Biomedical subjects

Guy Sella

Publications and source records attributed to Guy Sella.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Genetic architectures of brain-related traits are shaped by strong selective constraints.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of significant loci for psychiatric disorders, yet the strength of these associations remains modest compared to other human complex traits with similar numbers of hits. Whether this pattern reflects statistical artifacts or real biological differences-and, if the latter, what underlies it-remains unclear. In addition to psychiatric disorders, we find that other traits with functional enrichment in the central nervous system (CNS), whether binary or quantitative, also share similar genetic architectures, characterized by GWAS hits of limited statistical significance and generally higher allele frequencies. In comparing the architecture of binary and quantitative traits, we adjust for statistical power in their respective studies. After this adjustment, we fit an evolutionary model of architecture and show that CNS-enriched traits have large mutational target sizes, with contributing variants and genes experiencing stronger selection than those for other traits. Our findings reveal heterogeneity among complex traits and provide insights into traits that more effectively capture fitness-relevant processes. More broadly, our results suggest that the genetic architectures of complex traits are shaped by the tissues through which these traits are mediated.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Genetic architectures of brain-related traits are shaped by strong selective constraints.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of significant loci for psychiatric disorders, yet the strength of these associations remains modest compared to other human complex traits with similar numbers of hits. Whether this pattern reflects statistical artifacts or real biological differences - and, if the latter, what underlies it - remains unclear. In addition to psychiatric disorders, we find that other traits with functional enrichment in the central nervous system (CNS), whether binary or quantitative, also share similar genetic architectures, characterized by GWAS hits of limited statistical significance and generally higher allele frequencies. To robustly compare traits that differ in GWAS statistical power, we demonstrate how binarizing a quantitative trait reduces power. This loss of power can be replicated by a matched "effective sample size" on the liability scale. After matching "effective sample sizes", we show that CNS-enriched traits have large mutational target sizes, with contributing variants and genes experiencing stronger selection than those for other traits. Our findings reveal heterogeneity among diseases and provide insights into traits that more effectively capture fitness-relevant processes. More broadly, our results suggest that the genetic architectures of complex traits are shaped by the tissues through which these traits are mediated.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Simple scaling laws control the genetic architectures of human complex traits.

Genome-wide association studies have revealed that the genetic architectures of complex traits vary widely, including in terms of the numbers, effect sizes, and allele frequencies of significant hits. However, at present we lack a principled way of understanding the similarities and differences among traits. Here, we describe a probabilistic model that combines the effects of mutation, drift, and stabilizing selection at individual sites with a genome-scale model of phenotypic variation. In this model, the architecture of a trait arises from the distribution of selection coefficients of mutations and from two scaling parameters. We fit this model for 95 highly polygenic quantitative traits of different kinds from the UK Biobank. Notably, we infer that all these traits have fairly similar, though not identical, distributions of selection coefficients. This similarity suggests that differences in architectures of highly polygenic traits arise mainly from the two scaling parameters: the mutational target size and heritability per site, which vary by orders of magnitude among traits. When these two scale factors are accounted for, we find that the architectures of all 95 traits are very similar.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Gene regulatory network structure informs the distribution of perturbation effects.

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) govern many core developmental and biological processes underlying human complex traits. Even with broad-scale efforts to characterize the effects of molecular perturbations and interpret gene coexpression, it remains challenging to infer the architecture of gene regulation in a precise and efficient manner. Key properties of GRNs, like hierarchical structure, modular organization, and sparsity, provide both challenges and opportunities for this objective. Here, we seek to better understand properties of GRNs using a new approach to simulate their structure and model their function. We produce realistic network structures with a novel generating algorithm based on insights from small-world network theory, and we model gene expression regulation using stochastic differential equations formulated to accommodate modeling molecular perturbations. With these tools, we systematically describe the effects of gene knockouts within and across GRNs, finding a subset of networks that recapitulate features of a recent genome-scale perturbation study. With deeper analysis of these exemplar networks, we consider future avenues to map the architecture of gene expression regulation using data from cells in perturbed and unperturbed states, finding that while perturbation data are critical to discover specific regulatory interactions, data from unperturbed cells may be sufficient to reveal regulatory programs.

Gene Regulatory Networks↗