PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H B Muss

Publications and source records attributed to H B Muss.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

A phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

In this series 49 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy received leucovorin 200 mg/m2 i.v. bolus followed by 5-fluorouracil at 370 mg/m2 i.v. bolus daily for 5 days every 4 weeks for the first two courses and subsequent courses were given every 5 weeks. Of this group, 47 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 44 for response. Of the patients evaluable for response, 15 were considered platinum-sensitive and 29 were platinum-refractory. The overall response rate was 6/44 (13.6%). There were two complete responders (4.5%) and four partial responders (9.1%). In the platinum-sensitive patients, there was one complete response, yielding a response rate of 6.6%, whereas in the platinum-refractory patients, there were four partial responses and one complete response for a response rate of 17.2%. Five responses were in the pelvis and there was one response at an extrapelvic site in the abdominal mesentery. The median number of courses delivered was three (range: 1-10). The major adverse effect was myelosuppression with 16/47 (34.0%) experiencing granulocytopenia < 1,000/mm3. The median white blood count nadir for the patients experiencing any leukopenia was 2,700 (range: 400-3,900/mm3). There was one episode of grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 intestinal toxicity was seen in seven patients (14.9%). There were no treatment-related deaths. In this previously treated population, 5-fluorouracil with high-dose leucovorin exhibited activity of interest in the platinum-refractory population and warrants further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Patient preferences for treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a study of women with early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to elicit preferences for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in women with early-stage breast cancer who were given hypothetical treatment scenarios. We predicted that quality of life, demographic, and treatment variables would have an impact on patient preferences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients with stage 1-IIIA breast cancer were interviewed. All patients had either mastectomy or lumpectomy plus radiotherapy as primary treatment. Sixty-seven (58%) had prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were given four clinical scenarios that described a woman with metastatic breast cancer who was stated to have a life expectancy of 18 months. Side effects of the treatment options were systematically varied from low (hormonal therapy) to life-threatening (high-dose experimental therapy) and were consistent with common clinical situations. Patients were asked to select which treatment, with its associated toxicity, they would accept and prefer for a 50% chance of specified increments in life expectancy, ie, 5 years, 18 months, 1 year, 6 months, 1 month, and 1 week. RESULTS: Quality of life at the time of interview, previous chemotherapy treatment, and degree of difficulty of previous treatments did not predict patient preferences. The greater the toxicity potential of the treatment, the less likely patients were to accept the treatment, although approximately 15% of patients would prefer high-risk treatment for as little as 1 month of added life expectancy. Between 34% and 82% of patients would prefer different therapies for a 6-month addition to life expectancy, whereas almost all patients would accept treatment for a 5-year increase in length of survival. Younger patients were more willing to assume the risks of treatment for a small increase in life expectancy. Of note, between 54% and 78% of patients would elect to start the different treatments even without symptoms related to metastatic disease. Moreover, 76% of patients would prefer standard treatment or an experimental agent to reduce symptoms or pain, even if such treatment did not prolong life. Additionally, only 10% of patients would allow randomization to a clinical trial comparing high-dose with standard chemotherapy. Participation in the study was not distressing to most patients. CONCLUSION: Patients showed clear preferences for specific treatments for metastatic disease when given hypothetical scenarios. There was a wide range of patient preferences for treatment based on risk-benefit assessment, but a substantial percentage of patients would accept the risk of major toxicity for minimal increase in overall survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

The role of chemotherapy and adjuvant therapy in the management of breast cancer in older women.

The management of breast cancer in older women is a major challenge. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of adjuvant therapy in early stage breast cancer has indicated that the use of the antiestrogen tamoxifen improves relapse-free and overall survival for postmenopausal women, including those older than age 70 years. Tamoxifen therapy is of greatest benefit in patients whose primary lesions are estrogen- and progesterone-receptor positive, but lesser yet still significant benefits are seen in receptor-negative patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy has only been minimally studied in older women, because earlier trials tended to exclude women older than age 70 years from protocol entry. Trials are needed to explore the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women, especially those older than age 70 years. Metastatic breast cancer is incurable. Standard endocrine and chemotherapy regimens may be of great palliative benefit but probably only have modest effects on prolonging survival; older women should be offered such treatment. Initiating treatment for metastases with endocrine therapy does not compromise survival, even when such therapy is given to women who have receptor-negative malignancy. Patients progressing on endocrine therapy or whose metastatic disease is life-threatening should be considered for chemotherapy. Older women in generally good health tolerate standard doses of chemotherapy as well as their younger counterparts. Future research in this setting should include clinical trials designed specifically for the elderly and should include quality-of-life assessment as a major end point.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of recognized prognostic factors for breast cancer to account for the observed poorer survival in blacks compared with their white counterparts. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Subjects included 1130 women (612 blacks and 518 whites) aged 20 to 79 years residing in metropolitan Atlanta, Ga, New Orleans, La, or San Francisco/Oakland, Calif, who were diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer. Information on stage, tumor characteristics, treatment, comorbid conditions, and sociodemographic factors was obtained from personal interview, physician and hospital records, and a pathology review of biopsy and surgical specimens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Multivariable survival models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (relative risk of mortality) for blacks compared with whites, adjusting for various combinations of potential explanatory factors. RESULTS: After controlling for geographic site and age, the risk of dying was 2.2 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 2.8) greater for blacks than whites. Adjustment for stage reduced the risk from 2.2 to 1.7; further adjustment for sociodemographic variables had no effect. Treatment was not a contributing factor once stage and tumor pathology were in the model. After adjusting for stage, treatment, comorbid illness, and pathologic and sociodemographic variables, blacks continued to demonstrate a slightly increased, but not statistically significant, risk of death (hazard ratio = 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.8). Results were similar for all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 75% of the racial difference in survival was explained by the prognostic factors studied. Sociodemographic variables appeared to act largely through racial differences in stage at diagnosis, which may be amenable to change through improved access to and use of screening for black women.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of molecular markers in predicting the response to treatment of breast cancer is poorly defined. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a randomized adjuvant-chemotherapy trial (CALGB 8541) comparing three doses (high, moderate, and low) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil in 1572 women with node-positive breast cancer. This study (CALGB 8869) was designed to determine whether the DNA index, the S-phase fraction, c-erbB-2 expression, or p53 accumulation could be used as a marker to identify a subgroup of patients more likely than others to benefit from high doses of chemotherapy. METHODS: Tissue blocks were obtained from 442 patients randomly selected from the larger CALGB trial. Paraffin sections from the primary lesions were analyzed for DNA content, S-phase fraction, c-erbB-2 expression, and p53 accumulation. RESULTS: Patients randomly assigned to the high-dose regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly longer disease-free and overall survival if their tumors had c-erbB-2 overexpression. No further information was gained by adding the data on S-phase fraction or p53 accumulation to the analysis. There was no clear evidence of a dose-response effect in patients with minimal or no c-erbB-2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil in patients with overexpression of c-erbB-2 but not in patients with no c-erbB-2 expression or minimal c-erbB-2 expression. Overexpression of c-erbB-2 may be a useful marker to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from high doses of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Vincristine with high-dose etoposide in advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial of the Piedmont Oncology Association.

Vincristine (VCR) and etoposide (VP-16) have been shown to be synergistic in a murine model, and this combination was studied in a phase II trial. Eligibility required measurable disease, a performance status of 0-2, a life expectancy of > or = 2 months, an interval of at least 3 weeks since the receipt of previous radiation therapy or chemotherapy and recovery from related toxicity, no prior treatment with VCR or VP-16, and no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens (only one for treatment of metastatic disease). Treatment consisted of 0.5 mg i.v. (bolus) VCR followed by 200 mg/m2 VP-16 given over 2 h. Both drugs were given daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks (total dose: VCR, 1.5 mg; VP-16, 600 mg/m2). A total of 18 patients with metastatic breast cancer were accured; 14 had adjuvant chemotherapy and 8 had chemotherapy for advanced disease. As judged by International Union Against Cancer (UICC) criteria, one complete response (CR) and three partial responses (PR) were obtained, for a CR + PR rate of 22% (95% confidence interval, 6%-48%). All responders had soft-tissue involvement only. Six patients had stable disease and 8 showed progression. The median time to treatment failure was 3.5 months, and the median survival from study entry was 8.3 months. The major toxicity was myelosuppression, with 9 patients (50%) experiencing a total WBC of < 1,000/mm3. Grade 2-3 neurologic toxicity was noted in 6 patients (33%) and grade 3 nausea and vomiting was noted in 5 (28%). The combination of VCR and VP-16 is active in advanced breast cancer but is not convincingly superior to either of these agents used alone.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Tamoxifen versus high-dose oral medroxyprogesterone acetate as initial endocrine therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer: a Piedmont Oncology Association study.

PURPOSE: To determine in a prospective randomized trial whether high-dose orally administered medroxy-progesterone acetate (MPA) was superior to tamoxifen in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had received no prior endocrine therapy in either the adjuvant or advanced setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients initially received either tamoxifen 20 mg/d orally or MPA 1 g/d orally. At the time of disease progression, patients were crossed over to the other regimen. Eligibility required patients to be age > or = 18 years, performance status 0 to 3, and estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive or unknown. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two eligible patients were entered and 166 were assessable for response. Complete plus partial response rates for tamoxifen and MPA were 17% and 34%, respectively (P = .01). Patients with bone metastases had a significantly higher partial response rate with MPA compared with tamoxifen (33% v 13%). Median time to treatment failure was 5.5 months for tamoxifen and 6.3 months for MPA (P = .48). The median survival duration was 24 months for tamoxifen and 33 months for MPA (P = .09). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment significantly influenced response rate, but not time to treatment failure or survival. After treatment failure following MPA, six of 42 patients (14%) treated with tamoxifen responded, compared with six of 49 (12%) treated with MPA following tamoxifen. Both agents were associated with minimal toxicity, but 35% of patients on MPA gained more than 20 lb as opposed to only 2% on tamoxifen. CONCLUSION: In this trial, initial treatment with MPA of endocrine-naive metastatic breast cancer patients was associated with a significantly higher response rate but not with improvement in time to treatment failure or survival, when compared with initial treatment with tamoxifen. Further randomized trials in patients with bone metastases are warranted to determine if high-dose progestin therapy is superior to tamoxifen in these patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Management of disseminated disease in the patient with bladder cancer.

Advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a chemotherapy-sensitive neoplasm. Several single agents demonstrate substantial activity, and combination chemotherapy produces responses in the majority of patients treated. The benefits and toxicities associated with the most widely used combination regimens are discussed. Other topics reviewed include the use of colony-stimulating factor support for chemotherapy, adjunctive surgical therapy, and newer cytotoxic regimens.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1993

Breast cancer: factors associated with stage at diagnosis in black and white women. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported differences in cancer staging at diagnosis and in survival between Black and White patients with breast cancer. Utilizing data obtained from the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Black/White Cancer Survival Study for the period 1985-1986, a new study is presented here that systematically examines multiple explanatory factors (e.g., lack of mammograms) associated with these cancer-staging differences. PURPOSE: We evaluated within a single study the relationship of selected demographic, lifestyle, antecedent medical experiences, and health care access factors to cancer staging at diagnosis in Black and White breast cancer patients. METHODS: Data utilized in this population-based cohort study of 1222 eligible women (649 Black and 573 White) newly diagnosed for the period 1985-1986 with histologically confirmed primary breast cancer were obtained from the NCI's Black/White Cancer Survival Study. Sources of data included abstracts of hospital medical records, central review of histology slides by a study consultant pathologist, and patient interviews obtained from three metropolitan areas: Atlanta, New Orleans, and San Francisco-Oakland. Within each area, 70% of all Black incident cases were randomly selected, and a sample of White cases, frequency matched by age groups (20-49 years, 50-64 years, and 65-79 years), was selected for comparison. Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis was classified according to the international tumor-lymph node-metastases (TNM) system. Statistical models utilized in this study included the log-linear and polychotomous logistic regression with multiple predictor variables. RESULTS: Factors associated with cancer staging were differentially expressed in Blacks and Whites. Indicators of access to health care, a lack of mammograms, and an increased body mass index significantly (P < .02) contributed to stage differences in Blacks, whereas income was marginally associated (P = .06) with stage for Whites only. Nuclear grade, having a breast examination by a physician, and a history of patient delay explained approximately 50% of the excess risk for stage III-IV cancer versus stage I-IIN0 cancer among Blacks compared with Whites (odds ratio reduction from 2.19 to 1.68). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that no single factor or group of factors can explain more than half of the race-stage differences noted in this study with respect to Black and White breast cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Echinomycin in recurrent and metastatic endometrial carcinoma. A phase II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Twenty-one evaluable patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma were treated with 1,500 micrograms/m2 of echinomycin every 3 weeks. All patients had received prior chemotherapy. There was one complete response (5%), 95% confidence interval for response is 0.9-22.7%. The major toxicity was nausea and vomiting which was moderate to severe in 42% of patients. Myelosuppression was minimal. Echinomycin, in this dose and schedule, displays minimal activity in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma who have had prior chemotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1992

Treatment plans for black and white women with stage II node-positive breast cancer. The National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study experience.

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study began patient accrual in 1985 and was designed to investigate factors that might contribute to the observed racial differences in survival for cancer of the breast, uterine corpus, colon, and bladder. METHODS: To determine whether there were racial differences in treatment in a clinically homogeneous set of patients, 305 (25%) of the 1222 women in this study with Stage II node-positive (N+) breast cancer were evaluated. RESULTS: Patient characteristics for blacks and whites were similar for age, metropolitan area of residence, tumor size, extent of nodal involvement, and steroid receptors. Differences in histologic findings, tumor grade, and nuclear atypia were observed. Blacks had a higher frequency of comorbid conditions, especially hypertension (P < 0.00001). Fewer blacks underwent breast-conserving surgery (P = 0.004). In a multivariate analysis, race was no longer a significant factor in the selection of primary treatment, but education and metropolitan area of residence remained significant. Blacks and whites received similar postoperative systemic therapy, with combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) and tamoxifen, the most common cytotoxic and endocrine therapies used. CONCLUSIONS: The National Cancer Institute consensus statement concerning adjuvant therapy for breast cancer was published in the middle of the 2-year period that study cases were accrued, and treatment plans in this study generally agreed with consensus guidelines. Should survival differences in black and white patients with Stage II N+ disease in this study be found, they are unlikely to be attributable to differences in initial or postoperative treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer in the elderly. The Piedmont Oncology Association experience [see comment].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of age on treatment outcome in women with metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy. DESIGN: Case-comparison study of patients with metastic breast cancer treated in five clinical trials of the Piedmont Oncology Association. SETTING: University and private practice physicians participating in the Piedmont Oncology Association clinical trials in the southeastern United States. PATIENTS: Seventy patients 70 years of age or older were compared with 60 patients aged 50 through 69 years and 40 patients less than 50 years of age. All patients were ambulatory or capable of self-care, with adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with multidrug chemotherapy regimens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to treatment, time to disease progression, survival, and toxic effects. RESULTS: Pretreatment characteristics including race, performance status, disease-free interval, prior therapy, sites of metastatic disease, and number and dominant sites of metastases were similar for the three age groups. The response rates for the younger-than-50, 50-through-69, and 70-or-older age groups were 40%, 31%, and 29%, respectively (P = .53). There were no significant differences in time to disease progression or survival for patients in the three age groups. Estimates for time to progression and survival were 9.1 and 17.9 months, 6.2 and 12.8 months, and 7.2 and 14.2 months, respectively. Toxic effects, dose delivery, and dose delays were also similar for all three age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Women 70 years of age or older who were enrolled in these trials were similar to their younger counterparts in response rates, time to disease progression, survival, and toxic effects. Women in this age group should not be excluded, based on age alone, from clinical trials involving chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1992

Echinomycin (NSC 526417) in recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. A phase II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG).

Nineteen evaluable patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated with 1,500 micrograms/m2 of echinomycin every 4 weeks. No patient had received prior chemotherapy. There was one partial response (5% response, 95% confidence interval for response of 0% to 26%). The major toxicity was nausea and vomiting which was moderate to severe in six patients. Myelosuppression was not observed. Echinomycin, in this dose and schedule displays no major activity in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1992

Menogaril in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. A phase II trial of the Cancer Center of Wake Forest University.

Fifteen patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) were treated with menogaril 160 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every 28 days. No responses were seen: 8 patients had stable disease, 4 progressed after one course of therapy, and 3 patients were removed from study after 1 course for other reasons. Four of the 8 patients with stable disease had an improved performance status, and 3 had a decrease in analgesic use. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The median progression-free interval was 3.0 months with a range of 0.7 to 22 months and median survival was 11.3 months with a range of 0.7 to 39+ months. Menogaril displays little activity in patients with previously treated MM.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1992

Endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer: a review.

More than 45,000 women will die of metastatic breast cancer in the United States in 1991. Endocrine therapy remains a major option for treatment of such patients, and results in complete plus partial response rates of 30% with a median duration of approximately one year. Postmenopausal status, increased age, a prolonged disease-free interval, bone and soft tissue metastases, and positive estrogen and progesterone receptors are all associated with an increased response to endocrine therapy. The use of additive hormonal therapy, specifically antiestrogens, progestins, and aromatase inhibitors, have replaced surgical ablative procedures in the majority of patients; response rates to antiestrogen therapy, progestin therapy, and aromatase inhibitors are similar, but antiestrogens have generally been associated with the most favorable therapeutic index. At present, there is no convincing evidence that either combinations of endocrine therapies or endocrine therapy combined with chemotherapy are associated with an improvement in survival for patients with metastatic disease. Future research efforts directed at defining the molecular mechanisms of endocrine activity should facilitate clinical trials of newer and potentially more effective agents. All patients with metastatic breast cancer should be considered for at least one trial of endocrine therapy provided their metastatic disease is not rapidly progressive or life-threatening.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed1992

High-dose progestin therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Progestin therapy has become an established endocrine modality for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate being the most widely used agents. Both drugs display similar effectiveness as initial and secondary therapy for patients with advanced disease, with combined complete and partial response rates of approximately 30% to 40%. Uncontrolled trials have suggested that high doses of medroxyprogesterone may be more effective than lower doses, but randomized trials have yielded conflicting results. Clinical trials of megestrol acetate have demonstrated it to be an affective, well-tolerated oral progestin, and a recent randomized trial has suggested that higher megestrol acetate doses may be associated with not only improved response but also improved time to disease progression and survival. Further trials of high-dose megestrol acetate for both initial and secondary therapy are under way, and their results will provide valuable information concerning the role of such treatment.

Breast Neoplasms↗