PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H H Neumayer

Publications and source records attributed to H H Neumayer.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Entry-into-human study with the novel immunosuppressant SDZ RAD in stable renal transplant recipients.

AIMS: To evaluate the tolerability of single oral SDZ RAD doses in stable renal transplant recipients and the pharmacokinetics of ascending SDZ RAD doses when coadministered with steady-state cyclosporin A microemulsion (Neoral). METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential study involved 54 patients in six treatment groups; a different SDZ RAD dose (0.25, 0. 75, 2.5, 7.5, 15, 25 mg) was assessed in each group. Patients received a single oral dose of SDZ RAD (n=6) or placebo (n=3) with their usual Neoral dose. SDZ RAD and cyclosporin A pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. RESULTS: All SDZ RAD doses were well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, or deaths. Similar proportions of patients receiving SDZ RAD and placebo had at least one adverse event (44% and 50%, respectively). Mean changes in laboratory variables (baseline to endpoint) showed no clinically meaningful differences between SDZ RAD and placebo groups. SDZ RAD was absorbed rapidly and showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics (dose: 2.5-25 mg), based on systemic exposure. Multiple postabsorptive phases in the pharmacokinetic profile indicate tissue distribution. The elimination half-life ranged from 24 to 35 h across the five highest dose groups. Pharmacokinetics were similar in men and women. Co-administration of escalating single oral SDZ RAD doses did not affect steady-state cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: SDZ RAD was well tolerated; safety profiles of SDZ RAD and placebo were similar. SDZ RAD pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional across the range 2.5-25 mg in conjunction with cyclosporin A-based therapy, according to systemic exposure. Cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics were not affected by coadministration of single oral doses of 0.25-25 mg SDZ RAD.

Adolescent↗

Endothelin system-dependent cardiac remodeling in renovascular hypertension.

The aim of the present study was to analyze whether the cardiac endothelin system contributes to cardiac remodeling in rats with 2-kidney, 1 clip (2K1C) renovascular hypertension. The endothelin system seems to be a promising candidate for cardiac remodeling because endothelin (ET)-1 promotes growth of cardiomyocytes in vitro and induces cardiac collagen synthesis. The activity of the cardiac endothelin system was analyzed by measuring cardiac tissue big ET-1 and ET-1 concentrations as well as by estimating the cardiac expression of the ETA and ETB receptors 10 days, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after the renal artery was clipped. The effects of long-term treatment with ETA, ETB, and combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonists on cardiac hypertrophy, media/lumen ratio of intracardiac arteries, and left ventricular fibrosis were also analyzed. This study demonstrated that the overall left ventricular cardiac endothelin system has a similar activity in the early, middle, and late stages of 2K1C renovascular hypertension compared with sham-operated controls. Fibrosis of the left ventricle and hypertrophy of intracardiac arteries, however, were markedly altered after long-term treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists in a blood pressure-independent manner. These 2 effects are mediated by different subtypes of endothelin receptors. ETA receptor blockade completely normalized the hypertrophy of intracardiac arteries (P<0. 01 compared with 2K1C without treatment) in renovascular hypertension, whereas the ETB antagonist reduced cardiac fibrosis of the left ventricle (P<0.001 compared with 2K1C without treatment) to baseline values. This study demonstrates that the cardiac endothelin system plays an important role in the development of cardiac fibrosis as well as in hypertrophy of intracardiac arteries in 2K1C renovascular hypertensive rats.

Animals↗

Volume stress-induced peritoneal endothelin-1 release in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

In long-term peritoneal dialysis, functional deterioration of the peritoneal membrane is often associated with proliferative processes of the involved tissues leading to peritoneal fibrosis. In continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), failure to achieve target values for adequacy of dialysis is commonly corrected by increasing dwell volume; in case of ultrafiltration failure, osmolarity of the dialysate gets increased. In a prospective study, the impact of increasing dwell volume from 1500 ml to 2500 ml per dwell (volume trial) or changing the osmolarity of the dialysate from 1.36 to 3.86% glucose (hyperosmolarity trial) on the peritoneal endothelin-1 (ET-1) release was analyzed. ET-1 is known to exert significant proliferative activities on a variety of cell types leading to an accumulation of extracellular matrix. A highly significant difference in the cumulative peritoneal ET-1 synthesis was found between the low- and high-volume exchange, whereas differences in the hyperosmolarity setting were only moderate. Sixty minutes after initiating dialysis, the cumulative ET-1 synthesis was 2367 +/- 1023 fmol for the 1500 ml versus 6062 +/- 1419 fmol for the 2500 dwell (P < 0.0001) and 4572 +/- 969 fmol versus 6124 +/- 1473 fmol for the 1.36 and 3.86% glucose dwell (P < 0.05), respectively. In conclusion, increasing dwell volume leads to a strong activation of the peritoneal paracrine endothelin system. Because ET-1, apart from being a potent vasoactive peptide, contributes to fibrotic remodeling, this study indicates that volume stress-induced ET-1 release might contribute to structural alteration of the peritoneal membrane in long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Dialysis Solutions↗

Randomized, double-blind, one-year study of the safety and tolerability of cyclosporine microemulsion compared with conventional cyclosporine in renal transplant patients. International Sandimmun Neoral Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine, Neoral, has been developed to overcome the problems associated with the poor and variable absorption of the traditional oil-based oral formulation, Sandimmune. The present study was conducted to compare the safety and tolerability of Neoral versus Sandimmune in maintenance renal transplant recipients over 1 year, and to assess the number of dose adjustments necessary to maintain trough cyclosporine concentrations within the desired therapeutic range. METHODS. Patients on Sandimmune were randomized to be converted to Neoral (n=373) or remain on Sandimmune (n=93) for 12 months. RESULTS: The proportion of patients needing dose increases to maintain cyclosporine trough levels within the desired range was significantly higher in the Sandimmune group during the first 3 months of the study, whereas the number of patients needing dose reductions was similar in both groups throughout the study period. There were no differences between the groups in terms of changes in blood pressure, serum creatinine levels, or other laboratory parameters. No significant differences in the incidence of adverse events known to be related to cyclosporine were observed between the treatment groups. More adverse events were causally related to Neoral than to Sandimmune by the investigators. However, overall, there were no clinically relevant differences between the treatment groups in the main safety and tolerability variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study in maintenance renal transplant patients suggest that the improved pharmacokinetic characteristics of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine, Neoral, may facilitate the clinical management of cyclosporine immunosuppression, compared with the traditional formulation, Sandimmune. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the average improved bioavailability of Neoral has a negative impact on the main safety and tolerability variables, as no significant differences in graft function, the incidence of rejections, and most adverse events were seen.

Creatinine↗

Mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients on peritoneal dialysis.

We prospectively studied the impact of peritoneal dialysis (PD) on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in five patients following renal transplantation. Three patients had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 10 ml/min and two had a GFR of more than 40 ml/min. Pharmacokinetics of MPA and of its main metabolite, mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG), were studied during two consecutive 12-h periods (with and without PD). After initiation of PD in patients with severe renal impairment (GFR < 10 ml/ min), MPA-area-under-the-concentration-curve (AUC) decreased up to 59% and MPAG-AUC decreased up to 26%. We did not observe any substantial changes in the MPA-AUC or MPAG-AUC of either patient with a GFR above 40 ml/min. Patients with a reduced GFR had much higher MPAG values than patients with a GFR above 40 ml/l; yet, we did not observe any differences in the MPA values. We found a significant inverse correlation between GFR and MPA-AUC (r = 0.81, P < 0.05) and between GFR and MPAG-AUC (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). While MPA was found only in traces in the peritoneal ultrafiltrate, the cumulative amount of MPAG removed by PD reached up to 2 g/ 12 h, representing 1.2 g of MPA. This is the first report describing a reduction in MPA-AUC and MPAG-AUC during PD. Further studies are needed to completely understand the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil during PD.

Adult↗

The quality of life in end stage renal disease care.

The improved prognosis and survival statistics of both renal transplantation and dialysis have focused attention on the quality of life offered by these treatments. Using a standardized questionnaire, we assessed the quality of life of 612 patients undergoing renal replacement therapy at our center. Of these patients, 359 had been transplanted and 253 patients were on dialysis. Concerning the sociodemographic data, only the time on specific treatment was longer in dialysis patients than in transplanted patients (49.2 versus 55.6 months, P < 0.05). Most complaints were more common in dialysis patients than in transplanted patients. Only the side effects of medication were seen more in transplanted patients (P < 0.005). Life satisfaction was higher in transplanted patients than in dialysis patients. Dialysis patients were more anxious (P < 0.05) and more depressed (P < 0.001) than transplanted patients. Transplanted patients also felt that they had more social support than did dialysis patients. Overall life quality was almost equal between patients on hemodialysis and patients on peritoneal dialysis, and between patients on the waiting list for transplantation and those not on the waiting list. Despite a significantly better quality of life after renal transplantation, the percentage of patients working remained unchanged. (57.5% versus 57.8%, P = n.s.). We conclude that despite an improved quality of life after renal transplantation, these patients are economically not more productive than patients on dialysis.

Female↗