[Minimal invasive therapy of "early" tumors].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Colectomy↗
Biomedical subjects
H Allescher
Publications and source records attributed to H Allescher.
Initial experience with a new Yamakawa-type prosthesis for long-term percutaneous transhepatic drainage.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In a previous study evaluating the problems of long-term percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) using Yamakawa-type prostheses in patients with benign and malignant stenoses, breakage of the tube proved to be a serious problem, occurring in 19.7 % of PTBD exchanges. As a consequence of these results, a new PTBD tube made of Tecothane has been developed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1997 to September 1998, this new PTBD tube was applied in 64 patients (39 men, 25 women; median age: 70, range 29-89) in the treatment of benign (n = 30) or malignant stenoses (n=31; three stenoses remained indeterminate), and the course was followed. RESULTS: A total of 134 stent exchanges were performed, 52 of these being ahead of schedule (39 %). Not a single case of breakage occurred. However, other PTBD-related problems remained unchanged. Patients accepted the new prosthesis very well; among 19 patients who had experience of both the new one and the conventional one, 11 had preferences-eight for the new one and three for the old one. CONCLUSIONS: This new Tecothane prosthesis has solved the problem of PTBD breakage, which was often accompanied by serious problems. As was to be expected, other PTBD-related problems were not substantially affected. Nevertheless, this new tube represents progress in the percutaneous treatment of biliary stenoses.
Adult↗
Randomized study of intracorporeal laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment modalities are well established for the removal of bile duct stones. For the small percentage of stones that are difficult or impossible to extract by conventional means, more sophisticated endoscopic techniques or associated modalities such as intracorporeal laser lithotripsy (ILL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) have to be applied. Little is known, however, about the relative value of these different techniques. We therefore compared endoscopic ILL with ESWL in patients with difficult bile duct stones in a prospective randomized study. METHODS: The study included 60 patients (35 women; mean age 70+/-15 years) with bile duct stones in whom standard extraction failed (n=33) or in whom the papilla was not accessible, thus requiring percutaneous access (n=27). They were randomized to receive ESWL under fluoroscopic targeting (maximum discharge number per session: 6000) or ILL using a pulsed dye laser with an automatic stone recognition system, which was mostly performed (28 of 30 cases) under cholangioscopic control. Endoscopic removal of fragments was attempted within the subsequent (ESWL) or the same (ILL) session. Failure was defined as failure to remove all ductal stones/fragments after a maximum of three lithotripsy sessions. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in background variables between the two groups. Bile duct clearance was achieved in 22 of 30 patients (73%) in the ESWL group and in 29 of 30 patients (97%) in the ILL group (p < 0.05). The number of treatment sessions (ESWL 3.0+/-1.3; ILL 1.2+/-0.4; p < 0.001) and the duration of treatment (ESWL 3.9+/-3.5 days; ILL 0.9+/-2.3 days; p < 0.001) were also significantly different in favor of ILL. Two minor complications occurred in each group; there was no 30-day mortality. Crossover therapy to ILL led to stone removal in seven of the eight cases in which ESWL failed, whereas ESWL fragmented the stone in the single patient in whom ILL failed. CONCLUSIONS: ILL is more effective in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones than ESWL in terms of stone clearance rate and treatment duration.
Aged↗
Initial experience with a new, partially covered Wallstent for malignant biliary obstruction.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Metal billiary stents have been shown to be superior to plastic stents with regard to patency and the risk of dislocation. However, tumor ingrowth through the mesh continues to be a significant problem. We report here on our preliminary experience with covered metal stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients (mean age 68 years) with malignant biliary obstruction, who were not considered to be surgical candidates, received a partially covered Wallstent. The patients were followed up prospectively for one year, including laboratory tests, abdominal ultrasound, and plain abdominal radiographs during the first three months, and by monthly telephone interview thereafter. RESULTS: Stent insertion was technically successful in all patients, and led to a reduction in bilirubin levels from 8.4 mg/dl to 0.7 mg/dl. The mean survival of the patients was 7.5 months after the diagnosis of malignancy, and six months after stent insertion; only two patients were still alive after 12 months. During the observation period, four patients suffered from stent dysfunction for periods of one to nine months. These dysfunctions included three stent occlusions, which were successfully treated by inserting plastic stents, and one dislocation, which was treated by endoscopic replacement of the stent. There appeared to be a correlation between the narrowest stent diameter immediately after release and stent dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Covering biliary metal stents is a potential solution to prevent tissue ingrowth. However, current prototypes need to be improved in order to achieve this goal.
Aged↗
Long-term results of endoscopic treatment of biliary duct obstruction due to pancreatic disease.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic stenting has become an established method of providing palliative treatment in cases of malignant biliary obstruction, as well as in benign biliary stenosis. Several problems associated with the types of stent used have not yet been resolved, and an ideal stent has yet to be designed. Observation of the clinical course for patients with biliary obstruction of various etiologies, and evaluation of the results with various treatment methods are the aims of this study. METHODOLOGY: In 1993 and 1994, biliary obstruction was treated endoscopically in 47 patients with a malignant pancreatic tumor and in 18 patients with chronic pancreatitis. The primary intervention was assessed retrospectively on the basis of the patients' records, and information concerning the clinical course was obtained by contacting the patients or their relatives or general practitioners. RESULTS: Primary endoscopic drainage was successful in all cases. Only one of the patients with pancreatic tumors is still alive; survival after stent placement averaged 6.2 months. Metal stents remained patent significantly longer than plastic stents and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drains (PTBDs)(8.2 versus 3.5 or 1.9 months; p < 0.001). In cases of chronic pancreatitis, three of the nine patients who received only endoscopic treatment, without stenting, were able to continue without stents in the longer term, whereas seven of the nine who underwent surgery had no further problems. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic drainage of biliary obstruction provides excellent short-term results. In long-term treatment for purely palliative purposes, metal stents remain patent for longer than plastic stents. In chronic pancreatitis, surgical treatment clearly seems to provide better long-term results than endoscopic therapy.
Adult↗