PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gwendolen Jull

Publications and source records attributed to Gwendolen Jull.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Development of motor system dysfunction following whiplash injury.

Dysfunction in the motor system is a feature of persistent whiplash associated disorders. Little is known about motor dysfunction in the early stages following injury and of its progress in those persons who recover and those who develop persistent symptoms. This study measured prospectively, motor system function (cervical range of movement (ROM), joint position error (JPE) and activity of the superficial neck flexors (EMG) during a test of cranio-cervical flexion) as well as a measure of fear of re-injury (TAMPA) in 66 whiplash subjects within 1 month of injury and then 2 and 3 months post injury. Subjects were classified at 3 months post injury using scores on the neck disability index: recovered (<8), mild pain and disability (10-28) or moderate/severe pain and disability (>30). Motor system function was also measured in 20 control subjects. All whiplash groups demonstrated decreased ROM and increased EMG (compared to controls) at 1 month post injury. This deficit persisted in the group with moderate/severe symptoms but returned to within normal limits in those who had recovered or reported persistent mild pain at 3 months. Increased EMG persisted for 3 months in all whiplash groups. Only the moderate/severe group showed greater JPE, within 1 month of injury, which remained unchanged at 3 months. TAMPA scores of the moderate/severe group were higher than those of the other two groups. The differences in TAMPA did not impact on ROM, EMG or JPE. This study identifies, for the first time, deficits in the motor system, as early as 1 month post whiplash injury, that persisted not only in those reporting moderate/severe symptoms at 3 months but also in subjects who recovered and those with persistent mild symptoms.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Dizziness and unsteadiness following whiplash injury: characteristic features and relationship with cervical joint position error.

Dizziness and/or unsteadiness are common symptoms of chronic whiplash-associated disorders. This study aimed to report the characteristics of these symptoms and determine whether there was any relationship to cervical joint position error. Joint position error, the accuracy to return to the natural head posture following extension and rotation, was measured in 102 subjects with persistent whiplash-associated disorder and 44 control subjects. Whiplash subjects completed a neck pain index and answered questions about the characteristics of dizziness. The results indicated that subjects with whiplash-associated disorders had significantly greater joint position errors than control subjects. Within the whiplash group, those with dizziness had greater joint position errors than those without dizziness following rotation (rotation (R) 4.5 degrees (0.3) vs 2.9 degrees (0.4); rotation (L) 3.9 degrees (0.3) vs 2.8 degrees (0.4) respectively) and a higher neck pain index (55.3% (1.4) vs 43.1% (1.8)). Characteristics of the dizziness were consistent for those reported for a cervical cause but no characteristics could predict the magnitude of joint position error. Cervical mechanoreceptor dysfunction is a likely cause of dizziness in whiplash-associated disorder.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

A randomized controlled trial of exercise and manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache.

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial with unblinded treatment and blinded outcome assessment was conducted. The treatment period was 6 weeks with follow-up assessment after treatment, then at 3, 6, and 12 months. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of manipulative therapy and a low-load exercise program for cervicogenic headache when used alone and in combination, as compared with a control group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Headaches arising from cervical musculoskeletal disorders are common. Conservative therapies are recommended as the first treatment of choice. Evidence for the effectiveness of manipulative therapy is inconclusive and available only for the short term. There is no evidence for exercise, and no study has investigated the effect of combined therapies for cervicogenic headache. METHODS: In this study, 200 participants who met the diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache were randomized into four groups: manipulative therapy group, exercise therapy group, combined therapy group, and a control group. The primary outcome was a change in headache frequency. Other outcomes included changes in headache intensity and duration, the Northwick Park Neck Pain Index, medication intake, and patient satisfaction. Physical outcomes included pain on neck movement, upper cervical joint tenderness, a craniocervical flexion muscle test, and a photographic measure of posture. RESULTS: There were no differences in headache-related and demographic characteristics between the groups at baseline. The loss to follow-up evaluation was 3.5%. At the 12-month follow-up assessment, both manipulative therapy and specific exercise had significantly reduced headache frequency and intensity, and the neck pain and effects were maintained (P < 0.05 for all). The combined therapies was not significantly superior to either therapy alone, but 10% more patients gained relief with the combination. Effect sizes were at least moderate and clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: Manipulative therapy and exercise can reduce the symptoms of cervicogenic headache, and the effects are maintained.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Repeatability of surface EMG variables in the sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene muscles.

In this study we examined the repeatability and reliability of the surface electromyographic (sEMG) signal mean frequency (MNF), average rectified value (ARV) and conduction velocity (CV) measured for the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and the anterior scalene (AS) muscles in nine healthy volunteers during 15-s isometric cervical flexion contractions at 50% of the maximal voluntary contraction level over 3 non-consecutive days. Repeatability and reliability estimates were obtained for the initial values and rates of change of each sEMG variable by using both the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the normalised standard error of the mean (nSEM). Results from SCM indicated good levels of repeatability for the initial value and slope of ARV (ICC>65%). For the AS, high levels of repeatability were identified for the initial value of MNF (ICC>70%) and the slope of ARV (ICC>75%). Values of nSEM in the range 2.8-7.2% were obtained for the initial values of MNF and CV for both SCM and AS, indicating clinically acceptable measurement precision. The low value obtained for the nSEM of the initial value of MNF for the AS, in combination with the high ICC, indicates that of all of the variables examined, this variable could offer the best normative index to distinguish between subjects with and without neck pain, and represents the sEMG variable of choice for future evaluation purposes.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Are cervical physical outcome measures influenced by the presence of symptomatology?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Outcome measures must be repeatable over time to judge changes as a result of treatment. It is unknown whether the presence of neck pain can affect measurement reliability over a time period when some change could be expected as a result of an intervention. The present study investigated the reliability of two measures, active cervical range of movement (AROM) and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. METHOD: A repeated-measures study design with one week between testing sessions was used. Nineteen healthy asymptomatic subjects and 19 subjects with chronic neck pain participated in the study. The neck movements measured were: flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion, and axial rotation. PPTs were measured over six bilateral sites, both local and remote to the cervical spine. RESULTS: The between-week intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs2,1) for AROM ranged from 0.67 to 0.93 (asymptomatic group) and from 0.64 to 0.88 (chronic neck pain group). Standard error of measurement (SEM) was similar in both groups, from 2.66 degrees to 5.59 degrees (asymptomatic group) and from 2.36 degrees to 6.72 degrees (chronic neck pain group). ICCs2,1 for PPTs ranged from 0.70 to 0.91 (asymptomatic group) and from 0.69 to 0.92 (chronic neck pain group). SEM ranged from 11.14 to 87.71 kPa (asymptomatic group) and from 14.25 to 102.95 kPa (chronic neck pain group). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of moderate to very high between-week reliability of measures of AROM and PPTs in both asymptomatic and chronic neck pain subjects suggest the presence of symptomatology does not adversely affect reliability of these measures. The results support the use of these measures for monitoring change in chronic neck pain conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Reliability of detecting 'onset of pain' and 'submaximal pain' during neural provocation testing of the upper quadrant.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conflicting results have been reported with regard to the reliability of neural tissue provocation tests and it is unclear whether repeated testing affects the test results. In the present study, the stability and reliability of the occurrence of 'onset of pain' and 'submaximal pain' throughout the range of motion during neurodynamic testing was analysed, in both a laboratory and a clinical setting. METHOD: A repeated-measures study design within and between sessions was used. In the laboratory and clinical settings, the base neurodynamic test for the median nerve was performed during a single session on a total of 27 patients with neurogenic cervico-brachial pain. In addition, the base test and three common variations were performed on two occasions by two examiners on 10 asymptomatic subjects in laboratory conditions only. Patients indicated the moment of 'submaximal pain' occurrence, whereas asymptomatic subjects indicated 'onset of pain' and 'submaximal pain'. Corresponding angles at the elbow were recorded by use of an electrogoniometer. RESULTS: In the asymptomatic group, the intra- and inter-tester reliability within the same session was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1 > or = 0.95; standard error of measurement (SEM) < or = 4.9 degrees). Reliability after a 48-hour interval was moderate (ICC2.1 > or = 0.69; SEM < or = 9.9 degrees). The reliability coefficients for the symptomatic group within the same session were comparable with the excellent results of the asymptomatic group, for both the laboratory (ICC2.1 = 0.98; SEM = 2.8 degrees) and clinical settings (ICC2.1 > or = 0.98; SEM < or = 3.4 degrees). Consequently, from a statistical perspective, improvements in range of motion as small as approximately 7.5 degrees may be interpreted meaningfully. No significant trend due to repeated testing could be observed when three consecutive repetitions were analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Pain provocation during neurodynamic testing is a stable phenomenon and the range of elbow extension corresponding with the moment of 'pain onset' and 'submaximal pain' may be measured reliably, both in laboratory and clinical conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Use of high and low velocity cervical manipulative therapy procedures by Australian manipulative physiotherapists.

The use of cervical manipulation presents concerns because of a risk of devastating side effects of trauma to the vertebral artery. Little is known about the frequency of use of cervical manipulation versus passive mobilisation by physiotherapists. A recent national, multi-centre randomised clinical trial of the physiotherapy management of cervicogenic headache provided an opportunity to gain an insight into practices of a sample of manipulative physiotherapists across Australia. The treatment records for the 100 subjects who received only manipulative therapy, or manipulative therapy with exercise as per the trial protocol, were audited. The results revealed that cervical manipulation was used in 20.2% of the 1090 treatments provided to these subjects but cervical joint mobilisation only was used in the vast majority of treatments (77.6%). Nevertheless, 42% of subjects were treated with cervical manipulation at some time. In most instances, manipulation was accompanied by passive mobilisation in the same treatment session. Patients were manipulated on one to six occasions and this occurred predominantly in the latter half of the 12-treatment program. Cervical manipulation was used less frequently in the group who also received exercise. The data suggest that the physiotherapists participating in this study used cervical manipulation selectively and relatively conservatively considering the high use of cervical mobilisation techniques. This may reflect their due regard to safety in the treatment of the cervical region.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Breast surgery and neural tissue mechanosensitivity.

Arm pain is a complication following breast cancer surgery. This study examined the impact of breast surgery on the mechanosensitivity of upper quadrant neural tissues based on responses to a clinical provocation test. The responses of twenty patients to the ULTT 2a were recorded pre-operatively and six weeks post-operatively in terms of the available range of glenohumeral abduction and the area, nature and intensity of symptoms. The results indicated that there was a tendency towards increased neural tissue mechanosensitivity post-surgically, judged by a significant reduction in glenohumeral abduction range and a variance in symptoms in the operated arm. Unexpectedly, range of abduction reduced bilaterally suggesting that central as well as peripheral mechanisms may be involved in this response.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Inter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper cervical joint dysfunction.

The presence of painful upper cervical joint dysfunction is a diagnostic criterion for cervicogenic headache. This preliminary study investigated whether independent examiners for a planned multicentre study of treatment of cervicogenic headache sufferers would agree on the presence or not of joint dysfunction for inclusion/exclusion of subjects into the trial. Ten subjects with or without neck pain and headache were recruited in each of four centres (total 40 subjects). Examiners manually assessed subjects' upper cervical regions in a single blind manner. There was excellent to complete agreement between each pair of examiners on which subjects should be allowed to enter the study and 70 per cent agreement between examiners on the two most dysfunctional joints in symptomatic subjects. There can be confidence that an homogenous headache group will enter the planned trial.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Active stabilisation training for screen based keyboard operators - a single case study.

A single case study was undertaken of a screen based keyboard operator with a subclinical work related neck and upper limb disorder. It was proposed that retraining the stabilisation capacity of the postural supporting muscles (deep cervical flexors and the lower scapular stabilisers) would relieve selected musculoskeletal structures of stress, making them less sensitive to physical tests. The study involved three four-week phases: pre-intervention, intervention and a post-intervention phase. The results showed that as the ability of the postural supporting muscles to hold a low level contraction improved, the mechanosensitivity of the structures tested was reduced. This points to the benefits of exercise to improve muscle stabilisation capacity in work injury prevention programs and warrants further study.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Author's response.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗