Biomedical subjects

H Cherest

Publications and source records attributed to H Cherest.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1978

S-adenosyl methionine requiring mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidences for the existence of two methionine adenosyl transferases.

Mutants requiring S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) for growth have been selected in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Two classes of mutants have been found. One class corresponds to the simultaneous occurrence of mutations at two unlinked loci SAM1 and SAM2 and presents a strict SAM requirement for growth on any medium. The second class corresponds to special single mutations in the gene SAM2 which lead to a residual growth on minimal medium but to normal growth on SAM supplemented medium or on a complex medium like YPGA not containing any SAM. These genetic data can be taken as an indication that Saccharomyces cerevisiae possesses two isoenzymatic methionine adenosyl transferases (MAT). In addition, SAM1 and SAM2 loci have been identified respectively with the ETH-10 and ETH2 loci previously described. Biochemical evidences corroborate the genetic results. Two MAT activities can be dissociated in a wild type extract (MATI and MATII) by DEAE cellulose chromatography. Mutations at the SAM1 locus lead to the absence or to the modification of MATII whereas mutations at the SAM2 locus lead to the absence or to the modification of MATI. Moreover, some of our results seem to show that MATI and MATII are associated in vivo.

Bicarbonates↗

PubMed1976

Regulation of methionine synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae operates through independent signals: methionyl-tRNAmet and S-adenosylmethionine.

The synthesis of at least six enzymes implicated in methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated pleiotropically by two independent regulatory systems. Repression of enzyme synthesis is promoted either by exogenous methonine or by exogenous S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). The regulatory system acting in methionine mediated repression seems to comprise methionyl-tRNA-met as a co-repressor and the other system, acting in SAM repression, comprises SAM as a co-repressor. This concept gives a role in regulation to the two activated forms of methionine. Moreover, evidence is presented that the "SAM repressor" probably acts at a post-transcriptional level while the "met-tRNAmet repressor" would be active at the transcriptional level. These conclusions have been based on two series of experiments: one using a mutant bearing a modified methionyl-tRNA synthetase [L-methionine: tRNA-met ligase (AMP-forming) E.C.6.1.1.10] and one studying the kinetics of depression of synthesis of one of the biosynthetic enzymes after repression either by exogenous methionine or by exogenous SAM. Our results are strengthened by the use of two different drugs: one inhibiting messenger RNA synthesis and the other inhibiting protein synthesis.

Cycloheximide↗

PubMed1975

Biochemical and regulatory effects of methionine analogues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The effect of three methionine analogues, ethionine, selenomethionine, and trifluoromethionine, on the biosynthesis of methionine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been investigated. We have found the following to be true. (i) A sharp decrease in the endogenous methionine concentration occurs after the addition of any one of these analogues to growing cells. (ii) All of them can be transferred to methionine transfer ribonucleic acid in vitro as well as in vivo with, as a consequence, their incorporation into proteins. In the absence of radioactive trifluoromethionine, this conclusion results from experiments of an indirect nature and must be taken as an indication rather than a direct demonstration. (iii) Ethionine and selenomethionine can be activated as homologues of S-adenosylmethionine, whereas trifluoromethionine cannot. (iv) All of them can act as repressors of the methionine biosynthetic pathway. This has been shown by measuring the de novo rate of synthesis of methionine in a culture grown in the presence of any one of the three analogues.

Enzyme Repression↗

PubMed1975

Methionine-and S-adenosyl methionine-mediated repression in a methionyl-transfer ribonucleic-acid synthetase mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

A Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain unable to grow at 38 C and bearing a modified methionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) synthetase has been studied. It has been shown that, in this mutant, the percentage of tRNAmet charged in vivo paralleled the degree of repressibility of methionine biosynthetic enzymes by exogenous methionine. On the contrary, the repression mediated by exogenous S-adenosylmethionine does not correlate with complete acylation of tRNAmet. Althought McLaughlin and Hartwell reported previously that the thermosensitivity and the defect in the methionyl-tRNA synthetase were due to the same genetic lesion (1969), no diffenence could be found in the methionyl-tRNA synthetase activity or in the pattern of repressibility of methionine biosynthetic pathway after growth at the premissive and at a semipermissive temperature. It appears that the mutant also exhibits some other modified characters that render unlikely the existence of only one genetic lesion in this strain. A genetic study of this mutant was undertaken which led to the conclusion that the thermosensitivity and the other defects are not related to the methionyl-tRNA synthetase modification. It was shown that the modified repressibility of methionine biosynthetic enzymes by methionine and the lack of acylation of tRNAmet in vivo follow the methionyl-tRNA synthetase modification. These results are in favor of the idea that methionyl-tRNAmet, more likely than methionine, is implicated in the regulation of the biosynthesis of methionine.

Amino Acyl-tRNA Synthetases↗

PubMed1973

Relationship between methionyl transfer ribonucleic acid cellular content and synthesis of methionine enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Derepression of some methionine biosynthetic enzymes (methionine group I enzymes) obtained in methionine limitation has been found to be accompanied by a significant lack of in vivo charging of bulk methionine transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA(Met)) and in addition by a decreased rate of synthesis of all tRNAs. Under the same conditions, methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MTS) was derepressed rather than repressed. These results are in agreement with those previously published based on studies of a mutant with an impaired MTS (5) and reinforce the idea that the rate of synthesis of methionine group I enzymes can be related to the total content of methionyl (Met)-tRNA (Met) per cell. They also render unlikely that MTS could be a constituent of the regulatory signal.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed1973

S-adenosyl methionine-mediated repression of methionine biosynthetic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) has been shown to provoke repression of some methionine-specific enzymes in wild-type cells, namely, adenosine triphosphate sulfurylase, sulfite reductase, and homocysteine synthetase. Repressive effects observed in SAM-supplemented cultures should be due to SAM per se, since the intracellular pool of SAM increases while the intracellular pool of methionine remains low and constant. Derepression brought about by methionine limitation is accompanied by a severe decrease in SAM as well as methionine pool sizes, although methionine adenosyl transferase is slightly derepressed. Different hypotheses have been considered to account for the previously reported implication of methionyl transfer ribonucleic acid and the presently reported SAM effects in this regulatory process.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1973

Effects of regulatory mutations upon methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: loci eth2-eth3-eth10.

The effects of mutations occurring at three independent loci, eth2, eth3, and eth10, were studied on the basis of several criteria: level of resistance towards two methionine analogues (ethionine and selenomethionine), pool sizes of free methionine and S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) under different growth conditions, and susceptibility towards methionine-mediated repression and SAM-mediated repression of some enzymes involved in methionine biosynthesis (met group I enzymes). It was shown that: (i) the level of resistance towards both methionine analogues roughly correlates with the amount of methionine accumulated in the pool; (ii) the repressibility of met group I enzymes by exogenous methionine is either abolished or greatly lowered, depending upon the mutation studied; (iii) the repressibility of the same enzymes by exogenous SAM remains, in at least three mutants studied, close to that observed in a wild-type strain; (iv) the accumulation of SAM does not occur in the most extreme mutants either from endogenously overproduced or from exogenously supplied methionine: (v) the two methionine-activating enzymes, methionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) synthetase and methionine adenosyl transferase, do not seem modified in any of the mutants presented here; and (vi) the amount of tRNA(met) and its level of charging are alike in all strains. Thus, the three recessive mutations presented here affect methionine-mediated repression, both at the level of overall methionine biosynthesis which results in its accumulation in the pool, and at the level of the synthesis of met group I enzymes. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed1971

Methionine-mediated repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a pleiotropic regulatory system involving methionyl transfer ribonucleic acid and the product of gene eth2.

Detailed study of methionine-mediated repression of enzymes involved in methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae led to classification of these enzymes into two distinct regulatory groups. Group I comprises four enzymes specifically involved in different parts of methionine biosynthesis, namely, homoserine-O-transacetylase, homocysteine synthetase, adenosine triphosphate sulfurylase, and sulfite reductase. Repressibility of these enzymes is greatly decreased in strains carrying a genetically impaired methionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) synthetase (mutation ts(-) 296). Conditions leading to absence of repression in the mutant strain have been correlated with a sharp decrease in bulk tRNA(met) charging, whereas conditions which restore repressibility of group I enzymes also restore tRNA(met) charging. These findings implicate methionyl-tRNA in the regulatory process. However, the absence of a correlation in the wild type between methionyl-tRNA charging and the levels of methionine group I enzymes suggests that only a minor iso accepting species of tRNA(met) may be devoted with a regulatory function. Repressibility of the same four enzymes (group I) was also decreased in strains carrying the regulatory mutation eth2(r). Although structural genes coding for two of these enzymes, as well as mutations ts(-) 296 and eth2(r) segregate independently to each other, synthesis of group I enzymes is coordinated. The pleiotropic regulatory system involved seems then to comprise beside a "regulatory methionyl tRNA(met)," another element, product of gene eth2, which might correspond either to an aporepressor protein or to the "regulatory tRNA(met)" itself. Regulation of group II enzymes is defined by response to exogenous methionine, absence of response to either mutations ts(-) 296 and eth2(r), and absence of coordinacy with group I enzymes. However, the two enzymes which belong to this group and are both involved in threonine and methionine biosynthesis undergo distinct regulatory patterns. One, aspartokinase, is subject to a bivalent repression exerted by threonine and methionine, and the other, homoserine dehydrogenase, is subject only to methionine-mediated repression. Participation of at least another aporepressor and another corepressor, different from the ones involved in regulation of group I enzymes, is discussed.

Acyltransferases↗

PubMed1970

Role of homocysteine synthetase in an alternate route for methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In vivo studies have shown that, in the absence of homoserine-O-transacetylase activity (locus met(2)), the C(4)-carbon moiety of ethionine is utilized (provided the ethionine resistance gene eth-2r is present) by methionine auxotrophs, except for met(8) mutants (homocysteine synthetase-deficient). Concomitant utilization of sulfur and methyl group from methylmercaptan or S-methylcysteine has been demonstrated. In the absence of added methylated intermediates, the methyl group of methionine formed from ethionine is derived from serine. In vitro studies with crude extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have demonstrated that this synthesis of methionine occurs by the following reactions: CH(3)-SH + ethionine right harpoon over left harpoon methionine + C(2)H(5)SH and S-methylcysteine + ethionine right harpoon over left harpoon methionine + S-ethylcysteine. In the forward direction, the second product of the second reaction was shown to be S-ethylcysteine; this reaction has also been found reversible, leading to ethionine formation. Genetic and kinetic data have shown that homocysteine synthetase catalyzes these two reactions, at 0.3% of the rate it catalyzes direct homocysteine synthesis: O-Ac-homoserine + Na(2)S --> homocysteine + acetate. The three reactions are lost together in a met(8) mutant and are recovered to the same extent in spontaneous prototrophic revertants from this strain. Methionine-mediated regulation of enzyme synthesis affects the three activities and is modified to the same extent by the presence of the recessive allele (eth-2r) of the regulatory gene eth-2. Affinities of the enzyme for substrates of both types of reactions are of the same order of magnitude. Moreover, ethionine, the substrate of the second reaction, inhibits the third reaction, whereas O-acetyl-homoserine, the substrate of the third reaction, inhibits the second reaction. An enzymatic cleavage of S-methylcysteine, leading to methylmercaptan production, has been shown to occur in crude yeast extracts. It is concluded that the enzyme homocysteine synthetase participates in the two alternate pathways leading to methionine biosynthesis in S. cerevisiae, one involving O-acetyl-homoserine and H(2)S, the other involving the 4-carbon chain of ethionine and a mercaptyl donor. Participation of the two types of reactions catalyzed by homocysteine synthetase, in in vivo methionine synthesis, has been shown to occur in a met(2) partial revertant.

Amino Acids↗

PubMed1969

Genetic and regulatory aspects of methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Methionine biosynthesis and regulation of four enzymatic steps involved in this pathway were studied in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in relation to genes concerned with resistance to ethionine (eth(1) and eth(2)). Data presented in this paper and others favor a scheme which excludes cystathionine as an obligatory intermediate. Kinetic data are presented for homocysteine synthetase [K(m)(O-acetyl-l-homoserine) = 7 x 10(-3)m; K(i) (l-methionine) = 1.9 x 10(-3)m]. Enzymes catalyzing steps 3, 4, 5, and 9 were repressible by methionine. Enzyme 4 (homoserine-O-transacetylase) and enzyme 9 (homocysteine synthetase) were simultaneously derepressed in strains carrying the mutant allele eth(2) (r). Studies on diploid strains confirmed the dominance of the eth(2) (s) allele over eth(2) (r). Regulation of enzyme 3 (homoserine dehydrogenase) and enzyme 5 (adenosine triphosphate sulfurylase) is not modified by the allele eth(2) (r). The other gene eth(1) did not appear to participate in regulation of these four steps. Gene enzyme relationship was determined for three of the four steps studied (steps 3, 4, and 9). The structural genes concerned with the steps which are under the control of eth(2) (met(8): enzyme 9 and met(a): enzyme 4) segregate independently, and are unlinked to eth(2). These results are compatible with the idea that the gene eth(2) is responsible for the synthesis of a pleiotropic methionine repressor and suggest the existence of at least two different methionine repressors in S. cerevisiae. Implications of these findings in general regulatory mechanisms have been discussed.

Alcohol Oxidoreductases↗

PubMed1968