Mortality after blood transfusion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to H F Taswell.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Earlier investigations of the epidemiologic attributes of blood transfusion were not based on total community populations. To calculate incidence rates of the transfusion of blood and blood components in the general population and in age- and gender-specific groups, all residents of a United States county who received transfusion(s) from 1989 through 1992 were studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a prevalence survey (cross-sectional study) of a well-defined population at a specified time. RESULTS: There was no significant change in blood and blood component utilization from the beginning of 1989 through 1992. The incidence of red cell transfusion was 42.88 units per 1000 population per year in both men and women and varied from 12.08 units per 1000 population per year in those less than 41 years old to 245.24 units per 1000 population per year in the group aged more than 65. A random resident's probability of receiving transfusion(s) in any year was 0.89 percent (0.83% for men and 0.94% for women) and varied from 0.26 to 5.17 percent among the three age groups. The incidence of platelet and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion was 21.24 units per 1000 population per year and 8.64 units per 1000 population per year, respectively. CONCLUSION: Incidence rates of blood transfusion for "causal" planning of blood collections are presented here for the first time. The probability of receiving a transfusion of RBCs in any year rises by 20-fold from the rate in those less than 40 years old to that in those more than 65 years old, who receive 53.3 percent of the red cell units transfused.
BACKGROUND: Look-back investigations of populations of patients admitted to major tertiary-care hospitals in the 1980s found a 2-year posttransfusion mortality rate in excess of 50 percent. To quantify the association of blood transfusion with mortality in a more broadly based population, a cohort of all residents of a United States county who underwent transfusion in 1981 was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comprised 802 county residents. Complete follow-up (until death or for 10 years) was available on 93.9 percent. RESULTS: The median length of survival was 95.0 (+/- 2.5) months. Twenty-four percent of patients died within 1 year after the transfusion, 30 percent within 2 years, 40 percent within 5 years, and 52 percent within 10 years. The relative risk of death within 10 years increased by 4.1 percent per unit of red cells (p < 0.0001), by 1.2 percent per unit of platelets (p = 0.0003), and by 7.3 percent per unit of fresh-frozen plasma (p = 0.0018) received in 1981, after adjustment for the effects on mortality of age, gender, and number of days of hospitalization in 1981. CONCLUSION: Receipt of a blood transfusion can be used as a descriptive epidemiologic index of morbidity in the general population, as it is independently predictive of mortality, adding to the predictive value of age, gender, and previous hospitalization. There is a dose-response relationship between the amount of blood components received and a reduction in the subsequent length of survival. However, when a county's entire population is studied, posttransfusion mortality due to underlying disease is substantially lower than that previously reported in look-back investigations.
Chronic hepatitis frequently occurs after liver transplantation. The role of hepatitis C virus infection in patients after liver transplantation is unknown, although antibodies to HCV are detected in some of these cases. The use of polymerase chain reaction techniques for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA should improve sensitivity and specificity, particularly in these immunosuppressed patients. Our goal was to further clarify the role of hepatitis C virus infection in chronic hepatitis occurring after liver transplantation. Patients with chronic hepatitis of uncertain origin after transplantation were identified. Serum samples taken at the time of the most recent liver biopsy that showed chronic hepatitis were tested for anti-hepatitis C virus using enzyme-linked immunoassay and supplemented by recombinant immunoblot assay (recombinant immunoblot assay I and recombinant immunoblot assay II). The samples were also tested for the presence of hepatitis C virus RNA using polymerase chain reaction. Of the 25 patients with chronic hepatitis, 15 (60%) had hepatitis C virus RNA present. Only seven (47%) of these 15 patients had anti-hepatitis C virus detected. Hepatitis C virus is a major cause of chronic hepatitis occurring after liver transplantation. The magnitude of hepatitis C virus infection will be underestimated if only currently available assays for anti-hepatitis C virus are used.
To determine the duration and specificity of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative chronic active hepatitis, sera from 19 patients seropositive by enzyme immunoassay were assessed by recombinant immunoblot assay. Only 12 of the 19 patients were reactive by immunoblot assay (63%). Patients nonreactive by immunoblot assay had lower signal-cutoff ratios by enzyme immunoassay (1.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 6.5 +/- 0.1; P less than 0.05), higher serum immunoglobulin G levels (4082 +/- 301 vs. 1760 +/- 143 mg/dL; P less than 0.05), and higher serum gamma globulin levels (3.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.04 +/- 0.1 g/dL; P less than 0.05) than reactive patients. Twelve of 14 patients with serial studies remained seropositive after 39 +/- 11 months of follow-up (range, 7-113 months). Only patients nonreactive by immunoblot assay became seronegative by enzyme immunoassay during corticosteroid therapy (2/3 vs. 0/6 patients). It is concluded that seropositivity by enzyme immunoassay may not be documented by immunoblot assay. Patients nonreactive by immunoblot assay have lower signal-cutoff ratios and higher gamma globulin levels than reactive patients, and their seropositivity may be nonspecific. Patients nonreactive by immunoblot assay may lose seropositivity by enzyme immunoassay during corticosteroid therapy.
To determine the frequency of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in asymptomatic patients with HBsAg-negative chronic active hepatitis, sera from 30 consecutive patients with few or no symptoms of liver disease were tested by an enzyme immunoassay. The reactivity of antibodies detected by enzyme immunoassay against hepatitis C virus encoded antigens was determined by recombinant immunoblot assay. Antibodies were detected in 11 of the 30 patients (37%) and eight of the seropositive sera (73%) were reactive by recombinant immunoblot assay. Nonreactive patients were weakly positive by enzyme immunoassay (sample/cutoff ratio, less than or equal to 1.9) in contrast to reactive patients (sample/cutoff ratio, greater than or equal to 6.3). The prevalence of immunoserologic markers was similar in patients with and without antibodies (78 vs. 87%) but high titers (greater than or equal to 1:160) were more common in seronegative patients (53 vs. 11%). Additionally, seronegative patients had smooth muscle antibodies (83 vs. 25%, p less than 0.05) and concurrent extrahepatic immunologic diseases (37 vs. 9%) more commonly than seropositive counterparts. We conclude that asymptomatic patients with HBsAg-negative chronic active hepatitis frequently have antibodies to hepatitis C virus. These antibodies commonly react to specific viral antigens, especially if the enzyme immunoassay is strongly positive. Seropositive patients infrequently have concurrent immunologic disorders or smooth muscle antibodies. Immunoserologic markers lack diagnostic specificity except in higher titer.
We implemented a pilot program at our institution for automatic referral of patients for presurgical assessment for preoperative and intraoperative collection of autologous blood. Although patients and clinicians support the use of autologous transfusion, often a request for collection of autologous blood is not initiated. During 11 months, 269 patients (82%) of three orthopedic surgeons entered the program, and 218 underwent operation and were dismissed from the hospital. A total of 940 units of autologous blood (675 preoperatively and 265 intraoperatively) was collected from these 218 patients, and 84% of the units were transfused. Throughout hospitalization, 86% of the patients received only autologous blood, whereas 14% received various proportions of homologous and autologous blood. In contrast, only 26% of a concomitant control group of 220 consecutive orthopedic surgical patients not participating in the automatic-referral program received only autologous blood. Thus, the automatic-referral program increased the percentage of elective orthopedic surgical patients who received only autologous blood from 26% to 86% (P less than 0.001). This study also showed that the same amount of blood was used for autologous transfusions as was routinely used for homologous transfusions in similar cases. The automatic-referral system was convenient for physicians and patients and offered the benefits of reduction of transfusion-associated risks and amelioration of patient anxieties.
The authors reviewed their institutional experience with liver resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma to (1) determine whether perioperative blood transfusion affects survival; (2) identify prognostic determinants; and (3) estimate the patient requirement for a prospective randomized trial designed to demonstrate efficacy of liver resection. Two hundred eighty consecutive patients treated by potentially curative liver resection between 1960 and 1987 were included. Data were obtained for all but 10 patients for at least 5 years after operation or through 1990. Actuarial survival curves related to potential prognostic determinants were analyzed with the log-rank test. Overall, survival was 47 +/- 3% at 3 years and 25 +/- 3% at 5 years, including 4% 60-day operative mortality rate. Eighty-one patients who did not receive blood 7 days before to 14 days after operation had 60 +/- 6% 3-year and 32 +/- 6% 5-year survival compared with 40 +/- 4% and 21 +/- 3% survival rates for 183 patients who received at least one unit (p = 0.03, operative deaths excluded). Extrahepatic disease (p = 0.015), extrahepatic lymph node involvement (p = 0.002), satellite configuration of multiple metastases (p = 0.0052), and initial detection by abnormal liver enzymes (p = 0.0005) were associated with poor survival rates. Synchronous presentation of metastatic and stage B primary disease was associated with a favorable prognosis (p = 0.003). The requirement for a prospective randomized trial estimated by an exponential survival model would be 36, 74, 168, or 428 patients if 5-year survival without resection were 1, 5, 10, or 15%. We conclude that (1) perioperative blood transfusion may be adversely associated with survival; (2) extrahepatic disease, extrahepatic lymph node involvement, satellite configuration, and initial detection by clinical examination or a liver enzyme abnormality portend a poor prognosis; and (3) a prospective randomized trial of liver resection is impractical because of the large patient requirement, at least by a single institution.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To determine the frequency and significance of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in severe autoimmune chronic active hepatitis, we tested sera from 85 cortico-steroid-treated patients by an enzyme immunoassay. Seropositive patients were assessed for specific antibodies to hepatitis C virus-encoded antigens by recombinant immunoblot assay. The findings in patients with and without anti-HCV were contrasted, and the frequency of seropositivity was compared with that in patients who had other types of chronic liver disease and in normal adults. Only 5 of the 85 patients with autoimmune hepatitis (6%) were seropositive for anti-HCV, and only 2 of these patients were reactive by recombinant immunoblot assay. The frequency of seropositivity in autoimmune hepatitis was not significantly different from that in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (9%) and cryptogenic (18%) disease, but it was significantly less than that in posttransfusion chronic active hepatitis (6% versus 75%; P less than 0.001). Two patients became seronegative after corticosteroid therapy; both had been nonreactive by recombinant immunoblot assay. Four of the seropositive patients entered remission during corticosteroid therapy, including three whose sera were nonreactive to virus-encoded antigens. We conclude that anti-HCV occurs infrequently in corticosteroid-treated severe autoimmune hepatitis and that antibodies detected by enzyme immunoassay may be nonreactive to hepatitis C virus-encoded antigens. Seropositive patients who are nonreactive by immunoblot assay may still respond to corticosteroid therapy and become seronegative during treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To determine the frequency and significance of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in severe cryptogenic chronic active hepatitis (CAH), we tested sera from 17 corticosteroid-treated patients by an enzyme immunoassay. Specificity of the antibodies to HCV-encoded antigens was assessed by recombinant immunoblot assay. The findings in patients with and without anti-HCV were contrasted, and the frequency of seropositivity was compared with that in patients who had other types of chronic liver disease and in normal adults. Only three patients (18%) with severe cryptogenic CAH had anti-HCV. Sera from two of these patients were reactive by recombinant immunoblot assay; the other sample produced an indeterminate reaction. The frequency of seropositivity in patients with cryptogenic disease was not statistically different from that in patients with autoimmune CAH (6%), hepatitis B surface antigen-positive CAH (9%), or alcoholic liver disease (0%), but it was significantly less than in those with posttransfusion CAH (18% versus 75%; P less than 0.01). Seropositive patients tended to have lower serum aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-globulin, and bilirubin levels than seronegative counterparts, and they did not have histologic features of confluent necrosis at initial assessment. Two of the three seropositive patients, both of whom had been reactive by recombinant immunoblot assay, entered remission during therapy, and one, with an indeterminate reaction, died of liver failure. We conclude that anti-HCV occurs infrequently in severe corticosteroid-treated cryptogenic CAH. Seropositive patients may have less severe inflammatory activity than seronegative counterparts. Cryptogenic disease may improve during corticosteroid treatment, a result suggesting an underlying immunologic disorder in some patients.
We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to study the efficacy and tolerance of long-term versus short-term treatment with recombinant interferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Ten patients were randomly assigned to a 6-month interferon regimen, and 10 patients were assigned to a 3-week interferon trial. Eleven patients (five assigned to long-term treatment and six to short-term treatment) did not complete interferon therapy: eight had either severe thrombocytopenia or neutropenia; one had pronounced fatigue in relationship to administration of interferon; one had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and sepsis and died; and one had a massive fatal variceal hemorrhage during interferon therapy. Most of the serious hematologic complications occurred in patients with cirrhosis and hypersplenism. In one patient, seroconversion to hepatitis B virus DNA negativity occurred before the onset of treatment. Four of the five patients able to complete the 6-month interferon regimen and only one of four patients able to complete the 3-week trial had seroconversion to hepatitis B virus DNA negativity. Thus, we conclude that the therapeutic response was better among patients who were able to complete a 6-month interferon trial. In patients with cirrhosis and hypersplenism, development of either severe thrombocytopenia or leukopenia associated with interferon therapy precluded completion of treatment.
Autologous blood (collected preoperatively or salvaged intraoperatively) is the safest blood available for transfusion, but its use is not always feasible. It may be possible to decrease a patient's exposure to homologous donors. Pediatric cardiac surgery patients frequently are unable to donate autologous blood preoperatively. Since 1984, attempts have been made to provide parental apheresis platelets and intraoperative blood salvage to such patients to decrease their donor exposure. Further decreases in donor exposure have been the object of a program of collecting from one committed donor all the blood a patient is anticipated to need. This article reviews the experience with 50 pediatric cardiac surgery patients on such a program, in whom the mean decrease in homologous-donor exposure was 57 percent (range, 12-93%). Thirteen of these patients received only homologous blood products from one committed donor, for a mean decrease in homologous-donor exposure of 80 percent (range, 50-93%). A comparison of 12 of these 13 recipients with a matched control group showed no significant difference in red cell transfusion practice but a significant difference in the number of homologous-donor exposures per m2 of body surface area (BSA) (mean donor exposures/m2 of BSA: patients = 1.5, controls = 10.5). The use of one committed donor and autologous blood can provide a minimal-exposure transfusion.
Intraoperative blood salvage is an accepted, safe, and effective procedure which should be used more widely. Currently, intraoperative salvage is used predominantly in cardiac, vascular, and orthopedic surgery, but the variety of surgical procedures for which it is indicated continues to enlarge. Indications, apart from the type of surgery, include patients with religious objections to transfusions, rare blood types, or life-threatening hemorrhage from any cause. The future will likely produce an extension of the use of intraoperative salvage techniques to postoperative bleeding and to some patients with malignancy and infection.
In our orthotopic liver transplantation program, intraoperative autologous transfusion was used in 89 of the first 100 procedures. In these 89 cases, intraoperative autologous transfusion provided a mean of 6.2 erythrocyte units per case or 32% of the total intraoperative erythrocyte requirements. The maximal number of erythrocyte units administered to any patient was 36.6 units (and 51% of the erythrocyte requirements). The most rapid rate of reinfusion of intraoperatively salvaged blood (11.8 units/h) occurred during reperfusion. No coagulopathy, infectious sequelae, or other complications were attributable to intraoperative autologous transfusion. In patients with large volumes of blood loss, intraoperative autologous transfusion is cost-effective, apart from the consideration of its medical benefits. Use of intraoperative autologous transfusion in liver transplantation resulted in conservation of erythrocytes and reduction in exposure to homologous blood and blood components.