PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Hahm

Publications and source records attributed to H Hahm.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

[Quantifying stenosis of the internal carotid artery: which ultrasound criteria are relevant?].

UNLABELLED: Therapeutic decisions in cases of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery usually depend mainly on the degree of stenosis. However, the recommendations with regard to suitable ultrasonographic criteria are so controversial that even authors of repute describe "confusion" and "chaos in methodology". AIM: The aim of this study is to assess which of the most frequently recommended sonographic criteria for stenosis best fulfill the requirements of an exact quantification of stenoses of the internal carotid artery. METHOD: In 42 consecutive cases the preoperative ultrasound findings were compared with the degree of stenosis in surgically removed specimens. The sonographic technique employed consisted of the analysis of 2 direct and 3 indirect hemodynamic criteria of stenosis. In 34 of these cases planimetry was performed, too. The specimens were obtained by eversion thrombendarteriectomy or arteriotomy; for determination of the degree of stenosis a Paladur molded cylinder was prepared and measured. RESULTS: Quantification of the haemodynamic criteria carries provided well with the endarterectomy specimens. Only in two cases there was a deviation of more than 10 %; however, in these two cases a change with time in the degree of stenosis was probably responsible for the discrepancy. In contrast, planimetry usually underestimated the degree of stenosis: In 61 % of the findings the ultrasonographic results differed by more than 10 % from the reference standard. CONCLUSION: Quantification of stenosis of the internal carotid artery should be made using a combination of direct and indirect haemodynamic ultrasonographic criteria.

Aged↗

Comparison of melatonin products against USP's nutritional supplements standards and other criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the quality of a sample of melatonin products, as measured by the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) General Tests and Assays for Nutritional Supplements (other than Microbial Limits) and certain other tests. DESIGN: Five immediate-release, two sublingual, and two controlled-release products were randomly gathered from a health food store, groceries, and pharmacies in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight variation, disintegration (not applicable for controlled-release products), and drug dissolution, based on USP standards. Twelve-hour dissolution profiles were obtained from the controlled-release products. All tablets were also evaluated for friability following the USP procedure and for hardness following unofficial procedures. RESULTS: All products passed the weight variation test. Two products showed excessive friability. Three immediate-release products failed both the disintegration and the dissolution tests. One of the three products demonstrated a threefold difference in hardness. One controlled-release product released 90% of melatonin in four hours in the dissolution test; the other released 90% of its content in 12 hours. CONCLUSION: Some products showed evidence of poor formulation and/or poor quality control as indicated by excessive friability, failure to disintegrate and dissolve, and excessive variation in hardness. In vitro release profiles of the two controlled-release products were substantially different. The poor quality of some supplements should be a concern to consumers and health care providers.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗