Guillaume Pare | PubMed Health

PubMed2026

Five tenets for advancing evidence-based precision medicine.

Precision medicine for complex diseases uses individual-level characteristics to improve prediction of risk, therapeutic response and prognosis. Many precision medicine studies leverage existing data types and analytic methods to reveal new insights; however, beyond oncology, there has been limited success in translating precision medicine research for complex diseases into clinical practice. Thus, there is a need to identify areas for improvement, particularly in translation-oriented analytical methods and study designs. In this perspective article, we outline five fundamental tenets to enhance the efficient clinical translation of precision medicine research. These tenets focus on addressing (1) heterogeneity in risk, response and prognosis; (2) signal robustness; (3) structured statistical benchmarking against key performance indicators; (4) precision trial designs; and (5) risks and benefits to individuals and society. Our intention is to promote clinically meaningful, reproducible, scalable and equitable health outcomes through precision medicine, beyond those possible through contemporary approaches.

Precision Medicine↗

PubMed2025

Cross-omics risk scores of inflammation markers are associated with all-cause mortality: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Inflammation is a critical component of chronic diseases, aging progression, and lifespan. Omics signatures may characterize inflammation status beyond blood biomarkers. We leveraged genetics (polygenic risk score [PRS]), metabolomics (metabolomic risk score [MRS]), and epigenetics (epigenetic risk score [ERS]) to build multi-omics-multi-marker risk scores for inflammation status represented by the level of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). We found that multi-omics risk scores generally outperformed single-omics risk scores in predicting all-cause mortality in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Compared with circulating inflammation biomarkers, some multi-omics risk scores had a higher hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality when including both score and circulating IL-6 in the same model (1-SD IL-6 MRS-ERS: HR = 2.20 [1.55-3.13] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6 HR = 0.94 [0.67,1.32]. 1-SD IL-6 PRS-MRS: HR = 1.47 [1.35,1.59] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6 HR = 1.33 [1.18, 1.51]. 1-SD PRS-MRS-ERS: HR = 1.95 [1.40, 2.70] vs. 1-SD circulating IL-6: HR = 0.99 [0.71, 1.39]). In the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHS II, and Health Professional Follow-up Study with available omics, 1 SD of IL-6 PRS and 1-SD IL-6 PRS-MRS had HR = 1.12 [1.00,1.26] and HR = 1.13 [1.01,1.26] among individuals >65 years old without mutual adjustment of the score and circulating IL-6. Our study demonstrates that some multi-omics scores for inflammation markers may characterize important inflammation burden for an individual beyond those represented by blood biomarkers and improve our prediction capability for the aging process and lifespan.

Humans↗