[Infective endocarditis].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Guy de Gevigney.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As for myocardial infarction, the epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes is very different according to whether it concerns hospitalized patients only or acute coronary syndromes as a whole: many patients die before any medical intervention. The epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes is not well known since we have almost no specific data regarding unstable angina. The annual incidence of acute coronary syndromes in France is greater than 280 per 100,000 men and 60 per 100,000 women. The 1-month lethality rate is about 50%, increasing sharply with age.
OBJECTIVE: Rates of coronary angiography (CA) after myocardial infarction (MI) vary widely between institutions. Furthermore, the indications for CA are often in conflict with recognized guidelines. The present study sought to determine the characteristics and the one-year mortality in patients with MI, regardless of age and hospital facilities, according to the use of CA after MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were prospectively collected in all patients with MI admitted to all hospitals in three departments in the Rhône-Alpes region. Among 2493 patients, 1117 (45%) underwent CA. In multivariate analysis, CA rate was lower with increasing age, female sex, in patients with comorbidity or heart failure. CA was performed in 49% of patients admitted to hospitals with on-site CA vs. 32% in hospitals without on-site CA (OR: 3.54, after adjustment for patients' characteristics). One-year mortality rate was 6.5% for the CA group and 36.9% for the no-CA group. In multivariate analysis, age, history of angina pectoris, presence of Q waves, Killip class at admission II, III, or IV and CPK ratio > or = 9 were significant predictors of a higher one-year mortality, but performance of CA did not significantly influence it: RR: 0.79 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MI in a large unselected cohort in a French region, the one-year mortality was significantly lower in those referred for angiography. However, after correction for the confounding effects of simple baseline clinical indicators of risk, this apparent benefit reflected the fact that angiography was performed in those at lowest risk.
The paper presents the most recent recommendations for the treatment and prevention of infective endocarditis (IE). The treatment of IE is complex and requires close collaboration among specialists in infectious diseases, cardiology, cardiac surgery and microbiology. The mainstay of medical treatment is antibiotic therapy. Theoretical considerations regarding vegetations and antibiotics have practical consequences on the route and modalities of administration of antibiotics and on the techniques used to monitor treatment. The choice of antibiotics depends on the microorganism (streptococci, enterococci, staphylococci, HACEK group [Haemophilus sp., Actinobacillus sp., Cardiobacterium sp., Eikenella sp. and Kingella sp.], Coxiella, Brucella, Legionella, Bartonella, fungi) and on whether IE occurs on native or prosthetic valves. Treatment of IE with negative blood cultures is particularly difficult. Cardiac surgery is often needed during the bacteriologically active period (in ~50% of patients). The decision to intervene and the optimal timing of the intervention requires careful consideration of multiple potential risks: the haemodynamic risk, the infectious risk, the risk due to cardiac lesions, the risk due to extracardiac complications and the risk due to the location of infective endocarditis. Even though the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis of IE is not completely proven, it is recommended for selected patients who undergo an at-risk procedure. Lists of cardiac conditions and of medical procedures at risk are presented; specific antibiotic prophylactic regimens for dental and upper respiratory tract procedures in out-patients, procedures under general anaesthesia and urological and GI procedures are outlined.
OBJECTIVE: There is an excess mortality after myocardial infarction in diabetics, but also documented significant differences in the characteristics of MI and in management between diabetics and non-diabetics. The aim of this prospective study in a large unselected patient cohort in a single French region was to determine if baseline characteristics, management, or in-hospital and one-year mortality differed in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were prospectively collected in consecutive patients with myocardial infarction admitted to all hospitals in three departments in the Rhone-Alpes region between September 1, 1993 and January 31,1995. Among the 2,297 patients, 410 patients (17.8%) were diabetic. Although diabetics were older than non-diabetics (70.3 vs. 67.8 years; p < 0.0004), and less likely to receive thrombolysis (31% vs. 36%; p = 0.043), in-hospital mortality was not significantly higher (17.3% vs. 14.7%) than in non-diabetics. In multivariate analysis, diabetes was a significant predictor of one-year mortality (relative risk: 1.41; 95% CI = 1.10 - 1.79; p = 0.0063) but not of in-hospital mortality (relative risk: 1.2; 95% CI = 0.9 - 1.7; p = 0.25). Multivariate predictors of in-hospital and one-year mortality in diabetics were age and Killip class at admission. CONCLUSIONS: In this large unselected French cohort, diabetes mellitus was a significant predictor of one-year but not of in-hospital mortality after myocardial infarction in a French region. This negative effect of diabetes on mortality was not related to differences in baseline characteristics, or in initial or post-discharge management between diabetics and non-diabetics.
A prospective study of myocardial blood perfusion after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was conducted in two groups of patients. In group 1, a two-year assessment by exercise thallium myocardial scintigraphy without medical treatment was performed in 122 patients who consecutively underwent CABG with exclusive use of both internal mammary arteries (IMA) and gastroepiploic artery (GEA). In group 2, myocardial function and perfusion were determined by radionuclide investigations performed before and one year after CABG in 100 patients with preoperative LV dysfunction (defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 0.40), comparing results of myocardial revascularization performed with either exclusive arterial grafts (arterial group, 54 patients) or one arterial graft (IMA) associated with a sequential vein graft (vein group, 46 patients). In group 1, 21% of patients presented silent residual electric ischemia during exercise stress testing and 26% had reversible scintigraphic ischemic defect despite complete revascularization, 18% of those in the inferior wall bypassed with GEA and 8% in the anterior wall bypassed with the right IMA. In group 2, the significant preoperative ischemia significantly decreased in both the vein group and the arterial group. LV function was significantly improved in the vein group; in contrast there was no modification of LV function in the arterial group. A multivariate analysis showed that the surgical technique used and the preoperative LVEF were independent prognostic factors of the postoperative myocardial outcome, with a positive impact of the vein use on the postoperative myocardial function recovery. It is important to recognize that arterial grafts have some limitations in the ability to supply blood flow for coronary circulation that may induce postoperatively silent residual myocardial ischemia and a lack of LV function recovery.