PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Echols

Publications and source records attributed to H Echols.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Sequential folding of UmuC by the Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone complexes of Escherichia coli.

Replication-blocking lesions generate a signal in Escherichia coli that leads to the induction of the multigene SOS response. Among the SOS-induced genes are umuD and umuC, whose products are necessary for the increased mutation rate in induced bacteria. The mutations are likely to result from replication across the DNA lesion, and such a bypass event has been reconstituted in vitro (Rajagopalan, M., L, C., Woodgate, R., O'Donnel, M., Goodman, M. F., Echols, H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 10777-10781). In this work, we show that the chaperone proteins promote the proper folding of UmuC protein in vitro. We treated purified and inactive UmuC with Hsp70 and Hsp60. After Hsp70 treatment, the DNA binding activity of UmuC was recovered, but the ability to promote replication across DNA lesions was not. However, lesion bypass activity was recovered upon further treatment with Hsp60. The biological significance of such a folding pathway for UmuC protein is strengthened by in vivo evidence for a role of DnaK in UV-induced mutagenesis.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Function of the GrpE heat shock protein in bidirectional unwinding and replication from the origin of phage lambda.

The initiation of DNA replication by phage lambda depends on a specialized nucleoprotein structure that provides for the precise localization and activity of the Escherichia coli DnaB helicase at the lambda replication origin. Previous work has shown that the DnaJ and DnaK heat shock proteins function in the initiation pathway by releasing the DnaB helicase from the initiation complex to carry out localized unwinding of origin DNA. This DnaJ.DnaK pathway results in mainly unidirectional DNA unwinding and replication, whereas replication in vivo is mainly bidirectional. Based on recent replication work indicating an important role for the GrpE heat shock protein, we have used electron microscopy to study the action of GrpE in the DNA unwinding and replication reactions. We have found that GrpE acts with DnaJ and DnaK to facilitate the unwinding reaction at low concentrations of DnaK. In the presence of GrpE, bidirectional unwinding occurs in approximately half of the unwound DNA molecules. In addition, GrpE significantly increases the frequency of replication proceeding leftward from the origin. We suggest that reactions including GrpE result in more complete disassembly of the preinitiation nucleoprotein structure, thus allowing replication to proceed in both directions from the origin.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Activity of the Hsp70 chaperone complex--DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE--in initiating phage lambda DNA replication by sequestering and releasing lambda P protein.

Initiation of DNA replication by phage lambda requires the ordered assembly and disassembly of a specialized nucleoprotein structure at the origin of replication. In the disassembly pathway, a set of Escherichia coli heat shock proteins termed the Hsp70 complex--DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE--act with ATP to release lambda P protein from the nucleo-protein complex, freeing the DnaB helicase for its DNA-unwinding reaction. To investigate the mechanism of the release reaction, we have examined the interaction between P and the three heat shock proteins by glycerol gradient sedimentation and gel electrophoresis. We have discovered an ATP-dependent ternary interaction between P, DnaK, and DnaJ; this P.DnaK.DnaJ complex is dissociated by GrpE. We have concluded that the function of the Hsp70 complex in sequestering and releasing P protein provides for the critical step in the disassembly pathway. Based on our data and other work on protein folding, the formation of the P.DnaK.DnaJ complex might involve a conformational shift to a folding intermediate of P.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III.

The introduction of a replication-inhibiting lesion into the DNA of Escherichia coli generates the induced, multigene SOS response. One component of the SOS response is a marked increase in mutation rate, dependent on RecA protein and the induced mutagenesis proteins UmuC and UmuD. A variety of previous indirect approaches have indicated that SOS mutagenesis results from replicative bypass of the DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III (pol III) holoenzyme in a reaction mediated by RecA, UmuC, and a processed form of UmuD termed UmuD'. To study the biochemistry of SOS mutagenesis, we have reconstituted replicative bypass with a defined in vitro system containing purified protein and a DNA substrate with a single abasic DNA lesion. The replicative bypass reaction requires pol III, UmuC, UmuD', and RecA. The nonprocessed UmuD protein does not replace UmuD' but inhibits the bypass activity of UmuD', perhaps by sequestering UmuD' in a heterodimer. Our experiments demonstrate directly that the UmuC-UmuD' complex and RecA act to rescue an otherwise stalled pol III holoenzyme at a replication-blocking DNA lesion.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Processive DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase II mediated by DNA polymerase III accessory proteins.

An interesting property of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase II is the stimulation in DNA synthesis mediated by the DNA polymerase III accessory proteins beta,gamma complex. In this paper we have studied the basis for the stimulation in pol II activity and have concluded that these accessory proteins stimulate pol II activity by increasing the processivity of the enzyme between 150- and 600-fold. As is the case with pol III, processive synthesis by pol II requires both beta,gamma complex and SSB protein. Whereas the intrinsic velocity of synthesis by pol II is 20-30 nucleotides per s with or without the accessory proteins, the processivity of pol II is increased from approximately five nucleotides to greater than 1600 nucleotides incorporated per template binding event. The effect of the accessory proteins on the rate of replication is far greater on pol III than on pol II; pol III holoenzyme is able to complete replication of circular single-stranded M13 DNA in less than 20 s, whereas pol II in the presence of the gamma complex and beta requires approximately 5 min. We have investigated the effect of beta,gamma complex proteins on bypass of a site-specific abasic lesion by E. coli DNA polymerases I, II, and III. All three polymerases are extremely inefficient at bypass of the abasic lesion. We find limited bypass by pol I with no change upon addition of accessory proteins. pol II also shows limited bypass of the abasic site, dependent on the presence of beta,gamma complex and SSB. pol III shows no significant bypass of the abasic site with or without beta,gamma complex.

Autoradiography↗

Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding.

The main stress proteins of Escherichia coli function in an ordered protein-folding reaction. DnaK (heat-shock protein 70) recognizes the folding polypeptide as an extended chain and cooperates with DnaJ in stabilizing an intermediate conformational state lacking ordered tertiary structure. Dependent on GrpE and ATP hydrolysis, the protein is then transferred to GroEL (heat-shock protein 60) which acts catalytically in the production of the native state. This sequential mechanism of chaperone action may represent an important pathway for the folding of newly synthesized polypeptides.

Bacterial Proteins↗

DNA looping between the origin of replication of Epstein-Barr virus and its enhancer site: stabilization of an origin complex with Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1.

Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) is the only viral protein required to support replication of Epstein-Barr virus during the latent phase of its life cycle. The DNA segment required for latent replication, oriP, contains two essential binding regions for EBNA-1, termed FR and DS, that are separated by 1 kilobase pair. The FR site appears to function as a replicational enhancer providing for the start of replication at the DS site. We have used electron microscopy to visualize the interaction of EBNA-1 with its binding sites and to study the mechanism for communication between the FR and DS sites. We have found that DNA-bound EBNA-1 forms a DNA loop between the FR and DS sites. From these results, we suggest that EBNA-1 bound to the replicational enhancer acts by a DNA-looping mechanism to facilitate the initiation of DNA replication. Occupancy of the DS site alone is highly sensitive to competition with nonspecific DNA. In contrast, occupancy of the DS site by looping from FR is largely resistant to the competitor DNA. These experiments support the concept that enhancers act in cis from nearby sites to provide a high local concentration of regulatory proteins at their target sites and to stabilize regulatory interactions.

Animals↗

Specificity and enzymatic mechanism of the editing exonuclease of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III.

Exonucleolytic editing is a major contributor to the fidelity of DNA replication by the multisubunit DNA polymerase (pol) III holoenzyme. To investigate the source of editing specificity, we have studied the isolated exonuclease subunit, epsilon, and the pol III core subassembly, which carries the epsilon, theta, and alpha (polymerase) subunits. Using oligonucleotides with specific terminal mismatches, we have found that both epsilon and pol III core preferentially excise a mispaired 3' terminus and therefore have intrinsic editing specificity. For both epsilon and pol III core, exonuclease activity is much more effective with single-strand DNA; with a double-strand DNA, the exonuclease is strongly temperature-dependent. We conclude that the epsilon subunit of pol III holoenzyme is itself a specific editing exonuclease and that the source of specificity is the greater melting capacity of a mispaired 3' terminus.

Base Composition↗

Control of large chromosomal duplications in Escherichia coli by the mismatch repair system.

Excessive recombination between repeated, interspersed, and diverged DNA sequences is a potential source of genomic instability. We have investigated the possibility that a mechanism exists to suppress genetic exchange between these quasi-homologous (homeologous) sequences. We examined the role of the general mismatch repair system of Escherichia coli because previous work has shown that the mismatch repair pathway functions as a barrier to interspecies recombination between E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium. The formation of large duplications by homeologous recombination in E. coli was increased some tenfold by mutations in the mutL and mutS genes that encode the mismatch recognition proteins. These findings indicate that the mismatch recognition proteins act to prevent excessive intrachromosomal exchanges. We conclude that mismatch repair proteins serve as general controllers of the fidelity of genetic inheritance, acting to suppress chromosomal rearrangements as well as point mutations.

Chromosomes, Bacterial↗

DNA looping between sites for transcriptional activation: self-association of DNA-bound Sp1.

The Sp1 protein activates transcription from many eukaryotic promoters. Sp1 can act in vivo from enhancer sites that are distal to the promoter and exhibit synergistic interaction with promoter-proximal binding sites. To investigate possible protein-protein interactions between DNA-bound Sp1 molecules, we have used electron microscopy to visualize the DNA-protein complexes. At the SV40 promoter, we observed the expected localized interaction at the Sp1 sites; in addition, we found that DNA-bound Sp1 served to associate two or more DNA molecules. At a modified thymidine kinase promoter, we observed a localized interaction at each of two binding locations that were separated by 1.8 kbp; in addition, we noted a substantial fraction of DNA molecules in which the distant binding regions were joined by a DNA loop. As judged by studies with mutant Sp1 proteins, the distant interactions depended on the glutamine-rich regions of Sp1 required for transcriptional activation. We conclude that DNA-bound Sp1 can self-associate, bringing together distant DNA segments. From the correlation between DNA looping in vitro and synergistic activation of the modified thymidine kinase promoter shown previously in vivo, we suggest that Sp1 exerts its transcriptional synergism by a direct protein-protein association that loops the intervening DNA. Our experiments support the DNA-looping model for the function of transcriptional enhancers.

Base Sequence↗

Membrane localization of the HflA regulatory protease of Escherichia coli by immunoelectron microscopy.

The hflA locus of Escherichia coli specifies a multisubunit protease that selectively degrades the cII transcriptional activator of phage lambda. The regulated turnover of cII is critical for the choice between the lytic and lysogenic pathways of viral development. Previous cell fractionation work has indicated that HflA is associated with the inner membrane fraction. We have sought to demonstrate that the HflA protease is localized in the cell membrane of intact cells. To achieve this goal, we have combined electron microscopy of thin-sectioned E. coli cells with antibody tagging by a colloidal gold label. Using antibody to purified HflA protein, we have found preferential membrane labeling for hflA+ cells but not for hflA mutant cells. We conclude that HflA protease is localized in the cell membrane. The membrane location for HflA protein may serve as a component of a targeting mechanism to limit the action of the regulatory protease to selected cytoplasmic proteins.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Differential recognition of ultraviolet lesions by RecA protein. Possible mechanism for preferential targeting of SOS mutagenesis to (6-4) dipyrimidine sites.

A knowledge of the biochemical basis for UV-induced mutagenesis requires an understanding of the interaction of SOS-activated proteins with DNA polymerase at the replication-blocking dipyrimidine lesions. We have suggested previously that the presence of RecA in this multiprotein complex might be an important feature of induced mutagenesis because RecA associates preferentially with UV-irradiated double-stranded DNA compared to nonirradiated DNA. Previous work by others has indicated that (6-4) dipyrimidine lesions might be more mutagenic than the more common cyclobutane dimer. We have explored the possibility that RecA associates more efficiently with (6-4) lesions than with cyclobutane lesions. We have found that RecA binds DNA with (6-4) lesions much more efficiently than DNA with solely cyclobutane lesions. The distinction between substrates is probably achieved by differential nucleation of the RecA nucleoprotein filament. To investigate the structural basis for differential binding of RecA, we have estimated the unwinding of duplex DNA introduced by (6-4) and cyclobutane lesions. Our data indicate that (6-4) lesions introduce much greater distortion than cyclobutane dimers. We conclude that RecA probably binds preferentially at sites of (6-4) lesions in DNA and that this localization of RecA might target the mutagenic response more frequently to those sites.

Bacteriophage phi X 174↗

DNA-looping and enhancer activity: association between DNA-bound NtrC activator and RNA polymerase at the bacterial glnA promoter.

The NtrC protein activates transcription of the glnA operon of enteric bacteria by stimulating the formation of stable "open" complexes by RNA polymerase (sigma 54-holoenzyme form). To regulate the glnA promoter, NtrC binds to sites that have the properties of transcriptional enhancers: the sites will function far from the promoter and in an orientation-independent fashion. To investigate the mechanism of enhancer function, we have used electron microscopy to visualize the interactions of purified NtrC and RNA polymerase with their DNA binding sites and with each other. Under conditions that allow the formation of open complexes, about 30% of DNA molecules carry both RNA polymerase and NtrC bound to their specific sites. Of these, about 15% form looped structures in which NtrC and the RNA polymerase-promoter complex are in contact. The length of the looped DNA is that predicted from the spacing that was engineered between the enhancer and the glnA promoter (390 base pairs). As expected for activation intermediates, the looped structures disappear when RNA polymerase is allowed to transcribe the DNA. We conclude that the NtrC enhancer functions by means of a direct association between DNA-bound NtrC and RNA polymerase (DNA-looping model). Association of DNA-bound proteins appears to be the major mechanism by which different types of site-specific DNA transactions are localized and controlled.

Bacterial Proteins↗

DNA looping in cellular repression of transcription of the galactose operon.

Communication between distant DNA sites is a central feature of many DNA transactions. Negative regulation of the galactose (gal) operon of Escherichia coli requires repressor binding to two operator sites located on opposite sides of the promoter. The proposed mechanism for regulation involves binding of the repressor to both operator sites, followed by a protein-protein association that loops the intervening promoter DNA (double occupancy plus association). To assess these requirements in vivo, we have previously converted gal operator sites to lac and shown that both operator sites must be occupied by the homologous repressor protein (Lac or Gal) for negative regulation of the gal operon. We have now addressed more directly the need for protein-protein association by the use of the converted operator sites and a mutant Lac repressor defective in association of the DNA-binding dimers. We have compared the biological and biochemical activity of two Lac repressors: the wild-type (tetramer) I+ form, in which the DNA-binding dimer units are tightly associated; and the mutant Iadi repressor, in which the dimer units do not associate effectively. The I+ repressor is an efficient negative regulator of the gal operon in vivo, but the Iadi mutant is an ineffective repressor. Purified I+ repressor efficiently forms DNA loops between operator sites that we have visualized by electron microscopy; the Iadi repressor fails to form DNA loops, although the protein binds effectively to both operator sites. From the clear correlation between looping in vitro and repression in vivo, we conclude that regulation of the gal operon depends on the association of repressor proteins bound to the two operator sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

DNA, Bacterial↗

Specialized nucleoprotein structures at the origin of replication of bacteriophage lambda. Protein association and disassociation reactions responsible for localized initiation of replication.

Binding of the O protein of phage lambda to the replication origin (ori lambda) results in the formation of an organized nucleoprotein structure termed the O-some. The O-some serves to localize and initiate a six-protein sequential reaction that provides for localized unwinding of the origin region, the critical prepriming step for precise initiation of DNA replication. By the use of electron microscopy of gold-tagged antibody complexes, we have defined four stages of protein association and dissociation reactions that are involved in the prepriming pathway. First, as defined previously, O protein binds to multiple DNA sites and self-associates to form the O-some. Second, lambda P and host DnaB proteins add to the O-some to generate an O.P.DnaB.ori lambda complex. Addition of the DnaK and DnaJ proteins yields a third stage complex containing DnaK, DnaJ, O, P, and DnaB. With the addition of ATP and single-strand binding protein (SSB), the P protein is largely removed, and the DnaB acts as a helicase to generate locally unwound, SSB-coated single strand DNA. Thus, the initiation of lambda DNA replication requires ordered assembly and partial disassembly of specialized nucleoprotein structures. The disassembly activity of DnaK and DnaJ may be their general role in the heat shock response.

Bacteriophage lambda↗