Biomedical subjects

Gregory A Michaud

Publications and source records attributed to Gregory A Michaud.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae WW domains and their interacting proteins.

BACKGROUND: The WW domain is found in a large number of eukaryotic proteins implicated in a variety of cellular processes. WW domains bind proline-rich protein and peptide ligands, but the protein interaction partners of many WW domain-containing proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are largely unknown. RESULTS: We used protein microarray technology to generate a protein interaction map for 12 of the 13 WW domains present in proteins of the yeast S. cerevisiae. We observed 587 interactions between these 12 domains and 207 proteins, most of which have not previously been described. We analyzed the representation of functional annotations within the network, identifying enrichments for proteins with peroxisomal localization, as well as for proteins involved in protein turnover and cofactor biosynthesis. We compared orthologs of the interacting proteins to identify conserved motifs known to mediate WW domain interactions, and found substantial evidence for the structural conservation of such binding motifs throughout the yeast lineages. The comparative approach also revealed that several of the WW domain-containing proteins themselves have evolutionarily conserved WW domain binding sites, suggesting a functional role for inter- or intramolecular association between proteins that harbor WW domains. On the basis of these results, we propose a model for the tuning of interactions between WW domains and their protein interaction partners. CONCLUSION: Protein microarrays provide an appealing alternative to existing techniques for the construction of protein interaction networks. Here we built a network composed of WW domain-protein interactions that illuminates novel features of WW domain-containing proteins and their protein interaction partners.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2006

A pooling-deconvolution strategy for biological network elucidation.

The generation of large-scale data sets is a fundamental requirement of systems biology. But despite recent advances, generation of such high-coverage data remains a major challenge. We developed a pooling-deconvolution strategy that can dramatically decrease the effort required. This strategy, pooling with imaginary tags followed by deconvolution (PI-deconvolution), allows the screening of 2(n) probe proteins (baits) in 2 x n pools, with n replicates for each bait. Deconvolution of baits with their binding partners (preys) can be achieved by reading the prey's profile from the 2 x n experiments. We validated this strategy for protein-protein interaction mapping using both proteome microarrays and a yeast two-hybrid array, demonstrating that PI-deconvolution can be used to identify interactions accurately with fewer experiments and better coverage. We also show that PI-deconvolution can be used to identify protein-small molecule interactions inferred from profiling the yeast deletion collection. PI-deconvolution should be applicable to a wide range of library-against-library approaches and can also be used to optimize array designs.

Computational Biology↗

PubMed2006

Functional protein arrays to facilitate drug discovery and development.

Protein microarrays are miniaturized formats for studying proteins. This technology is empowering investigators with the ability to profile numerous types of interactions to progress basic science research and to advance drug discovery and development. Protein microarrays are poised to make significant contributions to our understanding of biology and disease because: (i) both covalent and non-covalent interactions can be reconstituted on solid-state supports; and (ii) a wealth of knowledge can be generated rapidly from such simple experiments. This feature focuses on applications of protein microarrays that have tremendous potential for addressing bottlenecks in disease-focused discovery efforts.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Functional protein microarrays: just how functional are they?

Arrays of immobilized proteins have been developed for the discovery and characterization of protein functions ranging from molecular recognition to enzymatic activity. The success of these applications is highly dependent upon the maintenance of protein structure and function while in an immobilized state - a largely untested hypothesis. However, the immobilization of functional proteins is not without precedent. Active enzymes have been successfully immobilized for industrial applications for several decades. Furthermore, a survey of recent protein microarray literature reveals that an even wider range of proteins can maintain 'proper' function while immobilized. These reports help to validate the functionality of so-called functional protein microarrays.

DNA-Binding Proteins↗

PubMed2005

Protein microarray-based screening of antibody specificity.

The increased use of antibodies as therapeutics, as well as the growing demand for large numbers of antibodies for high-throughput protein analyses, has been accompanied by a need for more specific antibodies. An array containing every protein for the relevant organism represents the ideal format for an assay to test antibody specificity since it allows the simultaneous screening of thousands of proteins in relatively normalized quantities. Indeed, the use of a yeast proleome array to profile the specificity of several antibodies directed against yeast proteins has recently been described. In this chapter, we present a detailed description of the methods used to probe protein arrays with antibodies as well as the technical issues to consider when carrying out such experiments.

Antibodies↗

PubMed2003

Analyzing antibody specificity with whole proteome microarrays.

Although approximately 10,000 antibodies are available from commercial sources, antibody reagents are still unavailable for most proteins. Furthermore, new applications such as antibody arrays and monoclonal antibody therapeutics have increased the demand for more specific antibodies to reduce cross-reactivity and side effects. An array containing every protein for the relevant organism represents the ideal format for an assay to test antibody specificity, because it allows the simultaneous screening of thousands of proteins for possible cross-reactivity. As an initial test of this approach, we screened 11 polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to approximately 5,000 different yeast proteins deposited on a glass slide and found that, in addition to recognizing their cognate proteins, the antibodies cross-reacted with other yeast proteins to varying degrees. Some of the interactions of the antibodies with noncognate proteins could be deduced by alignment of the primary amino acid sequences of the antigens and cross-reactive proteins; however, these interactions could not be predicted a priori. Our findings show that proteome array technology has potential to improve antibody design and selection for applications in both medicine and research.

Antibodies↗

PubMed2002

Proteomic approaches for the global analysis of proteins.

Improvements in technology that allow miniaturization and high-throughput analyses of thousand of genes and gene products have changed the focus and scope of research and development in both academia and industry. It is now possible to study entire proteomes with the goals of elucidating protein expression, subcellular localization, biochemical activities, and their regulation. Alterations in different cell types and conditions and in normal and disease states can be revealed. This wealth of information not only has facilitated our basic understanding of many biological processes but also has enormous potential for drug discovery and development.

Data Collection↗