PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Hays

Publications and source records attributed to H Hays.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Randomised crossover trial of transdermal fentanyl and sustained release oral morphine for treating chronic non-cancer pain.

OBJECTIVES: To compare patients' preference for transdermal fentanyl or sustained release oral morphine, their level of pain control, and their quality of life after treatment. DESIGN: Randomised, multicentre, international, open label, crossover trial. SETTING: 35 centres in Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: 256 patients (aged 26-82 years) with chronic non-cancer pain who had been treated with opioids. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' preference for transdermal fentanyl or sustained release oral morphine, pain control, quality of life, and safety assessments. RESULTS: Of 212 patients, 138 (65%) preferred transdermal fentanyl, whereas 59 (28%) preferred sustained release oral morphine and 15 (7%) expressed no preference. Better pain relief was the main reason for preference for fentanyl given by 35% of patients. More patients considered pain control as being "good" or "very good" with fentanyl than with morphine (35% v 23%, P=0.002). These results were reflected in both patients' and investigators' opinions on the global efficacy of transdermal fentanyl. Patients receiving fentanyl had on average higher quality of life scores than those receiving morphine. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups; however, more patients experienced constipation with morphine than with fentanyl (48% v 29%, P<0.001). Overall, 41% of patients experienced mild or moderate cutaneous problems associated with wearing the transdermal fentanyl patch, and more patients withdrew because of adverse events during treatment with fentanyl than with morphine (10% v 5%). However, within the subgroup of patients naive to both fentanyl and morphine, similar numbers of patients withdrew owing to adverse effects (11% v 10%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Transdermal fentanyl was preferred to sustained release oral morphine by patients with chronic non-cancer pain previously treated with opioids. The main reason for preference was better pain relief, achieved with less constipation and an enhanced quality of life.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1999

Clinical experience with oral ketamine.

Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist used recently for analgesia in patients with chronic pain. Twenty one patients with chronic neuropathic pain were treated with oral ketamine starting at a divided dose of 100 mg/day and titrating upwards by 40 mg/day until efficacy was reached, or until side effects became limiting. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and side effects of the treatment. Nine patients discontinued ketamine because of intolerable side effects, four patients experienced few or no side effects but had no discernible benefit, four others had equivocal responses. Four patients have continued oral ketamine for long periods. One patient has had no significant benefit or side effects but continues to use ketamine 500 mg/day and three people have used doses ranging from 100-240 mg day for over 1 year duration and have reported improvements in pain and decreased use of analgesics. The analgesic benefits of ketamine appeared to be most pronounced in, but not limited to, patients with pain histories of less than 5 years.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Using gabapentin to treat neuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To review use of gabapentin as an adjuvant agent to treat neuropathic pain. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: MEDLINE was searched from 1995 to October 1998 for reports. There were approximately 20 citations. Additional articles from Pain and other medical journals were reviewed. No double-blind studies have examined gabapentin and its use as an analgesic adjuvant agent. MAIN MESSAGE: Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant medication used recently as an effective adjuvant agent for treating neuropathic pain. It is a structural analogue of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), but its receptor and biochemical function remain unknown. Gabapentin has desirable pharmacokinetic properties and acceptable side effects, which simplify its use. There are very few interactions between gabapentin and other medications, and gabapentin is well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin could be an effective adjuvant agent for many neuropathic pain states.

Acetates↗
PubMed1998

A clinical evaluation of transdermal therapeutic system fentanyl for the treatment of cancer pain.

Fentanyl has been incorporated into a transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) containing a rate-limiting membrane that provides constant release of the opioid. TTS fentanyl provides continuous opioid delivery for up to 72 hr without the need for special equipment. After Institutional Review Board approval, 53 patients with cancer pain requiring 45 mg or more of oral morphine daily were admitted into an open-label, prospective, multicenter evaluation of TTS fentanyl for the relief of pain. After a 1-week stabilization on oral morphine, patients were transferred from morphine to an appropriate dose of TTS-fentanyl (25, 50, 75, or 100 micrograms/hr) administered as a transdermal patch every 3 days. TTS fentanyl was titrated to pain relief, and patients were followed up for as long as 3 months. Pain relief and the side effects of the medications were assessed daily. Twenty-six men and 27 women with a mean (+/- SD) age of 61 (+/- 12) years entered the study; 23 patients completed the full 84-day study. The mean duration of TTS fentanyl use was 58 +/- 32 days. The mean (+/- SEM) daily morphine dose during the last 2 days of stabilization was 189 (+/- 20) mg, and the mean initial fentanyl patch dose was 58 (+/- 6) micrograms/hr. The mean daily morphine dose taken "as needed" for breakthrough pain at study completion was 35 mg. The mean final fentanyl dosage at study completion was 169 (+/- 29) micrograms/hr. Pain relief was rated as good or excellent by 82% of patients during the treatment period. When asked to compare pain relief during the first month of TTS-fentanyl use to that provided by their last analgesic before study entry, 63% preferred TTS fentanyl. Side effects considered related to the fentanyl patch were nausea (13%), vomiting (8%), skin rash (8%), and drowsiness (4%). Thirty percent of patients reported adverse experiences related to the fentanyl patch, and 17% had to be discontinued from the study. We conclude that TTS fentanyl administered every 3 days for the treatment of cancer pain is effective, safe, and well tolerated by most patients.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1997

Fentanyl transdermal system. Pain management at home.

PROBLEM BEING ADDRESSED: About 65% of patients with advanced malignancies experience cancer pain. Although oral opioids provide effective analgesia for most of these patients, alternate routes of drug delivery are often necessary as the disease progresses. PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: To study use of Duragesic (fentanyl transdermal system), the only transdermal opioid approved in Canada for treating chronic cancer pain in adults. MAIN COMPONENTS: Transdermal fentanyl was prescribed for a heterogeneous group of 44 patients (aged 29 to 82 years) to treat cancer pain (37 patients), chronic non-malignant pain (six patients), and pain associated with terminal AIDS (one patient), for periods of 2 to 384 days. Patients were treated individually and switched to transdermal fentanyl from other opioids when oral delivery was no longer possible. Doses were titrated as necessary and ranged from 25 micrograms/h to 300 micrograms/h. Incidental pain was treated effectively with short-acting opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of patients experienced good analgesia, which led to an overall improvement in their quality of life. Transdermal fentanyl was discontinued for 17% of patients due to intractable nausea, diarrhea, adherence problems, or poor analgesia. Many patients wore the system until they died or until a few days before death when severe increasing pain necessitated parenteral opioids. The side effects of transdermal fentanyl were similar to those of conventional opioids. Patient compliance and acceptance of this noninvasive, continuous system of drug delivery has been excellent; its simplicity of administration allows patients to be cared for at home.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1994

Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of immediate release and controlled release hydromorphone for chronic severe cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: The short elimination half-life of hydromorphone necessitates 4-hourly dosing to maintain optimal levels of analgesia in patients with chronic cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of controlled release hydromorphone administered every 12 hours and immediate release hydromorphone administered every 4 hours in patients with chronic severe cancer pain. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with stable chronic severe cancer pain were randomized, in a double-masked crossover study, to controlled release hydromorphone every 12 hours or immediate release hydromorphone every 4 hours for 7 days each. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Present Pain Intensity Index of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Nausea and sedation were also assessed using a VAS. Assessments were made by the patient four times a day at 7:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m., and 7:00 p.m. Use of rescue hydromorphone also was recorded by the patient. RESULTS: Forty-five patients completed the study (26 women, 19 men; mean age, 57.1 +/- 13.6 years) and received a mean daily dose of 76 +/- 133 mg (range, 6-768 mg). There were no significant differences between controlled release hydromorphone and immediate release hydromorphone in overall VAS pain intensity scores (19 +/- 14 vs. 20 +/- 14 mm), ordinal pain intensity scores (1.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.8) and pain scores by day of treatment or time of day. The daily rescue analgesic consumption during controlled release hydromorphone and immediate release hydromorphone did not differ significantly overall (1.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.0 +/- 1.1 doses per day) or with respect to time of day. There were no significant differences in overall VAS sedation scores (18 +/- 18 mm vs. 19 +/- 18 mm) and in overall mean VAS nausea scores (12 +/- 15 mm vs. 11 +/- 14 mm) between controlled release hydromorphone and immediate release hydromorphone. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled release hydromorphone administered every 12 hours is as effective as immediate release hydromorphone administered every 4 hours in the management of patients with chronic severe cancer pain. The benefits of controlled release hydromorphone lie in the convenience of its capsule formulation, which can be sprinkled on soft food, and its 12-hour duration of action, which allows patients uninterrupted sleep and improved compliance.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed1967

Microbial destruction by low concentrations of hypochlorite and iodophor germicides in alkaline and acidified water.

Hypochlorite and iodophor germicides were evaluated for their ability to destroy a variety of organisms at levels approximating those used for final sanitizing rinse for dairy and food equipment and beverage bottles (3 to 50 ppm). Test organisms included Escherichia coli, Streptococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus cerevisiae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The hypochlorites and iodophors demonstrated approximate rates of destruction at equivalent concentrations for the bacterial species tested, except where the hypochlorite contained excess alkalinity. The hypochlorite responded more readily to a downward shift to a pH of 5.0 than did the iodophor. Excess alkalinity of the hypochlorite significantly affected its bactericidal activity. The iodophor exhibited a consistently greater rate of destruction of yeast cells than the hypochlorite. Successive treatment with low levels of iodophor (6 ppm) followed by a hypochlorite (12 to 25 ppm) resulted in a high level of destruction of all test organisms. Possibilities for employing these measures in a sanitizing rinse of bottles for maximal destruction of organisms were discussed. Among the test organisms, S. lactis showed a comparatively high resistance and was a useful organism for comparing the halogen preparations.

Chlorine↗