PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gwen C McIntosh

Publications and source records attributed to Gwen C McIntosh.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Caring for the underserved: blending service learning and a web-based curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of health disparities among underserved individuals, whose demographic, geographic, or economic characteristics impede access to health-related services, has led to calls for the development of medical school curricula that address care for the underserved, but reports of the development and evaluation of such curricula are limited. METHODS: Two formats of a curriculum addressing care for the underserved were developed and implemented during the 6-week pediatric clerkship for third-year medical students during the 2003-2004 academic year. One format was faculty-led; the other was web-based. Skills for providing care to underserved families were taught through didactic, experiential, and service-learning curriculum components. Novel core curriculum elements included a screening tool for recognizing underserved patients and an independent clinical project through which students linked underserved families with community health resources. Analyses from 2004-2005 compared pre- and post-curriculum knowledge and attitudes of web-based students (n = 29) to those receiving either the faculty-led (n = 36) or the established "readings-only" curriculum (n = 35). Qualitative data from service learning projects were analyzed to assess clinical skills. RESULTS: Compared to students in the established curriculum, both web-based and faculty-led students demonstrated improved knowledge (p < 0.001) and attitudes (p < 0.05) about caring for the underserved. Both web-based and faculty-led students were successful in recognizing and addressing underserved health issues in the clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty-led and web-based curricula can equally improve student knowledge, attitudes, and skills about caring for the underserved.

Adult↗

Development of an advocacy curriculum in a pediatric residency program.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education now requires pediatric residency programs to include advocacy training, but few guidelines for development exist. PURPOSE: To determine faculty and resident attitudes regarding advocacy training, and to develop consensus on the best method to teach and learn advocacy. METHODS: Pediatric residents (n = 28) and faculty (n = 51) participated in a survey about experience and training in advocacy, identified issues important to address in an advocacy curriculum, and rated a variety of learning methods. RESULTS: Nearly 90% of residents felt advocacy training was needed, and 82% felt advocacy activities would continue following residency. Faculty and residents agreed that participation in short-term or longitudinal projects was the best way to teach and learn advocacy skills. Respondents identified and ranked 45 issues to address through advocacy efforts and training, and these results were used to develop and implement an advocacy curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Residents and faculty were interested in incorporating an advocacy curriculum, and survey results were used to guide curriculum development.

Curriculum↗