PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Geijer

Publications and source records attributed to H Geijer.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Experiences of intentional carotid stenting in endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms--two case reports.

Endovascular repair of thoracic aneurysms has emerged as an attractive alternative especially in patients at high risk. However, the left common carotid artery limits the use of stent-grafts in aneurysms located in the aortic arch or close to the left subclavian artery. We report two cases with aneurysms in the distal arch and proximal descending aorta, where we have used a carotid stent in juxtaposition to an aortic stent-graft, to gain a longer proximal neck in the aortic arch in an attempt not to rely only on a by-pass graft feeding the left carotid artery.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

A clinical evaluation of the image quality computer program, CoCIQ.

To provide an objective way of measuring image quality, a computer program was designed that automatically analyzes the test images of a contrast-detail (CD) phantom. The program gives a quantified measurement of image quality by calculating an Image Quality Figure (IQF). The aim of this work was to evaluate the program and adjust it to clinical situations in order to find the detectable level where the program gives a reliable figure of the contrast resolution. The program was applied on a large variety of images with lumbar spine and urographic parameters, from very low to very high image qualities. It was shown that the computer program produces IQFs with small variations and there were a strong linear statistical relation between the computerized evaluation and the evaluation performed by human observers (R2= 0.98). This method offers a fast and easy way of conducting image quality evaluations.

Data Display↗
PubMed2005

Impact of digital imaging on radiation doses to the patient during X-ray examination of the urinary tract.

PURPOSE: To compare radiation doses given to patients undergoing IVU (intravenous urography) before and after digitalization of our X-ray department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: IVU examinations were monitored with dose area product meters before and after the X-ray department changed to digital techniques. The first step was a change from film-screen to storage phosphor plates, while the second step involved changing to a flat panel detector. Forty-two patients were included for the film-screen situation, 69 when using the storage phosphor plates, and 70 using the flat panel detector. RESULTS: A dose reduction from 41.8 Gycm2 to 31.5 Gycm2 was achieved with the first step when the film-screen system was replaced with storage phosphor plates. A further reduction to 12.1 Gycm2 was achieved using the flat panel detector. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the flat panel detectors made a considerable dose reduction possible.

Female↗
PubMed2005

Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

In recent years, endovascular stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms has become more and more common. The radiation dose associated with these procedures is not well documented however. The aim of the present study was to estimate the radiation exposure and to simulate the effects of a switch from C-arm radiographic equipment to a dedicated angiographic suite. Dose-area product (DAP) was recorded for 24 aortic stent-grafting procedures. Based on these data, entrance surface dose (ESD) and effective dose were calculated. A simulation of doses at various settings was also performed using a humanoid Alderson phantom. The image quality was evaluated with a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom. The mean DAP was 72.3 Gy cm(2) at 28 min fluoroscopy time with a mean ESD of 0.39 Gy and a mean effective dose of 10.5 mSv. If the procedures had been performed in an angiographic suite, all dose values would be much higher with a mean ESD of 2.9 Gy with 16 patients exceeding 2 Gy, which is considered to be a threshold for possible skin injury. The image quality for fluoroscopy was superior for the C-arm whilst the angiographic unit gave better acquisition images. Using a C-arm unit resulted in doses similar to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). If the same patients had been treated using dedicated angiographic equipment, the risk of skin injury would be much higher. It is thus important to be aware of the dose output of the equipment that is used.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations.

In diagnostic radiology increasing attention has been focused on dose reduction while maintaining a clinically good image quality. With the use of digital detectors balancing dose vs image quality is done differently than in film-screen radiography, since dose and image brightness are uncoupled in digital imaging. In this study a new direct digital detector (flat-panel detector) was used in a dose-image optimisation of a simulated pelvic examination. X-ray images were taken with a direct digital detector (DDD), of the pelvic of a phantom using varying tube current (varying stochastic noise). The entrance surface dose was measured for each image. These images were scored by two radiologists according to EU guidelines. A dose comparison was made with an older PCR system (storage phosphor plates). With decreasing tube current the noise in the images increased and the image with the lowest dose and still acceptable image quality was identified. The results showed that the entrance surface dose using the DDD decreased from 1.4 mGy (PCR value) to 0.48 mGy (DDD standard settings). Through the optimisation the dose could be further decreased to 0.24 mGy while still maintaining an acceptable image quality. A substantial dose reduction was obtained with this new direct digital detector. This simple but efficient optimisation approach is easily applicable to other examinations and both DDD and storage phosphor plate detectors.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the image quality for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector at various radiation dose settings and to compare the results with storage phosphor plates and a screen-film system. A CDRAD 2.0 contrast-detail phantom was imaged with a flat-panel detector (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at three different dose levels with settings for intravenous urography. The same phantom was imaged with storage phosphor plates at a simulated system speed of 200 and a screen-film system with a system speed of 160. Entrance surface doses were recorded for all images. At each setting, three images were read by four independent observers. The flat-panel detector had equal image quality at less than half the radiation dose compared with storage phosphor plates. The difference was even larger when compared with film with the flat-panel detector having equal image quality at approximately one-fifth the dose. The flat-panel detector has a very favourable combination of image quality vs radiation dose compared with storage phosphor plates and screen film.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose, image quality, and Cobb angle measurements obtained with a digital scanning method of scoliosis radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple images were reconstructed into one image at a workstation. A low-dose alternative was to use digital pulsed fluoroscopy. Dose measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson phantom. At the same time, kerma area-product values were recorded. A Monte Carlo dose calculation also was performed. Image quality was evaluated with a contrast-detail phantom and visual grading system. Angle measurements were evaluated with an angle phantom and measurements obtained on patient images. RESULTS: The effective radiation dose was 0.087 mSv for screen-film imaging, 0.16 mSv for digital exposure imaging, and 0.017 mSv for digital fluoroscopy; the corresponding kerma area-product values were 0.43, 0.87, and 0.097 Gy. cm(2), respectively. The image quality of the digital exposure and screen-film images was about equal at visual grading, whereas fluoroscopy had lower image quality. The angle phantom had lower angle values with digital fluoroscopy, although the difference in measured angles was less than 0.5 degrees. The patient images showed no difference in angles. CONCLUSION: The described digital scanning method has acceptable image quality and adequate accuracy in angle measurements. The radiation dose required for digital exposure imaging is higher than that required for screen-film imaging, but that required for digital fluoroscopy is much lower.

Fluoroscopy↗