PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H D Bernstein

Publications and source records attributed to H D Bernstein.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Evidence for a novel GTPase priming step in the SRP protein targeting pathway.

Protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway requires the interaction of two homologous GTPases that reciprocally regulate each other's GTPase activity, the SRP signal peptide- binding subunit (SRP54) and the SRP receptor alpha-subunit (SRalpha). The GTPase domain of both proteins abuts a unique 'N domain' that appears to facilitate external ligand binding. To examine the relationship between the unusual regulation and unique architecture of the SRP pathway GTPases, we mutated an invariant glycine in Escherichia coli SRP54 and SRalpha orthologs ('Ffh' and 'FtsY', respectively) that resides at the N-GTPase domain interface. A G257A mutation in Ffh produced a lethal phenotype. The mutation did not significantly affect Ffh function, but severely reduced interaction with FtsY. Likewise, mutation of FtsY Gly455 produced growth defects and inhibited interaction with Ffh. The data suggest that Ffh and FtsY interact only in a 'primed' conformation which requires interdomain communication. Based on these results, we propose that the distinctive features of the SRP pathway GTPases evolved to ensure that SRP and the SR engage external ligands before interacting with each other.

Alleles↗
PubMed2001

FtsY binds to the Escherichia coli inner membrane via interactions with phosphatidylethanolamine and membrane proteins.

Targeting of many polytopic proteins to the inner membrane of prokaryotes occurs via an essential signal recognition particle-like pathway. FtsY, the Escherichia coli homolog of the eukaryotic signal recognition particle receptor alpha-subunit, binds to membranes via its amino-terminal AN domain. We demonstrate that FtsY assembles on membranes via interactions with phosphatidylethanolamine and with a trypsin-sensitive component. Both interactions are mediated by the AN domain of FtsY. In the absence of phosphatidylethanolamine, the trypsin-sensitive component is sufficient for binding and function of FtsY in the targeting of membrane proteins. We propose a two-step mechanism for the assembly of FtsY on the membrane similar to that of SecA on the E. coli inner membrane.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2001

The targeting pathway of Escherichia coli presecretory and integral membrane proteins is specified by the hydrophobicity of the targeting signal.

Previous studies have demonstrated that presecretory proteins such as maltose binding protein (MBP) and outer membrane protein A (OmpA) are targeted to the Escherichia coli inner membrane by the molecular chaperone SecB, but that integral membrane proteins are targeted by the signal recognition particle (SRP). In vitro studies have suggested that trigger factor binds to a sequence near the N terminus of the mature region of OmpA and shunts the protein into the SecB pathway by blocking an interaction between SRP and the signal peptide. By contrast, we have found that the targeting pathway of a protein under physiological conditions is dictated by the composition of its targeting signal. Replacement of the MBP or OmpA signal peptide with the first transmembrane segment of AcrB abolished the dependence on SecB for transport and rerouted both proteins into the SRP targeting pathway. More modest alterations of the MBP signal peptide that simply increase its hydrophobicity also promoted SRP binding. Furthermore, we obtained evidence that SRP has a low affinity for typical signal peptides in vivo. These results imply that different classes of E. coli proteins are targeted by distinct pathways because bacterial SRP binds to a more restricted range of targeting signals than its eukaryotic counterpart.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗
PubMed2001

Physiological basis for conservation of the signal recognition particle targeting pathway in Escherichia coli.

The Escherichia coli signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein complex that targets nascent inner membrane proteins (IMPs) to transport sites in the inner membrane (IM). Since SRP depletion only partially inhibits IMP insertion under some growth conditions, however, it is not clear why the particle is absolutely essential for viability. Insights into this question emerged from experiments in which we analyzed the physiological consequences of reducing the intracellular concentration of SRP below the wild-type level. We found that even moderate SRP deficiencies that have little effect on cell growth led to the induction of a heat shock response. Genetic manipulations that suppress the heat shock response were lethal in SRP-deficient cells, indicating that the elevated synthesis of heat shock proteins plays an important role in maintaining cell viability. Although it is conceivable that the heat shock response serves to increase the capacity of cells to target IMPs via chaperone-based mechanisms, SRP-deficient cells did not show an increased dependence on either GroEL or DnaK. By contrast, the heat shock-regulated proteases Lon and ClpQ became essential for viability when SRP levels were reduced. These results suggest that the heat shock response protects SRP-deficient cells by increasing their capacity to degrade mislocalized IMPs. Consistent with this notion, a model IMP that was mislocalized in the cytoplasm as the result of SRP depletion appeared to be more stable in a Deltalon DeltaclpQ strain than in control cells. Taken together, the data provide direct evidence that SRP is essential in E. coli and possibly conserved throughout prokaryotic evolution as well partly because efficient IMP targeting prevents a toxic accumulation of aggregated proteins in the cytoplasm.

ATP-Dependent Proteases↗
PubMed2000

The biogenesis and assembly of bacterial membrane proteins.

Bacterial proteins in the inner and outer membranes differ dramatically in their architecture. Although both types of proteins are transported across the inner membrane through a common pore, recent studies have identified distinct factors that target them to transport sites and catalyze proper folding.

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins↗
PubMed1999

SecA is required for the insertion of inner membrane proteins targeted by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle.

Recent work has demonstrated that the signal recognition particle (SRP) is required for the efficient insertion of many proteins into the Escherichia coli inner membrane (IM). Based on an analogy to eukaryotic SRP, it is likely that bacterial SRP binds to inner membrane proteins (IMPs) co-translationally and then targets them to protein transport channels ("translocons"). Here we present evidence that SecA, which has previously been shown to facilitate the export of proteins targeted in a post-translational fashion, is also required for the membrane insertion of proteins targeted by SRP. The introduction of SecA mutations into strains that have modest SRP deficiencies produced a synthetic lethal effect, suggesting that SecA and SRP might function in the same biochemical pathway. Consistent with this explanation, depletion of SecA by inactivating a temperature-sensitive amber suppressor in a secAam strain completely blocked the membrane insertion of AcrB, a protein that is targeted by SRP. In the absence of substantial SecA, pulse-labeled AcrB was retained in the cytoplasm even after a prolonged chase period and was eventually degraded. Although protein export was also severely impaired by SecA depletion, the observation that more than 20% of the OmpA molecules were translocated properly showed that translocons were still active. Taken together, these results imply that SecA plays a much broader role in the transport of proteins across the E. coli IM than has been previously recognized.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1999

The structure of multiple polypeptide domains determines the signal recognition particle targeting requirement of Escherichia coli inner membrane proteins.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) targeting pathway is required for the efficient insertion of many polytopic inner membrane proteins (IMPs) into the Escherichia coli inner membrane, but in the absence of SRP protein export proceeds normally. To define the properties of IMPs that impose SRP dependence, we analyzed the targeting requirements of bitopic IMPs that are structurally intermediate between exported proteins and polytopic IMPs. We found that disruption of the SRP pathway inhibited the insertion of only a subset of bitopic IMPs. Studies on a model bitopic AcrB-alkaline phosphatase fusion protein (AcrB 265-AP) showed that the SRP requirement for efficient insertion correlated with the presence of a large periplasmic domain (P1). As previously reported, perturbation of the SRP pathway also affected the insertion of a polytopic AcrB-AP fusion. Even exhaustive SRP depletion, however, failed to block the insertion of any AcrB derivative by more than 50%. Taken together, these data suggest that many proteins that are normally targeted by SRP can utilize alternative targeting pathways and that the structure of both hydrophilic and membrane-spanning domains determines the degree to which the biogenesis of a protein is SRP dependent.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed1998

Protein targeting: getting into the groove.

The 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle has to identify a diverse family of substrates and deliver them in a controlled manner to the translocation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum. Important new insights into the function of this sorting protein have emerged from recent biochemical and structural studies.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

A mutation in the Escherichia coli secY gene that produces distinct effects on inner membrane protein insertion and protein export.

E. coli strains that contain the secY40 mutation are cold-sensitive, but protein export defects have not been observed even at the nonpermissive temperature. Here we describe experiments designed to explain the conditional phenotype associated with this allele. We found that combining the secY40 mutation with defects in the signal recognition particle targeting pathway led to synthetic lethality. Since the signal recognition particle is required for the insertion of inner membrane proteins (IMPs) into the cytoplasmic membrane but not for protein export, this observation prompted us to examine the effect of the secY40 mutation on IMP biogenesis. The membrane insertion of all IMPs that we tested was impaired at both permissive and nonpermissive temperatures in secY40 cells grown in either rich or minimal medium. The magnitude of the insertion defects was greatest in cells grown at low temperature in rich medium, conditions in which the growth defect was most pronounced. Consistent with previous reports, we could not detect protein export defects in secY40 cells grown in minimal medium. Upon growth in rich medium, only slight protein export defects were observed. Taken together, these results suggest that the impairment of IMP insertion causes the cold sensitivity of secY40 strains. Furthermore, these results provide the first evidence that the protein export and membrane protein insertion functions of the translocon are genetically separable.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1997

The N-domain of the signal recognition particle 54-kDa subunit promotes efficient signal sequence binding.

The signal recognition particle 54-kDa subunit (SRP54) binds to the signal sequences of nascent presecretory and transmembrane proteins. Previous studies have shown that signal sequences bind to the C-terminal methionine-rich domain of the protein (M-domain), but have raised the possibility that either the N-terminal domain (N-domain) or the central guanosine triphosphatase module (GTPase-domain) also contribute to signal-sequence-binding activity. We have generated a series of N-domain and GTPase-domain mutants to investigate this issue further. Mutations in a conserved N-domain motif (ALLEADV) produced significant defects in signal sequence binding that correlate with the severity of the mutation. The magnitude of the defect was independent of the preprotein substrate, which suggested that the mutations do not alter the specificity of signal sequence recognition. The N-domain mutants also showed defects in promoting the translocation of presecretory proteins across the membrane of microsomal vesicles, but these defects appeared to be a direct consequence of the reduction in signal-sequence-binding activity and not separate effects of the mutations. By contrast, mutations in the guanosine triphosphatase consensus sequence had no effect on signal sequence binding, but instead severely impaired protein translocation activity. These results indicate that a principal function of the SRP54 N-domain is to promote efficient signal sequence binding. These data also suggest that the SRP54 GTPase regulates the cycle of signal sequence binding and release, perhaps by modulating the relative orientation of the N- and M-domains.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

A highly conserved nucleotide in the Alu domain of SRP RNA mediates translation arrest through high affinity binding to SRP9/14.

Binding of the signal recognition particle (SRP) to signal sequences during translation leads to an inhibition of polypeptide elongation known as translation arrest. The arrest activity is mediated by a discrete domain comprised of the Alu portion of SRP RNA and a 9 and 14 kDa polypeptide heterodimer (SRP9/14). Although very few nucleotides in SRP RNA are conserved throughout evolution, the remarkable conservation of G24, which resides in the region of SRP9/14 interaction, suggests that it is essential for translation arrest. To understand the functional significance of the G24 residue, we made single base substitutions in SRP RNA at this position and analyzed the ability of the mutants to bind SRP9/14 and to reconstitute functional SRPs. Mutation of G24 to C reduced binding to SRP9/14 by at least 50-fold, whereas mutation to A and U reduced binding approximately 2- and 5-fold respectively. The mutant RNAs could nevertheless assemble into SRPs at high subunit concentrations. SRPs reconstituted with mutant RNAs were not significantly defective in translation arrest assays, indicating that the conserved guanosine does not interact directly with the translational machinery. Taken together, these results demonstrate that G24 plays an important role in the translation arrest function of SRP by mediating high affinity binding of SRP9/14.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1997

The E. coli signal recognition particle is required for the insertion of a subset of inner membrane proteins.

E. coli homologs of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor are essential for viability, but their role in protein export is unclear. To elucidate their function, we devised a genome-wide screen to identify genes that encode SRP substrates. Inhibition of the SRP pathway sharply blocked the membrane insertion of several polytopic inner membrane proteins (IMPs) that were predicted to be SRP substrates, but had a smaller effect on the insertion of other IMPs and no significant effect on preprotein translocation. Our results suggest that whereas most E. coli preproteins and some IMPs can utilize SRP-independent targeting pathways effectively, the structural features of a subset of IMPs have required the conservation of an SRP-based targeting machinery.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1996

Carboxyl-terminal targeting and novel post-translational processing of JAW1, a lymphoid protein of the endoplasmic reticulum.

Jaw1 is a lymphoid-restricted protein localized to the cytoplasmic face of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and is a member of a recently recognized class of integral membrane proteins that contain carboxyl-terminal membrane anchors. The carboxyl-terminal 71 amino acids of the Jaw1 protein, which contain a hydrophobic membrane spanning region, are sufficient to target a heterologous protein to the ER. By discontinuous sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation, differential sedimentation was noted for the four major Jaw1 protein isoforms, with two of the forms predominantly soluble and two microsome-bound. Pulse-chase immunoprecipitations suggest a post-translational modification of two major isoforms of the protein resulting in an increase in mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In vitro translation studies are compatible with a post-translational processing event that results in cleavage of a short 36 amino acid lumenal domain. These findings define a carboxyl-terminal domain of the Jaw1 protein that is both necessary and sufficient for ER localization. In addition, the processing of the small lumenal domain of Jaw1 represents a novel post-translational protein modification performed by the endoplasmic reticulum.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Interaction of E. coli Ffh/4.5S ribonucleoprotein and FtsY mimics that of mammalian signal recognition particle and its receptor.

The mechanism of protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane of eukaryotic cells and the plasma membrane of prokaryotic cells are thought to be evolutionarily related. Protein targeting to the eukaryotic translocation apparatus is mediated by the signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein, and the SRP receptor, an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. During targeting, the 54K SRP subunit (M(r) 54,000; SRP54), a GTP-binding protein, binds to signal sequences and then interacts with the alpha-subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha), another GTP-binding protein. Two proteins from Escherichia coli, Ffh and FTsY, structurally resemble SRP54 and SR alpha. Like SRP54, Ffh is a subunit of a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein that also contains the E. coli 4.5S RNA. Although there is genetic and biochemical evidence that the E. coli Ffh/4.5S ribonucleoprotein has an SRP-like function, there is no evidence for an SR alpha-like role for FtsY. Here we show that the Ffh/4.5S ribonucleoprotein binds tightly to FtsY in a GTP-dependent manner. This interaction results in the stimulation of GTP hydrolysis which can be inhibited by synthetic signal peptides. These properties mimic those of mammalian SRP and its receptor, suggesting that the E. coli Ffh/4.5S ribonucleoprotein and FtsY have functions in protein targeting that are similar to those of their mammalian counterparts.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Functional substitution of the signal recognition particle 54-kDa subunit by its Escherichia coli homolog.

The 54-kDa subunit of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP54) binds to the signal sequences of nascent secretory and transmembrane proteins and facilitates their cotranslational targeting to the membrane translocation apparatus in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). A 48-kDa Escherichia coli protein that shares extensive sequence similarity with SRP54 was identified in homology searches. Recent genetic experiments by Phillips and Silhavy [Phillips, G. J. & Silhavy, T. J. (1992) Nature (London) 359, 744-746] have shown that depletion of this protein, designated Ffh (fifty-four homolog), leads to a significant secretory defect in vivo. We demonstrate here that Ffh is structurally and functionally related to SRP54 by virtue of its ability to mimic closely its mammalian counterpart in several established biochemical assays, thereby suggesting that it plays a direct role in protein export. Ffh assembled efficiently with mammalian SRP components into a chimeric ribonucleoprotein ["SRP(Ffh)"] and bound at the site normally occupied by SRP54. Like SRP54, the Ffh moiety of the chimeric particle specifically recognized the signal sequence of preprolactin in a photocrosslinking assay. Moreover, Ffh could also act in concert with other SRP components to arrest elongation of preprolactin upon recognition of the signal sequence. In all of these assays, Ffh had approximately the same specific activity as SRP54. In contrast, SRP(Ffh) did not promote the translocation of preprolactin across the membrane of microsomal vesicles, suggesting that Ffh cannot mediate an interaction with a membrane component that is required for the translocation of nascent chains.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

GTPase domain of the 54-kD subunit of the mammalian signal recognition particle is required for protein translocation but not for signal sequence binding.

The 54-kD subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP54) binds to signal sequences of nascent secretory and transmembrane proteins. SRP54 consists of two separable domains, a 33-kD amino-terminal domain that contains a GTP-binding site (SRP54G) and a 22-kD carboxy-terminal domain (SRP54M) containing binding sites for both the signal sequence and SRP RNA. To examine the function of the two domains in more detail, we have purified SRP54M and used it to assemble a partial SRP that lacks the amino-terminal domain of SRP54 [SRP(-54G)]. This particle recognized signal sequences in two independent assays, albeit less efficiently than intact SRP. Analysis of the signal sequence binding activity of free SRP54 and SRP54M supports the conclusion that SRP54M binds signal sequences with lower affinity than the intact protein. In contrast, when SRP(-54G) was assayed for its ability to promote the translocation of preprolactin across microsomal membranes, it was completely inactive, apparently because it was unable to interact normally with the SRP receptor. These results imply that SRP54G plays an essential role in SRP-mediated targeting of nascent chain-ribosome complexes to the ER membrane and also influences signal sequence recognition, possibly by promoting a tighter association between signal sequences and SRP54M.

Animals↗