PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Guillermina Barril

Publications and source records attributed to Guillermina Barril.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

A multicentric survey of the practice of hand hygiene in haemodialysis units: factors affecting compliance.

BACKGROUND: This study intended to investigate the degree of compliance with hand hygiene and use of gloves by health workers in haemodialysis (HD) units, and the factors that influenced adherence to hand hygiene protocols. METHODS: During the month of November 2003, one person observed the health care staff in each of nine different dialysis units, during 495 randomly distributed 30 min observation periods that covered all steps of a haemodialysis session (connection, dialysis and disconnection). The observers noted the number of potential opportunities to implement standard precautions and the number of occasions on which the precautions were actually taken. Adherence to standard precautions was evaluated, analysing the influence of the following variables: the patient-to-nurse ratio, the number of HD shifts scheduled per day, acute HD units vs chronic, whether or not infectious patients were isolated and in-house vs contract cleaning personnel. RESULTS: There were a total of 977 opportunities to wear gloves for, and to wash the hands following, a patient-oriented activity, and 1902 opportunities to wash hands before such an activity. Gloves were actually used on 92.9% of these occasions. Hands were washed only 35.6% of the time after patient contact, and only 13.8% of the time before patient contact. Poor adherence to hand washing was associated with the number of shifts per HD unit per day and with higher patient-to-nurse ratios. In the acute HD units, there was greater adherence to standard precautions than in the chronic units, although there too it was substandard. The personnel's knowledge of patients' infectious status did not modify their adherence to hand hygiene practices. A higher patient-to-nurse ratio independently influenced hand washing both before and after patient contact. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adherence of health care workers to recommended hand washing practices is low. Whether or not programmes promoting higher hand hygiene standards and the potential use of alcohol-based hand cleansers will improve hand hygiene practices in HD units requires further investigation.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2005

Analysis of patient flow into dialysis: role of education in choice of dialysis modality.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in predialysis care, morbidity and mortality remain high. OBJECTIVES: To analyze end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient demographics and clinical data on education on dialysis treatment options, type of chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT), and effects of planned versus non-planned dialysis start. METHODS: 621 patients, from 24 Spanish hospitals, who started RRT in 2002. Peritoneal or vascular access at dialysis initiation was considered "planned." RESULTS: 304 (49%) patients were non-planned and half of them had prior nephrology follow-up. Of the patients with >3 months nephrology follow-up (76% of all), only half were educated on dialysis modalities. Dialysis education was associated with planned start in 73.4% versus 26% in non-educated patients (p < 0.05), shorter follow-up (55 vs 65 months, p = 0.033), more medical visits in the prior year (6.5 vs 4.4, *p < 0.001), more patients starting peritoneal dialysis (31% vs 8.3%*), and more specific follow-up by ESRD unit versus general nephrology care (63% vs 26%*). Non-planned start was associated with older age (63 vs 60.6 years, p = 0.06), fewer medical visits (4.6 vs 6.4*), less education about modality options, and greater use of hemodialysis (92% vs 75%*). Planned patients had better biochemical parameters at start of dialysis. CONCLUSION: Despite nephrology follow-up, half the patients did not have a planned dialysis start. Planned start was associated with better clinical status. More patients chose peritoneal dialysis when educated about dialysis modality options. ESRD-specific units were more likely to provide patient education.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Virus-specific effector CD4+ T-cell responses in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection.

Patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis who are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) may test consistently anti-HCV negative. Because CD4(+) T-cells provide help for antibody production virus-specific effector CD4(+) T-cell responses were investigated in relation to anti-HCV positivity in 15 hemodialysis patients grouped according to HCV antibody and viremia. CD4(+) T-cell reactivity was studied in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by standard lymphocyte proliferation assay and phenotypic/functional characterization (cell-surface staining/cytokine secretion) by flow cytometry. HCV-specific CD4(+) T-cell proliferation in viremic hemodialysis patients was weak or absent independently of their anti-HCV status. Virus-specific CD4(+) T-cells displayed a memory phenotype and showed low to undetectable capacity to secrete effector interferon (IFN)-gamma. Impaired activation-induced cytokine secretion appeared to be Th1 (IFN-gamma) but not Th2 (interleukin-4)-directed and was virus-specific as cytomegalovirus responses were preserved. The frequency ex vivo of CD3(+)CD4(+)IFN-gamma(+) T-cells was independent of the HCV antibody status and comparable between viremic (range: 0.08-1.54%) or non-viremic (0.11-3.2%) hemodialysis patients and healthy donors (0.13-1.10%; P = 0.58). The numbers of CD3(+)CD4(+)IFN-gamma(+) T-cells augmented slightly (P = 0.047) in HCV-infected hemodialysis patients but markedly in only one (greater than ninefold) after HCV stimulation. In conclusion, hemodialysis patients show limited HCV-specific effector CD4(+) Th1-cell responses which nonetheless seem unrelated to the anti-HCV status and are not more impaired due to the ongoing hemodialysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The changing epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in haemodialysis: European multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in HD patients has been known since the early 1990s but its evolution over the last decade is poorly documented. METHODS: All chronic HD patients from 15 Belgian units were tested at (re)start of HD and every 18 months for anti-HCV antibodies (ELISA 2 in May 1991 and November 1992, then ELISA 3 until May 2000). All chronic HD patients from HD units from eight other European countries, whose prevalence of anti-HCV (+) patients had been studied in 1991-1994 (and published except in one country), were tested for anti-HCV antibodies in 1999. RESULTS: Anti-HCV (+) prevalence decreased (P<0.001) from 13.5 (1991) to 6.8% (2000) in the Belgian cohort (n = 1710). Prevalence also decreased (P<0.05) in the participating units from France (42-30%), Sweden (16-9%) and Italy (28-16%), tended to decrease in the participating units from UK (7-3%, P = 0.058) and Hungary (26-15%, P = 0.057) but did not change (NS) in the participating units from Germany (7 to 6%), Spain (5 to 12%) and Poland (42 to 44%). In the Belgian cohort, the prevalence of anti-HCV(+) at (re)start of HD did not change significantly over 1991-2000. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anti-HCV(+) in HD has decreased markedly over the last decade in the participating units from most European countries. This decrease should reduce further the risk of nosocomial and occupational HCV infection in HD and ultimately contribute to improved long-term prognosis of HD patients and kidney graft recipients.

Hepatitis C↗
PubMed2003

Decrease in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence in hemodialysis patients in Spain: effect of time, initiating HCV prevalence studies and adoption of isolation measures.

The effectiveness of isolation measures to prevent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis units is a controversial issue. Strict adherence to the universal infection control precautions has been deemed adequate to prevent nosocomial transmission of HCV. Subsequently, however, select isolation measures, such as the clustering of HCV positive patients in a defined sector of the unit, have been adopted, specially for those units with a high HCV prevalence and when the personnel-patient ratio was such that it could involuntary favor the break of the universal precautions. In this Multicenter Spanish Study on HCV in Dialysis, the importance of both time and isolation measures led to a decrease of HCV prevalence. Time was the most important factor (although interacting with the isolation measures) and was independent of the initial HCV prevalence.

Cross Infection↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Eating behavior disorders in uremia: a question of balance in appetite regulation.

Eating and appetite disorders are frequent complications of the uremic syndrome which contribute to malnutrition in dialysis patients. The data suggest that uremic anorexia may occur with or without abdominal and visceral fat accumulation despite a lower food intake. This form of obesity (i.e., with low food intake and malnutrition) is more common in dialysis patients than obesity with high food intake. This article reviews the current knowledge regarding mechanisms responsible for appetite regulation in normal conditions and in uremic patients. Anorexia in dialysis patients has been historically considered as a sign of uremic toxicity due to "inadequate" dialysis as judged by uncertain means ("middle molecule" accumulation, Kt/V, "peak-concentration hypothesis," and others). We propose the tryptophan-serotonin hypothesis, based on a uremia-induced disorder in patients' amino acid profile--low concentrations of large neutral and branched-chain amino acids with high tryptophan levels. A high rate of tryptophan transport across the blood-brain barrier increases the synthesis of serotonin, a major appetite inhibitor. Inflammation may also play a role in the genesis of anorexia and malnutrition. For example, silent infection with Helicobacter pylori may be a source of cytokines with cachectic action; its eradication improves appetite and nutrition. The evaluation of appetite should take into account cultural and social aspects. Uremic patients showed a universal trend to carbohydrate preference and red meat refusal compared to healthy people. In contrast, white meat was less problematic. Uremic patients also have a remarkable attraction for citrics and strong flavors in general. Eating preferences or refusals have been related to the predominance of some appetite peptide modulators. High levels of cholecystokinin (CCK) (a powerful anorexigen) are associated with early satiety for carbohydrates and neuropeptide Y (NPY) (an orexigen) with repeated food intake. Obesity and elevated body mass index often falsely suggest a good nutritional status. In uremic patients (a hyperinsulinemia state), disorders in the regulation of fat distribution (insulin, leptin, insulin-like growth factor [IGF]-1, fatty acids, and disorders in receptors for insulin, lipoprotein lipase, mitochondrial uncoupling protein-2, and beta 3 adrenoreceptors) may cause abdominal fat accumulation without an increase in appetite. Finally, appetite regulation in uremia is highly complex. Disorders in adipose tissue, gastrointestinal and neuropeptides, retained or hyperproduced inflammatory end products, and central nervous system changes may all play a role. Uremic anorexia may be explained by a hypothalamic hyperserotoninergic state derived from a high concentration of tryptophan and low branched-chain amino acids.

Appetite↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Prevalence of HIV-1-infection in dialysis units in Spain and potential candidates for renal transplantation: results of a Spanish survey].

INTRODUCTION: Patients with HIV infection and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have improved their survival in the last few years. HIV infection is not considered a contradiction for renal transplantation, but little experience exists in renal transplantation in HIV infected individuals. There is no information about the prevalence of HIV infection in Spanish patients under renal replacement therapies (RRT). METHODS: A survey was performed in Spanish dialysis units during 2004. The objective was to study the prevalence and characteristics of HIV infection in patients under RRT in Spain. We also aimed to know how many of them met the Spanish criteria to be included on the renal transplantation waiting list. RESULTS: HIV prevalence was 1.15% (95%CI 0.85-1.45) of 4,962 patients who were under RRT, mostly under hemodialysis and, less commonly, peritoneal dialysis. The most frequent risk factor for HIV infection was parenteral drug use (58%). The most common causes of ESRD were glomerulonephritis (44%). The median time under RRT was 46 months. Coinfections with hepatitis C (60%) and B (7%) were found. Thirty-four percent of patients had a history of aids-defining events. Eighty-six percent were under HAART. The median CD4 cell count was 333 cells/.l and the viral load was undetectable in 68%. Of 40 patients with a completed clinical questionnaire, 9 (22.5%) met the Spanish criteria for renal transplantation. CONCLUSION: HIV prevalence in patients under RRT in Spain is 1.15% (0.85%-1.45%) and 22.5% percent of these patients met the Spanish criteria to be included on a renal transplantation waiting list.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[GESIDA/GESITRA-SEIMC, PNS and ONT consensus document on solid organ transplant (SOT) in HIV-infected patients in Spain (March, 2005)].

Solid organ transplant may be the only therapeutic alternative in some HIV-infected patients. Experience in North America and Europe during the last five years shows that survival at three years after an organ transplant is similar to that observed in HIV-negative patients. The criteria agreed upon to select HIV patients for transplant are: no opportunistic infections (except tuberculosis, oesophageal candidiasis or P. jiroveci -previously carinii- pneumonia), CD4 lymphocyte count above 200 cells/.L (100 cells/.L in the case of liver transplant) and an HIV viral load which is undetectable or suppressible with antiretroviral therapy. Another criterion is a two-year abstinence from heroin and cocaine, although the patient may be in a methadone programme. The main problems in the post-transplant period are pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between antiretorivirals and immunosuppressors, rejection and the management of relapse of HCV infection, which is one of the main causes of post-liver transplant mortality. Up to now, experience with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is scarce in this population. The English version of the manuscript is available at http://www.gesidaseimc.com.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Renal transplantation in patients with HIV infection].

The prevalence of human immunodeficience virus (HIV) infection among patients under renal replacement therapy varies, with estimates of 1% for Europe and 1.5% for the United States. Survival in HIV infected individuals receiving renal replacement therapy has improved since the introduction of high activity antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Current experience in renal transplantation in HIV-infected patients in the United States indicates that the three-year survival rate is similar to that of HIV-negative transplant recipients, with virological and immunological control of the infection by HAART and no increase in the number of opportunistic infections or tumors. The criteria for selecting renal transplantation candidates in this population are the following: no aids-defining events, CD4 cells > 200 cells/.l and undetectable viral load under HAART. In Spain, where most of these patients are former drug abusers, a two-year period of abstinence from cocaine and heroine abuse is also required, although patients can be participating in the methadone program. The main problems in the post-transplantation period have been interactions between HAART and immunosuppressive drugs, management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and the high rate of acute rejection. To date, seven such renal transplantations have been performed in Spain, with favorable patient and graft survival and no progression to aids.

Anti-HIV Agents↗