PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H F Vasen

Publications and source records attributed to H F Vasen.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Genetics of colorectal cancer. I. Non-polyposis and polyposis forms of hereditary colorectal cancer].

About 5% of colorectal cancer cases are due to an autosomal dominant genetic predisposition with high penetrance. In this condition, the patient is carrier of a pathogenic gene mutation present in all body cells which can be transmitted to descendants, a so-called germ line mutation. The mutation is usually present in a tumour suppressor gene. Three subgroups of hereditary colorectal cancer can be distinguished on the basis of the clinical characteristics: (a) syndromes without polyposis (mostly hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma; HNPCC), (b) syndromes with adenomatous polyposis (mostly familial adenomatous polyposis; FAP) and (c) syndromes with hamartomatous polyposis. Recently, the main gene defects which underlie these syndromes were identified. Consequently, it is possible in approximately half the families with HNPCC or FAP in patients with colorectal cancer to demonstrate the causative gene defect and subsequently, by blood testing of healthy relatives to determine who is and is not a carrier of this hereditary condition. Thus, preventive measures can be directed toward family members with a demonstrable high risk of large bowel cancer.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1999

[Genetics of colorectal cancer. II. Hereditary background of sporadic and familial colorectal cancer].

About 15% of patients with colorectal cancer have a positive family history: 5% have hereditary colorectal cancer (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or some other hereditary syndrome), while in 10% no clear hereditary pattern can be recognized ('familial colorectal cancer'). In sporadic and in familial intestinal cancer, a demonstrable hereditary predisposition may undoubtedly exist. HNPCC is often characterized by microsatellite instability, i.e. an increased number of short DNA sequences in the DNA indicating a disorder in DNA repair and a mutation in a DNA 'mismatch repair' (MMR) gene. Indicative of hereditary bowel cancer on the basis of such an MMR gene mutation are: (a) presence of bowel cancer in > or = 3 relatives, (b) early age at the time of the diagnosis of 'bowel cancer', (c) multiple primary bowel tumours, (d) uterine cancer in the family and (e) bowel and uterine cancer in a woman. Recent data demand a new subdivision of hereditary bowel cancer, based upon both the clinical picture and the results of DNA-tests. The genetic alterations in colonic adenomas and carcinomas are known to a large extent. In future these insights may be important in clinical practice, such as a more individual determination of the patient's prognosis and accordingly, of the treatment and follow-up.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1999

[Periodic colonoscopic examinations of persons with a positive family history for colorectal cancer. Work Group 'Hereditary non-polyposis- colon-rectum cancers'].

Individuals with one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer diagnosed before age 45 years and those with two first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer run a significantly increased risk (relative risk: 4-6) of developing colorectal cancer. Based on calculation of the mortality due to colorectal cancer for the age group 50-70 years (which is higher than the mortality due to breast cancer) surveillance may be justified, e.g. by colonoscopy at 5-year intervals from the age of 45-50. The total number of people in the Netherlands in this high risk group is estimated at 10,000. The authors conclude that prospective studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of such a programme.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

[The role of genetic factors in the development of gastric cancer].

In general, a genetic predisposition to a tumour disease such as gastric cancer is postulated in patients with cancer at an unusually early age or when several relatives are affected. A clear definition of hereditary gastric cancer is lacking. Two types of families may be distinguished: kindreds with gastric cancer only (site-specific), and kindreds with gastric as well as colorectal cancer, representing the hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) syndrome. A genetic predisposition is presumed in young patients with a diffuse type of gastric cancer, in contrast to the intestinal type which is associated with atrophic gastritis and older age. A variety of genetic abnormalities in tumour tissue have been described, e.g. mutations in genes involved in DNA repair. Helicobacter pylori plays an important role in the aetiology, but the interaction with genetic factors is unknown.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC) criteria and results of genetic diagnosis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of mutations in the mismatch repair genes in families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. METHODS: We devised two criteria for families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Criteria I and II). Criteria I consist of at least two first-degree relatives affected with colorectal cancer with at least one of the following: development of multiple colorectal tumors including adenomatous polyp, at least one colorectal cancer case diagnosed before the age of 50, and occurrence of a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer extracolonic cancer (endometrium, urinary tract, small intestine, stomach, hepatobiliary system, or ovary) in family members. Criteria II consist of one colorectal cancer patient with at least one of the following: early age of onset (<40 years); endometrial, urinary tract, or small intestine cancer in the index patient or a sibling (one aged <50 years); and two siblings with other integral hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer extracolonic cancers (one aged <50 years). A questionnaire was mailed to members of the International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer to determine the mutation detection rate in mismatch repair genes from the families fulfilling these criteria. For comparison the mutation detection rate for families fulfilling the Amsterdam hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer criteria in each institution was also obtained. RESULTS: Data were obtained from eight different institutions (in 7 different countries). In a total of 123 patients from 123 families (67 families fulfilling Criteria I and 56 families fulfilling Criteria II), genetic testing for germline mismatch repair gene variants was performed. Germline mutations of the hMLH1 or hMSH2 genes were identified in 24 families (20 percent). Of these, the mutation detection rate for families fulfilling Criteria I was 28 percent (19/67). The mutation detection rate for families fulfilling Criteria II was 9 percent (5/56). In these eight institutions, the overall mutation detection rate for families fulfilling the Amsterdam hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer criteria was 50 percent (77/154). CONCLUSION: The Criteria I for suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer have the advantages that they can be applied to nuclear families and they can include extracolonic cancers. The results of this study suggest that families fulfilling Criteria I should be offered genetic testing. The relatively low mutation detection rate in those families fulfilling Criteria II suggests that, using current techniques, genetic testing in these families is not practical.

Age of Onset↗
PubMed1999

Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term functional results of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) with those of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In patients with FAP, hundreds of colorectal adenomas develop, and the patient will die of colorectal cancer if left untreated. The surgeon must choose between colectomy with IRA and restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. One factor crucial to decision making is the functional outcome after either procedure. To date, studies on this issue have reported conflicting results and have been based on small series of patients. METHODS: To assess various functional variables, a questionnaire was sent to 323 patients with FAP who underwent either IRA or IPAA and who were registered at the Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors. The overall response rate was 86%; the responders comprised 161 patients who underwent IRA and 118 patients who underwent IPAA. RESULTS: Patients who underwent IRA scored significantly better for daytime and nighttime stool frequency, soiling, occasional passive incontinence, flatus and feces discrimination, stool consistency, and need for antidiarrheal medication. There was no difference with regard to perianal irritation, episodes of bowel discomfort, or dietary restrictions. The functional results according to the aggregate score of the Gastro-Intestinal Functional Outcome Scale, where the items specified above were integrated (0 indicating a poor and 100 a good overall function), were significantly better in patients with an IRA (74.5) than in patients with an IPAA (66.0) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The functional outcome after IRA is significantly better than after IPAA. On the basis of these results, IRA might still be considered in patients with a mild phenotypic expression of the disease in the rectum.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1999

Treatment of mesenteric desmoid tumours with the anti-oestrogenic agent toremifene: case histories and an overview of the literature.

Desmoid tumours are histologically benign but due to their infiltration and compression of surrounding structures potentially life-threatening fibromatous lesions of unknown aetiology. The annual incidence rate is 2-4 per million people. The mesenteric variant constitutes about 10% of all desmoid tumours, although in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients this may be up to 70%. Due to the small number of patients with mesenteric desmoids the therapy is mainly empirical. This report describes the rationale as well as the value of the short- and long-term treatment (up to 6 years) with the anti-oestrogenic agent toremifene in combination with sulindac in two patients suffering from such a mesenteric desmoid tumour. These patients did not respond to sulindac alone and previous treatment with tamoxifen together with this non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug had also failed. An overview of the literature on the management of these dismal tumours is presented.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Familial adenomatous polyposis: from bedside to bench and vice versa. A tribute to the somatic cell geneticist P. Meera Khan.

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is characterized by the presence of numerous adenomatous polyps in the colorectum, as well as an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. This syndrome will inevitably lead to colorectal cancer when left untreated, and it is estimated that 1% of all colorectal cancer cases are due to it. Over the past 20 years molecular genetic studies on FAP patients have laid down the basis for the elucidation of the genetic phenomena that ultimately result in the development of colorectal cancer. Professor P. Meera Khan was one of the leading authorities in the world of molecular genetics of colorectal cancer in general and of FAP in particular. His scientific contributions from the pre-DNA era up to the recent implementation of molecular genetic research in daily clinical practice have helped revolutionize our approach and management of FAP patients and their relatives.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1998

Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes (MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, PMS2, and MSH6) cause susceptibility to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. We assessed the prevalence of MSH2 and MLH1 mutations in families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and evaluated whether clinical findings can predict the outcome of genetic testing. METHODS: We used denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to identify MSH2 and MLH1 mutations in 184 kindreds with familial clustering of colorectal cancer or other cancers associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Information on the site of cancer, the age at diagnosis, and the number of affected family members was obtained from all families. RESULTS: Mutations of MSH2 or MLH1 were found in 47 of the 184 kindreds (26 percent). Clinical factors associated with these mutations were early age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer, the occurrence in the kindred of endometrial cancer or tumors of the small intestine, a higher number of family members with colorectal or endometrial cancer, the presence of multiple colorectal cancers or both colorectal and endometrial cancers in a single family member, and fulfillment of the Amsterdam criteria for the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (at least three family members in two or more successive generations must have colorectal cancer, one of whom is a first-degree relative of the other two; cancer must be diagnosed before the age of 50 in at least one family member; and familial adenomatous polyposis must be ruled out). Multivariate analysis showed that a younger age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer, fulfillment of the Amsterdam criteria, and the presence of endometrial cancer in the kindred were independent predictors of germ-line mutations of MSH2 or MLH1. These results were used to devise a logistic model for estimating the likelihood of a mutation in MSH2 and MLH1. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of clinical findings can improve the rate of detection of mutations of DNA mismatch-repair genes in families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1998

Characteristics of small bowel carcinoma in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. International Collaborative Group on HNPCC.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel carcinoma is uncommon. However, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) patients are at increased risk of small bowel carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to characterize small bowel tumors in HNPCC patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to the members of International Collaborative Group on HNPCC (ICG-HNPCC) requesting clinicopathologic data in their registries on HNPCC patients with small bowel carcinoma. Survival was estimated utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Forty-two individuals from 40 HNPCC families developed 42 primary and 7 metachronous small bowel tumors. There were 46 adenocarcinomas and 3 carcinoid tumors. The median age at diagnosis of the index small bowel tumor was 49 years. Mismatch repair gene mutations were present in 15 of 42 patients (36%). There were nine hMLH1 and six hMSH2 mutations. The small bowel was the first site of carcinoma in 24 patients (57%). The median survival for the 42 patients was 47 months (range, 0-447 months). The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 44% and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel tumors can be the presenting neoplasms in HNPCC patients. Similar to colorectal carcinoma in HNPCC, small bowel adenocarcinomas in HNPCC patients occur at an earlier age and appear to have a better prognosis than those occurring in the general population.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

A cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal screening of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma gene carriers.

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that the prevalence of carriers of a mutated mismatch repair (MMR) gene among the general population in Western countries is between 5 and 50 per 10,000. These carriers have a risk of >85% of developing colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and therefore need careful follow-up. The objective of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of CRC surveillance of carriers of a mutated MMR gene. METHODS: The authors constructed a model to estimate the potential health effects (life expectancy) and healthcare costs of two strategies: 1) surveillance, with colonoscopy every 2-3 years, and 2) no CRC surveillance. Estimates of the lifetime risk of developing CRC and the stage distribution of CRC for symptomatic patients were derived from the Dutch hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) registry. The CRC stage specific relative survival rates and the effectiveness of surveillance in preventing or detecting cancer early were based on Finnish studies. The costs of surveillance and treatment were derived from recent American studies. RESULTS: The results showed that 1) surveillance of gene carriers led to an increase in life expectancy of 7 years, and 2) the costs of surveillance under a wide range of assumptions are less than the costs of no CRC surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: CRC surveillance of HNPCC gene carriers appears to be effective and considerably less costly than no CRC surveillance and therefore deserves to be supported by governmental agencies and health insurance organizations.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Familial and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: issues relevant for surgical practice.

About 15% of patients with colorectal cancer report a family history of this disease. An estimated 1%-5% of patients have hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Recently, DNA mismatch repair genes associated with this syndrome were identified. For about 50% of families in which HNPCC occurs, DNA-based diagnosis and presymptomatic DNA testing are now feasible. Diagnosis of a hereditary tumour syndrome is relevant for both the patient with cancer and his or her close relatives. The complexities of family studies warrant the forming of a multidisciplinary team which may choose to work within a specialized cancer family clinic.

Adenomatous Polyps↗
PubMed1998

Current policies for surveillance and management in women at risk of breast and ovarian cancer: a survey among 16 European family cancer clinics. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

The recent isolation of breast cancer predisposing genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) allows the identification of carriers within affected families. These carriers have a 50-85% risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer and need careful follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management and screening protocols implemented in high risk families at various family cancer clinics in Europe. A questionnaire was mailed to the members of the European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (n = 30) requesting information on the following issues: indication for surveillance of breasts and ovaries, the recommended protocol, coordination of the screening examination, prophylactic surgery, the specific management of breast cancer in a mutation carrier and the use of oestrogen. 16 centres from nine countries responded. Most centres recommend surveillance of the breasts if the lifetime risk exceeds 15-20%. The surveillance protocol that is generally advised comprises monthly self breast examination, examination by a specialist every 6 months and annual mammography, all starting from an age between 25 and 35 years. Surveillance of the ovaries is recommended in BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutation carriers, in members from breast/ovarian cancer families and in some centres in 'breast cancer only' families with an early onset of breast cancer. The recommended protocol includes gynaecological examination, sonography and estimation of CA-125 at yearly intervals starting from the age 30-35 years. Prophylactic mastectomy is considered for proven mutation carriers in some centres. Most centres consider prophylactic oophorectomy in mutation carriers and some centres also consider it for members of breast/ovarian cancer families. This survey provides insight into the guidelines for surveillance and management of familial breast cancer used at various family cancer clinics in Europe; this insight may contribute to the appropriate management of these high risk women. It should be emphasised that most recommendations are based on experts' opinion rather than on any specific studies.

Adult↗