PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gurkirpal Singh

Publications and source records attributed to Gurkirpal Singh.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Risk of serious NSAID-related gastrointestinal events during long-term exposure: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with increased risk of serious gastrointestinal (GI) events compared with non-exposure. We investigated whether that risk is sustained over time. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (to 2002); MEDLINE, EMBASE, Derwent Drug File and Current Contents (1999-2002); manual searching of reviews (1999-2002). STUDY SELECTION: From 479 search results reviewed and 221 articles retrieved, seven studies of patients exposed to prescription non-selective NSAIDs for more than 6 months and reporting time-dependent serious GI event rates were selected for quantitative data synthesis. These were stratified into two groups by study design. DATA EXTRACTION: Incidence of GI events and number of patients at specific time points were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-regression analyses were performed. Change in risk was evaluated by testing whether the slope of the regression line declined over time. Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provided evaluable data from five NSAID arms (aspirin, naproxen, two ibuprofen arms, and diclofenac). When the RCT data were combined, a small significant decline in annualised risk was seen: - 0.005% (95% CI, - 0.008% to - 0.001%) per month. Sensitivity analyses were conducted because there was disparity within the RCT data. The pooled estimate from three cohort studies showed no significant decline in annualised risk over periods up to 2 years: - 0.003% (95% CI, - 0.008% to 0.003%) per month. CONCLUSIONS: Small decreases in risk over time were observed; these were of negligible clinical importance. For patients who need long-term (> 6 months) treatment, precautionary measures should be considered to reduce the net probability of serious GI events over the anticipated treatment duration. The effect of intermittent versus regular daily therapy on long-term risk needs further investigation.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Celecoxib versus naproxen and diclofenac in osteoarthritis patients: SUCCESS-I Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) safety of celecoxib, compared with nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), among patients with osteoarthritis. METHODS: A total of 13274 osteoarthritis patients from 39 countries were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (BID), celecoxib 200 mg BID, or nonselective NSAID therapy (diclofenac 50 mg BID or naproxen 500 mg BID) for 12 weeks. Standard validated measures were used to assess osteoarthritis efficacy. Serious UGI events were evaluated by 2 blinded, independent, gastrointestinal events committees. RESULTS: Results from all primary efficacy assessments showed that both dosages of celecoxib were as effective as NSAIDs in treating osteoarthritis. Significantly more ulcer complications occurred within the nonselective NSAID group (0.8/100 patient-years) compared with the celecoxib group (0.1/100 patient-years) (odds ratio = 7.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 33.80; P =.008). There were fewer ulcer complications in the celecoxib group compared with the NSAID group, both in patients taking concomitant aspirin and those not taking aspirin, but the difference reached statistical significance only in the latter comparison. The number of cardiovascular thromboembolic events was low and not statistically different between the groups (eg, myocardial infarction rates: celecoxib 10 events [0.55/100 patient-years] vs NSAIDs 1 event [0.11/100 patient-years], (P =.11), but the study was not powered to detect such differences. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of osteoarthritis, celecoxib is as effective as the nonspecific NSAIDs naproxen and diclofenac, but has significantly fewer serious upper gastrointestinal events.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Risk of acute myocardial infarction with nonselective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis.

The use of cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The association between the risks of AMI with nonselective NSAIDs is less clear. We reviewed the published evidence and assessed the risk of AMI with nonselective NSAIDs. We performed a meta-analysis of all studies containing data from population databases that compared the risk of AMI in NSAID users with that in non-users or remote NSAID users. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed AMI. Fourteen studies met predefined criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Nonselective NSAIDs as a class was associated with increased AMI risk (relative AMI risk 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 1.31). Similar findings were found with diclofenac (relative AMI risk 1.38, 95% CI 1.22-1.57) and ibuprofen (relative AMI risk 1.11, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.17). However, this effect was not observed with naproxen (relative AMI risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.88-1.11). In conclusion, based on current evidence, there is a general direction of effect, which suggests that at least some nonselective NSAIDs increase AMI risk. Analysis based on the limited data available for individual NSAIDs, including diclofenac and ibuprofen, supported this finding; however, this was not the case for naproxen. Nonselective NSAIDs are frequently prescribed, and so further investigation into the risk of AMI is warranted because the potential for harm can be substantial.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan.

We evaluated the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the association of H. pylori infection and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) ulcers in a cohort of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Using the clinical database of the cohort of RA patients and the serum titers of H. pylori antibody, 1815 patients were analyzed. Clinical data were successfully collected for 1529 patients over 2 years, and the history of NSAID use and the occurrence of newly diagnosed UGI ulcer were ascertained by patient self-reports and confirmed by their medical records. A total of 871 patients (49.3%) were H. pylori antibody-positive. Rates of positivity for H. pylori in patients with and without NSAID use were 47.5% and 54.7%, respectively (odds ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.58-0.96). The incidence of newly diagnosed UGI ulcer was 0% in the H. pylori-/NSAID- group, 1.24% in the H. pylori-/NSAID+ group, 1.06% in the H. pylori+/NSAID- group, and 3.46% in the H. pylori+/NSAID+ group. The odds ratios of H. pylori infection and NSAID for the occurrence of new UGI ulcers after adjusting for age and sex were 2.97 (95% CI: 1.19-7.38) and 4.31 (95% CI: 0.57-32.4), respectively. Although the prevalence of H. pylori antibody was low in patients with RA compared with that in healthy Japanese individuals, H. pylori infection was a significant risk factor for UGI ulcer in patients with RA.

Journal Article↗

Powering our way to the elusive side effect: a composite outcome 'basket' of predefined designated endpoints in each organ system should be included in all controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To review the methodological insights gained from the CLASS and VIGOR coxib trials and make suggestions for primary safety outcomes in future trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We reviewed the methodology and findings of recent coxib trials and similar studies that have produced considerable controversy. RESULTS: There were statistical power problems with the primary and unexpected endpoints in both coxib trials. One approach for decreasing sample size requirements is using composite outcomes, wherein different clinically relevant endpoints are combined. By virtue of increasing the event rate fewer patients are required to detect a relative treatment effect of 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The recent withdrawal from the market of rofecoxib took years; the approach proposed here could shorten this time. It is important to revisit the comprehensiveness of the ability to detect important outcomes. Composite outcomes can be more varied in content, including mortality and morbidity. The proposed basket would consist of predefined designated endpoints in each organ system that could be associated with the population one is treating, and not just expected to be related to treatment. The goal is to anticipate and have a reasonable chance of detecting the unexpected side effect.

Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors↗

Declines in mortality from acute myocardial infarction in successive incidence and birth cohorts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at high risk for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has become more intensive over the past 2 decades, resulting in tighter control of inflammation and lower levels of disability. The impact of this on atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: Death rates from AMI in a cohort of 3862 patients with rheumatoid arthritis followed up from 1980 to 1997 were studied. Time trends in AMI mortality among successive incidence and birth cohorts were examined by use of multivariable Poisson regression models and by comparing standardized mortality ratios. The mean age was 56 years in this predominantly female cohort (76%), and median disease duration was 6.5 years. During the period of observation, the use of methotrexate increased substantially, whereas that of prednisone was relatively stable. Over the 22,209 person-years of observation, there were 157 deaths as a result of AMI, with a death rate of 7.06 per 1000 person-years. Mortality rates were higher in older age groups and in men. After adjustment for age, sex, race, and disease duration, the risk of AMI declined in successive incidence years (relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.96). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis incident after 1990 did not have excess AMI mortality compared with general population. Declines in mortality trends were observed in successive birth cohorts as well. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality as a result of AMI among patients with rheumatoid arthritis has declined over time.

Adult↗

Risk of serious upper gastrointestinal and cardiovascular thromboembolic complications with meloxicam.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of serious gastrointestinal and thromboembolic complications with approved doses of meloxicam. METHODS: We pooled data from clinical trials of meloxicam at doses of 7.5 or 15 mg/d. A blinded gastrointestinal adjudication committee used prespecified criteria to identify gastric or duodenal perforation, gastric outlet obstruction, or hemodynamically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding. For analysis of thromboembolic complications, investigator-reported events were analyzed without adjudication. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 24,196 patients from 28 trials, most of whom had been followed for up to 60 days. Of these patients, 13,118 received meloxicam (10,158 received a daily dose of 7.5 mg and 2960 received 15 mg), 5283 were treated with diclofenac 100 mg, 181 received diclofenac 150 mg, 5371 were treated with piroxicam 20 mg, and 243 received naproxen 500 mg twice daily. Patients who received 7.5 mg of meloxicam daily had a 0.03% risk of serious upper gastrointestinal events, which was significantly lower than the risk in those who received diclofenac, naproxen, or piroxicam (P <0.02). With the 15 mg daily dose of meloxicam, this risk was significantly different only when compared with piroxicam (P = 0.03). The risk of thromboembolic events in patients treated with meloxicam at either dose was lower than with diclofenac, but similar to that observed with piroxicam and naproxen. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis of 24,196 patients demonstrates that meloxicam has a favorable gastrointestinal and thromboembolic safety profile. However, only a small number of patients were followed for more than 60 days, and meaningful comparisons were not possible in this subgroup.

Adolescent↗

Understanding NSAID-PPI-COX-2 interrelationships.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to treat arthritis but are associated with adverse gastrointestinal events. While the selective COX-2 inhibitors show fewer gastrointestinal complications than NSAIDs, they may not be suitable for all patients and one of them has been associated with serious thrombotic cardiovascular events. Furthermore, many arthritis patients are at high risk of coronary artery disease and take low-dose aspirin, which is also associated with adverse gastrointestinal events. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of gastrointestinal complications in this patient population. Recent randomized clinical trials have also shown that pantoprazole therapy is effective in the healing of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage. Several studies have also demonstrated that pantoprazole is effective in preventing the development of gastrointestinal lesions in patients with continuous NSAID intake. The use of PPIs in combination with nonselective NSAIDs has also been found to be beneficial in patients at high risk for rebleeding and reduces the incidence of dyspepsia. Finally, the combination of a COX-2 inhibitor with a PPI has shown promise in patients with previous NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications who are at high risk for reinjury.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

Attrition bias in rheumatoid arthritis databanks: a case study of 6346 patients in 11 databanks and 65,649 administrations of the Health Assessment Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Patient dropout (attrition) can bias and threaten validity of databank-based studies. Although there are several databanks of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in operation, this phenomenon has not been well studied. METHODS: We studied the attrition patterns of patients with RA in 11 long-running databanks where patients were followed using semiannual Health Assessment Questionnaires. Attrition rates were calculated as the proportion of living patients who were in active followup at the cutoff date. Mantel-Haenszel methods and Weibull regression were used to model the relationship between attrition and age, sex, race, education, disease duration, functional disability, and other characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 6346 patients with RA were recruited into the study cohorts and followed for 32,823 person-years with 65,649 observations. The crude attrition rate was 3.8% per cycle. Rates were lowest in community-based databanks. Smaller size of the centers, inner-city location, and university clinic settings were associated with worse attrition. In multivariable analyses, younger age, lower levels of education, and non-Caucasian race predicted attrition. Level of disability and disease duration were not associated with attrition. Conclusion. In terms of person-years of followup and observation-points, this may be the largest study on attrition to date. While it is possible to have very high overall retention rates, certain types of databanks (smaller, inner-city-based, and university-based) are more likely to be biased due to selective retention of older, more educated Caucasian patients.

Adolescent↗

Validation of a Japanese version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire in 3,763 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a self-administered instrument for measuring functional status in Japanese-speaking rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: We translated the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) into Japanese (original HAQ), and then made a tentative Japanese version of the HAQ (J-HAQ) with culturally appropriate modifications of the arising, eating, and reach category questions. The questionnaire was then administered to 3,763 RA patients (82.6% female; mean age 58.0 years; mean onset age 47.4 years; mean disease duration 10.5 years). RESULTS: This instrument showed excellent internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.927), with a mean interitem correlation of 0.60. For the arising category question, the J-HAQ asks about arising from a futon in addition to a bed because futons are still common in Japanese culture. Arising from a futon is generally more difficult for disabled individuals than is arising from a bed, so the arising score was higher in the J-HAQ (mean score 0.82) than in the original HAQ (0.48). The average scores for the eating and reach categories were virtually identical for the original HAQ and the J-HAQ, with correlation coefficients of 0.979 and 0.926, respectively. Thus, the overall disability index (average of the scores for all functional areas) was higher in the J-HAQ (0.81) than in the original HAQ (0.76), although the correlation coefficient was high (0.993). The test-retest reliability value (0.92), studied at a 1-week interval, revealed identical disability index scores measured on the 2 occasions. CONCLUSION: The final version of the J-HAQ is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring functional status in Japanese-speaking RA patients.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Consequences of increased systolic blood pressure in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential effect on cardiovascular event occurrence and treatment costs associated with increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) among patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used cardiovascular risk prediction models from the Framingham Heart Study and data on risk factors from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) to estimate occurrences of ischemic heart disease and stroke over one year among US adults with OA/RA. Separate analyses were conducted for treated hypertensive patients, and untreated hypertensive and normotensive patients, respectively. Published estimates were used to assign costs to these events and to follow care. The effect of incremental increases in SBP on events and costs was then assessed. Monte Carlo simulation was undertaken to assess the range of event occurrence and costs associated with alternative assumptions regarding the distribution of increased SBP in the at-risk population. RESULTS: Of the estimated 30 million adults in the US aged > or = 35 years with OA and RA, roughly 11.8 million (39%) receive pharmacologic treatment for hypertension. Increases in SBP of 1-5 mm Hg were associated with 7,100-35,700 additional ischemic heart disease and stroke events over one year, with corresponding costs (year 2000 USD) of 114-569 million year 2000 USD. A 20 mm Hg increase in SBP experienced by 15% of the at-risk population (equivalent to a population-average 3 mm Hg increase) is associated with about 21,700 additional events (95% CI 19,120, 24,221) and 346 million year 2000 USD (95% CI 305 year 2000 USD, 387 million) in associated costs. CONCLUSION: Relatively small changes in SBP associated with use of common arthritis medications can have a significant effect on the cardiovascular risk profile. It is important that clinicians who treat patients with OA/RA accurately weigh the potential risks of these medications against their benefits.

Adult↗

Treatment options for osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating, degenerative disease of the articular cartilage and synovial fluid. Approximately 20 million Americans suffer from this disease for which no cure exists as yet. The primary goals of current OA therapy are centered on controlling pain; improving, preserving, or both, joint function and mobility; and improving health-related quality of life-but not on reversing the disease process. Current treatment options of OA consist of both non-pharmacological and pharmacological modalities. Non-pharmacological therapy that consists of patient education and physical/occupational therapy is a primary component of OA management, either rendered alone or in combination with pharmacological treatment. The several options for pharmacological treatment include acetaminophen, nonspecific NSAIDs, and COX-2 specific inhibitors. Many of these drugs, however, are beset with serious side effects. For patients with severe OA not responsive to medical treatment, nonsurgical interventions such as viscosupplements and injectable compounds that mimic healthy synovial fluid or surgical interventions are two likely options. The former, however, have not been shown unequivocally to be effective. Future treatment modalities for OA are geared toward reversing the disease process and may include disease-modifying drugs and gene therapy.

Aged↗

Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 54 weeks of infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of infliximab plus methotrexate for active, refractory rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We projected the 54-week results from a randomized controlled trial of infliximab into lifetime economic and clinical outcomes using a Markov computer simulation model. Direct and indirect costs, quality of life, and disability estimates were based on trial results; Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information System (ARAMIS) database outcomes; and published data. Results were discounted using the standard 3% rate. Because most well-accepted medical therapies have cost-effectiveness ratios below $50,000 to $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, results below this range were considered to be "cost-effective." RESULTS: At 3 mg/kg, each infliximab infusion would cost $1393. When compared with methotrexate alone, 54 weeks of infliximab plus methotrexate decreased the likelihood of having advanced disability from 23% to 11% at the end of 54 weeks, which projected to a lifetime marginal cost-effectiveness ratio of $30,500 per discounted QALY gained, considering only direct medical costs. When applying a societal perspective and including indirect or productivity costs, the marginal cost-effectiveness ratio for infliximab was $9100 per discounted QALY gained. The results remained relatively unchanged with variation of model estimates over a broad range of values. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab plus methotrexate for 54 weeks for rheumatoid arthritis should be cost-effective with its clinical benefit providing good value for the drug cost, especially when including productivity losses. Although infliximab beyond 54 weeks will likely be cost-effective, the economic and clinical benefit remains uncertain and will depend on long-term results of clinical trials.

Adult↗

Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among US adults with self-reported osteoarthritis: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among US adults with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Using survey data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we estimated the prevalence of selected CVD risk factors among a US OA and nonarthritic adult population. In additional analyses, we stratified the sample by gender and age (35-44, 45-64, and 65+ years) to further understand the CVD risk profile in an arthritic population and nonarthritic population. Relevant data on each survey participant's demographics, arthritis status, CVD risk factors, and sampling weights were obtained from the survey database. RESULTS: Of the 115.9 million US adults aged > or = 35 years, 24.3 million (21%) have OA. Hypertension is prevalent in approximately 40% of OA patients; 20% of the patients smoke and 11% have diabetes. Prevalence of high total cholesterol is estimated to be 32%, while prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is estimated at 13%. Approximately 37% of OA patients are estimated to have renal impairment, but less than 1% suffer from renal failure. CONCLUSION: National survey data suggest that, on average, US adults with OA have a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. These findings highlight the need to consider patients' comorbidites when selecting the appropriate treatment options.

Adult↗