (PTCA) and abciximab versus no abciximab according to a 2-by-2 factorial design. Total 1-year costs and lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, measured as cost per quality-adjusted year of life (QALY) gained, were calculated. Compared with PTCA, stenting increased procedural costs by 1148 dollars and initial hospital costs by 1384 dollars (both P<0.001). By 1-year, stenting led to fewer repeat revascularization procedures and reduced follow-up medical care costs by 1215 dollars, such that aggregate costs were similar for the PTCA and stent groups (18 690 dollars versus 18 859 dollars, P=0.75). The cost-effectiveness ratio for stenting versus PTCA was favorable at 11 237 dollars/QALY gained and remained <20 000 dollars/QALY in sensitivity analyses. Compared with standard anticoagulation, abciximab increased initial procedural costs by 1122 dollars (P<0.001). By facilitating accelerated hospital discharge, abciximab reduced length of stay by approximately 0.6 days, offsetting most of the drug costs. These cost offsets were not maintained, however; aggregate 1-year costs for the abciximab group were 1244 dollars greater than for standard therapy (19 389 dollars versus 18 145 dollars , P=0.02). Abciximab was reasonably cost-effective (cost-effectiveness ratio 21 305 dollars/QALY) only if nonsignificant differences in 1-year mortality (3.7% versus 4.3%, P=0.62) were incorporated in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting is a highly cost-effective treatment for AMI. The cost-effectiveness of abciximab in this setting is uncertain and depends primarily on whether long-term survival is enhanced.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Fenoldopam mesylate for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures is associated with a marked increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Fenoldopam mesylate, a specific agonist of the dopamine-1 receptor, preserves renal blood flow after iodinated contrast administration and has shown promise in ameliorating contrast nephropathy in previous observational and small randomized trials. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of fenoldopam mesylate in preventing contrast nephropathy after invasive cardiovascular procedures. DESIGN: Prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter randomized trial with serial serum creatinine levels measured at a central biochemistry laboratory (at baseline and 1, 24, 48, and 72 to 96 hours after study drug administration) and 30-day clinical follow-up. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Between March 2001 and July 2002, 315 patients with creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (1.00 mL/s) at 28 centers in the United States were randomized to receive fenoldopam mesylate (n = 157) or placebo (n = 158). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were hydrated and randomized to receive intravenous fenoldopam (0.05 microg/kg/min titrated to 0.10 microg/kg/min) vs matching placebo, starting 1 hour prior to angiography and continuing for 12 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as an increase of 25% or more in serum creatinine level within 96 hours postprocedure. RESULTS: Mean (SD) patient age was 70 (11) years, and 49% had diabetes mellitus. Mean (SD) baseline creatinine clearance was 29.0 (10.0) mL/min (0.48 [0.16] mL/s) (range, 7.5-56.8 mL/min [0.12-0.94 mL/s]), and 157 (108) mL of contrast was administered during the procedures. The primary end point of contrast-induced nephropathy occurred in 33.6% of patients assigned to receive fenoldopam vs 30.1% assigned to receive placebo (relative risk, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.57; P =.61). There were no significant differences in the 30-day rates of death (2.0% vs 3.8%, P =.50), dialysis (2.6% vs 1.9%, P =.72), or rehospitalization (17.6% vs 19.9%, P =.66) in fenoldopam vs placebo randomized patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The selective dopamine-1 agonist fenoldopam mesylate does not prevent further renal function deterioration after contrast administration in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Outcomes following bail-out abciximab administration during primary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (The CADILLAC Trial).

The utility of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors as a "bail-out" modality after unsuccessful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction is unknown. In the CADILLAC trial, of 1,030 control patients, 62 patients (6.0%) crossed over and received abciximab for procedural complications or suboptimal angioplasty results. Compared with patients who received routine upfront abciximab, those treated with bail-out abciximab had markedly lower rates of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow and increased rates of hemorrhagic and ischemic complications at 30 days and 1 year.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Outcomes of bail-out stenting for suboptimal balloon angioplasty during primary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (The CADILLAC trial).

The results of bail-out stenting after unsuccessful primary balloon angioplasty compared with routine stenting or successful balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction are unknown. In the CADILLAC trial, 168 of 1,044 patients (16.1%) randomized to balloon angioplasty crossed over to stenting after unsuccessful dilatation. Event-free survival was similar after bail-out and routine stenting, and was greater than after successful balloon angioplasty.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary interventions on risk of hemorrhagic stroke in patients >or=75 years of age versus those <75 years of age.

Of 1,369 consecutive patients who underwent stent-assisted coronary angioplasty and who were treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during these procedures, 17.5% were >or=75 years of age. Compared with patients <75 years old, those >or=75 years of age had similar procedural and in-hospital outcomes but significantly higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke (0.08% vs 1.2%, p <0.001).

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Feasibility and implications of an early discharge strategy after percutaneous intervention with abciximab in acute myocardial infarction (the CADILLAC Trial).

Early complications may hamper efforts to hasten discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for myocardial infarction (MI). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, by reducing early recurrent ischemia, may aid in these efforts. We examined whether adjunctive abciximab could accelerate discharge and reduce costs within a trial of primary PCI after acute MI. The CADILLAC trial randomized 2,082 patients with MI to 1 of 4 reperfusion strategies in a 2 x 2 factorial design: angioplasty, angioplasty with abciximab, stent implantation, or stenting with abciximab. Patients randomized to abciximab had postprocedural heparin withheld, and discharge scheduled for days 1.5 to 2 (low-risk patients) or days 2 to 3 (high-risk patients) after MI if they were stable. Other patients were discharged at the physician's discretion. Abciximab treatment was associated with significant reductions in the primary end points of in-hospital death, reinfarction, ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR), or disabling stroke (5.6% vs 2.7%, p = 0.003)--largely reflecting reduced ischemic TVR (3.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.002)--and in early subacute thrombosis (1.3% vs 0.2%, p = 0.01). Hospitalization was significantly shorter in abciximab-treated patients (median 3.1 vs 3.5 days, p <0.001), but total in-hospital costs did not differ significantly (13,413 +/- 5,309 US dollars vs 13,000 +/- 6,006 US dollars, p = 0.13). Rates of the composite end point did not differ significantly during the week after discharge (0.8% vs 0.2%, p = 0.10), nor did component event rates. Abciximab during primary PCI is associated with fewer early adverse outcomes, likely contributing to offset its cost. Hospitalizations after primary PCI are so short, however, that efforts to accelerate discharge with abciximab appear unfeasible, and overall costs remain unchanged.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Variation in hospital length of stay in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty and the need to change the diagnostic-related group system.

Our findings show significant variation in length of hospital stay among patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention; length of stay can be predicted from baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. Our investigation suggests the need for a multi-tier diagnostic-related group system for patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

The incidence, predictors, and outcomes of early reinfarction after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the incidence, predictors, and clinical consequences of one-month reinfarction (RE-MI) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: One-month reinfarction after AMI significantly increases long-term mortality; however, little is known about the incidence and predictors of RE-MI in patients undergoing primary angioplasty. METHODS: We analyzed data from 3,646 patients who underwent primary PCI in the Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies. We studied the incidence, correlates, and clinical outcomes of 30-day RE-MI. RESULTS: Reinfarction within one month of index hospitalization occurred in 77 (2.1%) of patients. In multivariate analysis, admission Killip class >1 (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 3.76), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.30 to 4.74), final coronary stenosis >30% (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.15), and presence of coronary dissection (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.24) and thrombus (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.53) on the final angiogram were independent correlates of RE-MI. One-month reinfarction was independently associated with death (OR 7.14, 95% CI 3.28 to 15.5) and ischemic target vessel revascularization (I-TVR) (OR 15.0, 95% CI 8.68 to 26.0) at six months. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, although early RE-MI is uncommon in patients treated by primary PCI, it is a significant independent predictor of death and I-TVR at six months. Admission Killip class >1 and left ventricular systolic dysfunction were associated with higher incidence of RE-MI. Our results suggest that optimal revascularization during primary PCI may decrease RE-MI rates.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2003

Triple antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved outcomes including one-year survival: results from the Do Tirofiban and ReoProGive Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET).

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine if clopidogrel treatment initiated before coronary stenting improved clinical outcomes among patients receiving aspirin and a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy plays a pivotal role in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). METHODS: Outcomes among 4,809 patients randomized to tirofiban or abciximab during PCI with stent placement were compared according to whether they received 300 mg of clopidogrel before PCI (93.1%) versus immediately after the procedure. RESULTS: The 30-day primary composite end point (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or urgent target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was lower among clopidogrel-pretreated patients (6.6% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.009), mainly because of reduction of MI (6.0% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.012). The benefit of clopidogrel pretreatment was sustained at six months (death, MI, any TVR: 14.6% vs. 19.8%, HR = 0.71, p = 0.010), and this was due mainly to lowering of death and MI (7.8% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.001). At one year, clopidogrel pretreatment was associated with a lower mortality rate (1.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.011). Because clopidogrel pretreatment was not randomized, multivariable and propensity analyses were performed. After adjusting for baseline heterogeneity, clopidogrel pretreatment was an independent predictor for death or MI at 30 days (HR = 0.63, p = 0.012) and at six months (HR = 0.61, p = 0.003), and survival at one year (HR = 0.53, p = 0.044). No excess in 30-day bleeding events was noted with clopidogrel pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing coronary stent placement with aspirin and a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, clopidogrel pretreatment is associated with a reduction of death and MI irrespective of the type of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor used.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Outcomes of optimal or "stent-like"balloon angioplasty in acutemyocardial infarction: the CADILLAC trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare outcomes between patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with an optimal or "stent-like" result versus patients who underwent routine stent placement. BACKGROUND: Recent studies in patients with AMI undergoing stent implantation have suggested that PTCA may no longer be a relevant treatment modality for stent eligible lesions. However, whether routine stent placement is superior or necessary when an optimal PTCA or "stent-like" result is achieved is unknown. METHODS: In the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial, 2,082 patients with AMI were randomly assigned to undergo PTCA alone, PTCA + abciximab, stenting alone, or stenting + abciximab. Outcomes were compared in patients achieving an optimal acute PTCA result (residual core laboratory diameter stenosis <30% without significant dissection) versus those assigned to routine stenting. RESULTS: Optimal PTCA was achieved in 40.7% of patients randomized to balloon angioplasty, including 38.5% and 42.7% assigned to PTCA alone and PTCA + abciximab, respectively. Ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days occurred more frequently after optimal PTCA than routine stenting (5.1% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.007). The one-year composite adverse event rate (death, reinfarction, disabling stroke, or TVR) was greater after optimal PTCA than routine stenting (21.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.001), driven largely by increased rates of ischemic TVR (19.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001); no significant differences were present in the rates of death, reinfarction, or disabling stroke between the two groups. Angiographic restenosis also was more common with optimal PTCA than routine stenting (36.2% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.003). Even a post-PTCA diameter stenosis of <20% (realized in 12% of patients) did not result in outcomes equivalent to stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Even if an optimal result is achieved after primary PTCA in AMI, early and late outcomes can be further improved with routine stent implantation.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Benefits and risks of abciximab use in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial.

BACKGROUND: Trials of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (MI) have shown improved early clinical and angiographic outcomes with treatment. However, variations in trial designs, modest sample sizes, and limited long-term follow-up have precluded these studies from being definitive. METHODS AND RESULTS: As a prespecified secondary analysis of the CADILLAC trial, we compared early and late outcomes by abciximab assignment among 2082 patients randomized in an open-label, 2x2 factorial-design trial of primary stenting versus angioplasty and abciximab treatment (n=1052) versus no abciximab treatment (n=1030). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Abciximab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the composite end point of death, MI, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR), or disabling stroke at 30 days (4.6% versus 7.0%; relative risk, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93; P=0.01). Subacute thrombosis also was significantly reduced with abciximab treatment. At 12 months, however, rates of the composite end point did not differ significantly (18.4% for controls versus 16.9% for abciximab-treated patients; relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P=0.29), reflecting a decrease in the relative difference in TVR rates (ie, no effect of abciximab on reducing restenosis). In an angiographic substudy (n=656), myocardial salvage, restenosis, and infarct-artery reocclusion at 7 months were unaffected by abciximab treatment. There was no significant interaction between stenting and abciximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive abciximab treatment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention significantly enhanced 30-day event-free survival, predominantly by reducing ischemia-driven TVR. Abciximab treatment did not affect the composite end point at 1 year, reflecting a lack of effect on restenosis.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Frequency, determinants, and clinical implications of residual intracoronary thrombus following primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

The presence of intracoronary thrombus after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) worsens clinical outcomes. We performed this study to assess the incidence of intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the clinical impact of nonocclusive thrombus. In 2,148 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI)-2, Stent PAMI, and PAMI No-Surgery-On-Site trials, we compared clinical and angiographic characteristics of 131 patients (6%) who had angiographically visible thrombus after PCI with those who did not (n = 2,017). In the subset of 2,115 patients with post-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 or 3 flow, we assessed the impact of post-PCI thrombus (n = 110) on in-hospital, 1-month, and 1-year outcomes (reinfarction, ischemic target vessel revascularization [I-TVR], death, and major adverse cardiovascular events [MACEs] [i.e., death, reinfarction, or I-TVR]). Lack of stent use, presence of thrombus before PCI, and no history of PCI were independent correlates of post-PCI thrombus. Patients with nonocclusive thrombus after PCI had more reinfarctions during the index hospitalization (5.5% vs 2.0%, p = 0.03) and at 1 month (6.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.01) and had nonsignificantly higher I-TVR (during hospitalization 5.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.13; at 1 month 5.9% vs 3.4%, p = 0.17), but similar mortality and MACE rates as those without post-PCI thrombus. In multivariate analysis, post-PCI thrombus was not a significant predictor of in-hospital or 1-month reinfarction. At 1 year, clinical outcomes were similar between patient groups (reinfarction 8.3% vs 4.7%, p = 0.14; I-TVR 12.5% vs 12.1%, p = 0.91; death 5.9% vs 5.0%, p = 0.68; and MACEs 21% vs 18%, p = 0.54). We conclude that residual intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty is relatively uncommon. In patients who achieve TIMI 2 or 3 flow after PCI, intracoronary thrombus is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. However, differences in outcomes between patients with and without residual thombus are related to baseline clinical differences rather than thrombus per se.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of in-hospital and one-year outcomes after multiple coronary arterial stenting in patients > or =80 years old versus those <80 years old.

The present study evaluated in-hospital and 1-year outcomes after multivessel stenting in patients aged > or =80 (75 patients, 241 lesions) and <80 years (894 patients, 2,678 lesions). Despite a high technical success rate of multivessel stenting, octogenarians had higher in-hospital cardiac and noncardiac complication rates and a higher mortality rate at 1-year clinical follow-up compared with their younger counterparts.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Long-term follow-up of patients after gamma intracoronary brachytherapy failure (from GAMMA-I, GAMMA-II, and SCRIPPS-III).

We report the long-term outcome of 225 patients who failed gamma-brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis. Total adverse events, target vessel revascularization, and myocardial infarction were higher after repeat percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting. Therefore, coronary artery bypass grafting may be the preferable first-line therapy in these patients until other therapies (i.e., drug-eluting stents) are available. Shorter time from brachytherapy to radiation failure and late thrombosis after brachytherapy were independent predictors of adverse events.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2003

Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts.

BACKGROUND: The high rate of periprocedural complications resulting from atherothrombotic embolization after percutaneous intervention in diseased saphenous vein grafts is reduced by distal microcirculatory protection using a balloon occlusion and aspiration system. Whether filter-based catheters, which offer the inherent advantages of maintained perfusion and ease of use, are as effective for this purpose has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 651 patients undergoing percutaneous intervention of 682 saphenous vein graft lesions were prospectively randomized to distal protection with the filter-based FilterWire EX versus the GuardWire balloon occlusion and aspiration system. Device success was 95.5% and 97.2% with the FilterWire EX and GuardWire, respectively (P=0.25). Postprocedural measures of epicardial flow and angiographic complications were similar between the 2 groups, although bailout IIb/IIIa inhibitors were required slightly less frequently in the FilterWire EX group (0% versus 1.5%, P=0.03). The primary end point, the composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 30 days, occurred in 9.9% of FilterWire EX patients and 11.6% of GuardWire patients (difference [95% CI]=-1.7% [-6.4%, 3.1%]; P for superiority=0.53, P for noninferiority=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Distal protection with the FilterWire EX may be safely used as an adjunct to percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein grafts and, compared with distal protection with the GuardWire balloon occlusion and aspiration system, results in similar rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days.

Aged↗