PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Guillaume Bobrie

Publications and source records attributed to Guillaume Bobrie.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Blunt renal trauma-induced hypertension: prevalence, presentation, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Blunt renal trauma (RT) may cause hypertension. We assessed the frequency and mechanisms of RT, and blood pressure (BP) outcome after treatment. METHODS: We searched the records of all patients referred to our hypertension unit and included those of previously normotensive patients who developed hypertension within 6 months of RT. RESULTS: Ten of the 17,410 referred patients, with a median age of 26 years, developed hypertension 0 to 3 months after a well-documented RT. Median BP at referral was 170/107 mm Hg. Median glomerular filtration rate was 89 mL/min. Five patients had hematuria. Median kidney length was 107 mm on the damaged side and 114 mm on the opposite side. Renal artery lesions were present in six cases. A pattern of unilateral renin hypersecretion and contralateral suppression was present in five of eight cases with unilateral RT. Six patients underwent surgery. Seven months after referral, median BP was 128/79 mm Hg. The BP was <140/90 mm Hg without medication in one patient who did not undergo surgery and in three patients who did. CONCLUSIONS: Renal trauma is a rare cause of hypertension, mostly in young men. Hypertension is usually renin dependent and associated with parenchymal injury. The RT-induced hypertension may resolve spontaneously and is amenable to surgery.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2006

Blood pressure and renal outcomes in patients with kidney infarction and hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the causes and frequency of kidney infarction associated with hypertension, and the blood pressure and renal function outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed the records of patients with kidney infarction documented by angiography and referred to a hypertension unit. RESULTS: Spontaneous kidney infarction was documented in 55 of 18,287 patients and was associated with renal artery disease in 41 cases. Twenty-five patients had a longstanding history of hypertension at referral, and 30 patients presented with acute hypertension. Patients with acute hypertension were more likely to report a history of lumbar pain and to develop malignant hypertension than patients with longstanding hypertension; they also had higher plasma renin concentrations. Data for long-term follow-up after referral were available for 36 patients, including 15 patients who underwent surgery or renal artery angioplasty. From referral to most recent follow-up, the blood pressure decreased from 176/111 to 143/89 mmHg in patients with longstanding hypertension, and from 183/111 to 127/80 mmHg in those with acute hypertension (P = 0.007/0.041 for between-group differences). Three patients with acute hypertension had normal blood pressure without treatment at follow-up. Patients with long-term follow-up displayed no change in the glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSION: Kidney infarction is a rare cause of hypertension, usually associated with renal artery lesions. In cases of kidney infarction with acute hypertension, the blood pressure outcome is favorable following intervention and/or medication, and hypertension may resolve spontaneously.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Predictive factors for masked hypertension within a population of controlled hypertensives.

CONTEXT: Prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) is far from negligible reaching 40% in some studies. The SHEAF study (Self measurement of blood pressure at Home in the Elderly: Assessment and Follow-Up) and others clearly showed that masked hypertension (MH) as detected by home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. OBJECTIVE: Systematic HBPM to detect MH is not yet routine. The aim of this work is to better define the clinical profile of masked hypertensives within a population with controlled office blood pressure (BP) and the factors associated with a higher prevalence of MH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BP was measured at the clinic by the doctor and at home by the patient himself. Risk factors for MH were analysed in a cohort of 1150 treated hypertensive patients over the age of 60 (mean age 70 +/- 6.5, 48.9% men) with controlled office BP. (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg). RESULTS: 463 patients (40%) were masked hypertensives (SBP > or = 135 mmHg or DBP > or = 85 mmHg at home). Three parameters were associated with MH (odds ratio OR): office SBP (OR = 1.110), male gender (OR = 2.214) and age (OR = 1.031). Decision trees showed a 130 mmHg SBP was an efficient threshold to propose HBPM with a higher probability to detect MH. Subsequent variables were male gender and age over 70 in males. CONCLUSION: To detect masked hypertension, it would be logical to first of all select patients whose office SBP is between 130 and 140 mmHg.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

A home blood pressure monitoring study comparing the antihypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonist fixed combinations.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan 80 mg v irbesartan 150 mg when combined with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg. METHODS: Untreated or uncontrolled hypertensive adults (n = 800) were enrolled by primary care physicians. After a 5-week open-label lead-in phase in which all patients received 12.5 mg HCTZ once daily, subjects whose blood pressure (BP) remained uncontrolled were randomized (n = 464) to valsartan/HCTZ (80/12.5 mg) or irbesartan/HCTZ (150/12.5 mg) for 8 weeks. Home BP monitoring (HBPM) was performed in the morning and in the evening for 5 days, at baseline, and after 8 weeks. Office BP measurements were obtained at baseline and after 8 weeks. RESULTS: Irbesartan/HCTZ produced greater reductions in average systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) measured by HBPM than valsartan/HCTZ (SBP: -13.0 v -10.6 mm Hg, P = .0094; DBP: -9.5 v -7.4 mm Hg, P = .0007). These differences were more pronounced in the morning (trough) than in the evening. Office BP measurements also showed greater reductions in trough seated SBP and DBP with irbesartan/HCTZ compared with valsartan/HCTZ. Normalization rates observed with HBPM (SBP <135 mm Hg and DBP <85 mm Hg) were significantly greater with irbesartan/HCTZ than with valsartan/HCTZ (50.2 v 33.2%; P = .0003). The overall safety was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The superior BP-lowering potency of the fixed combination irbesartan/HCTZ (150/12.5 mg) over valsartan/HCTZ (80/12.5 mg), evidenced independently from the investigators by HBPM, supports the use of this technique in trials with prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint designs.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Cardiovascular prognosis of "masked hypertension" detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients.

CONTEXT: Blood pressure (BP) measurement in clinicians' offices with a mercury sphygmomanometer has numerous drawbacks. In contrast, the use of home BP measurement improves measurement precision and reproducibility. However, data about its prognostic value are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of home vs office BP measurement by general practitioners in a European population of elderly patients being treated for hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Office and home BP and cardiac risk factors were measured at baseline in a cohort of 4939 treated hypertensive patients (mean age, 70 [SD, 6.5] years; 48.9% men) who were recruited and followed up by their usual general practitioners without specific recommendations about their management. The cohort was then followed up for a mean of 3.2 (SD, 0.5) years. The thresholds defining uncontrolled hypertension were at least 140/90 mm Hg for office BP and 135/85 mm Hg for home BP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was cardiovascular mortality. Secondary end points were total mortality and the combination of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, transient ischemic attack, hospitalization for angina or heart failure, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, clinical status was known for 99.9% of patients. At least 1 cardiovascular event had occurred in 324 (incidence, 22.2/1000 patient-years). For BP self-measurement at home, each 10-mm Hg increase in systolic BP increased the risk of a cardiovascular event by 17.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.0%-23.8%) and each 5-mm Hg increase in diastolic BP increased that risk by 11.7% (95% CI, 5.7%-18.1%). Conversely, for the same increase in BP observed using office measurement, there was no significant increase in the risk of a cardiovascular event. In a multivariable model with patients having controlled hypertension (normal home and office BP) as the referent, the hazard ratio of cardiovascular events was 1.96 (95% CI, 1.27-3.02) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (high BP with both measurement methods), 2.06 (95% CI, 1.22-3.47) in patients with normal office BP and elevated home BP, and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.67-2.10) in patients with elevated office BP and normal home BP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that home BP measurement has a better prognostic accuracy than office BP measurement. Blood pressure should systematically be measured at home in patients receiving treatment for hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Recent development of recommendations for the screening and treatment of arterial hypertension].

Hypertension is a very prevalent condition which alone, or in association with various risk factors including smoking, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus, may lead to fatal or non-fatal stroke or myocardial infarction. Antihypertensive treatment is effective at preventing cardiovascular events. However, only a minority of patients with hypertension ever experience a stroke or myocardial infarction and a few patients with well-controlled hypertension may suffer such events. Before committing a patient to lifelong treatment, the physician should ensure that high blood pressure is not a symptom of an underlying correctable disease, that hypertension is persistent and requires medication, and that prevention measures take into account all correctable risk factors.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Hypertension in the elderly].

Systolic blood pressure rises with age, and the prevalence of hypertension (systolic pressure of 140 mmHg or more and diastolic pressure below 90 mmHg) exceeds 70% after the age of 70. At any age, high systolic pressure is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, stroke and myocardial infarction. Antihypertensive drugs reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic pressure exceeding 160 mmHg. The ability of blood pressure reduction to prevent cardiovascular events in elderly hypertensive patients is often compromised by poor systolic pressure control. This is due to the relatively limited efficacy of antihypertensive medications to normalize systolic blood pressure, but also to the fact that many physicians fail to follow systolic hypertension treatment guidelines.

Adult↗