PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Cortés-Funes

Publications and source records attributed to H Cortés-Funes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Randomized study of cefepime versus ceftazidime plus amikacin in patients with solid tumors treated with high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCS) with febrile neutropenia.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with cefepime for patients with solid tumors treated with high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCS) with febrile neutropenia. SUBJECTS: Patients with solid tumors treated with HDC and PBSCS, that developed fever and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/microL) were eligible, and randomly assigned to receive ceftazidime plus amikacin or cefepime. RESULTS: Fifty-one episodes were randomized, and all were evaluable (27 received ceftazidime plus amikacin arm, and 24 cefepime). Major efficacy endpoints did not show significant differences, with success rates of 44.4% and 54.2% (p = 0.481) for the combination arm and the monotherapy arm, respectively. The proportion of patients that became afebrile in the first 24 hours was significantly higher in the cefepime group (41.7% vs 11.1%, respectively; p = 0.012). However, due to its premature closure and small sample size, this study lacks the adequate power to definitely address this question. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime monotherapy appeared to have an equivalent efficacy and safety as empiric treatment in febrile neutropenia episodes in a highrisk population compared with ceftazidime and amikacin. Nevertheless, this study is not adequately powered to answer this question. Given the small number of patients randomized and the single-center nature of this study, these results must be cautiously interpreted.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Biweekly gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in first-line metastatic breast cancer: efficacy and correlation with HER2 extracellular domain.

Purpose. To assess the toxicity and efficacy of biweekly gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in first-line advanced breast cancer, and to establish whether circulating HER2 ECD levels correlate with the efficacy of the combination. Patients and methods. 52 patients were treated with gemcitabine 2500 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2), both on day 1 of 14-day cycles, for a maximum of 10 cycles. Baseline serum levels of HER2 ECD were assessed with an ELISA. Results. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 50 for efficacy. Overall toxicity was moderate. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 35% of patients and grade 4 in 19%. Other grade 3 toxicities were observed in less than 6%. There was one episode of febrile neutropenia, and one death after cycle three. Overall response rate was 52% (95% CI: 38% to 66%), with 2 patients achieving a CR (4%). Response rate did not correlate with HER2 ECD, with 50% of HER2 ECD positive patients responding, vs 48.5% of the HER2 ECD negative. Median overall survival was 24.6 months. Conclusion. Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine, given as an every-two-week schedule, is an active regimen in advanced breast carcinoma. This combination can be an option when anthracyclines and taxanes are not preferred. HER2 ECD has no predictive value in this non-taxane combination.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Phase II trial of cisplatin and capecitabine in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and correlative study of angiogenic factors.

The combination of cisplatin and capecitabine was evaluated in patients with recurrent or unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), and outcome parameters were correlated with the expression of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), thymidilate syntetase (TS), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1-3, and microvessel density (MVD). Patients with recurrent or unresectable HNSCC were eligible if they had received prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, or no prior systemic therapy. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg m(-2) day 1), and capecitabine (2000 mg m(-2) day 1-14) every 3 weeks. A total of 41 patients received 194 cycles. In all, 16 complete responses (39%) and 12 partial responses (29%) were documented, for an overall response rate of 68% (95% CI, 53-80%). Grade 3-4 uncomplicated neutropenia was documented in five subjects. Asthenia, anorexia, hand-foot syndrome, and constipation were the most frequent nonhaematologic events. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.4 and 12.6 months. Cytoplasmic TP expression was more prevalent in patients with a laryngeal location vs other, and in patients with a recurrence vs primary disease. Microvessel density count was higher in patients with recurrent vs primary disease. The combination of cisplatin and capecitabine is effective in recurrent or unresectable HNSCC, and shows a manageable toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with a combination of cyclophosphamide, r-metHuSCF and filgrastim in patients with breast cancer previously treated with chemotherapy.

The objective of our study was to determine the effect of adding r-metHuSCF to Filgrastim and cyclophosphamide for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC), on collection of CD34(+) cells and engraftment after autologous stem cell transplant. Twenty-three patients with previously treated stage II-IV breast cancer received cyclophosphamide (3 g/m(2)), Filgrastim 5 microg/kg daily and r-metHuSCF 20 microg/kg daily. Two PBPC collections were performed on consecutive days starting the day the WBC count was above 7.5 x 10(3)/microl. Collection was performed between days +9 and +12 and the median number of CD34(+) cells collected was 9.9 x 10(6)/kg (1.1-53.1) and 6.6 x 10(6)/kg (1.4-33.8) for the first and second apheresis, respectively. Despite being previously treated patients, the target CD34(+) cell dose required for SCT was obtained in all patients. SCT was associated with rapid neutrophil and platelet engraftment and a highly significant correlation was observed between the number of CD34(+) cells infused and engraftment. Treatment with SCF plus filgrastim was well tolerated, with mild to moderate local skin rash being the most frequently reported adverse event. In conclusion, addition of r-metHuSCF induces mobilization of a large number of CD34(+) cells which results in shortening of time to engraftment and hospitalization.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Biweekly vinorelbine and gemcitabine: a phase I dose-finding study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose of a combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine administered on a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors included in this phase I study were treated with vinorelbine followed by gemcitabine. Vinorelbine was given intravenously over 10 min, and gemcitabine was given intravenously at an fixed-dose infusion rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min. Six dose levels of vinorelbine/gemcitabine were explored: 20/2000, 25/2500, 25/3000, 30/3000, 30/3500 and 30/2500 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in the study. Fourteen patients were pretreated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. A total of 123 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. DLTs were neutropenic fever and grade 3 asthenia at dose level 5 (30/3500 mg/m(2)); at dose level 4 (30/3000 mg/m(2)) they were grade 3 asthenia, and a radiation-recall reaction and pneumonitis. Sixteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Five patients had an objective response (one complete response and four partial responses), for an overall response rate of 31%. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for phase II study is vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 2500 mg/m(2) administered once every 2 weeks. This regimen is feasible and well-tolerated at this dose, and shows a good clinical activity in all levels explored.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

The role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the post-transplant period.

The administration of G-CSF post transplant has been shown to accelerate the time to neutrophil engraftment. However, this does not necessarily translate into a meaningful clinical benefit to the patient. This randomized study was designed to determine the role of G-CSF following transplantation in patients with breast cancer (BC). A total of 241 evaluable patients with BC were included. There were 200 patients with high-risk BC, and 41 had disseminated BC in complete remission. All patients received conventional dose chemotherapy prior to transplantation. Patients were mobilized with G-CSF, received the STAMP V regimen, were transplanted with > or = 2.5 x 10(6) of CD34(+) cells/kg and were then randomized to receive 5 microg/kg of G-CSF starting on the day of infusion (arm A), five days later (arm B), or no G-CSF (arm C). The need for transfusion support, infectious complications and length of hospitalization were the variables chosen to demonstrate clinical benefit. Patients receiving G-CSF reached 500 and 1000 neutrophils significantly faster (P = 0.001) than patients with no G-CSF. This translated into a significantly (P < 0.05) shorter hospitalization time for patients receiving G-CSF. Arm C was closed and, after recruiting 110 patients in arm A, and 106 in arm B, the significant difference in neutrophil recovery persisted with no difference in the time of hospitalization between arms A and B. Therefore, G-CSF significantly accelerates the time to neutrophil engraftment. This translates into a shorter time of hospitalization. There is no difference in this variable regarding the time of administering the G-CSF: day 0 vs day +5. Therefore, G-CSF on day +5 should be the standard in this setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: long-term results of a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PPF) as induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Seventy patients with previously untreated stage III-IV SCCHN were included in this phase II trial. Induction treatment consisted of a maximum of three outpatient courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) as a 3-h infusion on day 1, cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500-750 mg/m(2)/day as a 24-h continuous infusion on days 2-6, repeated every 3 weeks. The 5-FU dose was reduced from 750 mg/m(2)/day to 500 mg/m(2)/day due to the excessive toxicity observed in the first 14 patients enrolled. Local treatment consisted of radiotherapy and/or surgery. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-one cycles were administered to 70 patients. The main toxicities of PPF were neutropenia (grade 4, 14%; febrile neutropenia, 4%), peripheral neuropathy (grade 2-3, 14%) and catheter-associated venous thrombosis (7%). There were three early deaths (two from neutropenic sepsis and one from pulmonary embolism), and 13 patients required hospitalization due to toxicity. Other side effects included mucositis, anorexia, diarrhea, myalgias and alopecia. The overall response rate to PPF was 88%, including 59% complete responses (CR) and 29% partial responses. The CR rates at the primary tumor and neck lymph nodes were 74% and 62%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 51 months (range 40-63 months), the estimated 5-year time-to-disease progression and overall survival rates were 56% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PPF regimen has major antitumor activity and is associated with manageable toxicity as induction treatment in SCCHN patients. The high complete response rate and favorable long-term outcome justify further evaluation of this chemotherapy combination.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

High-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide without stem cell support in patients with high-risk and advanced breast carcinoma: a Phase II multicentric trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently employed high-dose regimens for patients with breast carcinoma consist mainly of single-cycle combinations of alkylating agents. In a previous Phase I trial, the authors developed a tandem high-dose combination of two cycles of mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) and high-risk breast carcinoma (HRBC). Treatment was delivered with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) but without stem cell support to avoid potential tumor cell reinfusion. The objective was to validate the safety and obtain preliminary efficacy assessment of this combination in a Phase II trial. METHODS: Fifty-three patients were included: 27 patients with MBC and 26 patients with HRBC. After standard induction treatment, patients received two cycles of mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2 separated by a 4-week interval. Patients received G-CSF and ciprofloxacin until hematologic recovery. Follow-up was performed in an outpatient setting. RESULTS: One hundred one of 106 projected cycles (95%) were delivered. The mean dose intensities achieved were mitoxantrone 5.8 mg/m2 per week and cyclophosphamide 933 mg/m2 per week. Infection developed in 46% of the cycles, and platelet transfusions were required in 42%. Nonhematologic toxicity was mainly Grade 3 emesis. There were no toxic deaths. In 17 evaluable patients with MBC, 13 patients (77%) had response improvements, including 7 complete responses (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with two cycles of mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2 with G-CSF but without stem cell support was well tolerated. The dose intensities achieved approach those obtained with conventional high-dose therapy. This combination warrants further investigation as an alternative to conventional high-dose regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia: a multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) have been shown to help prevent febrile neutropenia in certain subgroups of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, but their role in treating febrile neutropenia is controversial. The purpose of our study was to evaluate-in a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial-the efficacy of adding G-CSF to broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment of patients with solid tumors and high-risk febrile neutropenia. METHODS: A total of 210 patients with solid tumors treated with conventional-dose chemotherapy who presented with fever and grade IV neutropenia were considered to be eligible for the trial. They met at least one of the following high-risk criteria: profound neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <100/mm(3)), short latency from previous chemotherapy cycle (<10 days), sepsis or clinically documented infection at presentation, severe comorbidity, performance status of 3-4 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale), or prior inpatient status. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive the antibiotics ceftazidime and amikacin, with or without G-CSF (5 microg/kg per day). The primary study end point was the duration of hospitalization. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Patients randomly assigned to receive G-CSF had a significantly shorter duration of grade IV neutropenia (median, 2 days versus 3 days; P = 0.0004), antibiotic therapy (median, 5 days versus 6 days; P = 0.013), and hospital stay (median, 5 days versus 7 days; P = 0.015) than patients in the control arm. The incidence of serious medical complications not present at the initial clinical evaluation was 10% in the G-CSF group and 17% in the control group (P = 0.12), including five deaths in each study arm. The median cost of hospital stay and the median overall cost per patient admission were reduced by 17% (P = 0.01) and by 11% (P = 0.07), respectively, in the G-CSF arm compared with the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Adding G-CSF to antibiotic therapy shortens the duration of neutropenia, reduces the duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, and decreases hospital costs in patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Effects of gamma-linolenic acid and oleic acid on paclitaxel cytotoxicity in human breast cancer cells.

It has been suggested that dietary interventions may improve the effectiveness of cancer chemotherapy. We have examined the combined in vitro cytotoxicity of paclitaxel and the fatty acids gamma-linolenic acid (GLA, 18:3n-6) and oleic acid (OA, 18:1n-9) in human breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells. The effect of fatty acids on paclitaxel chemosensitivity was determined by comparing IC(50) and IC(70) (50 and 70% inhibitory concentrations, respectively) obtained when the cells were exposed to IC(50) and IC(70) levels of paclitaxel alone and fatty acids were supplemented either before or during the exposure to paclitaxel. The 3-4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to determine cell growth inhibition. GLA by itself showed antiproliferative effects, and a possible GLA-paclitaxel interaction at the cellular level was assessed by the isobologram and the combination-index (CI) methods. Isobole analysis at the isoeffect levels of 50 and 70% revealed that drug interaction was predominantly synergistic when GLA and paclitaxel were added concurrently for 24 h to the cell cultures. Interaction assessment using the median-effect principle and the combination-index (CI) method showed that exposure of MDA-MB-231 cells to an equimolar combination of concurrent GLA plus paclitaxel for 24 h resulted in a moderate synergism at all effect levels, consistent with the results of the isobologram analysis. When exposure to GLA (24 h) was followed sequentially by paclitaxel (24 h) only an additive effect was observed. The GLA-mediated increase in paclitaxel chemosensitivity was only partially abolished by Vitamin E, a lipid peroxidation inhibitor, suggesting a limited influence of the oxidative status of GLA in achieving potentiation of paclitaxel toxicity. When OA (a non-peroxidisable fatty acid) was combined with paclitaxel, an enhancement of chemosensitivity was found when OA was used concurrently with paclitaxel, although less markedly than with GLA. Pretreatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with OA for 24 h prior to a 24 h paclitaxel exposure produced greater enhancement of paclitaxel sensitivity at high OA concentrations than the concurrent exposure to OA and paclitaxel. The OA-induced sensitisation to paclitaxel was not due to the cytoxicity of the fatty acid itself. When these observations were extended to three additional breast carcinoma cell lines (SK-Br3, T47D and MCF-7), simultaneous exposure to GLA and paclitaxel also resulted in synergism. GLA preincubation followed by paclitaxel resulted in additivity for all cell lines. Simultaneous exposure to paclitaxel and OA enhanced paclitaxel cytotoxicity in T47D and MCF-7 cells, but not in SK-Br3 cells, whereas preincubation with OA failed to increase paclitaxel effectiveness in all three cell lines. For comparison, the effects of other fatty acids on paclitaxel chemosensitivity were examined: GLA was the most potent at enhancing paclitaxel cytotoxicity, followed by alpha-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3n.3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3), whereas linoleic acid (LA; 18:2n-6) did not increase paclitaxel toxicity. These findings provide experimental support for the use of fatty acids as modulators of tumour cell chemosensitivity in paclitaxel-based therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2001

High-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide without stem cell support in high-risk and advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial.

This phase I study was designed to develop a high-dose combination of two cycles of mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide in patients with solid tumors, as an alternative to single-cycle high-dose regimens that use only alkylating agents. Treatment was delivered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), but without stem cell support, in order to avoid potential tumor cell reinfusion. Thirty-one patients with advanced solid tumors received two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone (20-30 mg/m2) plus high-dose cyclophosphamide (3000-4000 mg/m2). All patients received G-CSF until hematologic recovery. Dose-escalation was performed when less than 50% of cycles per level had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) achieved was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Main dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were hematological: grade IV neutropenia lasting more than 7 days and thrombopenia below 20 x 10(9)/l requiring more than one platelet transfusion. Non-hematological DLT consisted predominantly of grade III emesis and asthenia. Follow-up after each cycle was performed in an outpatient setting and there were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, the administration of two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support is safe and feasible. MTD was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Evaluation of this regimen is being done in a phase II trial.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Sequential analysis of CD34+ and CD34- cell subsets in peripheral blood and leukapheresis products from breast cancer patients mobilized with SCF plus G-CSF and cyclophosphamide.

Administration of stem cell factor (SCF) has been proven to enhance cytokine-induced mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) into the peripheral blood (PB). The aim of the present study was to explore in a homogeneous group of 22 uniformly treated breast cancer patients: (1) the kinetics of mobilization into PB of both CD34+ and CD34- cell subsets, including dendritic cells, in sequential samples obtained from day +7 up to day +12 after mobilization; and (2) the composition of the CD34+ and CD34- cell subsets present in the two leukapheresis products obtained for each patient. The following CD34+ and CD34- subsets were analyzed: early CD34+ HPC, erythroid-, myeloid- and B-lymphoid-committed CD34+ precursor cells, mature T, B and NK cells, monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and dendritic cells (DC) including three subsets of lin-/HLADR+DC (CD16+, CD33high and CD123high). Our results show that the absolute number of PB CD34+ HPC progressively increases from day +7 onwards. As far as the CD34- PB leukocyte subsets are concerned, monocytes (CD14+) displayed the earliest recovery after mobilization predicting neutrophil recovery 1 day in advance. The number of CD34+ HPC collected in a single leukapheresis product was always > or = 1.4 x 10(6) cells/kg body weight. No significant changes were observed between the two leukapheresis sessions either as regards their composition in CD34+ HPC subsets or their CD34- leukocyte populations except for a higher ratio of both CD34+ erythroid/CD34+ myeloid HPC (0.35 +/- 0.13 vs 0.30 +/- 0.13; P = 0.04) and neutrophils/monocytes (1.58 +/- 2.1 vs 0.69 +/- 0.27; P = 0.009) found for the first leukapheresis. Interestingly, the overall number of dendritic cells (DC) was higher in the second leukapheresis (1.06 +/- 0.56 vs 1.9 +/- 0.46; P = 0.02) due to a selective increase of the CD16+ antigen-presenting cells. In summary, our results show that the combination of cyclophosphamide, G-CSF and SCF is highly effective for stem cell mobilization, with differences observed in the mobilization kinetics of the different hematopoietic cell subsets analyzed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Phase I-II study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the antitumor activity of a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic TCC and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2 and creatinine clearance > or = 55 mL/min were eligible. Cisplatin was given on day 1 at a fixed dose of 70 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel and gemcitabine were given on days 1 and 8 at increasing dose levels. Cycles were repeated every 21 days to a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were registered. In phase I, 15 patients were entered at four different dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of early onset (after the first cycle) grade 2 asthenia (two of six patients) and grade 3 asthenia (one of six patients) at dose level 4. A paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) was recommended for phase II, and 46 additional patients were entered at this level for a total of 49 patients. Main nonhematologic toxicity was grade 2 asthenia in 18 patients, with early onset in five patients, and grade 3 in four patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 27 (55%) and 11 (22%) patients, respectively. Overall, febrile neutropenia was seen in 11 patients, and one toxic death occurred because of neutropenic sepsis. The combination was active at all dose levels. In total, 58 of 61 eligible patients were assessable for response; 16 complete responses (27.6%) and 29 partial responses (50%) were observed for an overall response rate of 77.6% (95% confidence interval, 60% to 98%). The median survival time (MST) available for the phase I part of the study is 24.0 months. MST has not been reached for the whole group with the current follow-up. CONCLUSION: This combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine is feasible and highly active in patients with advanced TCC of the urothelium. Further evaluation of this regimen in patients with TCC is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Tumor markers at the time of recurrence in patients with germ cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) closely follow the course of germ cell tumors (GCTs) and are widely used for diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up purposes. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance of tumor markers at the time of diagnosis and recurrence. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 794 patients with GCTs treated in three Spanish hospitals from 1977-1996 and analyzed the concordance between AFP, HCG, and LDH levels at diagnosis and first and second recurrence. A positive marker was defined as a level of AFP > 10 ng/mL, HCG > 5 IU/L, or LDH > the upper limit of normal. One hundred twenty-five patients were identified who developed a first recurrence (123 had marker levels recorded). The median age was 27 years (range, 14-78 years). Histology was seminoma in 36 patients (29%) and nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) in 87 patients (71%). RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (64%) had elevated tumor markers at diagnosis and 76 (62%) at first recurrence. An elevated marker was present at first recurrence in 58 of 79 patients (73%) with initially positive markers and in 18 of 44 patients (41%) with initially negative markers. In 84 of 123 patients (68%), the same marker pattern (positive or negative) was present at the time of diagnosis and at first recurrence, 78% in seminomas and 64% in NSGCTs. The earliest indicator of recurrence was an elevated marker in patients with NSGCTs and a radiologic finding in patients with seminomas. Thirty patients developed a second recurrence, 27 of whom (90%) had the same marker pattern as at first recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor marker pattern at diagnosis is not a good predictor of the pattern at recurrence, particularly in patients with NSGCTs. Marker assessment should be included in the follow-up schedule regardless of levels at the time of diagnosis. Early detection of recurrence should not rely only on marker levels, even in patients with elevated levels at presentation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Gemcitabine/paclitaxel-based three-drug regimens in advanced urothelial cancer.

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium is a highly chemosensitive tumour. Combination chemotherapy can provide both palliation and a modest survival advantage in patients with advanced disease. At present, the combination of cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin and vinblastine (M-VAC) is the most widely used for advanced TCC with an overall response rate of 40-72% in phase II, and 35-45% in phase III studies, and a median survival of approximately 12 months. These modest results and the unsuccessful attempts to increase efficacy with dose intensive M-VAC schedules have prompted the identification of new active agents in TCC, such as the taxanes and gemcitabine. The overall response rates for two-drug regimens of cisplatin-paclitaxel, carboplatin-paclitaxel and cisplatin-gemcitabine range from 63 to 72%, 14 to 65% and 42 to 66%, respectively. The overall response rates for platinum-paclitaxel-gemcitabine three-drug regimens range from 58 to 80%. The potential clinical benefit of these new three-drug combinations in the treatment of TCC needs to be tested in future phase III studies.

Adult↗