PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

H Henning

Publications and source records attributed to H Henning.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Influence of right bundle branch block on short- and long-term survival after acute anterior myocardial infarction.

The impact of right bundle branch block on long-term prognosis after anterior wall myocardial infarction is unclear. In 932 patients with Q wave anterior infarction, the short- and long-term prognostic significance of the presence of right bundle branch block was analyzed. Compared with 754 patients without block, 178 patients with right bundle branch block after myocardial infarction showed an increased incidence of left ventricular failure (72% versus 52%, p less than 0.001) and increased in-hospital (32% versus 8%, p less than 0.001) and 1 year after hospital discharge (17% versus 7%, p less than 0.001) cardiac mortality rates. The presence of right bundle branch block was an independent predictor of increased in-hospital and 1-year mortality when entered in a multivariate analysis. However, the absence of left ventricular failure identified a subgroup of patients with right bundle branch block with low in-hospital (4%) and 1 year postdischarge (5%) cardiac mortality rates comparable with those of patients with neither failure nor right bundle branch block (1.7% and 4.8%, respectively). In the presence of left ventricular failure, patients with associated right bundle branch block had higher in-hospital (43% versus 14%, p less than 0.01) and 1 year postdischarge (24% versus 9%, p less than 0.01) cardiac mortality rates than those of patients with failure but no right bundle branch block. Thus, the presence of right bundle branch block after anterior myocardial infarction is an independent marker of poor prognosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Bundle-Branch Block

Factors associated with recurrent myocardial infarction within one year after acute myocardial infarction.

In a large population of patients (n = 3666) who were discharged from the hospital after acute myocardial infarction and followed up for 1 year, factors associated with recurrent nonfatal (n = 171) or fatal (n = 74) infarction were identified. Also, the effects of combining various end points (recurrent nonfatal or fatal infarction and other cardiac death) in multivariate analyses, a practice common in many small studies that evaluate the predictive-value of various treatments or special tests, was examined. In univariate analyses, patients with nonfatal recurrent infarction did not differ with respect to age or gender from infarct-free survivors, but they more often had a history of previous myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, and diabetes; more severe pulmonary congestion was present on chest x-ray during the admission, and a non-Q wave index infarction was more frequent. Patients with either a fatal or nonfatal recurrent infarction had more angina pectoris during follow-up (55% to 60%) compared with 27% in event-free survivors and 31% in patients who died of other cardiac causes in whom this factor could be assessed before death. In multivariate analyses, historical and clinical prognostic factors were ranked differently for fatal or nonfatal reinfarction and other cardiac causes of death; angina pectoris at follow-up was highly related to recurrent infarction (fatal or nonfatal), along with a history of diabetes, and a non-Q wave index infarction. These factors were not independently related to other causes of cardiac death.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

California

Trends in use of coronary angiography in subacute phase of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Most patients do not undergo acute reperfusion after myocardial infarction, and which of these patients should undergo coronary angiography is still debated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the 1-year clinical outcomes and rates of coronary angiography performed as late as 60 days after myocardial infarction in 3,804 patients admitted between 1979 and 1988 and followed in six different centers. Patients less than 75 years old were classified into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups using a multivariate analysis of historical and clinical variables gathered during the first 8 hospital days. Patients who underwent early reperfusion (17%, all after 1984) were analyzed separately. To analyze time trends, patients were compared before and after mid-1984. Mortalities from day 9 through 1 year were similar for the two time periods in the low- (3.3% versus 2.5%) and medium-risk (7.4% versus 5.6%) groups, but mortality was lower for the high-risk group after 1984 (31.6% versus 20.0%). The proportion of patients undergoing coronary angiography increased dramatically in each group after 1984 (low risk, 18% versus 48%; medium risk, 23% versus 49%; high risk, 10% versus 32%, before and after 1984, respectively). Furthermore, a large percentage of patients (more than 40%) in the low-risk group did not have at least one of the indications for coronary angiography recently recommended by a joint task force. Among patients undergoing coronary angiography, the proportion of patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease decreased after 1984, whereas the proportion undergoing mechanical revascularization in the year after infarction increased in all risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent development of noninvasive techniques with high sensitivity for detecting high-risk patients after myocardial infarction, coronary angiography is being performed increasingly in all patients, including those determined to be at low risk for complications based on clinical data. The economic consequences of such a trend could be considerable, and its impact requires careful analysis.

Age Factors

Influence of heart rate on mortality after acute myocardial infarction.

Elevated heart rate (HR) during hospitalization and after discharge has been predictive of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but whether this association is primarily due to associated cardiac failure is unknown. The major purpose of this study was to characterize in 1,807 patients with AMI admitted into a multicenter study the relation of HR to in-hospital, after discharge and total mortality from day 2 to 1 year in patients with and without heart failure. HR was examined on admission at maximum level in the coronary care unit, and at hospital discharge. Both in-hospital and postdischarge mortality increased with increasing admission HR, and total mortality (day 2 to 1 year) was 15% for patients with an admission HR between 50 and 60 beats/min, 41% for HR greater than 90 beats/min and 48% for HR greater than or equal to 110 beats/min. Mortality from hospital discharge to 1 year was similarly related to maximal HR in the coronary care unit and to HR at discharge. In patients with severe heart failure (grade 3 or 4 pulmonary congestion on chest x-ray, or shock), cumulative mortality was high regardless of the level of admission HR (range 61 to 68%). However, in patients with pulmonary venous congestion of grade 2, cumulative mortality for patients with admission HR greater than or equal to 90 beats/min was over twice as high as that in patients with admission HR less than 90 beats/min (39 vs 18%, respectively); the same trend was evident in patients with absent to mild heart failure (mortality 18 vs 10%, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists

Predicting 1-year outcome following acute myocardial infarction: physicians versus computers.

Whether decision rules derived statistically from patient data can produce better decisions than an expert clinician or a model of the expert clinician (expert system) is controversial. We examined this issue in the context of predicting cardiac death by 1 year for patients discharged from the hospital following acute myocardial infarction. Decision rules were derived from a base sample of 781 patients. These decision rules and three experienced cardiologists then estimated probability of death by 1 year for each patient in a separate test sample (n = 400). In our evaluation of the performance of the decision rules and physicians, we detected no differences, although the decision rules and physicians tended to classify the patients somewhat differently. Further multivariate analyses on the physicians' predictions showed that two of the physicians paid attention to somewhat different variables than the third physician. Lack of agreement among expert cardiologists would complicate modeling of a consensual decision-making process within the framework of an expert system.

Aged

Outlook after acute myocardial infarction in the very elderly compared with that in patients aged 65 to 75 years.

Little is known concerning late outcome and prognostic factors after acute myocardial infarction in the very elderly (greater than 75 years of age). Accordingly, this study compared the clinical course and mortality rate for up to 1 year in a large multicenter data base that included 702 patients greater than 75 years of age (mean +/- SD 81 +/- 4 years), with a less elderly subset of 1,321 patients between 65 and 75 years of age (mean 70 +/- 3 years). The postdischarge 1 year cardiac mortality rate was 17.6% for those greater than 75 years of age compared with 12.0% for patients between 65 and 75 years of age (p less than 0.01). There were differences in the prevalence of several factors, including female gender, history of angina pectoris, history of congestive heart failure, smoking habits and incidence of congestive heart failure during hospitalization. Multivariate analyses of predictors of cardiac death in hospital survivors selected different factors as important in the two age subgroups; age was selected in the 65 to 75 year age group but was not an independent predictor in the very elderly. The survival curves beginning at day 10 for patients 65 to 75 and in those greater than 75 years old were similar for up to 90 days but diverged later. In the very elderly, 63% of late cardiac deaths were sudden or due to new myocardial infarction, similar to the causes of 67% of deaths in the younger age group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Age Factors

Cardiovascular and renal haemodynamic effects of dopexamine: comparison with dopamine.

We have studied the effects of dopexamine and dopamine on systemic and renal haemodynamics in 20 male patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups (n = 10) who were treated with incremental doses of either dopexamine 1, 2 and 4 micrograms kg-1 min-1, or dopamine 2.5 and 5 micrograms kg-1 min-1, each dose being maintained for 15 min. Measurements were performed before administration of the drug and at the end of the infusion period at each dose. Fentanyl and midazolam were used as anaesthetic agents. Renal blood flow was measured with the argon washin technique. Dopexamine 4 micrograms kg-1 min-1 produced an increase in cardiac index of 117% caused by a 65% reduction in afterload and an increase in heart rate by 61%. Dopamine 5 micrograms kg-1 min-1 caused a 40% increase in cardiac index as a result of an increase in stroke volume. Renal vascular resistance decreased more than systemic vascular resistance with dopamine. With dopexamine, the increase in renal blood flow (66%) was less than the increase in cardiac index, while renal vascular resistance and systemic vascular resistance declined to almost the same extent. The results show that dopexamine exerts systemic and renal effects mainly via stimulation of beta 2-receptors. An action of dopexamine at renal DA1-receptors could not be demonstrated in this study.

Adrenergic Agonists

Diabetic patients and beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction.

Whether diabetic patients may benefit, compared with non-diabetic patients, from beta-blocker therapy following acute myocardial infarction was examined in a large multicentre cohort of 2024 patients, including 340 diabetics, 281 of whom survived hospitalization. One-year mortality following discharge was 17% for diabetics compared with 10% for non-diabetics (P less than 0.001). However, diabetics discharged on beta-blockers had a 1-year mortality of only 10%, compared with 23% for diabetics not on beta-blockers. In non-diabetics, mortality rates were 7% and 13% for those taking and not taking beta-blockers, respectively. Bias in patient selection for beta-blocker therapy might be responsible for the trends exhibited in our population since patients were not randomized to treatment. In diabetics, evidence of pulmonary congestion on X-ray was more prevalent than in non-diabetics; this appeared to be true both for patients taking beta-blockers and for those not taking beta-blockers. However, even in diabetics without evidence of pulmonary congestion on X-ray, 1-year mortality was 7% vs 17% for those with and without beta-blocker therapy, respectively (P less than 0.04). In multivariate analysis, beta-blocker use was an independent predictor of 1-year cardiac survival following hospital discharge for all diabetics, even those without evidence for pulmonary congestion on X-ray, but not for non-diabetics. These data suggest a beneficial effect, but a definitive answer regarding the benefit of beta-blockade in diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction would require a prospective, randomized study.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists

[Duplex sonography measurement of portal vein blood flow with healthy livers and in patients with chronic hepatitis after a fully absorbable test meal].

In 36 patients with chronic viral hepatitis and 20 patients with an intact liver we determined the blood flow and blood flow velocities of the portal vein by means of duplexsonography. This was done before and after the intake of a test meal (Biosorbin MCT). According to preexisting data the cases of chronic hepatitis were subdivided into groups consisting of 14 cases having chronic persistent hepatitis, 9 cases having chronic aggressive hepatitis without tendency of cirrhotic transformation and 13 cases of chronic aggressive hepatitis with beginning cirrhotic changes. Patients with known cirrhosis of the liver or signs of portal hypertension were excluded from the study. It was not possible to assign a patient with chronic hepatitis to a definite group merely on the knowledge of his portal blood flow. Only after the intake of the test meal varying increases in blood flow velocity and volume were demonstrated. These increases were found to be smallest in the group of "chronic aggressive hepatitis with developing cirrhosis". In some individual cases this enabled us to conclude from changes of the portal blood flow whether or not a portal hypertension is developing.

Adult

[Diagnosis and prevalence of latent hepatic encephalopathy].

To compare the efficacy of various psychometric and neurophysiological tests in the detection of latent hepatic encephalopathy (LHE) cerebral functions were studied in 146 patients with liver cirrhosis but without overt encephalopathy and in 146 matched controls. Patients with liver cirrhosis scored significantly worse than controls in 8 out of 11 tests. Best discrimination between patients with cirrhosis and controls was obtained by testing for reaction time to white and colored light with a reaction time apparatus (DTG), and with the digit symbol (UT1) and block design test (UT4), i.e. with two Wechsler adult intelligence scale performance tests. Thirtyseven out of 146 (25%) patients with cirrhosis reveiled an abnormal result with the DTG alone. A combination of the DTG, UT1 and UT4 yielded the diagnosis in 44 (30%) patients. LHE correlated with the severity of the disease (Child-Pugh classification) but not with its etiology or with portasystemic shunting. In the Federal Republic of Germany about 300,000 subjects suffer from liver cirrhosis. Based on our results 100,000 of them may have LHE.

Adult

A decision scheme for coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction.

It is important to select patients in the convalescent phase of acute myocardial infarction in whom knowledge of coronary anatomy may identify those potentially suitable for intervention aimed at improving prognosis. However, differing guidelines have been proposed, and by applying some of these guidelines to our large database of patients after acute myocardial infarction, several problem areas were identified. These include lack of considering patients with resting ischemia beyond day 5 of hospitalization, management of patients with reduced ventricular function or patients not exercise tested, and the role of coronary angiography in the elderly. Based on this experience and further analysis in 1,848 patients surviving beyond day 5 of hospitalization, a modified decision scheme for coronary angiography was developed and then tested in a second population (n = 780). In the new scheme, patients over 75 years of age are considered individually. Those under 75 years of age with severe resting ischemia in the hospital at any time beyond the first 24 hours (18% mortality between day 6 and year 1), and hospital survivors with a history of previous myocardial infarction and clinical or radiographic signs of left ventricular failure in the hospital (25% 1-year mortality after discharge), are recommended for coronary angiography. Among the remaining patients, some will perform an exercise test, and those with an ischemic response or poor workload (11% 1-year mortality) are also assigned to coronary angiography. When an exercise test is not performed, a resting radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction is recommended, and coronary angiography is considered if the value lies between 0.20 and 0.44 (12% 1-year mortality). This relatively simple scheme does not make general recommendations in the elderly, considers patients with in-hospital left ventricular failure or reduced left ventricular function or both, and approaches the problem of patients who do not perform an exercise test. This general approach would avoid early coronary angiography in patients with an average 1-year mortality risk after discharge of 3% and recommend coronary angiography in those at increased risk (average mortality rate, 16%) who make up about 55% of this population under 75 years of age.

Aged

Short- and long-term clinical outcome after Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in a large patient population.

Prognosis for patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction is controversial although a number of studies have shown a less favorable outlook after hospital discharge for patients with non-Q wave than for those with Q wave infarction. Therefore, the in-hospital and 1-year prognosis was investigated in a sufficiently large patient population (n = 2,024) to allow stratification by subgroups, in particular by age and previous myocardial infarction. Patients with non-Q wave infarction (n = 444; 22% of the total study population) were somewhat older (65 vs. 63 years, p less than 0.001) and had an increased incidence of previous myocardial infarction (46% vs. 24%, p less than 0.001) and congestive heart failure (21% vs. 8%, p less than 0.001) than patients with Q wave infarction. In-hospital mortality of patients with non-Q wave infarction was lower (8.1% vs. 11.5%; p less than 0.06), whereas their 1-year mortality after hospital discharge was significantly higher (13.7% vs. 9.2%, p less than 0.05) than for patients with Q wave infarction. However, total mortalities at 1 year were nearly equal. When patients were subgrouped by presence or absence of a previous myocardial infarction, patients in both subgroups exhibited mortality patterns typical of the entire population with Q wave or non-Q wave infarction. However, when stratified by age and previous infarction, in-hospital mortality for patients with non-Q wave infarction was significantly lower only in patients older than 70 years of age. Similarly, the higher mortality after hospital discharge in patients with non-Q wave infarction occurred only in patients older than 70 years of age without previous myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Age Factors

Differing circadian patterns of symptom onset in subgroups of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Circadian variation of the onset of acute myocardial infarction has been noted in many studies and may carry important pathophysiologic implications. However, only a few previous studies have attempted subgroup analyses. In 4,796 patients with documented acute myocardial infarction, the time of symptom onset was recorded. As in other studies, the peak of onset occurred in the morning from 6:01 AM to 12:00 noon, and 28% of the population (1.16 times the average percentage for the other time periods) experienced symptom onset in that period (p less than 0.001). There was a second, lower peak (25%) in the evening between 6:01 PM and 12:00 midnight, which was also observed in some previous studies. We sought to determine whether or not the presence of subgroups with specific clinical characteristics would exhibit different patterns and thereby contribute to these peaks in the overall population. In patients with a history of congestive heart failure (n = 606) or with non-Q wave infarction (n = 832), a pronounced peak (29%) occurred only in the evening. Two nearly equal peaks were observed in patients older than 70 years of age (n = 1,422), smokers (n = 2,057), diabetics (n = 767), women (n = 1,213), and patients taking beta-blocking drugs (n = 847). Finally, in patients with a previous myocardial infarction (n = 1,104), no peaks were observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists

Acute myocardial infarction in women: influence of gender on mortality and prognostic variables.

The contention that mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is increased in women compared with men has been controversial, with findings in a recent multicenter study suggesting that gender plays an important prognostic role. To assess whether or not early and late mortality after AMI is greater in women, 2,089 patients (1,551 men, 538 women) were followed for 1 year after AMI. In the hospital, women had an increased mortality compared to men (17.5 vs 12.3%, p less than 0.003) and were on average 7 years older, whereas after hospital discharge and up to 1 year no difference in mortality was observed. Multivariate analyses of historical, clinical and laboratory features demonstrated that gender had no independent predictive value when variables that included age, congestive heart failure in the hospital, history of congestive failure, prior AMI and diabetes mellitus were considered. Moreover, when age stratification was performed, the significant difference of in-hospital mortality between genders was no longer present. Causes of death in the hospital and during 1 year after hospital discharge were similar between men and women, whether or not age stratification was performed. Several baseline clinical characteristics were different between men and women; a history of systemic hypertension and congestive heart failure occurred more frequently in women and previous AMI and smoking occurred more commonly in men. Also, the value of several other important prognostic indicators after AMI, such as the ejection fraction, was found to differ between men and women.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged